Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points
Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)
Pharmacists - 0.25 Knowledge-based ACPE (0.025 CEUs)
Physician Assistant - 0.25 AAPA hour(s) of Category I credit
IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit
This activity is intended for physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, physician assistants and other frontline healthcare providers.
The goal of this activity is learners will be better able to evaluate the effect of resilience training among healthcare workers.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will:
Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.
All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated according to Medscape policies. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.
This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.
Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.
Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of nursing continuing professional development for RNs and APNs; 0.00 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.
Medscape designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number: JA0007105-0000-22-266-H01-P).
Medscape, LLC has been authorized by the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for 0.25 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until 8/5/2023. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of
continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the
time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the
valid credit period that
is noted on the title page. To receive
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 75% on the post-test.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in
your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as
the certificates from the
CME/CE Tracker.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 8/5/2022
Valid for credit through: 8/5/2023
processing....
Note: The information on the coronavirus outbreak is continually evolving. The content within this activity serves as a historical reference to the information that was available at the time of this publication. We continue to add to the collection of activities on this subject as new information becomes available. It is the policy of Medscape Education to avoid the mention of brand names or specific manufacturers in accredited educational activities. However, manufacturer names related to the approved COVID-19 vaccines are provided in this activity in an effort to promote clarity. The use of manufacturer names should not be viewed as an endorsement by Medscape of any specific product or manufacturer.
There is no doubt that the COVID-19 pandemic has placed a high burden of stress on the healthcare system and the workers in that system. A study by Gilleen and colleagues quantified that level of stress and mental trauma as well as risk factors for stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Their results were published in the April 29, 2021 issue of BJPsych Open.[1]
A total of 2773 healthcare employees took a survey in mid-2020. Nearly one-third of healthcare workers reported moderate to severe levels of anxiety and depression, and the rate of severe mood symptoms had increased more than 4-fold since the time before the pandemic.
Risk factors for mood symptoms included being a frontline health worker; being female; and a prior history of a mood disorder. Age was not as significant a risk factor, and the rate of anxiety/depression was higher among managers compared with that of physicians. Being in a relationship was protective against mood symptoms compared with being single.
Could resilience training help healthcare workers to reduce stress and mood symptoms? The current study by Yi-Frazier and colleagues addresses this issue.
Hospital workers, both persons who work directly with patients and persons behind the scenes, have faced enormous challenges during the pandemic, leading to significant mental health burdens, including increased stress, anxiety, and burnout. Although these problems have been well-documented, there has been little research on the efficacy of methods to address them, but a recent study published in JAMA Network Open looked at a program that shows promise for struggling healthcare workers.[2]
The study looked at the feasibility of Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM), a skills-based training program designed to mitigate stress and build resilience in situations of elevated stress. This study used a program called PRISM at Work,[3] a version of PRISM adapted for healthcare workers. Participants completed a baseline survey, attended classes, then completed a follow-up survey.
SatisfactionOf 153 participants, 140 were female, 12 were male, and 1 was nonbinary. The mean age was 40.6 ± 10.1 years, and 84% of participants were white. A little more than half (53%) were in patient-facing roles (nurses, doctors, and allied health professionals) whereas 46% were in non--patient-facing roles (such as managers, research staff, and business office workers). The baseline scores found low levels of perceived resilience, moderate levels of stress and anxiety, and high levels of burnout/exhaustion.[2]
Study investigators divided participants into 15 classes, with 8 to 12 people in each. They defined feasibility as 70% completion among the enrolled participants. Of the 153 who completed the baseline survey, 145 (95%) attended the first session. Of those participants, 78% completed 5 or 6 of the 6 total sessions. A large majority (91%) completed follow-up surveys, and 64% answered open-ended questions. None of the participants expressed concerns that prompted support greater than the program's coaches could offer.
A total of 88% of the participants who filled out follow-up surveys said they were satisfied overall with the program. Attendees were also largely satisfied or very satisfied with the frequency of the sessions (91%) and the length of the sessions (83%).
OpportunitiesOf the participants who answered the open-ended questions, 99% said they could nominate someone at their workplace who would benefit from the program; 48% said they thought everyone at work would benefit. Individuals who responded to the open-ended questions most often mentioned community, connection, and support as the things they liked best about the program. Suggestions for improvement included extending the program by making the sessions longer or by having more sessions. These results suggest that the PRISM at Work program is both feasible and acceptable to participants.
Baseline scores of resilience increased by a mean of 1.74 points, stress decreased by a mean of 2.4 points, anxiety was down by 2.04, and burnout/exhaustion dropped by 0.37, a slight improvement post-PRISM.
The authors pointed out that it is unclear if the baseline low-resilience scores were due to the COVID-19 pandemic or whether they were common before the pandemic.
"Regardless," they wrote, "opportunities to learn, reflect on, and develop one's resilience resources are necessary."
This study showed that programs such as PRISM at Work are feasible, acceptable, and could potentially be effective in addressing such issues; however, the authors also warned that efforts must come from both healthcare workers themselves and the healthcare organizations for which they are a part.
Abby Rosenberg, MD, associate professor of pediatrics, division of hematology/oncology, at the University of Washington School of Medicine in Seattle, Washington, and lead author of the study, noted that people seem to be hungry for a means of coping with the stress and burnout that has plagued health care in recent years, but she added that programs like this, although well-received and helpful, are "not a panacea, not a singular fix."
We need to fix the system that has created the problem in the first place.
This study was funded by an internal grant sponsored by the Seattle Children's Research Institute COVID funds. Rosenberg disclosed grants for unrelated work from the National Institutes of Health, the American Cancer Society, Arthur Vining Davis Foundations, Cambia Health Solutions, Conquer Cancer Foundation of ASCO®, CureSearch for Children's Cancer, the National Palliative Care Research Center, and the Seattle Children's Research Institute.