You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Can Daily Reductions in Social Media Use Improve Body Image in Youth?

  • Authors: News Author: Lorraine L. Janeczko, MPH; CME Author: Charles P. Vega, MD
  • CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 4/14/2023
  • Valid for credit through: 4/14/2024
Start Activity

  • Credits Available

    Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

    ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points

    Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)

    Physician Assistant - 0.25 AAPA hour(s) of Category I credit

    IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit

    You Are Eligible For

    • Letter of Completion
    • ABIM MOC points

Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for primary care clinicians, pediatricians, psychiatrists, nurses, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and other clinicians who treat and manage adolescents and young adults.

The goal of this activity is for members of the healthcare team to be better able to evaluate the effects of reducing social media time on appearance and weight esteem.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  • Distinguish clinical characteristics of body dysmorphic disorder among adolescents
  • Evaluate the effects of reducing social media time on appearance and weight esteem
  • Outline implications for the healthcare team


Disclosures

Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.


News Author

  • Lorraine L. Janeczko, MPH

    Freelance writer, Medscape

    Disclosures

    Lorraine L. Janeczko, MPH, has no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Charles P. Vega, MD

    Health Sciences Clinical Professor of Family Medicine
    University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
    Irvine, California

    Disclosures

    Charles P. Vega, MD, has the following relevant financial relationships:
    Consultant or advisor for: Boehringer Ingelheim; GlaxoSmithKline; Johnson & Johnson

Editor/Compliance Reviewer

  • Yaisanet Oyola, MD

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Yaisanet Oyola, MD, has no relevant financial relationships.

Nurse Planner

  • Leigh Schmidt, MSN, RN, CNE, CHCP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Leigh Schmidt, MSN, RN, CNE, CHCP, has no relevant financial relationships.

Peer Reviewer

This activity has been peer reviewed and the reviewer has no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements



In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited with commendation by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider’s responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit. Aggregate participant data will be shared with commercial supporters of this activity.

    The European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS)-European Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (EACCME) has an agreement of mutual recognition of continuing medical education (CME) credit with the American Medical Association (AMA). European physicians interested in converting AMA PRA Category 1 credit™ into European CME credit (ECMEC) should contact the UEMS (www.uems.eu).

    College of Family Physicians of Canada Mainpro+® participants may claim certified credits for any AMA PRA Category 1 credit(s)™, up to a maximum of 50 credits per five-year cycle. Any additional credits are eligible as non-certified credits. College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) members must log into Mainpro+® to claim this activity.

    Through an agreement between the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, medical practitioners participating in the Royal College MOC Program may record completion of accredited activities registered under the ACCME’s “CME in Support of MOC” program in Section 3 of the Royal College’s MOC Program.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of nursing continuing professional development for RNs and APNs; 0.00 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.

    Contact This Provider

  • For Physician Assistants

    Medscape, LLC has been authorized by the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for 0.25 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until 4/14/2024. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 75% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Can Daily Reductions in Social Media Use Improve Body Image in Youth?

Authors: News Author: Lorraine L. Janeczko, MPH; CME Author: Charles P. Vega, MDFaculty and Disclosures

CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 4/14/2023

Valid for credit through: 4/14/2024

processing....

Clinical Context

Body dysmorphic disorder occurs in approximately 2% of adolescents and adults and is associated with a high risk for serious pathology such as eating disorders, substance use disorders, and mood disorders. Yet many individuals with body dysmorphic disorder go unrecognized in clinical practice, and this is particularly important in the pediatric population, as the traits of body dysmorphic disorder are often first manifest during childhood.

To promote greater recognition of characteristics of body dysmorphic disorders among adolescents, Rautio and colleagues assessed a cohort of 172 young people referred to 2 specialty centers in Europe. This study was published in the January 2022 issue of European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.[1]

A total of 79.1% of the cohort was female and 2.3% were transgender. In general, the symptoms of body dysmorphic disorder were moderate to severe, and the majority of the cohort had poor or absent insight into their pathology or delusional beliefs. A total of 71.5% had psychiatric comorbidity, 52.1% had a history of current or past self harm, 53.7% wanted cosmetic procedures, and nearly one third had dropped out of school. Overall, female gender was associated with greater severity compared with male gender.

An emerging risk factor for body dysmorphic disorder is the use of social media. However, there is little evidence as to whether limiting social media is associated with improved body image outcomes.

Study Synopsis and Perspective

From movies to billboards to magazine covers, media have been pushing impossible beauty ideals for decades. But the recent rise of social media brings that exposure to new levels, particularly for young people.

“Youth spend, on average, between 6 and 8 hours per day on screens, much of it on social media,” says senior study author Gary S. Goldfield, PhD, senior scientist at Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute in Ottawa, Canada. “Social media provides exposure to so many photo-edited pictures, including those of models, celebrities, and fitness instructors, that perpetuate an unattainable beauty standard that gets internalized by impressionable youth and young adults, leading to body dissatisfaction.”

Plenty of research has linked frequent social media use to body image issues and even eating disorders.[2] But crucial gaps in our knowledge remain, Dr Goldfield says.

Much of that research “is correlational,” Dr Goldfield adds. And studies do not always focus on individuals who may be more vulnerable to social media’s harmful effects, such as those with ruminative or brooding cognitive styles, affecting results.

In addition, no studies have explored an obvious question: Can cutting down on social media use also diminish its potential harms?

Dr Goldfield and colleagues found an answer: Yes, it can.

Limiting social media use to 1 hour per day helped older teenagers and young adults feel much better about their weight and appearance after only 3 weeks, according to the study, published in Psychology of Popular Media, a journal of the American Psychological Association.

“Our randomized controlled design allowed us to show a stronger causal link between social media use and body image in youth, compared to previous research,” Dr Goldfield says. “To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that social media use reduction leads to enhanced body image.”

Nancy Lee Zucker, PhD, professor of psychology and neuroscience at Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, and director of the Duke Center for Eating Disorders, says the results provide needed data that could help guide young people and parents on optimal social media use. Dr Zucker was not involved in the study.

What the Researchers Did

For the study, Dr Goldfield and colleagues recruited undergraduate psychology students aged 17-25 years who averaged at least 2 hours per day of social media use on smartphones and who had symptoms of depression or anxiety.

Participants were not told the purpose of the study, and their social media use was monitored by a screen time tracking program. At the beginning and end of the study they answered questions such as “I’m pretty happy about the way I look,” and “I am satisfied with my weight,” on a 1 (never) to 5 (always) Likert scale.

During the first week all 220 participants (76% female, 23% male, and 1% other) were told to use social media on their smartphones as they usually do. During the next 3 weeks 117 students were told to limit their social media use to 1 hour per day, whereas the rest of the participants were instructed to carry on as usual. In both groups more than 70% of participants were between ages 17 and 19 years. 

The first group cut their social media use by about 50%, going from a mean of around 168 minutes per day during week 1 to around 78 minutes per day by the end of week 4, whereas the unrestricted group went from around 181 minutes per day to 189 minutes.

Cutting Use by Around Half Yielded Quick, Significant Improvements

The students who curbed their social media use saw significant improvements in their “appearance esteem” (from 2.95 to 3.15 points; P<.001) and their “weight esteem” (from 3.16 to 3.32 points; P<.001), whereas those who used social media freely saw no such changes (from 2.72 to 2.76 [P=.992] and 3.01 to 3.02 [P=.654], respectively). No gender differences between the groups were found.

The researchers are now studying possible reasons for these findings.

The changes in appearance scores “represent a small- to medium-effect size,” said child psychologist Sara R. Gould, PhD, director of the Eating Disorders Center at Children’s Mercy Kansas City in Missouri, who was not associated with the research. “As such, these are clinically meaningful results, particularly since they were achieved in only 3 weeks. Even small impacts can be added to other changes to create larger impacts or have the potential to grow over time.”

The Push to Limit Social Media

As more and more experts scrutinize the effect of social media on young people’s mental health, social media companies have responded with features designed to limit the time young users spend on their platforms.

Just this year a photo-sharing app rolled out “quiet mode,” which lets users shut down their direct messages for a specified amount of time. To turn on quiet mode, a user can navigate to their profile, select the triple line icon and then “settings,” “notifications,” and “quiet mode.” Another option is to tap the triple line icon, “your activity,” and “time spent” to set reminders to take breaks after 10, 20, or 30 minutes of use.

Video-sharing app users younger than 18 will soon have their accounts defaulted to a 1-hour daily screen-time limit. Unlike other similar features, it will require users to turn it off rather than turn it on.

Leveraging built-in controls is “a good start to being more intentional about your screen time,” suggests lead author Helen Thai, a PhD student in clinical psychology at McGill University in Montreal, Canada. “Unfortunately, users can easily bypass these settings.”

One reason for social’s magnetic pull is that “FOMO--fear of missing out on what friends are doing--can make cutting back on social media use difficult,” says Dr Zucker. To help prevent FOMO, parents may consider talking to parents of their children’s friends about reducing usage for all the children, Dr Zucker suggests.

Mary E. Romano, MD, MPH, associate professor of pediatrics-adolescent medicine at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee, urges parents “to have very clear rules and expectations about social media use.” 

Dr Romano, who was also not involved in the study, recommends the website Wait Until 8th to help parents band together to commit to delaying smartphone access until at least eighth grade.

Dr Gould recommends the Family Media Plan, a tool from the American Academy of Pediatrics that lets users create a customized plan, complete with guidance tailored to each person’s age and the family’s goals. Sample tips include designating a basket for holding devices during meals and switching to audiobooks or relaxing music instead of videos to fall asleep at night.

Psychol Popular Media. Published online ahead of print 2023.

Study Highlights

  • Study participants were undergraduates enrolled in an introductory psychology course at a use in Canada. All were between the ages of 17 and 25 years and used social media for at least 2 hours per day.
  • Possible participants underwent screening at baseline for depression and anxiety, and only students with some symptoms were included in the study cohort.
  • This randomized prospective study was divided into a 1-week baseline period and 3-week intervention period. Participants randomly assigned to the intervention group were asked to limit social media use to 1 hour per day, whereas the control group was told to use social media as usual.
  • Researchers tracked social media use objectively during the study period, using screenshots of screen time tracking reports forwarded by participants.
  • The main study outcome was an abbreviated version of the Body Esteem Scale for Adults and Adolescents. Researchers were focused on the outcomes of appearance and body weight esteem.
  • 279 participants entered the study: 76% were female and two thirds were between the ages of 17 and 19 years. A total of 220 students provided data for study analysis.
  • Adherence to social media monitoring was strong, with more than 90% of the study cohort providing screenshots throughout the trial period.
  • At baseline the intervention group used social media for an average of 168.04 minutes per day, which fell to a mean of 78.25 minutes per day during the 3-week intervention period. The respective average rates of daily social media use in the intervention group were 180.81 and 188.76 minutes per day.
  • Appearance esteem and weight esteem improved at 4 weeks in comparing the intervention and control groups, with small to medium effect sizes.
  • The improvement in the intervention vs control groups was similar regardless of participant gender.

Clinical Implications

  • In a previous study of adolescents with body dysmorphic disorders seen in specialized centers, 79% of the cohort was female. Overall, female gender was associated with greater severity compared with male gender. The majority of the cohort had poor or absent insight into their pathology or delusional beliefs. A total of 71.5% had psychiatric comorbidity and 52.1% had a history of current or past self-harm.
  • The current study finds that a 3-week intervention to reduce social media use among university students resulted in reduced screen time and improvements in appearance and weight esteem, with similar results for women and men.
  • The healthcare team should provide support for adolescents and young adults to limit social media use.

 

Earn Credit

  • Print