You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

Table1.  

Variable

Overall, N = 483

2008–2013, n = 89

2014–2019, n = 394

Sex
   F 228 (47.2) 48 (53.9) 180 (45.7)
   M 255 (52.8) 41 (46.1) 214 (54.3)
Age, y, median (interquartile range) 62 (41–75) 60 (37–75) 64 (41–75)
Age group, y
   <5 24 (5.0) 4 (4.5) 20 (5.1)
   5–17 43 (4.8) 5 (5.6) 18 (4.6)
   18–34 45 (9.3) 12 (13.5) 33 (8.4)
   35–49 58 (12.0) 10 (11.2) 48 (12.2)
   50–64 104 (21.5) 20 (22.5) 84 (21.3)
   65–79 147 (30.4) 21 (23.6) 126 (32.0)
   ≥80 92 (17.0) 17 (19.1) 65 (16.5)
Race/ethnicity n = 444† n = 83† n = 361†
   Hispanic 22 (5.0) 2 (2.4) 20 (5.5)
   Non-Hispanic
      White 390 (87.8) 74 (89.2) 316 (87.5)
      Black 4 (0.9) 1 (1.2) 3 (0.8)
      American Indian/Alaska Native 18 (4.1) 5 (6.0) 13 (3.6)
      Asian 5 (1.1) 1 (1.2) 4 (1.1)
      Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 5 (1.1) 0 (0.0) 5 (1.4)
Residence type n = 428* n = 71* n = 357*
   Private residence 349 (81.5) 56 (78.9) 293 (82.1)
   Long-term care or nursing facility 63 (14.7) 13 (18.3) 50 (14.1)
   Homeless 9 (2.1) 1 (1.4) 8 (2.2)
   Correctional facility 7 (1.6) 1 (1.4) 6 (1.7)

Table 1. Demographics of patients with invasive group A Streptococcus disease, overall and by 6-year periods, Idaho, USA, 2008–2019*

*Values are no. (%) patients except as indicated. †Excludes cases with missing data.

Table2.  

Variable

Unadjusted odds ratio* (95% CI)

p value

Adjusted odds ratio† (95% CI)

p value

Sex
   F Referent      
   M 1.4 (0.9–2.2) 0.16    
Age group, y
   0–17 1.2 (0.5–2.8) 0.71 1.3 (0.5–3.3) 0.63
   18–49 Referent   Referent  
   50–64 1.2 (0.6–2.3) 0.65 1.6 (0.7–3.8) 0.29
   65–79 1.7 (0.9–3.2) 0.13 1.7 (0.8–3.8) 0.16
   ≥80 1.1 (0.5–2.1) 0.90 1.1 (0.5–2.6) 0.84
Ethnicity
   Non-Hispanic Referent      
   Hispanic 2.4 (0.5–10.4) 0.25    
Residence type
   Private Referent   Referent  
   Long-term care or nursing facility 0.7 (0.4–1.4) 0.37 0.7 (0.3–1.5) 0.33
   Correctional facility 1.2 (0.1–9.7) 0.90 1.9 (0.1–36.7) 0.67
   Homeless 1.5 (0.2–12.5) 0.69 0.7 (0.1–4.8) 0.74
Underlying conditions
   Diabetes 0.9 (0.5–1.5) 0.68    
   Heart disease: congestive heart failure or coronary artery disease 1.3 (0.7–2.3) 0.46    
   Obesity 1.3 (0.7–2.4) 0.49 1.2 (0.6–2.5) 0.58
   Chronic kidney disease or failure 1.6 (0.7–3.6) 0.30    
   Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 0.8 (0.4–1.8) 0.62    
   Cancer 2.4 (0.7–7.9) 0.17    
   Immunosuppression 2.0 (0.5–8.6) 0.37    
   Hepatitis C or chronic liver disease 1.5 (0.4–6.9) 0.57    
   Other‡ 2.3 (0.3–18.2) 0.42    
   Any underlying condition 0.9 (0.5–1.7) 0.75    
Other risk factors
   Skin injury 1.0 (0.6–1.7) 0.97    
   Cigarette smoking 0.9 (0.5–1.9) 0.82    
   Alcohol abuse 0.9 (0.3–2.3) 0.75    
   Injection drug use 3.4 (0.2–60.0) 0.40 3.2 (0.2–63.0) 0.45

Table 2. Individual risk factor and multivariable analysis of risk factors comparing invasive group A Streptococcus cases during 2014–2019 with cases from the 2008–2013 baseline period, Idaho, USA

*Standard logistic regression analysis performed unless otherwise noted. An odds ratio >1 indicates higher odds of being in the 2014–2019 period. †Firth logistic regression used to account for separation attributable to limited sample size and highly predictive risk factors. For multivariable analysis, results for residence type and injection drug use represent total effect and results for age group and obesity represent direct effect. ‡Other underlying conditions include paralysis, neurologic conditions, and developmental delay.

Table3.  

Type of infection or clinical syndrome

No. (%) patients

p value‡

Overall, N = 476†

2008–2013, n = 82†

2014–2019, n = 394

Bacteremia without focus§ 163 (34.2) 34 (41.5) 129 (32.7) 0.13
Cellulitis 197 (41.4) 30 (36.6) 167 (42.4) 0.33
Pneumonia 80 (16.8) 15 (18.3) 65 (16.5) 0.69
Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome 25 (5.3) 0 (0.0) 25 (6.4) 0.02
Septic arthritis 24 (5.0) 6 (7.3) 18 (4.6) 0.30
Empyema 19 (4.0) 4 (4.9) 15 (3.8) 0.65
Necrotizing fasciitis 12 (2.5) 4 (4.9) 8 (2.0) 0.14
Osteomyelitis 6 (1.3) 0 (0.0) 6 (1.5) 0.26
Meningitis 4 (0.8) 0 (0.0) 4 (1.0) 0.36
Other¶ 3 (0.6) 1 (1.2) 2 (0.5) 0.46

Table 3. Clinical syndromes of invasive group A Streptococcus disease, overall and by 6-year periods, Idaho, USA, 2008–2019*

*Cases can have >1 type of infection or clinical syndrome. †Excludes 7 cases with missing data on type of infection or clinical syndrome, all during 2008–2013. ‡By χ2 test. §Group A Streptococcus isolated from blood, with no other clinical syndrome identified. ¶Other includes abscess, epiglottitis, and pelvic inflammatory disease.

Table4.  

Risk factor

No. (%) patients

Overall, N = 432*

2008–2013, n = 69*

2014–2019, n = 363*

Any underlying condition
   No 113 (26.2) 17 (24.6) 96 (26.5)
   Yes 319 (73.8) 52 (75.4) 267 (73.6)
Condition
   Diabetes 178 (41.2) 30 (43.5) 148 (40.8)
   Heart disease: congestive heart failure or coronary artery disease 116 (26.9) 16 (23.2) 100 (27.6)
   Obesity 95 (22.0) 13 (18.8) 82 (22.6)
   Kidney disease: chronic kidney disease or chronic kidney failure 61 (14.1) 7 (10) 54 (14.9)
   Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or emphysema 43 (10.0) 8 (11.6) 35 (9.6)
   Cancer 38 (8.8) 3 (4.3) 35 (9.6)
   Immunosuppression 22 (5.1) 2 (2.9) 20 (5.5)
   Hepatitis C or chronic liver disease 18 (4.2) 2 (2.9) 16 (4.4)
   Other† 13 (3.0) 1 (1.4) 12 (3.3)
Total underlying conditions
   0 115 (26.6) 17 (24.6) 98 (27.0)
   1 113 (26.2) 24 (34.8) 89 (24.5)
   2 93 (21.5) 10 (14.5) 83 (22.9)
   ≥3 111 (25.7) 18 (26.1) 93 (25.6)
Skin injury
   Any skin injury n = 412* n = 70* n = 342*
      No 211 (51.2) 36 (51.4) 175 (51.2)
      Yes 201 (47.8) 34 (48.6) 167 (48.8)
   Type of skin injury‡ n = 201 n = 34 n = 167
      Nonsurgical wound 127 (63.2) 22 (64.7) 105 (62.9)
      Surgical wound 17 (8.5) 3 (8.8) 14 (8.4)
      Trauma§ 47 (23.4) 8 (23.5) 39 (23.4)
      Burn 2 (1.0) 0 2 (1.2)
      Skin breakdown 3 (1.5) 1 (2.9) 2 (1.2)
      Other 5 (2.5) 0 5 (3.0)
Behavioral risk factors
   Current cigarette smoking¶ n = 375* n = 60* n = 315*
      No 310 (82.7) 49 (81.6) 261 (82.9)
      Yes 65 (17.3) 11 (18.3) 54 (17.1)
   Substance abuse n = 386* n = 63* n = 323*
   Alcohol abuse 27 (7.0) 5 (7.9) 22 (6.8)
   Methamphetamine use 6 (1.6) 0 6 (1.8)
   Injection drug use 8 (2.1) 0 8 (2.5)
   None of the above 346 (89.6) 58 (92.1) 288 (89.2)
   Other risk factors n = 389* n = 66* n = 323*
      GAS pharyngitis 31 (8.0) 7 (10.6) 24 (7.4)
      Household member with GAS 8 (2.1) 2 (3.0) 6 (1.9)
      Influenza 12 (3.1) 4 (6.1) 8 (2.5)
      None of the above 336 (86.4) 54 (81.8) 282 (87.3)

Table 4. Underlying conditions and risk factors of patients with invasive group A Streptococcus disease, overall and by 6-year periods, Idaho, 2008–2019

*Excludes missing data. †Other underlying conditions include paralysis, neurologic conditions, and developmental delay. ‡Data from 201 cases with a skin injury reported. §Cut, laceration, or puncture wounds. ¶Does not include e-cigarette use or vaping.

CME / ABIM MOC

Increasing Incidence of Invasive Group A Streptococcus Disease, Idaho, USA, 2008–2019

  • Authors: Eileen M. Dunne, PhD; Scott Hutton, PhD; Erin Peterson, BS; Anna J. Blackstock, PhD; Christine G. Hahn, MD; Kathryn Turner, PhD; Kris K. Carter, DVM
  • CME / ABIM MOC Released: 8/22/2022
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT
  • Valid for credit through: 8/22/2023, 11:59 PM EST
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for infectious disease clinicians, internists, critical care clinicians, diabetologists, dermatologists, and other clinicians caring for patients with invasive group A Streptococcus infection.

The goal of this activity is for learners to be better able to describe the epidemiology of invasive group A Streptococcus in Idaho (where invasive group A Streptococcus is a reportable disease) during 2008 to 2019, based on a retrospective analytical study using surveillance data, emm typing results, and medical record review.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  • Assess the epidemiology and clinical features of invasive group A Streptococcus and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome in Idaho during 2008 to 2019, based on a retrospective analytical study using surveillance data and medical record review
  • Evaluate emm typing results and potential risk factors for increased incidence in invasive group A Streptococcus, based on a comparison of cases reported during 2014 to 2019 with those from 2008 to 2013
  • Determine the clinical and public health implications of the epidemiology and clinical features of invasive group A Streptococcus in Idaho during 2008 to 2019, based on a retrospective analytical study using surveillance data and medical record review


Disclosures

Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.


Faculty

  • Eileen M. Dunne, PhD

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
    Boise, Idaho

  • Scott Hutton, PhD

    Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
    Boise, Idaho

  • Erin Peterson, BS

    Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
    Boise, Idaho

  • Anna J. Blackstock, PhD

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Atlanta, Georgia

  • Christine G. Hahn, MD

    Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
    Boise, Idaho

  • Kathryn Turner, PhD

    Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
    Boise, Idaho

  • Kris K. Carter, DVM

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
    Boise, Idaho

CME Author

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Freelance writer and reviewer
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Laurie Barclay, MD, has the following relevant financial relationships:
    Formerly owned stocks in: AbbVie

Editor

  • Tony Pearson-Clarke, MS

    Copyeditor 
    Emerging Infectious Diseases

Compliance Reviewer

  • Amanda Jett, PharmD, BCACP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Amanda Jett, PharmD, BCACP, has no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

Medscape

Interprofessional Continuing Education

In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by Medscape, LLC and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 1.0 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read about the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or print it out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate, but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period, you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / ABIM MOC

Increasing Incidence of Invasive Group A Streptococcus Disease, Idaho, USA, 2008–2019: Discussion

processing....

Discussion

Using statewide reportable disease surveillance data supplemented by information from medical record review, we investigated the epidemiology of iGAS in Idaho over a 12-year period, during which incidence increased ≈>4-fold. The ABCs program, which does not include data from Idaho, identified a similar increase in nationwide iGAS incidence per 100,000 persons, from 3.69 in 2008 to 7.63 in 2019[1,12,23]. In Canada, incidence per 100,000 persons rose from 4.42 in 2008 to 8.12 in 2019 (https://diseases.canada.ca/notifiable/charts).

In Idaho, average annual iGAS incidence during our study was 2-fold as high among American Indian or Alaska Native persons compared with white non-Hispanic persons. Higher iGAS incidence among indigenous compared with nonindigenous populations has been reported in multiple settings, including the United States, Australia, and New Zealand[24]. In Alberta, Canada, iGAS incidence was 6-fold as high and increasing more rapidly among First Nation compared with non-First Nation populations, rising to 52.2 cases per 100,000 persons in 2017[25]. Neither the proportion of cases occurring among American Indian and Alaska Native persons nor the racial and ethnic distribution of Idaho’s population changed substantially during our study period (Appendix Table 2).

Approximately three quarters of iGAS patients had ≥1 underlying medical condition; diabetes, obesity, and skin injuries were common, emphasizing the need for diabetes management and wound care to reduce the risk for iGAS associated with these conditions[4,5]. The high proportion of cases associated with skin injury or infection is consistent with national data; in 2019, a total of 44.7% of iGAS case-patients had cellulitis[1]. Two outbreaks and a household cluster were identified through routine surveillance, all during 2014–2019; emm typing made outbreak detection easier. Because the state public health laboratory only began emm typing in 2014, earlier outbreaks might not have been detected. We recommend that states with available resources conduct emm typing to enhance surveillance and outbreak detection.

The incidence of iGAS in Idaho, 4.76 cases per 100,000 persons in 2019, is lower than the national incidence rate, 7.63 per 100,000 persons in 2019, possibly because Idaho iGAS estimates are based on passive data reporting, whereas national estimates are based on data from the ABCs active surveillance system. Other factors related to demographics or prevalence of risk factors might also contribute to lower Idaho compared with national iGAS incidence estimates. Increased iGAS rates across all age groups and in all geographic regions of Idaho during 2008–2019 present cause for concern. We identified no changes in surveillance procedures that might have led to increased case reporting. However, we did not assess potential changes in clinical practice (e.g., the number of blood cultures ordered by emergency departments), which might have affected case detection.

We identified a rise in STSS incidence: 25 cases occurred during 2014–2019, compared with none during 2008–2013, although these numbers do not account for the increase in overall iGAS cases. We found evidence of STSS underreporting, as has been reported in other studies[26]. Cases of STSS from the baseline period might have been missed because medical records were only available for 70% of iGAS patients. We observed 10 different emm types among STSS cases that had an isolate submitted for typing, indicating a lack of clonality. Of note, a study in the Netherlands identified a temporal association between STSS and influenza A virus[27]. However, STSS cases in Idaho occurred throughout the year, without seasonal patterns that might have been associated with influenza.

emm1 was the most common emm type identified in Idaho and also the most common cause of iGAS nationally during 2008–2019[1,12,23]. The diversity of emm types observed in Idaho was consistent with reports from high-income countries in North America and Europe[28–30]. Although no vaccines targeting GAS are available, the 30-valent M protein–based strep A vaccine, one of the few vaccines under development in phase 1 or 2 clinical trials, would potentially cover 167/194 (86.1%) emm types from Idaho iGAS cases, and possibly more through cross-protection within emm clusters based on M protein structure[31–33].

We identified no associations between risk factors and increased incidence during 2014–2019. In New Mexico, increases in iGAS incidence were linked to rises in cases among persons experiencing homelessness and persons injecting drugs[17]. Similarly, an analysis of ABCs national surveillance data concluded that injection drug use and homelessness likely contribute to increasing iGAS incidence in the United States, noting that particular emm types are increasing among this patient population[7]. Factors responsible for increased incidence of iGAS during 2003–2017 in Alberta, Canada, were not clear, and multiple risk factors likely contributed, particularly alcohol abuse and drug use[13]. In Idaho, only 8 patients reported injection drug use and 9 experiencing homelessness. Although these conditions might be underreported, homelessness and injection drug use do not appear to be driving the increase in iGAS in Idaho, although they might be contributing factors. We found no evidence that alcohol abuse was contributing to the increase in iGAS in Idaho.

Our results suggest that iGAS is increasing among the general population of Idaho and not limited to a particular age group or associated with an individual risk factor. The reasons for increases in reported incidence in Idaho might be multifactorial and involve factors not assessed in this study, such as expansion of ≥1 emm types and improvements in collection of diagnostic specimens by clinicians and passive reporting by laboratories. One limitation of our study is that we did not directly assess whether changes in the distribution of risk factors in the underlying population, such as the proportion of adults with skin injuries, could have led to increases in iGAS. For certain characteristics and risk factors, Idaho population data on estimated prevalence or proportion were unavailable (Appendix Table 2). For most factors, only minor changes over time were observed, and we did not identify any changes considered potentially responsible for the increase in iGAS incidence. Another limitation to the risk factor analysis was the small sample size during the baseline period—only 89 cases, some missing data. A third key limitation to our study was the lack of emm typing data from the 2008–2013 baseline period, because only 2% of cases had emm typing conducted, compared with 49% during 2014–2019. Therefore, we could not assess potential shifts in emm types, which might have contributed to increasing rates of iGAS. In Ireland, an increase in iGAS during 2012–2015 coincided with an upsurge in emm3[34]. In the United States, expansion over time of select emm types, including 11, 77, and 92, was linked to increasing prevalence of antimicrobial drug–resistant iGAS infections[35]. Factors that contribute to the emergence of emm types are not well understood but might include genetic changes in bacteria and acquisition of new virulence factors, as well as variations in population immunity[30]. emm59, which emerged initially in Canada and more recently has been found in the southwestern United States, was the most common emm type in Idaho in 2014; all 5 cases were associated with outbreaks, but emm59 declined during subsequent years[19,36].

In conclusion, in Idaho, iGAS is an urgent and consequential clinical and public health concern because of its severity, high case-fatality rate, and statewide increases. The absence of an identified risk factor contributing to increasing iGAS incidence in the general population suggests a potential role for vaccination as a preventive measure. Ongoing surveillance of state-level iGAS cases would help identify outbreaks, track regional trends in incidence, and monitor circulating emm types.