You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

Table 1.  

Characteristic No. (%)
Congenital syphilis (n = 360) Noncongenital syphilis (n = 410)
Any substance use
(n = 173)
No substance use
(n = 187)
Any substance use
(n = 101)
No substance use
(n = 309)
Age, yrs, median (IQR) 27.7 (23.4–31.9) 26.3 (21.8–30.7) 27.8 (23.8–31.3) 25.3 (22.2–29.6)
Age group, yrs
<25 55 (31.8) 72 (38.5) 37 (36.6) 146 (47.2)
25–29 59 (34.1) 63 (33.7) 31 (30.7) 92 (29.8)
30–34 37 (21.4) 34 (18.2) 25 (24.8) 54 (17.5)
≥35 21 (12.1) 16 (8.6) 8 (7.9) 17 (5.5)
Missing/Not reported 1 (0.6) 2 (1.1) 0 (—) 0 (—)
Education level
Less than high school 51 (29.5) 55 (29.4) 30 (29.7) 94 (30.4)
High school graduate or GED 53 (30.6) 50 (26.7) 35 (34.7) 113 (36.6)
Some college but no degree 24 (13.9) 35 (18.7) 24 (23.8) 59 (19.1)
College degree or more 5 (2.9) 23 (12.3) 8 (7.9) 22 (7.1)
Missing/Not reported 40 (23.1) 24 (12.8) 4 (4.0) 21 (6.8)
Insurance at delivery
Public 130 (75.1) 91 (48.7) 81 (80.2) 164 (53.1)
Private 12 (6.9) 12 (6.4) 6 (5.9) 31 (10.0)
Other/None/Self-pay 14 (8.1) 10 (5.3) 2 (2.0) 12 (3.9)
Missing/Not reported 17 (9.8) 74 (39.6) 12 (11.9) 102 (33.0)
Prenatal care
First/Second trimester 78 (45.1) 124 (66.3) 79 (78.2) 281 (90.9)
Third trimester 26 (15.0) 25 (13.4) 13 (12.9) 16 (5.2)
No care 66 (38.2) 35 (18.7) 4 (4.0) 3 (1.0)
Missing/Not reported 3 (1.7) 3 (1.6) 5 (5.0) 9 (2.9)
No. of prenatal visits, median (IQR) 1 (0–6) 6 (1–10) 9 (6–11) 10 (7–13)
Treatment
Adequate§ 26 (15.0) 46 (24.6) 101 (100) 309 (100)
Inadequate 55 (31.8) 62 (33.2) NA NA
Not treated during pregnancy 92 (53.2) 79 (42.2) NA NA
History of incarceration**
Yes 28 (16.2) 6 (3.2) 11 (10.9) 5 (1.6)
No 70 (40.5) 102 (54.5) 63 (62.4) 181 (58.6)
Missing/Not reported 75 (43.4) 79 (42.2) 27 (26.7) 123 (39.8)
History of homelessness**
Yes 46 (26.6) 2 (1.1) 9 (8.9) 3 (1.0)
No 70 (40.5) 106 (56.7) 71 (70.3) 190 (61.5)
Missing/Not reported 57 (32.9) 79 (42.2) 21 (20.8) 116 (37.5)

Table 1. Characteristics of pregnant persons with syphilis, by reported substance use* and congenital syphilis pregnancy outcome (N = 770) — Surveillance for Emerging Threats to Pregnant People and Infants Network, Arizona and Georgia, 2018–2021

Abbreviations: CSTE = Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists; GED = general educational development certificate; NA = not applicable.
*Any substance use includes any use of tobacco (e.g., cigars, cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, or e-cigarettes), alcohol, cannabis, illicit use of opioids (e.g., prescription opioids not taken as prescribed, fentanyl, or heroin), and other illicit, nonprescription substances (e.g., cocaine, methamphetamines, inhalants, or hallucinogens, such as LSD or PCP).
Congenital syphilis pregnancy outcome includes pregnancy outcomes that meet the CSTE surveillance case definition for syphilitic stillborn or live-born infant with probable or confirmed congenital syphilis.
§Adequacy of treatment dependent on syphilis stage. Primary, secondary, and early latent syphilis require at least 1 dose of penicillin during pregnancy, with the dose administered ≥30 days before pregnancy outcome. Late latent, latent of unknown duration, tertiary, and other cases of syphilis require ≥3 doses of penicillin, spaced 5–9 days apart, with the first dose administered ≥30 days before delivery and the final dose administered during pregnancy.
Stillborn and live-born infants born to pregnant persons inadequately treated or not treated during pregnancy meet the CSTE case definition for a probable congenital syphilis pregnancy outcome.
**Within the 12 months preceding case report or positive test results or during pregnancy.

Table 2.  

Substance used No. (%) Prevalence ratio
(95% CI)
Congenital syphilis
(n = 360)
Noncongenital syphilis
(n = 410)
Any substance* 173 (48.1) 101 (24.6) 1.95 (1.60–2.38)
Tobacco 99 (27.5) 46 (11.2)** 2.45 (1.78–3.37)
Alcohol 29 (8.1) 20 (4.9)** 1.65 (0.95–2.86)
Cannabis 69 (19.2) 56 (13.7)†† 1.40 (1.01–1.93)
Illicit use of opioids§§ 75 (20.8) 14 (3.4)** 6.09 (3.50–10.58)
Illicit, nonprescription substance¶¶ 101 (28.1) 26 (6.4)** 4.41 (2.94–6.63)

Table 2. Reported substance use*,† among pregnant persons with syphilis, by congenital syphilis pregnancy outcome§ — Surveillance for Emerging Threats to Pregnant People and Infants Network, Arizona and Georgia, 2018–2021

Abbreviation: CSTE = Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists.
*Any substance use includes any use of tobacco (e.g., cigars, cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, or e-cigarettes), alcohol, cannabis, illicit use of opioids (e.g., prescription opioids not taken as prescribed, fentanyl, or heroin), and other illicit, nonprescription substances (e.g., cocaine, methamphetamines, inhalants, or hallucinogens such as LSD or PCP).
Numbers in categories are not mutually exclusive.
§Congenital syphilis pregnancy outcome includes pregnancy outcomes that meet CSTE surveillance case definition for syphilitic stillborn and live-born infant with probable or confirmed congenital syphilis.
Unadjusted.
**Denominator = 409.
††Denominator = 408.
§§Includes prescription opioids not taken as prescribed, fentanyl, and heroin.
¶¶Includes other illicit, nonprescription substances (e.g., cocaine, methamphetamines, inhalants, or hallucinogens such as LSD or PCP).

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Substance Use Among Persons With Syphilis During Pregnancy — Arizona and Georgia, 2018–2021

  • Authors: Jeffrey M. Carlson, PhD; Ayzsa Tannis, MPH; Kate R. Woodworth, MD; Megan R. Reynolds, MPH; Neha Shinde, MPH; Breanne Anderson, MPH; Keivon Hobeheidar; Aisha Praag, MPH; Kristen Campbell, MPH; Cynthia Carpentieri, MPH; Teri Willabus, MPH; Elizabeth Burkhardt, MSPH; Elizabeth Torrone, PhD; Kevin P. O’Callaghan, MBBCh; Kathryn Miele, MD; Dana Meaney-Delman, MD; Suzanne M. Gilboa, PhD; Emily O’Malley Olsen, PhD; Van T. Tong, MPH
  • CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 8/30/2023
  • Valid for credit through: 8/30/2024, 11:59 PM EST
Start Activity

  • Credits Available

    Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

    ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points

    Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)

    Pharmacists - 0.25 Knowledge-based ACPE (0.025 CEUs)

    You Are Eligible For

    • Letter of Completion
    • ABIM MOC points

Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for primary care clinicians, obstetricians, infectious disease specialists, and other healthcare professionals who care for women considering pregnancy.

The goal of this activity is for learners to be better able to analyze risk factors for congenital syphilis.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  • Distinguish the prevalence of congenital syphilis among women with a positive test for syphilis during pregnancy
  • Assess how substance use during pregnancy affects the risk for congenital syphilis
  • Evaluate social risk factors for congenital syphilis among women with substance use during pregnancy
  • Analyze the use of different substances with respect to their contribution to the risk for congenital syphilis


Disclosures

Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.


Faculty

  • Jeffrey M. Carlson, PhD

    Eagle Global Scientific, LLC
    Atlanta, Georgia

    Disclosures

    Jeffrey M. Carlson, PhD, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Ayzsa Tannis, MPH

    Eagle Global Scientific, LLC
    Atlanta, Georgia

    Disclosures

    Ayzsa Tannis, MPH, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Kate R. Woodworth, MD

    Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders
    National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Atlanta, Georgia

    Disclosures

    Kate R. Woodworth, MD, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Megan R. Reynolds, MPH

    Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders
    National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Atlanta, Georgia

    Disclosures

    Megan R. Reynolds, MPH, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Neha Shinde, MPH

    Eagle Global Scientific, LLC
    Atlanta, Georgia

    Disclosures

    Neha Shinde, MPH, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Breanne Anderson, MPH

    Arizona Department of Health Services
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Division of STD Prevention
    National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Atlanta, Georgia

    Disclosures

    Breanne Anderson, MPH, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Keivon Hobeheidar

    Arizona Department of Health Services
    Phoenix, Arizona

    Disclosures

    Keivon Hobeheidar has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Aisha Praag, MPH

    Chickasaw Nation Industries, Inc.
    Norman, Oklahoma

    Disclosures

    Aisha Praag, MPH, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Kristen Campbell, MPH

    Maricopa County Public Health
    Phoenix, Arizona

    Disclosures

    Kristen Campbell, MPH, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Cynthia Carpentieri, MPH

    Chickasaw Nation Industries, Inc.
    Norman, Oklahoma

    Disclosures

    Cynthia Carpentieri, MPH, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Teri Willabus, MPH

    Georgia Department of Public Health
    Atlanta, Georgia

    Disclosures

    Teri Willabus, MPH, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Elizabeth Burkhardt, MSPH

    Georgia Department of Public Health
    Atlanta, Georgia

    Disclosures

    Elizabeth Burkhardt, MSPH, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Elizabeth Torrone, PhD

    Division of STD Prevention
    National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Atlanta, Georgia

    Disclosures

    Elizabeth Torrone, PhD, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Kevin P. O’Callaghan, MBBCh

    Division of STD Prevention
    National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Atlanta, Georgia

    Disclosures

    Kevin P. O’Callaghan, MBBCh, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Kathryn Miele, MD

    Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders
    National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Atlanta, Georgia

    Disclosures

    Kathryn Miele, MD, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Dana Meaney-Delman, MD

    Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders
    National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Atlanta, Georgia

    Disclosures

    Dana Meaney-Delman, MD, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Suzanne M. Gilboa, PhD

    Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders
    National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Atlanta, Georgia

    Disclosures

    Suzanne M. Gilboa, PhD, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Emily O’Malley Olsen, PhD

    Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders
    National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention&
    Atlanta, Georgia

    Disclosures

    Emily O’Malley Olsen, PhD, has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Van T. Tong, MPH

    Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders
    National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Atlanta, Georgia

    Disclosures

    Van T. Tong, MPH, has no relevant financial relationships

CME Author

  • Charles P. Vega, MD

    Health Sciences Clinical Professor of Family Medicine
    University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
    Irvine, California

    Disclosures

    Charles P. Vega, MD, has the following relevant financial relationships:
    Consultant or advisor for: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; GlaxoSmithKline; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

Compliance Reviewer/Nurse Planner

  • Stephanie Corder, ND, RN, CHCP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Stephanie Corder, ND, RN, CHCP, has no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

Medscape

Interprofessional Continuing Education

In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited with commendation by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit. Aggregate participant data will be shared with commercial supporters of this activity.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of nursing continuing professional development for RNs and APNs; 0.00 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.

    Contact This Provider

    For Pharmacists

  • Medscape designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number: JA0007105-0000-23-306-H01-P).

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™, you must receive a minimum score of 75% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read about the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or print it out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate, but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period, you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Substance Use Among Persons With Syphilis During Pregnancy — Arizona and Georgia, 2018–2021: Discussion

processing....

Discussion

Among pregnant persons in Arizona and Georgia, substance use prevalence was higher among those with a congenital syphilis pregnancy outcome than among those with a noncongenital syphilis outcome; the largest difference was observed in persons who used opioids illicitly or used other illicit, nonprescription substances. Consistent with previous research;[5] the prevalence of late or no prenatal care was high among persons who used any substance during pregnancy, and those who did receive care had fewer prenatal visits. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of syphilis are critical to reducing adverse syphilis-related outcomes for persons who are pregnant, congenital syphilis, and overall syphilis transmission. The need for syphilis screening and treatment should be addressed at any health care encounter during pregnancy, especially among persons who use substances, and in all health care encounters with persons of childbearing age who have a high risk for syphilitic infection.[6] Although syphilis is highly treatable with penicillin G,[5,7] one third of persons in this analysis who used any substances remained untreated.

Previous studies suggest that social determinants of health, including incarceration and homelessness, might be associated with substance use and contribute to deficiencies in care and syphilis treatment.[5,8] Although this study included small numbers and had high levels of missingness for history of incarceration and homelessness, up to one quarter of those who used substances and had a congenital syphilis pregnancy outcome had a history of incarceration or homelessness. Prioritizing persons with these lived experiences for screening and treatment of syphilis at every health care encounter is critical, and innovative strategies need to be developed to reach these populations.

The findings in this report are subject to at least five limitations. First, data collection is ongoing and is from only two states. Data from one of these states are restricted to only three counties; however, these counties represent approximately 80% of births in the state. Prevalence of substance use and other risk factors for congenital syphilis likely vary by jurisdiction, thereby limiting the generalizability of these results. Second, stigma and social desirability bias might have resulted in underreporting of substance use and contributed to the high missingness identified for history of incarceration and homelessness.[9] Further, self-reported substance use creates the potential for recall bias by congenital syphilis status if captured retrospectively (after the birth) among those with a congenital syphilis pregnancy outcome. Fourth, because treatment is highly effective, the finding of 20% of persons with adequate treatment among those with congenital syphilis outcome could be an artifact of the CSTE case definition, which includes nonspecific clinical findings for probable cases or could be related to occult or undiagnosed reinfection that could not be assessed. Finally, there is no age limit for diagnosing congenital syphilis, which might create some misclassification in these data; however, almost all congenital syphilis cases are diagnosed during the neonatal period.[10]

This report highlights the value of the SET-NET surveillance approach of linking data on pregnant persons to data on infants to understand factors related to congenital syphilis. The increasing numbers of congenital syphilis cases across the United States demand further exploration of factors that contribute to this trend and development of strategies to address missed opportunities for diagnosis and treatment before, during, and after pregnancy.[1,2] Although screening and treatment can prevent most cases of congenital syphilis, numerous barriers to implementing these prevention strategies exist, some of which might be amplified among persons who use substances. Tailored interventions need to address barriers and facilitators for accessing screening and treatment for syphilis for persons with current or previous substance use, including those with a history of incarceration and homelessness.