Physicians - maximum of 0.50 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.50 ABIM MOC points
This activity is intended for infectious disease physicians, internists, intensivists, public health officials, pulmonologists, and other clinicians who treat and manage patients in a pandemic setting or public health emergency.
The goal of this activity is for learners to be better able to describe ethical considerations regarding guidelines for allocation of healthcare resources during a pandemic or other public health catastrophe, based on an American College of Physicians ethics case study and commentary.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will:
Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.
All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.
Ethics case studies are developed by the American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee and the ACP Center for Ethics and Professionalism.
Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.50 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.50 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider’s responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate, but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period, you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME / ABIM MOC Released: 2/23/2023
Valid for credit through: 2/23/2024, 11:59 PM EST
processing....
Note: The information on the coronavirus outbreak is continually evolving. The content within this activity serves as a historical reference to the information that was available at the time of this publication. We continue to add to the collection of activities on this subject as new information becomes available. It is the policy of Medscape Education to avoid the mention of brand names or specific manufacturers in accredited educational activities. However, manufacturer names related to the approved COVID-19 vaccines are provided in this activity in an effort to promote clarity. The use of manufacturer names should not be viewed as an endorsement by Medscape of any specific product or manufacturer.
A pandemic respiratory virus has gripped the United States, including the area served by Community Healthcare Trust Incorporated (Community), a large, integrated health system that includes several area hospitals, multiple specialty and subspecialty groups, and primary care clinics. The best models and estimates regarding the pandemic are dire. Although uncertain, they suggest that infections will peak in 18 days and that, if so, patient need for critical resources, such as ventilators, could exceed the current total capacity. As a result, Community has to plan for the worst while hoping to increase capacity and that state and local public health measures and “shelter in place” orders can stem the tide of infections.
Community has decided to create a team to develop institutional policy on how to allocate scarce resources in the event the pandemic is as bad as models predict. Dr Giles, an internal medicine physician and ethicist for Community, has been asked to join this team and lead the drafting of the policy.
Dr Giles just got off the telephone with Dr Stead, a critical care colleague and friend in a smaller community in another state. Dr Stead was distressed, relaying that staffing is strapped, as a number of employees are home ill, on quarantine, caring for ill relatives, or engaged in childcare because of school closures intended to prevent spread of disease. Almost every intensive care unit bed is occupied by a patient receiving mechanical ventilation, and new patients are arriving regularly at the emergency department (ED) in respiratory distress. Dr Stead noted that among the patients currently in his intensive care unit whose condition is most dire is the grandmother of the hospital’s director of social work. A half dozen of her friends and family members were in the lobby wanting to go to her bedside; meanwhile, he just evaluated an elderly leader in his church and a 24-year-old patient with asthma and severe viral pneumonia for possible admission from the ED. The elderly man’s brother (a health professional) keeps mentioning the Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA).
Dr Giles can only imagine what his hospital soon may be facing. What ethical considerations and principles should guide Dr Giles in drafting the policy?