You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Do All Children With Type 2 Diabetes Have Obesity?

  • Authors: MDEdge News Author: Diana Swift; CME Author: Charles P. Vega, MD
  • CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 2/3/2023
  • Valid for credit through: 2/3/2024
Start Activity

  • Credits Available

    Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

    ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points

    Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)

    Pharmacists - 0.25 Knowledge-based ACPE (0.025 CEUs)

    Physician Assistant - 0.25 AAPA hour(s) of Category I credit

    IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit

    You Are Eligible For

    • Letter of Completion
    • ABIM MOC points

Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for primary care physicians, pediatricians, endocrinologists, nurses, pharmacists, physician assistants, and other clinicians who treat and manage pediatric patients at risk for diabetes.

The goal of this activity is for learners to be better able to analyze the prevalence of obesity in pediatric cases of type 2 diabetes.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  • Distinguish different phenotypes of adult-onset diabetes
  • Assess the prevalence of obesity in pediatric cases of type 2 diabetes
  • Outline implications for the healthcare team


Disclosures

Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.


MDEdge News Author

  • Diana Swift

    Disclosures

    Diana Swift has no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Charles P. Vega, MD

    Health Sciences Clinical Professor of Family Medicine
    University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
    Irvine, California

    Disclosures

    Charles P. Vega, MD, has the following relevant financial relationships:
    Consultant or advisor for: GlaxoSmithKline; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

Editor/Nurse Planner

  • Leigh Schmidt, MSN, RN, CNE, CHCP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Leigh Schmidt, MSN, RN, CNE, CHCP, has no relevant financial relationships.

Compliance Reviewer

  • Yaisanet Oyola, MD

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Yaisanet Oyola, MD has no relevant financial relationships.

Peer Reviewer

This activity has been peer reviewed and the reviewer has no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements



In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited with commendation by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.


This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit. Aggregate participant data will be shared with commercial supporters of this activity.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of nursing continuing professional development for RNs and APNs; 0.00 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.

    Contact This Provider

    For Pharmacists

  • Medscape designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number: JA0007105-0000-23-048-H01-P).

    Contact This Provider

  • For Physician Assistants

    Medscape, LLC has been authorized by the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for 1.00 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until 01/27/2024. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read about the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or print it out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate, but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period, you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Do All Children With Type 2 Diabetes Have Obesity?

Authors: MDEdge News Author: Diana Swift; CME Author: Charles P. Vega, MDFaculty and Disclosures

CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 2/3/2023

Valid for credit through: 2/3/2024

processing....

Clinical Context

Clinicians know that there are different forms of adult-onset diabetes, and a previous study by Ahlqvist and colleagues used age at diagnosis, HbA1c, body mass index (BMI), the presence of glutamate decarboxylase antibodies (GADA), and measures of beta-cell function and insulin resistance to characterize different phenotypes of adult-onset diabetes using diabetes registries in Sweden. Their research was published in the May 2018 issue of Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology.[1]

A total of 6.4% of cases of adult-onset diabetes were characterized by early-onset disease, relatively low BMI, insulin deficiency, and the presence of GADA, and another 17.5% had a similar phenotype but were GADA-negative. A total of 15.3% of adults had high insulin resistance and high BMI, whereas 21.6% had obesity but only mild insulin resistance. Finally, 39.1% of cases were older at the time of diabetes diagnosis but had only mild metabolic derangements. The cohort with the highest insulin resistance had the highest prevalence of kidney disease, whereas insulin deficiency was more associated with retinopathy.

Similar to adults, there are different phenotypes of diabetes among pediatric patients. However, there is a lack of research into basic differentiating characteristics of these cases, including obesity. The current study addresses this issue.

Study Synopsis and Perspective

Obesity is not a universal phenotype in children with type 2 diabetes, a global systematic review and meta-analysis reported. In fact, the study found, as many as 1 in 4 children with type 2 diabetes do not have obesity and some have normal reference-range body mass measurements. Further studies should consider other mechanisms beyond obesity in the genesis of pediatric diabetes, the authors of the international analysis concluded, writing for JAMA Network Open.[2]

“We were aware that some children and adolescents with [type 2 diabetes] did not have obesity, but we didn’t know the scale of obesity in [type 2 diabetes] or what variables may impact the occurrence of diabetes in this group,” endocrinologist M. Constantine Samaan, MD, associate professor of pediatrics at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, said. “So, the analysis did help us understand the body mass distribution of this group in more detail.”

This appears to be the first article to systematically quantify obesity prevalence in this population. “There is not much known about this small but potentially important group of [type 2 diabetes] patients,” Dr Samaan said.

The international investigators included in their meta-analysis 53 articles with 8,942 participants from multiple world regions and races/ethnicities. The overall prevalence of obesity in pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes was 75.27% (95% CI, 70.47%-79.78%). The prevalence of obesity at time of diagnosis in 4,688 participants was 77.24% (95% CI, 70.55%-83.34%). Male participants had higher odds of obesity than females (odds ratio, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.33-3.31), although girls are generally more likely to develop type 2 diabetes. The highest prevalence of obesity occurred in Whites, at 89.86% (95% CI, 71.50%-99.74%), whereas prevalence was lowest in Asian participants, at 64.50% (95% CI, 53.28%-74.99%).

The authors note that childhood obesity affects approximately 340 million children worldwide and is a major driver of pediatric type 2 diabetes, an aggressive disease with a high treatment failure rate. Understanding the contribution of body mass to the evolution of insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, and type 2 diabetes with its attendant comorbidities and complications, such as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, remains crucial for developing personalized interventions.

Known risk factors for type 2 diabetes include interactions between genetics and the environment, including lifestyle factors such as diet and low physical activity levels, Dr Samaan noted. Certain ethnic groups have higher type 2 diabetes risks, as do babies exposed in the womb to maternal obesity or diabetes, he said. “And there are likely many other factors that contribute to the risk of type 2 diabetes, though these remain to be defined.”

Is “lean” type 2 diabetes in children without obesity likely then to be hereditary, more severe, and harder to control with lifestyle modification? “That’s a great question, but the answer is we don’t know,” Dr Samaan said.

Commenting on the study but not involved in it, Timothy J. Joos, MD, a pediatrician in Seattle, Washington, who is affiliated with the Swedish Medical Center, said that the findings raise the question of how many patients with pediatric type 2 diabetes are being missed because they do not meet current screening criteria. “In nonobese type 2 diabetes pediatric patients, genetics (and by proxy family history) obviously play a heavier role. In my practice, I often get parents asking me to screen their skinny teenager for diabetes because of diabetes in a family member. In the past I would begrudgingly comply with a smirk on my face. Now the smirk will be gone.”

Dr Joos said that it would be interesting to see what percentage of these patients with type 2 diabetes without obesity (body mass index <95th percentile) would still meet the criteria for being overweight (BMI >85th percentile), as this is the primary criterion for screening according to the American Diabetes Association guidelines.

Current guidelines generally look for elevated body mass measures as a main screening indication, Dr Samaan’s group note. But in their view, although factors such as ethnicity and in utero exposure to diabetes are already used in combination with BMI-based measures to justify screening, more sophisticated prediabetes and diabetes prediction models are needed to support a more comprehensive screening approach.

“Because being overweight is the initial criterion, children with multiple other criteria are not being screened,” Dr Joos said. He agreed that more research is needed to sort out the other risk factors for pediatric type 2 diabetes without obesity so that these patients may be detected earlier.

New models may need to incorporate lifestyle factors, hormones, puberty, growth, and sex as well, the authors write. Markers of insulin resistance, insulin production capacity, and other markers are needed to refine the identification of those who should be screened.

Dr Samaan’s group is planning to study the findings in more detail to clarify the effect of body mass on the comorbidities and complications of pediatric type 2 diabetes.

In addition to the study limitation of significant interstudy heterogeneity, the authors acknowledged varying degrees of glycemic control and dyslipidemia among participants.

No specific funding was provided for this review and meta-analysis. The authors and Dr Joos have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(12):e2247186.

Study Highlights

  • Researchers searched for observational studies of children and adolescents younger than 18 years with type 2 diabetes.
  • Included research used age- and sex-adjusted BMI values to define obesity. Obesity was generally defined as BMI values at the 95th percentile or more.
  • The main study outcome was the prevalence of obesity among pediatric patients with obesity. Researchers compared rates of obesity based on sex and race/ethnicity.
  • 53 studies with a total of 8942 participants were included in the meta-analysis; 45.6% of studies had a cross-sectional design and 40.4% were retrospective cohort studies. A total of 14% of included research was made up of prospective cohort studies.
  • The overall prevalence of obesity in cases of type 2 diabetes was 75.3%. Obesity prevalence was similar across different study designs.
  • The obesity prevalence at the time of diagnosis of type 2 diabetes was 77.2%.
  • There was a wide range of HbA1c levels across different studies, but obesity did not correlate with HbA1c. Similarly, obesity did not affect levels of dyslipidemia.
  • The prevalence of obesity among boys and girls was 78.6% and 59.2%, respectively (P<.001).
  • The prevalence of obesity among White patients was 89.9%, and the respective rates of obesity among Black, Hispanic, and Indigenous patients were 84.5%, 81.3%, and 76.7%. The prevalence of obesity was significantly higher among White patients compared with Asian patients (64.5%).
  • The prevalence of obesity in type 2 diabetes was 81.1% in North America but just 68.3% in Europe.
  • There was no evidence of publication bias in the included research.

Clinical Implications

  • In a previous study, 6.4% of cases of adult-onset diabetes were characterized by early-onset disease, relatively low BMI, insulin deficiency, and the presence of GADA, and another 17.5% had a similar phenotype but were GADA-negative. A total of 15.3% of adults had high insulin resistance and high BMI, whereas 21.6% had obesity but only mild insulin resistance. Finally, 39.1% of cases were older at the time of diabetes diagnosis but had only mild metabolic derangements.
  • The overall prevalence of obesity in cases of pediatric type 2 diabetes was 75.3%. The prevalence of obesity among boys and girls was 78.7% and 59.2%, respectively (P<.001). There was a wide range of HbA1c levels across different studies, but obesity did not correlate with HbA1c. Similarly, obesity did not affect levels of dyslipidemia.
  • Implications for the healthcare team: The healthcare team should consider variables other than BMI in assessing the risk for type 2 diabetes among pediatric patients.

 

Earn Credit

  • Print