You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Do Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Medications Increase Cardiovascular Risk?

  • Authors: News Author: Megan Brooks; CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MD
  • CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 1/6/2023
  • Valid for credit through: 1/6/2024
Start Activity

  • Credits Available

    Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

    ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points

    Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0.25 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)

    Pharmacists - 0.25 Knowledge-based ACPE (0.025 CEUs)

    Physician Assistant - 0.25 AAPA hour(s) of Category I credit

    IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit

    You Are Eligible For

    • Letter of Completion
    • ABIM MOC points

Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for psychiatrists, cardiologists, pediatricians, nurses/nurse practitioners, family medicine/primary care clinicians, pharmacists, physician assistants, and other members of the health care team for patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

The goal of this activity is for learners to be better able to describe potential associations of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications with risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), and any difference in these associations by types of ADHD medication, types of cardiovascular events, sex, age, and preexisting CVD conditions, based on an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  • Evaluate the potential associations of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medications with the risk for cardiovascular disease, based on an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Assess the clinical implications of potential associations of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medications with the risk for cardiovascular disease, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Outline implications for the healthcare team


Disclosures

Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.


News Author

  • Megan Brooks

    Freelance writer, Medscape

    Disclosures

    Megan Brooks has no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Freelance writer and reviewer
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Laurie Barclay, MD, has the following relevant financial relationships:
    Formerly owned stocks in: AbbVie Inc.

Editor/Compliance Reviewer

  • Amanda Jett, PharmD, BCACP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Amanda Jett, PharmD, BCACP, has no relevant financial relationships.

Nurse Planner

  • Leigh Schmidt, MSN, RN, CNE, CHCP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Leigh Schmidt, MSN, RN, CNE, CHCP, has no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements



In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited with commendation by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider’s responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of nursing continuing professional development for RNs and APNs; 0.25 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.

    Contact This Provider

    For Pharmacists

  • Medscape designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number: JA0007105-0000-23-016-H01-P).

    Contact This Provider

  • For Physician Assistants

    Medscape, LLC has been authorized by the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for 0.25 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until 1/6/2024. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 75% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Do Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Medications Increase Cardiovascular Risk?

Authors: News Author: Megan Brooks; CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MDFaculty and Disclosures

CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 1/6/2023

Valid for credit through: 1/6/2024

processing....

Clinical Context

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a highly prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by developmentally inappropriate inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms starting in childhood and often persisting into adulthood. Recommended pharmacological treatment, including stimulants and nonstimulants, has increased substantially in many countries.

Findings have been conflicting from longitudinal observation studies evaluating serious cardiovascular outcomes associated with ADHD medication use. An updated evidence synthesis is needed to address methodological limitations of previous studies and to include several new original studies published after previous meta-analyses.

Study Synopsis and Perspective

A new study provides some reassurance regarding the cardiovascular safety of medications used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

A large meta-analysis showed no statistically significant association between use of stimulant or nonstimulant ADHD medications and any cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcome across age groups.

However, a “modest” increase in risk could not be ruled out, especially with regard to risk for cardiac arrest or tachyarrhythmias and among women and those with preexisting heart disease.

“Overall, the meta-analysis provides reassuring data on the putative cardiovascular risk with ADHD medications, but the possible associations with cardiac arrest or tachyarrhythmias, among female patients, and among those with preexisting CVD warrant further investigation,” Dr Zheng Chang, PhD, with Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, told Medscape Medical News.

The study was published online November 23 in JAMA Network Open.[1]

Biologically Plausible

ADHD medications can increase heart rate and blood pressure, making it biologically plausible that they could increase the risk for CVD, including arrhythmias, especially in susceptible people.

Yet the literature has been mixed, and an updated synthesis is needed to address limitations of prior studies, the investigators note in their article.

To that end, they analyzed 19 studies from the United States, South Korea, Canada, Denmark, Spain, and Hong Kong. The studies involved roughly 3.9 million children, adolescents, and adults (61% male; median follow-up time, 1.5 years).

The results showed no statistically significant association between ADHD medication use and any CVD outcome among children and adolescents (pooled adjusted relative risk [RR], 1.18; 95% CI, 0.91-1.53), young or middle-aged adults (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.43-2.48), older adults (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.62-4.05), or overall (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.88-1.68).

By medication type, there were no significant associations for stimulant medications (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.84-1.83) or nonstimulant medications (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.25-5.97).

Regarding specific CVD outcomes, no statistically significant association was suggested for cardiac arrest or arrhythmias (RR, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.94-2.72), cerebrovascular diseases (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.72-1.15), or myocardial infarction (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.68-1.65).

The risk for CVD outcomes associated with ADHD medications seemed to be higher in those with preexisting CVD (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.80-2.16) compared with those without prior CVD, although the association did not reach the threshold of statistical significance.

Point estimates for risk for CVD with ADHD medications also trended higher among female compared with male patients (RR, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.43-8.24).

“Further investigation is warranted for the cardiovascular risk in female patients and patients with preexisting CVD as well as long-term risks associated with ADHD medication use,” the authors say.

They also say that further studies with rigorous methods are needed to evaluate the long-term risk for CVD associated with ADHD medication use.

In only 2 of the 19 studies was follow-up time sufficient to examine the long-term CVD risk associated with ADHD medication, but these studies were only of moderate quality.

Other limitations include high heterogeneity between studies and an inability to compare the associations between specific ADHD medications. Also, few studies had information on dosage and duration of medication use.

“Importantly,” Dr Chang told Medscape Medical News, “the findings are presented at the population level; in clinical practice, clinicians should make individual-level assessment of the patient’s risk for cardiovascular outcomes and weigh it with other risks and benefits of ADHD medications.”

Important Work, Interpret With Caution

In an invited commentary, Roy Ziegelstein, MD, with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, says the investigators are “appropriately cautious in the stated conclusions of this study. Clinicians should be similarly cautious in reaching conclusions about the safety of ADHD medications, especially in older adults with established CVD.”[2]

Dr Ziegelstein also notes that as ADHD medication use increases among older adults, the likelihood that individuals with preexisting CVD will be exposed to these medications increases as well.

Of note, he pointed to a study published last year that showed that older adults exposed to amphetamines were at increased risk for CVD events compared with those who did not take amphetamines (odds ratio, 6.16; 95% CI, 4.22-8.99).[3]

A separate study of older adults found that the use of prescription stimulants was associated with an increased risk for a CVD event at 30 days, with a hazard ratio of 3.0 (95% CI, 1.1-8.7) for ventricular arrhythmias and 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.1) for stroke or transient ischemic attack.[4]

It should also be noted that polypharmacy is common among older individuals, and the potential for drug-drug interactions is therefore greater, Dr Ziegelstein writes.

“Every treatment decision is a balance of potential harm and potential benefit, and that balance is different for every individual patient based on their biological variability. . .and other important differences in psychological, social, cultural, behavioral, and economic factors and each individual’s unique life circumstances,” Dr Ziegelstein advises.

Although the study by Chang and colleagues is “reassuring in many ways, health care professionals must carefully weigh these factors when prescribing ADHD medications, especially to older adults, individuals with established CVD, and those with other comorbidities that increase CVD risk,” Dr Ziegelstein concludes.

The study was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life, and Welfare and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program. Dr Chang has disclosed no relevant financial relationships. A complete list of author disclosures is available with the original article. Dr Ziegelstein has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

JAMA Netw Open. Published online November 23, 2022.

Study Highlights

  • This systematic review and meta-analysis included 19 observational studies (14 cohort studies, from 6 countries/regions) of the association between ADHD medications (stimulants and nonstimulants) and risk for CVD, identified from a search of PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science up to May 1, 2022.
  • Reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality, using the Good Research for Comparative Effectiveness checklist.
  • Outcome data for any cardiovascular event (hypertension, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, venous thromboembolism, tachyarrhythmias, and cardiac arrest) were pooled using random effects models.
  • Participants were 3,931,532 children, adolescents, and adults (60.9% male).
  • Median follow-up time was 1.5 years (range, 0.25-9.5 years).
  • Pooled adjusted RR showed no statistically significant association between ADHD medication use and any CVD among children and adolescents (1.18; 95% CI, 0.91-1.53), young or middle-aged adults (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.43-2.48), or older adults (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.62-4.05).
  • There were no significant associations for stimulants (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.84-1.83) or nonstimulants (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.25-5.97).
  • There was no statistically significant association with cardiac arrest or arrhythmias (RR, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.94-2.72), cerebrovascular diseases (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.72-1.15), or myocardial infarction (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.68-1.65).
  • There were no associations with any CVD in females (RR, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.43-8.24) or in patients with preexisting CVD (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.80-2.16).
  • The only 2 studies with long-term follow-up both showed elevated risk in those with a history of CVD (RR, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.98-2.06] and RR, 3.07 [95% CI, 1.09-8.64]).
  • Except for the analysis on cerebrovascular diseases, heterogeneity between studies was high and significant (P<.001).
  • There was no evidence of publication bias.
  • The investigators found it reassuring overall that their meta-analysis, the most comprehensive to date, suggested no statistically significant association between ADHD medications and CVD risk across age groups.
  • However, it could not exclude a modest risk increase, especially for risk for cardiac arrest or tachyarrhythmias.
  • As absolute risk is relatively low, even a significant risk increase could possibly be offset by medication benefits, including reducing ADHD symptoms and risky behavior.
  • High-risk patients could have different benefit-risk balance.
  • ADHD medication use seemed to be associated with an increased risk for cardiac arrest or tachyarrhythmias, but not with cerebrovascular disease and myocardial infarction.
  • FDA labeling includes a warning on ADHD medication use among individuals with structural cardiac abnormalities or other serious heart problems.
  • Current guidelines recommend carefully assessing patients with ADHD (eg, personal and family history of CVD, physical examination, electrocardiogram), identifying individuals at risk before initiating ADHD medications, and monitoring during use.
  • The findings are at the population level; in clinical practice, specific individuals with ADHD might be particularly susceptible to negative cardiovascular outcomes.
  • Clinicians should therefore discuss with patients and families the possible cardiovascular risk for ADHD medication in light of the latest evidence and should rigorously follow clinical guidelines for blood pressure and heart rate monitoring at baseline and each medication review.
  • The researchers recommend further investigation of cardiovascular risk in females and patients with preexisting CVD, of long-term risks, and of potential risk for cardiac arrest and tachyarrhythmias.
  • Head-to-head comparison studies are warranted to compare stimulant vs nonstimulant ADHD medications regarding specific CVD risk.
  • An accompanying commentary urges caution for clinicians in reaching conclusions about ADHD medication safety, especially in older adults with established CVD.
  • Polypharmacy is common among older individuals, with greater potential for drug-drug interactions.

Clinical Implications

  • The most comprehensive meta-analysis to date suggested no statistically significant association between ADHD medications and CVD risk across age groups.
  • However, it could not exclude a modest risk increase, especially for risk for cardiac arrest or tachyarrhythmias.
  • Implications for the Health Care Team: The healthcare team should carefully weigh and discuss possible cardiovascular risks for ADHD medication and rigorously follow guidelines for blood pressure and heart rate monitoring at baseline and follow-up.

 

Earn Credit

  • Print