You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

 

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Do Social Determinants of Health Affect Food Allergy Prevalence?

  • Authors: News Author: Jake Remaly; CME Author: Charles P. Vega, MD
  • CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 8/11/2023
  • Valid for credit through: 8/11/2024, 11:59 PM EST
Start Activity

  • Credits Available

    Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

    ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points

    Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)

    Pharmacists - 0.25 Knowledge-based ACPE (0.025 CEUs)

    Physician Assistant - 0.25 AAPA hour(s) of Category I credit

    IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit

    You Are Eligible For

    • Letter of Completion
    • ABIM MOC points

Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for pediatricians, family medicine clinicians, allergists, nurses, physician assistants, pharmacists, and other clinicians who manage patients at risk for food allergy.

The goal of this activity is for members of the healthcare team to be better able to evaluate the prevalence of food allergy based on race/ethnicity, as well as household income and health insurance status.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  • Assess the prevalence of atopic disease among pediatric patients
  • Evaluate the prevalence of food allergy based on race/ethnicity, as well as household income and health insurance status
  • Outline implications for the healthcare team


Disclosures

Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.


News Author

  • Jake Remaly

    Freelance writer, Medscape

    Disclosures

    Jake Remaly has no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Charles P. Vega, MD

    Health Sciences Clinical Professor of Family Medicine
    University of California, Irvine School of Medicine

    Disclosures

    Charles P. Vega, MD, has the following relevant financial relationships:
    Consultant or advisor for: Boehringer Ingelheim; GlaxoSmithKline; Johnson & Johnson

Editor/Nurse Planner

  • Leigh Schmidt, MSN, RN, CNE, CHCP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Leigh Schmidt, MSN, RN, CNE, CHCP, has no relevant financial relationships.

Compliance Reviewer

  • Amanda Jett, PharmD, BCACP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Amanda Jett, PharmD, BCACP, has no relevant financial relationships.

Peer Reviewer

This activity has been peer reviewed and the reviewer has no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

Medscape

Interprofessional Continuing Education

In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited with commendation by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

IPCE

This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider’s responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit. Aggregate participant data will be shared with commercial supporters of this activity.

    College of Family Physicians of Canada Mainpro+® participants may claim certified credits for any AMA PRA Category 1 credit(s)™, up to a maximum of 50 credits per five-year cycle. Any additional credits are eligible as non-certified credits. College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) members must log into Mainpro+® to claim this activity.

    Through an agreement between the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, medical practitioners participating in the Royal College MOC Program may record completion of accredited activities registered under the ACCME’s “CME in Support of MOC” program in Section 3 of the Royal College’s MOC Program.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of nursing continuing professional development for RNs and APNs; 0.00 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.

    Contact This Provider

    For Pharmacists

  • Medscape designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number: JA0007105-0000-23-303-H01-P).

    Contact This Provider

  • For Physician Assistants

    Medscape, LLC has been authorized by the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for 0.25 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until 8/11/2024. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read about the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or print it out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate, but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period, you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Do Social Determinants of Health Affect Food Allergy Prevalence?

Authors: News Author: Jake Remaly; CME Author: Charles P. Vega, MDFaculty and Disclosures

CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 8/11/2023

Valid for credit through: 8/11/2024, 11:59 PM EST

processing....

Clinical Context

Food allergy affects approximately 8% of children in the US, and the prevalence of food allergy among children has generally been increasing for the past 2 decades. However, the increase in food allergy cases has not been the same in all racial/ethnic groups. A previous study by Mahdavinia and colleagues, published in the March-April 2017 issue of the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, used a retrospective cohort design to assess the relationship between race/ethnicity and food allergy among children in 2 urban tertiary care centers in the United States.[1]

A total of 817 children were included in the study: 35% were African American and 12% were Hispanic; 53% of patients were White. Compared with White patients, Black children had higher rates of eczema and asthma, and they were also more likely to have an allergy to wheat, soy, corn, fish, and shellfish. Hispanic children had higher rates of eczema compared with White children, but the prevalence of asthma was similar in these 2 groups. Hispanic children had higher rates of allergy to corn, fish, and shellfish compared with White children. Finally, Black and Hispanic children had a shorter duration of follow-up with an allergy specialist and experienced higher rates of anaphylaxis and emergency department visits.

The current study expands on this prior research of disparities in food allergy by including adults and social determinants of health in its analysis.

Study Synopsis and Perspective

TOPLINE:

The prevalence of food allergies and rates of specific types vary by race, ethnicity, and income, according to research published online June 14 in JAMA Network Open.[2]

METHODOLOGY:

  • A nationally representative survey of 51,819 households was conducted in 2015 and 2016.
  • Researchers grouped participants by race (including Asian, Black, and White), ethnicity (Hispanic and non-Hispanic), and socioeconomic status and estimated the prevalence of food allergies in each category.

TAKEAWAY:

  • Non-Hispanic White individuals had the lowest rate of self-reported or parent-reported food allergies (9.5%), compared with Asian (10.5%), Hispanic (10.6%), and non-Hispanic Black (10.6%) individuals.
  • Among kids, Black children had the highest rate of food allergies (8.9%), whereas Asian children had the lowest rate (6.5%).
  • Asian children had the highest rates of tree nut allergies (2.0%), whereas Black children had the highest rates of allergies to peanuts (3.0%), eggs (1.6%), and fin fish (0.9%).
  • By income, the prevalence of food allergies was lowest among households earning more than $150,000 per year (8.3%).

IN PRACTICE:

“Additional targeted, educational interventions may address disparities in [food allergy] outcomes and improve targeted [food allergy] management,” the researchers say.

STUDY DETAILS:

Ruchi S. Gupta, MD, MPH, founding director of the Center for Food Allergy and Asthma Research at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois, is the study’s corresponding author. The research was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and Denise and Dave Bunning.

LIMITATIONS:

The study relied on self- and parent-reported data, and the researchers did not evaluate subpopulations within racial or ethnic groups. Sample sizes were limited for individuals who identified as multiracial, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, American Indian, or Alaskan Native.

DISCLOSURES:

The authors have received grants or fees from nonprofit organizations, foundations, biopharmaceutical companies, and government and academic centers. Dr Gupta has an ownership interest in Yobee Care, a company that markets scalp care products.

Study Highlights

  • Researchers distributed a population-based survey regarding allergy to 51,819 US households in 2015 to 2016. Rural and low-income neighborhoods were purposefully oversampled in this survey.
  • The main study outcome was the self-reported prevalence of allergy to any of 9 common food allergens. Researchers examined survey respondents’ answers to ensure that they constituted a convincing case for an immunoglobulin E-mediated reaction, and not just food intolerance or oral allergy syndrome.
  • Participants were also queried if they had received a diagnosis of food allergy from a physician, and they also provided details regarding comorbid atopic conditions and the complications and treatment of food allergy.
  • Researchers evaluated survey results from 40,443 adults and 38,408 children. The mean ages of adults and children in the study cohort were 46.8 and 8.7 years, respectively; 51.1% of the cohort was female.
  • The racial/ethnic breakdown of the study cohort was as follows:
    • Asian: 3.7%
    • Black: 12.0%
    • Hispanic: 17.4%
    • White: 62.2%
    • Multiple or other races: 4.7%
  • The overall prevalence of physician-confirmed food allergy was 5.0%, whereas 10.1% were judged to have convincing evidence of food allergy based on their history.
  • In general, the prevalence of food allergy increased during childhood, reached a plateau during adulthood, and then declined among older adults. This trend was noted in all racial/ethnic groups.
  • The prevalence of convincing food allergy in the total patient cohort based on race/ethnicity groups was as follows:
    • Asian: 10.5%
    • Black: 10.6%
    • Hispanic: 10.6%
    • White: 9.5%
    • Multiple or other races: 13.4%
  • The prevalence of convincing food allergy in the pediatric patient cohort based on race/ethnicity groups was as follows:
    • Asian: 6.5%
    • Black: 8.9%
    • Hispanic: 8.4%
    • White: 7.0%
    • Multiple or other races: 8.1%
  • Among children, the prevalence of peanut, egg, and fin fish allergy was highest among Black children. Asian children had the highest rate of tree nut allergy.
  • Among adults, Black participants had the highest rates of tree nut allergy, whereas Asian adults had the highest rates of peanut and shellfish allergy. Hispanic adults had the highest rates of egg and fin fish allergy.
  • Overall, food allergy was less common among participants with a household income of $150,000/year or more (8.3%). The prevalence rates for lower income levels ranged from 9.9% to 10.7%.
  • Health insurance status was not associated with any of the food allergy prevalence outcomes.
  • Black participants had the highest rate of multiple convincing food allergies, and Black and Hispanic individuals had the highest rates of severe convincing food allergy.
  • The rates of emergency department visits for food allergy in the past year were 15.5% among Hispanic participants and 13.5% among Black participants. No other group had a rate at 10% or more for this outcome. The use of an epinephrine autoinjector was also slightly higher in Black and Hispanic participants.
  • The rates of severe food allergy were not significantly affected by household income, but the lowest income levels were associated with lower use of an epinephrine autoinjector.

Implications for the healthcare team

  • In a previous study of pediatric patients with food allergy, Black children had higher rates of eczema and asthma compared with White children, and Black children were also more likely to have an allergy to wheat, soy, corn, fish, and shellfish. Hispanic children had higher rates of eczema compared with White children, but the prevalence of asthma was similar in these 2 groups. Hispanic children had higher rates of allergy to corn, fish, and shellfish compared with White children. Finally, Black and Hispanic children had a shorter duration of follow-up with an allergy specialist and experienced higher rates of anaphylaxis and emergency department visits.
  • In the current study, the prevalence of food allergy was highest among Black, Hispanic, and Asian participants, with lower rates among White participants. Food allergy was less common among participants with a household income of $150,000/year or more, but health insurance status was not associated with any of the food allergy prevalence outcomes.
  • When providing clinical guidance and patient education, the healthcare team should be aware that racial and ethnic minority groups in the US have higher rates of food allergy, and households with high income levels have lower rates of food allergy.

 

Earn Credit

  • Print