Characteristic | CH negative (n = 345) | CH positive (n = 236) | Total (n = 581) | P value* |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age, median (IQR), y | 64 (55–73) | 73.5 (66.75–81) | 68 (59–76) | <.001 |
Sex, no. (%) | .012 | |||
Female | 227 (65.8) | 130 (55.1) | 357 (61.4) | |
Male | 118 (34.2) | 106 (44.9) | 224 (38.6) | |
TOAST classification, no. (%) | .037 | |||
Large-artery atherosclerosis | 77 (22.3) | 76 (32.2) | 153 (26.3) | |
Cardiac embolism | 80 (23.2) | 60 (25.4) | 140 (24.1) | |
Small-artery occlusion | 61 (17.7) | 32 (13.6) | 93 (16.0) | |
Other determined cause | 12 (3.5) | 4 (1.7) | 16 (2.8) | |
Undetermined cause | 115 (33.3) | 64 (27.1) | 179 (30.8) | |
Modified ranking scale, no. (%) | 1 | |||
≤1 | 224 (64.9) | 153 (64.8) | 377 (64.9) | |
≥2 | 121 (35.1) | 83 (35.2) | 204 (35.1) | |
NIHSS score, no. (%) | .08 | |||
≤4 | 268 (77.7) | 168 (71.2) | 436 (75.0) | |
>4 | 77 (22.3) | 68 (28.8) | 145 (25.0) | |
Smoking status, no. (%) | .002 | |||
Never smoker | 114 (33.4) | 108 (46.8) | 222 (38.8) | |
Current or former smoker | 227 (66.5) | 123 (53.2) | 350 (61.2) | |
Arterial hypertension, no. (%) | .01 | |||
No | 136 (39.4) | 68 (28.8) | 204 (35.1) | |
Yes | 209 (60.6) | 168 (71.2) | 377 (64.9) | |
Diabetes mellitus, no. (%) | .066 | |||
No | 279 (80.9) | 175 (74.2) | 454 (78.1) | |
Yes | 66 (19.1) | 61 (25.8) | 127 (21.9) | |
Dyslipidemia, no. (%) | .754 | |||
No | 272 (79.8) | 183 (78.5) | 455 (79.3) | |
Yes | 69 (20.2) | 50 (21.5) | 119 (20.7) | |
Obesity, no. (%) .022 | ||||
No | 250 (72.7) | 186 (80.9) | 436 (76.0) | |
Yes | 94 (27.3) | 44 (19.1) | 138 (24.0) | |
Atrial fibrillation, no. (%) | .01 | |||
No | 283 (82.0) | 172 (72.9) | 455 (78.3) | |
Yes | 62 (18.0) | 64 (27.1) | 126 (21.7) | |
Coronary heart disease, no. (%) | .91 | |||
No | 287 (83.2) | 198 (83.9) | 485 (83.5) | |
Yes | 58 (16.8) | 38 (16.1) | 96 (16.5) | |
Peripheral artery disease, no. (%) | .043 | |||
No | 328 (95.1) | 214 (90.7) | 542 (93.3) | |
Yes | 17 (4.9) | 22 (9.3) | 39 (6.7) | |
History of cancer, no. (%) | .30 | |||
No | 313 (92.3) | 210 (89.7) | 523 (91.3) | |
Yes | 26 (7.7) | 24 (10.3) | 50 (8.7) | |
Statin therapy, no. (%) | .41 | |||
None | 50 (14.7) | 26 (11.1) | 76 (13.3) | |
Low dose | 243 (71.7) | 178 (76.1) | 421 (73.5) | |
High dose† | 46 (13.6) | 30 (12.8) | 76 (13.3) | |
Antithrombotics, no. (%) | .19 | |||
None | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.4) | 1 (0.2) | |
Antiplatelet | 271 (79.9) | 174 (74.4) | 445 (77.7) | |
Anticoagulation | 61 (18.0) | 50 (21.4) | 111 (19.4) | |
Both | 7 (2.1) | 9 (3.8) | 16 (2.8) | |
IL-6R p.D358A, no. (%) | .069 | |||
D/D | 148 (42.9) | 91 (38.6) | 239 (41.1) | |
D/A | 146 (42.3) | 121 (51.3) | 267 (46.0) | |
A/A | 51 (14.8) | 24 (10.2) | 75 (12.9) |
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the PROSCIS-B cohort
Analyses were restricted to patients without missing values in the respective category.
IQR, interquartile range; TOAST, Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment.
*P value from Wilcoxon rank sum test or Fisher exact test.
†High-dose statin therapy is defined as a dose equivalent to atorvastatin ≥ 40 mg/d.
Table 2: Multivariable Cox regression model for the CEP
Physicians - maximum of 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 1.00 ABIM MOC points
This activity is intended for hematologists, internists, neurologists, cardiologists and other clinicians caring for patients with clonal hematopoiesis and incident ischemic stroke.
The goal of this activity is for learners to be better able to describe secondary cardiovascular risk for patients with ischemic stroke with clonal hematopoiesis.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will:
Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.
All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.
Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 1.0 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider’s responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate, but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period, you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME / ABIM MOC Released: 2/16/2023
Valid for credit through: 2/16/2024
processing....
Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is common among older people and is associated with an increased risk of atherosclerosis, inflammation, and shorter overall survival. Age and inflammation are major risk factors for ischemic stroke, yet the association of CH with risk of secondary vascular events and death is unknown. We investigated CH in peripheral blood DNA from 581 patients with first-ever ischemic stroke from the Prospective Cohort With Incident Stroke–Berlin study using error-corrected targeted sequencing. The primary composite end point (CEP) consisted of recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality. A total of 348 somatic mutations with a variant allele frequency ≥1% were identified in 236 of 581 patients (41%). CH was associated with large-artery atherosclerosis stroke (P = .01) and white matter lesion (P < .001). CH-positive patients showed increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), interferon gamma, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1. CH-positive patients had a higher risk for the primary CEP (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–2.31; P = .03), which was more pronounced in patients with larger clones. CH clone size remained an independent risk factor (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.04–1.62; P = .022) in multivariable Cox regression. Although our data show that, in particular, larger and TET2- or PPM1D-mutated clones are associated with increased risk of recurrent vascular events and death, this risk is partially mitigated by a common germline variant of the IL-6 receptor (IL-6R p.D358A). The CH mutation profile is accompanied by a proinflammatory profile, opening new avenues for preventive precision medicine approaches to resolve the self-perpetuating cycle of inflammation and clonal expansion.
With aging, the risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer is increasing. Clonal hematopoiesis (CH), defined by the acquisition of somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), has been identified as a commonality between these 2 age-related conditions. CH occurs in 20% to 30% of individuals aged >60 years and most frequently involves mutations in epigenetic regulatory genes (eg, DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1).[1–7] It is associated with a higher all-cause mortality, an increased risk for cardiovascular events, and an approximately 10-fold risk of developing hematologic malignancies.[6,8] A causal relationship between CH and cardiovascular disease is best known for TET2, for which accelerated development of atherosclerosis driven by an altered function of the nucleotide-binding domain (NOD)-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3)/interleukin-1β (IL-1β) inflammasome of mutated monocytes/macrophages was reported in preclinical models.[8–10] Moreover, in patients with ischemic and nonischemic heart failure, CH has been reported to be associated with rapid progression and unfavorable overall survival.[11,12] These data point toward multifaceted effects of mutated clones in CH-positive individuals, not only affecting self-renewal and differentiation but also inflammatory signaling of mature blood cells.[13,14] Inflammation plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke and its functional consequences after brain injury.[15–17] Compared with the rapidly increasing number of reports in the field of myocardial infarction (MI) and heart failure, little is known with respect to CH and ischemic stroke. In their original 2014 article, Jaiswal and colleagues reported an increased risk of ischemic stroke in individuals with CH, which has recently been confirmed in large patient series.[6,18] To fill the knowledge gap concerning the role of CH in patients with ischemic stroke, we conducted a thorough genetic study investigating secondary cardiovascular risk of patients with ischemic stroke and CH in a large prospective cohort.[19]