You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Are Racial or Ethnic Disparities Factors in the Increasing Homicide Rate Among Children?

  • Authors: News Author: Samantha Lande; CME Author: Charles P. Vega, MD
  • CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 2/10/2023
  • Valid for credit through: 2/10/2024
Start Activity

  • Credits Available

    Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

    ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points

    Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)

    Physician Assistant - 0.25 AAPA hour(s) of Category I credit

    IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit

    You Are Eligible For

    • Letter of Completion
    • ABIM MOC points

Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for primary care physicians, pediatricians, emergency medicine physicians, critical care physicians, trauma surgeons, nurses/nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and other clinicians who treat and manage children at risk for violence.

The goal of this activity is for members of the healthcare team to be better able to analyze the epidemiology of child homicide in the US.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  • Assess biases among White adults who work regularly with children
  • Analyze the epidemiology of child homicide in the US
  • Outline implications for the healthcare team


Disclosures

Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.


News Author

  • Samantha Lande

    Freelance writer, Medscape

    Disclosures

    Samantha Lande has no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Charles P. Vega, MD

    Health Sciences Clinical Professor of Family Medicine
    University of California, Irvine School of Medicine

    Disclosures

    Charles P. Vega, MD, has the following relevant financial relationships:
    Consultant or advisor for: GlaxoSmithKline; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

Editor/Nurse Planner

  • Lisa Simani, APRN, MS, ACNP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Lisa Simani, APRN, MS, ACNP, has no relevant financial relationships.

Compliance Reviewer

  • Yaisanet Oyola, MD

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Yaisanet Oyola, MD, has no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements



In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited with commendation by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider’s responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of nursing continuing professional development for RNs and APNs; 0.00 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.

    Contact This Provider

  • For Physician Assistants

    Medscape, LLC has been authorized by the American Academy of Pas (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for 0.25 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until 2/10/2024. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read about the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or print it out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate, but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period, you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Are Racial or Ethnic Disparities Factors in the Increasing Homicide Rate Among Children?

Authors: News Author: Samantha Lande; CME Author: Charles P. Vega, MDFaculty and Disclosures

CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 2/10/2023

Valid for credit through: 2/10/2024

processing....

Clinical Context

It should come as a surprise to no one that Black children experience the highest rates of homicide among major racial/ethnic groups in the United States and that systemic racism contributes to this terrible fact. A previous study by Priest and colleagues used an online survey to assess potential biases of 1022 White adults in the US who either volunteered or worked with children. Their research was published in the September 12, 2018, issue of PLoS One.[1]

White adults held the highest bias against Black adults vs other racial/ethnic groups: 52% of participants felt that Black adults were violence prone and 36% and 19% felt that Black adults had unhealthy habits and were unintelligent, respectively. These negative attributes were maintained for Black adolescents, and the proportion of Black adolescents perceived as lazy actually increased compared with that for Black adults (24% for Black adults; 41% for Black adolescents). Other findings from the study included higher rates of perceived laziness among American Indian/Alaska Native adolescents and a higher perceived predilection for violence among Hispanic adolescents.

Although White adults were less biased against Black children compared with Black adolescents and adults, even younger children were perceived more negatively than White children. This work is important because these biases contribute to multiple negative health outcomes for Black and other minority children, including homicide.

Study Synopsis and Perspective

The mean homicide rate among children in the United States rose by more than 4% per year since 2013, but jumped nearly 27.7% from 2019 to 2020, new data show.

Although long-term trends varied by region and demographics, with some groups and areas seeing declines in killings, the increases were the highest among Black children and boys aged 11 to 17 years, according to the researchers, who attribute the surge in violent deaths to a recent rise in firearm-related killings in children.[2] Gun violence is now the leading cause of death for children in the United States, claiming what the American Academy of Pediatrics has equated to a classroom-full of lives each day.[3]

“There are troubling recent rate increases among several groups, warranting immediate attention, with some racial and ethnic disparities persisting for more than 20 years,” said Rebecca F. Wilson, PhD, from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who helped conduct the study.

Dr Wilson and colleagues, whose findings appear this week in JAMA Pediatrics, examined data on 38,362 homicide victims in the United States aged 0 to 17 years who were killed between 1999 to 2020.[4]

The nation’s overall homicide rate for youth fell by 5.6% per year from 2007 to 2013 before reversing course. Between 2013 and 2020, the overall rate rose 4.3% annually.

The figures show that not all children are affected equally. The rate of child homicide has fallen significantly for girls, infants, and children aged 5 years and younger, whose deaths often result from caregiver neglect or violence, as well as Asian or Pacific Islander populations, White populations, and those living in the Northeast.

But the child homicide rate in the South increased 6.4% per year between 2013 and 2020, and the rate for children both in rural America and in cities is also rising after years of decline, according to the researchers.

The suspected perpetrator was known in about 64% of child killings. Nearly 80% of those perpetrators were male.

Dr Wilson and colleagues also note that the COVID-19 pandemic appears to have precipitated a wave of gun-related violence among children, a link borne out by another paper published in JAMA Pediatrics.[5] (Recent data suggest that intentional firearm injuries often are misclassified as accidental.)[6]

The second JAMA Pediatrics study found that gun-related injuries in youth remained elevated through 2021, with non-Hispanic Black children and those with public insurance making up greater proportions of victims during the pandemic. The researchers identified 1815 firearm injuries per month before the pandemic and 2759 per month during the outbreak, for a 52% increase.

Although the 2 studies look at different data, both show that Black children are most affected by gun violence, experts said.

“This demonstrates a critical issue for the medical, public health, and legal communities: While homicide is often presented as a criminal justice problem, it is increasingly a racial justice problem,” said Katherine E. Hoops, MD, from the Center for Gun Violence Solutions at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, Maryland.

In an editorial about the homicide study, researchers at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine in Philadelphia called the violent deaths “preventable and unacceptable.”[7] Eliminating such deaths “must be among our first priorities,” they write.

The editorial authors also note that researchers know relatively little about nonfatal violent injuries such as those involving firearms. “These injuries are important not only because they may have life-altering consequences for children and families but also because understanding only the most severe form of any health condition (death) will hamper our ability to design and evaluate prevention strategies,” they write.

Dr Wilson’s group identified different causes of youth homicide for different age groups, and the potential interventions for each differ. Although the youngest children are more likely to die from abuse or neglect, those aged 6 to 10 years were most likely to die by firearm, often associated with abuse that ends in suicide. Meanwhile, adolescents aged 11 to 17 were more subject to peer violence.

For Dr Hoops, “each of these differences has important policy implications including the need for policies that address structural racism, poverty, and systematic disadvantage, but also firearm safe storage to prevent youth violence and suicide, reduction of access to lethal means such as through extreme risk protective orders when someone is at risk of harming themselves or others.”

Dr Wilson agreed. “We know child homicides are preventable,” she said. “The rate decrease for some groups is encouraging, yet more can be done to protect all children.”

JAMA Pediatr. Published online December 19, 2022.

Study Highlights

  • Study data were drawn primarily from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Vital Statistics System WONDER data, which contains data on homicides across the US. Using these data, researchers compared trends in homicide of children between 0 and 17 years from 1999 to 2020.
  • Researchers also queried the CDC National Violent Death Reporting System to assess characteristics of child homicides on a national level.
  • The age-adjusted child homicide rate in 2020 was 2.8 per 100,000 children. This was a 27.7% increase from the rate in 2019, and there was a broad increase in the rate of child homicide across demographic variables.
  • Between 1999 and 2020 there were 38,362 victims of child homicide in the US. In general, there was a decline in the rate of child homicide between 1999 and 2013, which was steady at a mean annual rate of decline of 5.6% between 2006 and 2013. However, beginning in 2014 the rate of child homicide increased at a mean annual rate of 4.3%.
  • There was a slight but steady reduction in the rate of child homicide among girls between 1999 and 2020. However, the rate of child homicide among boys increased by 16.1% between 2018 and 2020.4
  • Rates of homicide among children younger than 6 years declined from 1999 to 2020, but the opposite was true among children between the ages of 11 and 17 years.
  • The child homicide rate significantly decreased among Asian/Pacific Islander and White children from 1999 to 2020.
  • Rates of homicide among Black children remained significantly higher than any other racial/ethnic group during the study period. Trends in child homicide over time among Black children mirrored those of the general cohort, with a steep increase between 2018 and 2020.
  • Homicide rates among Native American/Alaska Native and Hispanic children were elevated above White children and declined slightly for both groups from 1999 to 2020.
  • Increasing rates of child homicide in the US South in particular drove overall increases between 2013 and 2020. Only the Northeast experienced a decline in child homicide rates during this period.
  • Rates of child homicide rose steadily in both rural and urban areas during the last 7 to 9 years of the study period.
  • Children younger than 6 years were most commonly killed with personal weapons (i.e., hands and feet), whereas children at ages 11 through 17 were most likely to be killed with a firearm.
  • 79.3% of children were killed by a male; 88.9% of infants were killed as a consequence of caregiver abuse or neglect.
  • An argument preceded the child homicide in 22% to 32% of cases. There was a strong correlation between child homicide among 11- to 17-year-old adolescents and the local rate of community violence.

Clinical Implications

  • In a previous study, 52% of White adults felt that Black adults were violence prone and 36% and 19% felt that Black adults had unhealthy habits and were unintelligent, respectively. These negative attributes were maintained for Black adolescents, and the proportion of Black adolescents perceived as lazy actually increased compared with that for adults (24% for Black adults; 41% for Black adolescents). However, White adults were less biased regarding Black children. Other findings from the study included higher rates of perceived laziness among American Indian/Alaska Native adolescents and a higher perceived predilection for violence among Hispanic adolescents.
  • In general, there was a decline in the US rate of child homicide between 1999 and 2013, but this reversed, particularly from 2018 to 2020. A higher number of deaths of Black male adolescents drove this latter trend. Rates of child homicide increased in urban and rural areas from 2018 to 2020, and only the Northeast did not experience a higher rate of child homicide during this period.
  • Implications for the healthcare team: The healthcare team should screen children of all ages for the risk for violence that they face on a routine basis and intervene when necessary using an interprofessional approach.

 

Earn Credit

  • Print