Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points
Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)
Pharmacists - 0.25 Knowledge-based ACPE (0.025 CEUs)
IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit
This activity is intended for cardiologists, primary care physicians, diabetologists and endocrinologists, nurses and nurse practitioners, and pharmacists.
The goal of this activity is for learners to be better able to understand the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) associated with obesity, and weight loss strategies to reduce the risk of CVD in obese patients.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will:
Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.
All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.
This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.
Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit. Aggregate participant data will be shared with commercial supporters of this activity.
The European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS)-European Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (EACCME) has an agreement of mutual recognition of continuing medical education (CME) credit with the American Medical Association (AMA). European physicians interested in converting AMA PRA Category 1 credit™ into European CME credit (ECMEC) should contact the UEMS (www.uems.eu).
College of Family Physicians of Canada Mainpro+® participants may claim certified credits for any AMA PRA Category 1 credit(s)™, up to a maximum of 50 credits per five-year cycle. Any additional credits are eligible as non-certified credits. College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) members must log into Mainpro+® to claim this activity.
Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of nursing continuing professional development for RNs and APNs; 0.00 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.
Medscape designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number: JA0007105-0000-23-123-H01-P).
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate, but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period, you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 4/10/2023
Valid for credit through: 4/10/2024, 11:59 PM EST
processing....
The global incidence of obesity is on the rise. The "2013 AHA/TOS Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults" uses the World Health Organization criteria to define overweight as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 and < 30 kg/m[2] and obesity as a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m[2]. Furthermore, obesity is subdivided into further categories and classified as class 1, class 2, or class 3 (Table 1) Although BMI is strongly correlated with percent body fat across populations, there are limitations in its predictive ability to estimate body fat for any given individual, with considerable variation by sex, age, and race/ethnicity.
Table 1. Classification of Obesity by BMI in Adults[1]
BMI (kg/m2) |
Classification |
---|---|
18.5 to 24.9 |
Normal weight |
25 to 29.9 |
Overweight |
30 to 34.99 |
Class 1 obesity |
35 to 39.99 |
Class 2 obesity |
≥ 40 |
Class 3 obesity |
Why does obesity matter in cardiology? The main reason it matters is because obesity is consistently associated with metabolic disorders and cardiovascular disease (CVD). States participating in the Behavioral Risk factor Surveillance System have reported a consistent rise in the number of adults with obesity (BMI > 30, or 30 lb overweight for a 5'4" person) -- in 1990, 10 states had a prevalence of obesity < 10% and no states had prevalence ≥ 15%. By 2000, no state had a prevalence of obesity < 10%, 23 states had a prevalence between 20% and 24%, and no state had prevalence ≥ 25%. By 2010, no state had a prevalence of obesity < 20%, but 36 states had a prevalence ≥ 25%; 12 of these states (Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and West Virginia) had a prevalence ≥ 30%.
Data from the AHA scientific statement on obesity and CVD reported that fat deposition in the myocardium results in insulin resistance, resulting in altered vascular resistance or altered autonomic function. One important association exists between obesity and heart failure -- a BMI > 25 is associated with a slight increase in the prevalence of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, there is a direct linear relationship between obesity and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) when the BMI is > 25. This does not mean that obesity is not important in HFrEF, it just means that the relationship is less strong.
There is also a significant disruption in the autonomic nervous system that is associated with obesity. There are multiple risk factors that cause obesity, such as physical inactivity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, poor diet, diabetes, smoking, and excess alcohol. These can result in cardiac QRS fragmentation and fibrosis, which can lead to ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. Obesity can also result in atrial fibrosis and atrial myopathy, resulting in atrial fibrillation (AF). AF is no longer thought of as a purely electrical problem, but more as a myopathic problem. Although the abnormal impulses emanating from the pulmonary veins can elicit AF, the extra systoles in the context of a normal atrial structure will likely not result in fibrillation. However, the development of atrial myopathy leads to AF, and obesity is one of the strongest risk factors for that as evidenced in studies where weight loss was associated with a reduction in the prevalence and the burden of AF.
There are a number of ways to assess obesity: BMI, waist-to-height ratio, and waist-to-hip ratio. Which one is best? The ECHORN study assessing the relationship between these different measures of obesity and 10-year risk of CVD showed that the waist-to-hip ratio was a better indicator than BMI or waist-to-height ratio of obesity-related CVD.[2] Whole-body fat percentage and visceral adipose tissue mass, which are correlated with obesity-related complications, are not fully accounted for through BMI evaluation. However, the BMI remains useful since this measurement has been employed in numerous clinical studies to define "overweight," "obese," and "very obese" patients.
What about metabolically healthy obesity (MHO)? This refers to obese individuals without the metabolic abnormalities that commonly accompany excess adiposity, such as dyslipidemia, glucose dysregulation, and inflammation. The evidence has been inconsistent. Although some studies have shown that those with MHO have a similar risk of CVD as their nonobese metabolically active counterparts, other studies report that people with MHO have a significantly higher risk of CVD compared with metabolically normal weight patients.[3] The inconsistent results are related to how MHO is defined -- there is no standard for defining MHO, and the definition used to define this phenotype varies from study to study.
In overweight and obese patients with established CVDs and other chronic conditions, the "obesity paradox" refers to a protective effect of obesity, associated with decreased mortality. Multiple studies have demonstrated that overweight and obese patients may have a more favorable prognosis when compared to those with normal BMI after the onset of clinical CVD. However, there are many factors to consider when interpreting the obesity paradox, such as comorbidities, confounders, and selection bias. Notably, the paradox seems to keep defining obesity using BMI, which is not able to quantify body fat percentage and adiposity distribution, nor the degree of metabolic disturbances that it can underlie.[4]
Weight management and weight loss are fundamental goals in treating overweight and obesity, and should be part of a comprehensive multidisciplinary and interprofessional treatment plan to address both weight and any associated comorbidities, including behavioral interventions. The combination of medication and lifestyle modifications results in greater and sustained weight loss than either pharmacotherapy or lifestyle changes alone. Recently, novel medical pharmacotherapies that could impact obesity were approved by the FDA (Table 2), but for a long time, bariatric surgery was the best way to get a significant reduction in weight. The Swedish Obese Subjects study, a nonrandomized prospective study that looked at 2010 obese patients who had undergone bariatric surgery compared with 2037 contemporaneously matched controls, reported that patients who had undergone surgery had a 30% lower risk of total mortality and a 41% lower risk of coronary artery disease after a 15-year follow-up.[5] These procedures should be considered for patients with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m[2] and for those with ≥ 1 severe weight-related condition and a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m[2] when therapeutic goals cannot be attained using structured lifestyle change and pharmacotherapy alone.[1]
Table 2. Prescription Medications Approved to Treat Overweight and Obesity (Adapted by NIH)[6]
Management Medication |
Approved for |
How It Works |
Common Side Effects |
---|---|---|---|
Orlistat |
Adults and children ≥ 12 years |
|
|
Phentermine-topiramate |
Adults |
|
|
Naltrexone-bupropion |
Adults |
|
|
Liraglutide |
Adults and children ≥ 12 years |
|
|
Semaglutide |
Adults |
|
|
Setmelanotide |
People ≥ 6 years old with obesity due to specific genetic conditions only* |
|
|
(Other medications that curb your desire to eat include)
|
Adults |
|
|
FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; NIH, National Institutes of Health.
*Pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 1 (PCSK1), or leptin receptor (LEPR) deficiency/Bardet-Biedl syndrome.