You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

 

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

What Are Updated Guidelines for Pharmacotherapy of Chronic Constipation?

  • Authors: News Author: Jennie Smith; CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MD
  • CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 7/7/2023
  • Valid for credit through: 7/7/2024, 11:59 PM EST
Start Activity

  • Credits Available

    Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

    ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points

    Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0.25 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)

    Pharmacists - 0.25 Knowledge-based ACPE (0.025 CEUs)

    Physician Assistant - 0.25 AAPA hour(s) of Category I credit

    IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit

    You Are Eligible For

    • Letter of Completion
    • ABIM MOC points

Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for gastroenterologists, family medicine/primary care clinicians, internists, nurses, pharmacists, physician assistants, and other members of the healthcare team for patients with chronic idiopathic constipation, also termed functional constipation.

The goal of this activity is for members of the healthcare team to be better able to describe evidence-based practice recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults, based on an updated guideline developed jointly by the American Gastroenterological Association and the American College of Gastroenterology.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  • Assess evidence-based practice recommendations for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults using fiber supplements and osmotic laxatives
  • Evaluate evidence-based practice recommendations for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults using stimulant laxatives and secretagogues
  • Outline implications for the healthcare team


Disclosures

Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.


News Author

  • Jennie Smith

    Freelance writer, Medscape

    Disclosures

    Jennie Smith has no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Freelance writer and reviewer
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Laurie Barclay, MD, has no relevant financial relationships.

Editor/Nurse Planner

  • Leigh Schmidt, MSN, RN, CNE, CHCP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Leigh Schmidt, MSN, RN, CNE, CHCP, has no relevant financial relationships.

Compliance Reviewer

  • Yaisanet Oyola, MD

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Yaisanet Oyola, MD, has no relevant financial relationships.

Peer Reviewer

This activity has been peer reviewed and the reviewer has no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

Medscape

Interprofessional Continuing Education

In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited with commendation by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

IPCE

This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider’s responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

    College of Family Physicians of Canada Mainpro+® participants may claim certified credits for any AMA PRA Category 1 credit(s)™, up to a maximum of 50 credits per five-year cycle. Any additional credits are eligible as non-certified credits. College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) members must log into Mainpro+® to claim this activity.

    Through an agreement between the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, medical practitioners participating in the Royal College MOC Program may record completion of accredited activities registered under the ACCME’s “CME in Support of MOC” program in Section 3 of the Royal College’s MOC Program.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of nursing continuing professional development for RNs and APNs; 0.25 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.

    Contact This Provider

    For Pharmacists

  • Medscape designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number: JA0007105-0000-23-139-H01-P).

    Contact This Provider

  • For Physician Assistants

    Medscape, LLC has been authorized by the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for 0.25 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until 07/07/2024. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read about the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or print it out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate, but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period, you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

What Are Updated Guidelines for Pharmacotherapy of Chronic Constipation?

Authors: News Author: Jennie Smith; CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MDFaculty and Disclosures

CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 7/7/2023

Valid for credit through: 7/7/2024, 11:59 PM EST

processing....

Clinical Context

Chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) is a lower gastrointestinal tract disorder with symptoms including infrequent, incomplete defecation without mucosal or structural abnormalities. Medical costs of CIC management are estimated at approximately $2,000 to $7,500/patient/year. Effects on quality of life may be similar to those of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and depression.

The first step in management is often nonpharmacological interventions, including dietary (increased fluid intake and fiber) and behavioral changes (exercise). Pharmacological treatment may include polyethylene glycol, secretagogues, and prokinetic agents.

Study Synopsis and Perspective

A new practice guideline aims to help clinicians navigate an increasingly crowded field of over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription treatment options for CIC in otherwise-healthy people.

The guideline, published in the American Journal of Gastroenterology, was developed jointly by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) and the American College of Gastroenterology. It marks the AGA’s first update on CIC, also called functional constipation, in a decade.

In an interview, guideline lead author Lin Chang, MD, from the University of California, Los Angeles, noted that CIC, defined as constipation lasting at least 3 months in the absence of malignancy or obstruction, a medication adverse effect, or inflammatory bowel disease, is common, affecting between 8% and 12% of all US adults. Most will be treated by primary care physicians, not specialists, Dr Chang said. And most will see their physicians having already tried different OTC treatments.

“The criteria for CIC or functional constipation, hasn’t really changed” since the last AGA guideline on it was published in 2013, Dr Chang said, adding that the diagnostic standard currently used is the Rome IV criteria for functional constipation. “There are just more medications right now than there were 10 years ago.”

The new guideline, into which evidence from 28 studies was integrated, offers recommendations regarding different types of fiber; the osmotic laxatives polyethylene glycol, magnesium oxide (MgO), and lactulose; and the stimulant laxatives bisacodyl, sodium picosulfate, and senna. It also assesses the secretagogues lubiprostone, linaclotide, and plecanatide and the serotonin type 4 agonist prucalopride.

One commonly used agent in clinical practice, the stool softener docusate sodium, does not appear in the guideline, as there were too few data available on it to make an assessment, Dr Chang said. Fruit-based laxatives were excluded because they were the subject of a recent evidence review. Lifestyle modifications such as exercise, surgical interventions, and probiotics were not assessed.

The guideline’s strongest recommendations are for polyethylene glycol, sodium picosulfate, linaclotide, plecanatide, and prucalopride, with conditional recommendations for fiber, lactulose, senna, MgO, and lubiprostone.

As monthly costs of the recommended therapies vary from less than $10 to more than $500, the authors also included price information, noting that “patient values, costs, and health equity considerations” must be factored into treatment choices. “For polyethylene glycol there’s a strong recommendation, although the certainty of evidence was moderate,” Dr Chang said. “And with fiber, even though we made only a conditional recommendation based on the evidence, our remarks and our algorithm make clear that it should be considered as a first-line treatment.”

In general, “if someone has more mild symptoms, you should try fiber or increase their fiber intake in their diet,” Dr Chang commented. “If that doesn’t work, try [OTC] remedies like polyethylene glycol. Then if symptoms are more severe, or if they fail the first-line treatments, then you go to prescription agents.”

In clinical practice, “there always considerations besides scientific evidence of safety and efficacy,” Dr Chang stressed. “You have to personalize treatment for the patient.” A patient may present having already failed with fiber, or who does not want to use magnesium or can’t afford a costlier agent.

The guidelines contain implementation advice that might guide choice of therapy or dosing. With the prescription osmotic laxative lactulose, for example, “you may not wish to use it as a first-line treatment because bloating and flatulence are very common,” Dr Chang said. “Our implementation advice makes that clear.” For senna, a stimulant laxative derived from the leaves of the senna plant and for which quality evidence is limited, the guideline authors stressed that patients should be started on low doses to avoid cramping.

Dr Chang said that although the new guideline covers medication options for otherwise-healthy adults, clinicians should be mindful that patients presenting with CIC might still have a defecatory disorder. “A person could also have pelvic floor dysfunction as a primary cause or contributing factor. If someone fails fiber or polyethylene glycol, consider a digital rectal examination as part of the physical exam. If this is abnormal, consider referring them for anorectal manometry.”

Untreated constipation carries risks, Dr Chang noted, but “sometimes people with bothersome symptoms don’t treat them because they’re worried they’ll become dependent on treatment. It’s a dependency in the sense that you have to treat any chronic condition, such as high blood pressure or diabetes, but the treatments aren’t addictive, except for some stimulant laxatives to which people can develop tolerance.”

Hemorrhoids and defecatory disorders can occur over time because of straining, Dr Chang said. “The pelvic wall can also get very lax, and that is hard to fix. Or, one can develop a rectal prolapse. Another thing that happens when people have longstanding constipation for many years is they start losing the urge to have a bowel movement.”

The guideline’s development was funded by the AGA and American College of Gastroenterology without industry support. Authors with conflicts of interest regarding a specific intervention or drug were not allowed to weigh in on those interventions.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2023;118(6):936-954.[1]

Study Highlights

  • A multidisciplinary AGA/American College of Gastroenterology guideline panel conducted systematic reviews of fiber, osmotic laxatives (polyethylene glycol, MgO, lactulose), stimulant laxatives (bisacodyl, sodium picosulfate, senna), secretagogues (lubiprostone, linaclotide, plecanatide), and serotonin type 4 agonist (prucalopride).
  • Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework assessed evidence certainty for each intervention.
  • Evidence to Decision framework developed recommendations considering desirable vs undesirable effects, patient values, costs, and health equity considerations.
  • Ten recommendations addressed pharmacological management of CIC in adults.
  • Use of fiber supplementation is conditionally recommended (low evidence certainty) as first-line CIC therapy, particularly for individuals with low dietary fiber intake.
  • Among evaluated fiber supplements, only psyllium appeared effective, but data on bran and inulin are very limited and uncertain.
  • Adequate hydration should be encouraged with fiber use; flatulence is a common adverse effect.
  • Polyethylene glycol use is strongly recommended (moderate evidence certainty).
  • For mild constipation, a trial of fiber supplement can be considered before or in combination with polyethylene glycol use.
  • Polyethylene glycol response lasts more than 6 months; adverse effects include abdominal distension, loose stool, flatulence, and nausea.
  • MgO use is conditionally recommended (very low evidence certainty), started at a lower dose and increased if needed, and avoided in patients with renal insufficiency because of risk for hypermagnesemia.
  • In adults with CIC who fail or are intolerant to OTC therapies, lactulose use is conditionally recommended (very low evidence certainty).
  • Bloating and flatulence are dose-dependent, common adverse effects, limiting lactulose use in clinical practice.
  • Bisacodyl or sodium picosulfate is strongly recommended for occasional or short-term use (daily for 4 weeks or less) or as rescue therapy combined with other CIC agents (moderate evidence certainty).
  • Long-term use is likely appropriate, but data are needed regarding tolerance and adverse effects (eg, abdominal pain, cramping, and diarrhea).
  • Sodium picosulfate should be started at a lower dose and increased as tolerated.
  • Senna is conditionally recommended (low evidence certainty from 4-week trials using a higher dose than commonly used in practice), started at a low dose to avoid abdominal pain and cramping at higher doses, and increased if there is no response.
  • For adults not responding to OTC agents, lubiprostone is conditionally recommended (low evidence certainty), as a replacement or adjunct to OTC agents.
  • Dose-dependent nausea may occur, but at lower risk when taken with food and water.
  • For adults not responding to OTC agents, linaclotide is strongly recommended (moderate evidence certainty) as a replacement or adjunct to OTC agents.
  • Linaclotide may be associated with diarrhea causing treatment discontinuation.
  • In adults with CIC not responding to OTC agents, plecanatide is strongly recommended (moderate evidence certainty) as a replacement or adjunct to OTC agents.
  • Diarrhea may cause treatment discontinuation.
  • In adults with CIC not responding to OTC agents, prucalopride is strongly recommended (moderate evidence certainty) as a replacement or adjunct to OTC agents.
  • Adverse effects may include headache, abdominal pain, nausea, and diarrhea.
  • Comprehensive recommendations of various OTC and prescription drugs aimed to offer a framework for CIC management, but clinicians should engage in shared decision-making based on patient preferences, medication cost, and availability.
  • Limitations and evidence gaps should help guide future research to improve care of patients with CIC.

Clinical Implications

  • Recommendations were strong for use of polyethylene glycol, sodium picosulfate, linaclotide, plecanatide, and prucalopride.
  • Recommendations were conditional for use of fiber supplements, lactulose, senna, MgO, and lubiprostone, but fiber should be considered in first-line management.
  • Implications for the Health Care Team: Nonpharmacological therapies are often initial management steps, including diet (better hydration; increased dietary fiber) and behavioral changes (exercise).

Earn Credit

  • Print