You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Health Disparities: How Are COVID-19 Waves Affecting Cardiovascular Disease?

  • Authors: News Author: Marilynn Larkin; CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MD
  • CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 9/23/2022
  • Valid for credit through: 9/23/2023
Start Activity

  • Credits Available

    Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

    ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points

    Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)

    Pharmacists - 0.25 Knowledge-based ACPE (0.025 CEUs)

    Physician Assistant - 0.25 AAPA hour(s) of Category I credit

    IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit

    You Are Eligible For

    • Letter of Completion
    • ABIM MOC points

Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for cardiologists, family medicine and primary care physicians, pharmacists, nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, critical care physicians, infectious disease physicians, nephrologists, internists, and other members of the healthcare team for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in whom health disparities may have been affected by COVID-19 waves.

The goal of this activity is for learners to be better able to describe patterns and demographics of CVD death and subtypes of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and heart failure (HF) before the COVID-19 era (2018-2019) vs during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) in the United States, according to a cross-sectional study.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  • Describe patterns and demographics of CVD death and subtypes before the COVID-19 era (2018-2019) vs during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) in the United States, according to a cross-sectional study
  • Identify clinical and public health implications of patterns and demographics of CVD death and subtypes before the COVID-19 era (2018-2019) vs during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) in the United States, according to a cross-sectional study
  • Outline implications for the healthcare team


Disclosures

Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated according to Medscape policies. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.


News Author

  • Marilynn Larkin

    Freelance writer, Medscape

    Disclosures

    Marilynn Larkin has no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Freelance writer and reviewer
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Laurie Barclay, MD, has the following relevant financial relationships:
    Formerly owned stocks in: AbbVie Inc.

Editor/Compliance Reviewer

  • Amanda Jett, PharmD, BCACP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Amanda Jett, PharmD, BCACP, has no relevant financial relationships.

Nurse Planner

  • Lisa Simani, APRN, MS, ACNP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Lisa Simani, APRN, MS, ACNP, has no relevant financial relationships.

Peer Reviewer:

This activity has been peer reviewed and the reviewer has no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements



In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited with commendation by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of nursing continuing professional development for RNs and APNs; 0.00 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.

    Contact This Provider

    For Pharmacists

  • Medscape designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number: JA0007105-0000-22-297-H01-P).

    Contact This Provider

  • For Physician Assistants

    Medscape, LLC has been authorized by the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for 0.25 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until 9/23/2023. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 75% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Health Disparities: How Are COVID-19 Waves Affecting Cardiovascular Disease?

Authors: News Author: Marilynn Larkin; CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MDFaculty and Disclosures

CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 9/23/2022

Valid for credit through: 9/23/2023

processing....

Note: The information on the coronavirus outbreak is continually evolving. The content within this activity serves as a historical reference to the information that was available at the time of this publication. We continue to add to the collection of activities on this subject as new information becomes available. It is the policy of Medscape Education to avoid the mention of brand names or specific manufacturers in accredited educational activities. However, manufacturer names related to the approved COVID-19 vaccines are provided in this activity in an effort to promote clarity. The use of manufacturer names should not be viewed as an endorsement by Medscape of any specific product or manufacturer.

Clinical Context

Despite the devastating direct toll of COVID-19, indirect effects of the pandemic on health care and outcomes may be of similar importance. Although hospitalizations for acute cardiovascular (CV) conditions fell during the pandemic, cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality has risen substantially.

It is still unknown whether avoidance of medical care, overwhelmed medical personnel, and/or other factors directly or indirectly related to COVID-19 explain increased CVD deaths during the pandemic. Underlying disparities including structural racism and the US healthcare system may be exacerbated by the pandemic.

Study Synopsis and Perspective

Cardiovascular disease mortality rose significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic and persists more than 2 years on and, once again, Black persons have been disproportionately affected, an analysis of death certificates shows.

The findings "suggest that the pandemic may reverse years or decades of work aimed at reducing gaps in [CV] outcomes," Sadeer G. Al-Kindi, MD, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, told theheart.org | Medscape Cardiology.

Although the disparities are in line with previous research, he said, "[w]hat was surprising is the persistence of excess [CV] mortality approximately 2 years after the pandemic started, even during a period of low COVID-19 mortality."

"This suggests that the pandemic resulted in a disruption of healthcare access and, along with disparities in COVID-19 infection and its complications, he said, "may have a long-lasting effect on healthcare disparities, especially among vulnerable populations."

The study was published online July 20 in Mayo Clinic Proceedings[1] with lead author Scott E. Janus, MD, also of Case Western Reserve University.

Impact Consistently Greater for Black Persons

Al-Kindi and colleagues used 3,598,352 US death files to investigate trends in deaths due specifically to CVD as well as its subtypes: myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and heart failure (HF) in 2018 and 2019 (prepandemic) and the pandemic years 2020 and 2021. Baseline demographics showed a higher percentage of older, female, and Black individuals among the CVD subtypes of interest.

Overall, there was an excess CVD mortality of 6.7% during the pandemic compared with prepandemic years, including a 2.5% rise in MI deaths and an 8.5% rise in stroke deaths. Heart failure mortality remained relatively steady, decreasing only 0.1%.

Subgroup analyses revealed "striking differences" in excess mortality between Black and White persons, the authors noted. Black persons had an overall excess mortality of 13.8% vs 5.1% for White persons compared with the prepandemic years. The differences were consistent across subtypes: MI (9.6% vs 1%); stroke (14.5% vs 6.9%); and HF (5.1% vs −1.2%; P < .001 for all).

When the investigators looked at deaths on a yearly basis with 2018 as the baseline, they found CVD deaths increased by 1.5% in 2019, 15.8% in 2020, and 13.5% in 2021 among Black persons compared with 0.5%, 5.1%, and 5.7%, respectively, among white persons.

Excess deaths from MI rose by 9.5% in 2020 and by 6.7% in 2021 among Black persons but fell by 1.2% in 2020 and by 1% in 2021 among White persons.

Disparities in excess HF mortality were similar, rising 9.1% and 4.1% in 2020 and 2021 among Black persons yet dipping 0.1% and 0.8% in 2020 and 2021 among White persons.

The "most striking difference" was in excess stroke mortality, which doubled among Black persons compared with White persons in 2020 (14.9% vs 6.7%) and in 2021 (17.5% vs 8.1%), according to the authors.

Awareness Urged

Although the disparities were expected, "there is clear value in documenting and quantifying the magnitude of these disparities," Amil M. Shah, MD, MPH, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, told theheart.org | Medscape Cardiology.

In addition to being observational, the main limitation of the study, he noted, is the quality and resolution of the death certificate data, which may limit the accuracy of the cause of death ascertainment and classification of race or ethnicity; "[h]owever," he added, "I think these potential inaccuracies are unlikely to materially impact the overall study findings."

Shah, who was not involved in the study, said he would like to see additional research into the diversity and heterogeneity in risk among Black communities.

"Understanding the environmental, social, and healthcare factors -- both harmful and protective -- that influence risk for CVD morbidity and mortality among Black individuals and communities offers the promise to provide actionable insights to mitigate these disparities."

"Intervention studies testing approaches to mitigate disparities based on race/ethnicity" are also needed, he added. These may be at the policy, community, health system, or individual level, and community involvement in phases will be essential."

Meanwhile, both Al-Kindi and Shah urged physicians to be aware of the disparities and the need to improve access to care and address social determinants of health in vulnerable populations.

These disparities "are driven by structural factors, and are reinforced by individual behaviors. In this context, implicit bias training is important to help clinicians recognize and mitigate bias in their own practice," Shah said. "Supporting diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts, and advocating for anti-racist policies and practices in their health systems" can also help.

Al-Kindi and Shah have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Mayo Clin Proc. Forthcoming 2022.[1]

Study Highlights

  • Investigators used US multiple cause of death files (2018-2021) to examine trend of excess cause-specific deaths from CVD (n = 3,598,352), MI, stroke, and HF.
  • Primary outcome was excess mortality from CVD and its 3 subtypes between prepandemic (2018-2019) and pandemic years (2020-2021).
  • Subgroup analyses examined race and month-to-month and year-to-year variation.
  • During the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) vs prepandemic era (2018-2019), there was 6.7% excess CVD mortality, 2.5% MI mortality, and 8.5% stroke mortality.
  • CVD subtypes had higher percentages of older, female, and Black individuals.
  • Black persons vs White persons had higher excess mortality from CVD (13.8% vs 5.1%), MI (9.6% vs 1%), stroke (14.5% vs 6.9%), and HF (5.1% vs −1.2%; P < .001 for all).
  • Annual CVD deaths increased from 2018 by 1.5% in 2019, 15.8% in 2020, and 13.5% in 2021 among Black persons vs. 0.5%, 5.1%, and 5.7%, respectively, among White persons.
  • Excess deaths from MI and HF rose by 9.5% and 9.1% in 2020 and by 6.7% and 4.1% in 2021 among Black persons but fell by 1.2% and 0.1% in 2020 and by 1% and 0.8% in 2021 among White persons.
  • Excess stroke mortality increased > 2-fold among Black persons vs White persons in 2020 (14.9% vs 6.7%) and 2021 (17.5% vs 8.1%).
  • During the first COVID-19 wave (May 2020), excess CVD mortality was 44.3% in Black persons vs 8.6% in White persons.
  • Patterns were similar but progressively less disparate during the second (July 2020; 19.1% vs 10.1%), third (December 2020; 19.8% vs 11%); and fourth waves (September 2021; 20.3% vs 14.6%).
  • Black persons vs White persons were significantly more likely to die at home.
  • The investigators concluded that CVD and subtype-specific mortality rose significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic and has persisted despite 2 years since pandemic onset.
  • Excess CVD mortality has disproportionately affected Black persons vs White persons, warranting further studies targeting and eliminating healthcare disparities.
  • These should include research on risk diversity and heterogeneity among Black communities to identify harmful and protective environmental, social, and healthcare factors affecting CVD morbidity and mortality risk, which could provide actionable insights to reduce disparities.
  • Intervention studies are also needed testing strategies at the policy, community, health system, or individual level to reduce racial/ethnic disparities driven by structural factors and reinforced by individual behaviors.
  • Members of the healthcare team should be aware of disparities and the need to improve care access and address social determinants of health in vulnerable populations; undergo implicit bias training to help recognize and mitigate bias in their own practice; support diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts; and advocate for antiracist policies and practices in their health systems.
  • Community-based participatory research and intervention strategies are needed for sustaining and generational effects.
  • Elected officials should change policy to produce population-level efforts to improve lifestyles through primary and secondary prevention strategies.
  • Explanations for healthcare inequity are not well understood but likely multifactorial.
  • Biologic explanations include higher prevalence of CVD comorbidities (hypertension, obesity, and chronic kidney disease) among Black persons.
  • Structural and systematic racism likely play a larger, multigenerational role in healthcare outcomes.
  • Greater likelihood of Black persons vs White persons dying at home may reflect avoidance of healthcare systems.
  • Study limitations include reliance on provisional diagnosis codes, which may be incomplete because of reporting delays; possibly undiagnosed cases of COVID-19 partially contributing to excess deaths; and reliance on death certification for race, with potential misclassification.

Clinical Implications

  • Excess CVD mortality has disproportionately affected Black persons vs White persons during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Further studies should target and eliminate healthcare disparities.
  • Implications for the Healthcare Team: The healthcare team should be aware of disparities and the need to improve care access and address social determinants of health in vulnerable populations.

 

Earn Credit

  • Print