You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

 

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Can Peanut Allergy Be Prevented If Peanut Is Introduced Earlier in Pediatrics?

  • Authors: News Author: Lorraine L. Janeczko, MPH; CME Author: Charles P. Vega, MD
  • CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 8/19/2022
  • Valid for credit through: 8/19/2023
Start Activity

  • Credits Available

    Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

    ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points

    Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)

    Pharmacists - 0.25 Knowledge-based ACPE (0.025 CEUs)

    Physician Assistant - 0.25 AAPA hour(s) of Category I credit

    IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit

    You Are Eligible For

    • Letter of Completion
    • ABIM MOC points

Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for primary care physicians, pediatricians, allergists, nurses, pharmacists, physician assistants, and other members of the healthcare team who care for young children.

The goal of this activity is for learners to be better able to assess how the early introduction of peanuts affects rates of peanut allergy in a cohort of young children.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  • Analyze data on the relationship between the introduction of foods during infancy and subsequent food allergy
  • Assess how the early introduction of peanuts affects rates of peanut allergy in a cohort of young children
  • Outline implications for the healthcare team


Disclosures

Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.


News Author

  • Lorraine L Janeczko, MPH

    Freelance writer, Medscape

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Lorraine L. Janeczko, MPH, has no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Charles P. Vega, MD

    Health Sciences Clinical Professor of Family Medicine
    University of California, Irvine School of Medicine

    Disclosures

    Charles P. Vega, MD, has the following relevant financial relationships:
    Consultant or advisor for: GlaxoSmithKline; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

Editor/Nurse Planner

  • Leigh Schmidt, MSN, RN, CMSRN, CNE, CHCP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Leigh Schmidt, MSN, RN, CMSRN, CNE, CHCP, has no relevant financial relationships.

Compliance Reviewer

  • Yaisanet Oyola, MD

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Yaisanet Oyola, MD, has no relevant financial relationships.

Peer Reviewer

This activity has been peer reviewed and the reviewer has no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements



In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of continuing nursing education for RNs and APNs; 0.00 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.

    Contact This Provider

    For Pharmacists

  • Medscape, LLC designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number JA0007105-0000-22-271-H01-P).

    Contact This Provider

  • For Physician Assistants

    Medscape, LLC has been authorized by the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for 0.25 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until 8/19/2023. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read about the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or print it out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate, but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period, you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Can Peanut Allergy Be Prevented If Peanut Is Introduced Earlier in Pediatrics?

Authors: News Author: Lorraine L. Janeczko, MPH; CME Author: Charles P. Vega, MDFaculty and Disclosures

CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 8/19/2022

Valid for credit through: 8/19/2023

processing....

Clinical Context

Food allergy is a common and potentially dangerous diagnosis among children, and the authors of the current study describe a radical change in thinking in the prevention of food allergy during the past 15 years. Previous guidelines recommended that parents avoid more allergenic foods during infancy and early childhood, but data that the early introduction of allergenic foods could actually reduce the risk for subsequent food allergy reversed some of these guidelines.

A systematic review and meta-analysis by Ierodiakonou and colleagues assessed the effects of consuming allergenic foods during infancy, and the results of this study were published in the September 20, 2016, issue of JAMA.[1] The current study examines how peanut introduction during infancy might affect rates of peanut sensitization.

Study Synopsis and Perspective

Introducing peanut to children in their first year of life may not affect their likelihood of developing peanut allergy, a population-based study conducted in Australia suggests.[2]

The prevalence of peanut allergy among infants at 12 months did not change, despite a large increase in parents introducing the food early to infants, the researchers report.

"In cross-sectional analyses, introduction of a guideline recommending early peanut introduction in Australia was not associated with a statistically significant lower or higher prevalence of peanut allergy across the population," lead study author Victoria X. Soriano, PhD, and coauthors write in JAMA.

To analyze potential changes in rates of peanut allergy over time, Dr Soriano, from the Centre for Food and Allergy Research of Murdoch Children's Research Institute in Parkville, Victoria, Australia, and colleagues compared the prevalence of peanut allergy between 2 cohorts of infants recruited at immunization centers in Melbourne.

They used the same sampling frame and methods in 2 periods roughly a decade apart: 5276 infants in the 2007 to 2011 group and 1933 infants in the 2018 to 2019 group. The 2 groups represent before and after samples to assess the effect of the 2016 Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy guidelines that advised introducing peanut before 12 months of age to prevent peanut allergy. Earlier guidelines had advised avoiding allergenic foods until ages 1 to 3 years.

Both groups enrolled infants, regardless of immunization status, at their 12-month immunization visit. Ages hovered around 12 to 13 months, and males and females were equally represented.

All infants underwent a peanut skin-prick test, and those who developed a 1-mm or larger wheal were given open oral food challenges. Parents completed questionnaires covering demographics, food allergy risk factors, peanut introduction, and reactions.

Prevalence estimates were standardized to account for changes in population demographics over time. Between the 2 testing periods, the percentage of infants in the study of East Asian ancestry, who are known to be at increased risk for peanut allergy, rose from 10.5% to 16.5%.

Experts Recommend Introducing Infants to Peanut

Parents should carry on introducing their infants to peanuts while research in this area continues, several experts not involved in the study advise.

David R. Stukus, MD, director of the Food Allergy Treatment Center at Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio, wants members of the healthcare team to encourage parents to introduce peanut and other allergenic foods into their infants' diets. "The worldwide adoption of new guidelines to introduce peanut to infants was based on only a few studies, so it is important to continue to monitor whether this approach is making a difference on a population level," he mentioned. 

"These results definitely do not undermine the theory that early introduction helps prevent peanut allergy, but it does suggest that early introduction, at least as currently practiced, may not be a magic bullet that eliminates peanut allergy in the overall population," Corinne Keet, MD, PhD, vice-chair of research in pediatrics at UNC (University of North Carolina) Health in Chapel Hill, told Medscape Medical News.

Matthew Greenhawt, MD, director of the Food Challenge and Research Unit at Children's Hospital Colorado in Aurora, pointed out that population-level changes in prevalence take time.

"This is part of a larger ongoing study, where additional data regarding these trends are anticipated," Dr Greenhawt explained. "This research group has a well-established population-level sampling frame and methodology to examine the development of food allergy, using ingestion challenge and clinician-observed reactions, making their cohort among the most robustly defined in the world."

Christina E. Ciaccio, MD, section chief of pediatric allergy and immunology at University of Chicago Medicine in Illinois, told Medscape Medical News, "This paper demonstrated that the creation of guidelines was not enough to reduce peanut allergy across the population. We providers need to work with families to encourage early introduction.”

In an accompanying editorial, Jennifer Dantzer, MD,  and Robert A. Wood, MD, from the Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology in the Department of Pediatrics at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland, write that the results provide important insights.[3]

They recommend further related research and add that, "in the interim, given the potential for benefit and the low risk of harm, the results of this important study should not dissuade clinicians from following current consensus guidance that recommends early peanut introduction for infants."

Dr Soriano, Dr Stukus, Dr Keet, Dr Greenhawt, Dr Ciaccio, and Dr Dantzer report no relevant financial relationships. Several study authors and Dr Wood report financial relationships with the pharmaceutical industry.

Study Highlights

  • The study enrolled young children in Melbourne, Australia, presenting for vaccinations at 12 months of age. There were 2 cohort recruitments 10 years apart in 2007 to 2011 and 2018 to 2019. In 2016 the national guidelines in Australia were changed to encourage the consumption of peanuts before 12 months of age.
  • Infants underwent a skin prick test for peanut allergy. Those with a positive result of 1 mm or more wheal formation completed an oral challenge to confirm peanut allergy if they had no clear clinical history of such an allergy.
  • The main study variable was the introduction of peanuts before age 12 months. The main study outcome was peanut allergy, with a comparison of the 2007 to 2011 and 2018 to 2019 cohorts.
  • The 2007 to 2011 cohort comprised 4786 children, and the 2018 to 2019 cohort had 1311 children. More parents declined skin prick testing for their children in 2018 to 2019.
  • The median age of participants was 12.4 months, and 51% were boys. Baseline characteristics were generally similar in comparing the 2 cohorts, but the percentage of children from East Asian ancestry increased from 10.5% to 16.5% from 2007 to 2011 to 2018 to 2019. Previous research has found that persons of East Asian descent have more than a 3-fold increase in the risk for peanut allergy compared with the general population.
  • Rates of peanut introduction before 12 months were 85.6% and 21.6% in comparing the 2018 to 2019 and 2007 to 2011 cohorts, respectively.
  • Early introduction of peanuts made a profound difference in the risk for peanut allergy among persons of Australian descent, with the risk cut by more than 90% regardless of the timing of peanut introduction at age 6 to 11 months vs before age 6 months.
  • However, early peanut introduction did not affect the risk for peanut allergy among children of East Asian ancestry.
  • Overall, the rates of peanut allergy were similar in the 2007 to 2011 cohort (3.1%) and 2018 to 2019 cohort (2.6%). 
  • A subgroup analysis focused on children with early-onset eczema also found similar rates of peanut allergy in the 2 cohorts.

Clinical Implications

  • In a previous meta-analysis, early introduction to eggs at ages 4 to 6 months was associated with a risk ratio of 0.56 (95% CI, 0.36-0.87) for incident egg allergy. However, the timing of gluten introduction in the diet did not affect the risk for celiac disease, and the evidence that early sensitization to fish could reduce fish allergy was weak. There was moderate certainty based on low-quality evidence that the introduction of peanuts between 4 and 11 months could reduce the risk for subsequent peanut allergy.
  • The current study did not find that increased rates of introduction of peanuts during infancy improved the risk for peanut allergy across the broad population. Early peanut introduction was associated with lower rates of peanut allergy among persons of Australian descent, but not among high-risk children of East Asian ancestry.
  • Implications for the healthcare team: The healthcare team should continue to provide evidenced-based education to parents on peanut allergy along with information from the current study that the early introduction of peanuts during infancy may not reduce the risk for peanut allergy in all children.

Earn Credit

  • Print