Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points
Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)
Pharmacists - 0.25 Knowledge-based ACPE (0.025 CEUs)
Physician Assistant - 0.25 AAPA hour(s) of Category I credit
IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit
This activity is intended for primary care physicians, pediatricians, endocrinologists, nurses, pharmacists, physician assistants, and other clinicians who treat and manage pediatric patients at risk for diabetes.
The goal of this activity is for learners to be better able to analyze the prevalence of obesity in pediatric cases of type 2 diabetes.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will:
Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.
All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.
Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit. Aggregate participant data will be shared with commercial supporters of this activity.
Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of nursing continuing professional development for RNs and APNs; 0.00 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.
Medscape designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number: JA0007105-0000-23-048-H01-P).
Medscape, LLC has been authorized by the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for 1.00 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until 01/27/2024. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate, but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period, you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 2/3/2023
Valid for credit through: 2/3/2024
processing....
Clinicians know that there are different forms of adult-onset diabetes, and a previous study by Ahlqvist and colleagues used age at diagnosis, HbA1c, body mass index (BMI), the presence of glutamate decarboxylase antibodies (GADA), and measures of beta-cell function and insulin resistance to characterize different phenotypes of adult-onset diabetes using diabetes registries in Sweden. Their research was published in the May 2018 issue of Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology.[1]
A total of 6.4% of cases of adult-onset diabetes were characterized by early-onset disease, relatively low BMI, insulin deficiency, and the presence of GADA, and another 17.5% had a similar phenotype but were GADA-negative. A total of 15.3% of adults had high insulin resistance and high BMI, whereas 21.6% had obesity but only mild insulin resistance. Finally, 39.1% of cases were older at the time of diabetes diagnosis but had only mild metabolic derangements. The cohort with the highest insulin resistance had the highest prevalence of kidney disease, whereas insulin deficiency was more associated with retinopathy.
Similar to adults, there are different phenotypes of diabetes among pediatric patients. However, there is a lack of research into basic differentiating characteristics of these cases, including obesity. The current study addresses this issue.
Obesity is not a universal phenotype in children with type 2 diabetes, a global systematic review and meta-analysis reported. In fact, the study found, as many as 1 in 4 children with type 2 diabetes do not have obesity and some have normal reference-range body mass measurements. Further studies should consider other mechanisms beyond obesity in the genesis of pediatric diabetes, the authors of the international analysis concluded, writing for JAMA Network Open.[2]
“We were aware that some children and adolescents with [type 2 diabetes] did not have obesity, but we didn’t know the scale of obesity in [type 2 diabetes] or what variables may impact the occurrence of diabetes in this group,” endocrinologist M. Constantine Samaan, MD, associate professor of pediatrics at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, said. “So, the analysis did help us understand the body mass distribution of this group in more detail.”
This appears to be the first article to systematically quantify obesity prevalence in this population. “There is not much known about this small but potentially important group of [type 2 diabetes] patients,” Dr Samaan said.
The international investigators included in their meta-analysis 53 articles with 8,942 participants from multiple world regions and races/ethnicities. The overall prevalence of obesity in pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes was 75.27% (95% CI, 70.47%-79.78%). The prevalence of obesity at time of diagnosis in 4,688 participants was 77.24% (95% CI, 70.55%-83.34%). Male participants had higher odds of obesity than females (odds ratio, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.33-3.31), although girls are generally more likely to develop type 2 diabetes. The highest prevalence of obesity occurred in Whites, at 89.86% (95% CI, 71.50%-99.74%), whereas prevalence was lowest in Asian participants, at 64.50% (95% CI, 53.28%-74.99%).
The authors note that childhood obesity affects approximately 340 million children worldwide and is a major driver of pediatric type 2 diabetes, an aggressive disease with a high treatment failure rate. Understanding the contribution of body mass to the evolution of insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, and type 2 diabetes with its attendant comorbidities and complications, such as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, remains crucial for developing personalized interventions.
Known risk factors for type 2 diabetes include interactions between genetics and the environment, including lifestyle factors such as diet and low physical activity levels, Dr Samaan noted. Certain ethnic groups have higher type 2 diabetes risks, as do babies exposed in the womb to maternal obesity or diabetes, he said. “And there are likely many other factors that contribute to the risk of type 2 diabetes, though these remain to be defined.”
Is “lean” type 2 diabetes in children without obesity likely then to be hereditary, more severe, and harder to control with lifestyle modification? “That’s a great question, but the answer is we don’t know,” Dr Samaan said.
Commenting on the study but not involved in it, Timothy J. Joos, MD, a pediatrician in Seattle, Washington, who is affiliated with the Swedish Medical Center, said that the findings raise the question of how many patients with pediatric type 2 diabetes are being missed because they do not meet current screening criteria. “In nonobese type 2 diabetes pediatric patients, genetics (and by proxy family history) obviously play a heavier role. In my practice, I often get parents asking me to screen their skinny teenager for diabetes because of diabetes in a family member. In the past I would begrudgingly comply with a smirk on my face. Now the smirk will be gone.”
Dr Joos said that it would be interesting to see what percentage of these patients with type 2 diabetes without obesity (body mass index <95th percentile) would still meet the criteria for being overweight (BMI >85th percentile), as this is the primary criterion for screening according to the American Diabetes Association guidelines.
Current guidelines generally look for elevated body mass measures as a main screening indication, Dr Samaan’s group note. But in their view, although factors such as ethnicity and in utero exposure to diabetes are already used in combination with BMI-based measures to justify screening, more sophisticated prediabetes and diabetes prediction models are needed to support a more comprehensive screening approach.
“Because being overweight is the initial criterion, children with multiple other criteria are not being screened,” Dr Joos said. He agreed that more research is needed to sort out the other risk factors for pediatric type 2 diabetes without obesity so that these patients may be detected earlier.
New models may need to incorporate lifestyle factors, hormones, puberty, growth, and sex as well, the authors write. Markers of insulin resistance, insulin production capacity, and other markers are needed to refine the identification of those who should be screened.
Dr Samaan’s group is planning to study the findings in more detail to clarify the effect of body mass on the comorbidities and complications of pediatric type 2 diabetes.
In addition to the study limitation of significant interstudy heterogeneity, the authors acknowledged varying degrees of glycemic control and dyslipidemia among participants.
No specific funding was provided for this review and meta-analysis. The authors and Dr Joos have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(12):e2247186.