You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Is Cognitive Decline Linked to Retinal Layer Thinning?

  • Authors: News Author: Batya Swift Yasgur, MA, LSW; CME Author: Charles P. Vega, MD
  • CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 7/22/2022
  • Valid for credit through: 7/22/2023
Start Activity

  • Credits Available

    Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

    ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points

    Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)

    Physician Assistant - 0.25 AAPA hour(s) of Category I credit

    IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit

    You Are Eligible For

    • Letter of Completion
    • ABIM MOC points

Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for primary care physicians, ophthalmologists, neurologists, nurses, physician assistants, and other members of the health care team who treat and manage older adults at risk for cognitive decline.

The goal of this activity is for learners to be better able to analyze how the retinal nerve fiber layer might predict cognitive outcomes among older adults.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  • Distinguish retinal findings associated with an increased risk for cognitive decline
  • Analyze retinal thickness as a risk variable for cognitive decline
  • Outline implications for the healthcare team


Disclosures

Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated according to Medscape policies. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.


News Author

  • Batya Swift Yasgur, MA, LSW

    Freelance writer, Medscape

    Disclosures

    Batya Swift Yasgur, MA, LSW, has no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Charles P. Vega, MD

    Health Sciences Clinical Professor of Family Medicine
    University of California, Irvine School of Medicine

    Disclosures

    Charles P. Vega, MD, has the following relevant financial relationships:
    Consultant or advisor for: GlaxoSmithKline; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

Editor/Compliance Reviewer

  • Yaisanet Oyola, MD

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Yaisanet Oyola, MD, has no relevant financial relationships.

Compliance Reviewer

  • Amanda Jett, PharmD, BCACP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Amanda Jett, PharmD, BCACP, has no relevant financial relationships.

Peer Reviewer

This activity has been peer reviewed and the reviewer has no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements



In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of continuing nursing education for RNs and APNs; none of these credits is in the area of pharmacology.

    Contact This Provider

  • For Physician Assistants

    Medscape, LLC has been authorized by the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for 0.25 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until 7/22/2023. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 75% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Is Cognitive Decline Linked to Retinal Layer Thinning?

Authors: News Author: Batya Swift Yasgur, MA, LSW; CME Author: Charles P. Vega, MDFaculty and Disclosures

CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 7/22/2022

Valid for credit through: 7/22/2023

processing....

Clinical Context

Findings in the eye may portend serious illness in other organs, and there has been interest in the relationship between retinal findings and cognitive decline. The authors of the current study provide a brief review of previous research in this topic area.

Thinning of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) has been widely reported among patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In addition, AD has been associated with reduced macular vessel and perfusion density in the superficial capillary plexus. Even persons with normal cognition but positive biomarkers for AD were found to have enlargement of the foveal avascular zone.

The current study uses a longitudinal design to evaluate which retinal layers might be most predictive of cognitive decline.

Study Synopsis and Perspective

Thinning of the eye's macular RNFL is linked to cognitive decline in older adults, new research suggests.

Results from a study of more than 400 adults showed an association between baseline macular RNFL thickness and scores on 2 cognitive tests, with thinner baseline macular RNFL associated with greater cognitive decline.

A steeper decline in cognitive scores and a higher prevalence of cognitive impairment and AD were also shown in participants with baseline total macular RNFL thickness below the lowest quartile cutoff value vs participants with RNFL thickness above that threshold.

"In this study, macular RNFL thickness could be used as a prognostic biomarker of long-term cognitive decline in adults 60 years or older," the investigators, led by Hyeong Min Kim, MD, from Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea, write.

The findings were published online May 26 in JAMA Ophthalmology.[1]

Early Diagnosis

Subjective cognitive decline, or preclinical AD, precedes MCI and AD. Because of this, clinicians and researchers "have investigated several biomarkers of AD to diagnose the disease as early as possible," the investigators note.

These include the discovery of noninvasive ophthalmic biomarkers that might identify patients with cognitive impairment and AD. Since publication of a 2001 study[2] reporting peripapillary RNFL thinning in patients with AD, other studies have reported similar findings and advances in visualization.

In addition, segmentation of retinal layer structures by optical coherence tomography (OCT) has "provided better opportunities to analyze retinal layer morphology in vivo," the researchers write.

In the current study, they looked both cross-sectionally and longitudinally at retinal layer thickness parameters and their potential association with future cognitive decline and AD.

The investigators assessed 430 randomly selected community-dwelling adults (mean age, 76.3 years; 48.6% women) from 2 population-based longitudinal cohort studies: the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging and the Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging and Dementia. Of these participants, 215 completed a mean of 5.4 years of follow-up.

Spectral-domain OCT was used to assess the thickness of 6 retinal layers of the macular region, RNFLs, and subfoveal choroid. In addition, participants completed 2 neuropsychological assessments at baseline and at follow-up: the Korean version of the Consortium to establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-K) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Covariates included age, sex, level of education, presence of the APOE e4 allele, diabetes, and hypertension.

Ocular Biomarker

Baseline total macular RNFL thickness was associated with scores on both cognitive assessments at baseline.

Assessment Tool

Coefficient [β] (95% CI)

Value

CERAD-K

.077 (.054-.100)

.04

MMSE

.082 (.063-.101)

.03

CI = confidence interval

The same baseline associations between RNFL thickness and both assessment tools held true for outer as well as inner macular RNFL thickness.

However, in the longitudinal study, macular RNFL thickness was not associated with decreases in CERAD or MMSE scores during the follow-up period.

Nevertheless, when the researchers set the cutoff value as the lowest quartile (less than 231 mm total RNFL thickness), they found that participants with the thinnest baseline total macular RNFL thickness had the largest decline in CERAD and MMSE scores during the follow-up period (P=.003 and P=.01, respectively) compared with those above that threshold. The same finding held true with outer as well as inner macular RNFL thickness.

Changes in the prevalence of MCI and AD from baseline to follow-up in the below-lowest and above-lowest quartile groups (n=55 and n=160, respectively) are shown in the table below.

Quartile

MCI Prevalence

AD Prevalence

Below-lowest

baseline: 27.2%

follow-up: 41.8%

baseline: 7.2%

follow-up: 10.9%

Above-lowest

baseline: 6.3%

follow-up: 9.4%

baseline: 1.3%

follow-up: 1.9%

No differences were found in the association of cognitive score and RNFL thickness according to APOE e4 status.

The investigators note several study limitations. For example, only half of the baseline participants continued to the follow-up phase, which might have affected the findings of the longitudinal analysis. Also, the follow-up period lasted for only about 5 years, "which is a considerably small period of time in the development of neurodegenerative diseases," they write.

Nevertheless, the study did reveal that "OCT-measured baseline macular RNFL thickness was associated with future cognitive decline," they add.

The researchers propose that "a thinner macular RNFL may predict a decline in cognitive performance" and "macular RNFL thickness may be considered a noninvasive ocular biomarker for assessing changes in cognitive function in patients."

However, further population-based investigations with long-term follow-up are necessary, they write.

Inexpensive, Noninvasive

Howard Fillit, MD, cofounder and chief science officer at the Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation and clinical professor of geriatric medicine and palliative care, medicine, and neuroscience at The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City, said that there is "a lot of interest now in retinal imaging as a technology for detecting early-stage AD."

The current researchers assessed the retinal layer of the eye, which is particularly populated by neurons and by peripapillary nerve fibers, which come from the brain, he noted.

"So, it's logical, plausible, and reasonable that what's happening in the retinal layer of the eye is reflective of neurodegeneration in the brain," and this was demonstrated in the study, said Dr Fillit, who was not involved with the research.

OCT technology is commonly used in ophthalmological practice, but not for the purpose described in this study.

There are other, more advanced technologies under investigation that may be able to detect amyloid and be used as add-ons to OCT devices, such as hyperspectral camera imaging, that might "find its place in the algorithm" for AD diagnoses, Dr Fillit said.

"Imagine a world where older people going for their annual eye checkup could have a 5- to 10-minute examination to screen for AD. Or, if they already have memory problems, a diagnosis of AD could be confirmed based on the presence of amyloid plaques at the back of the eye," Dr Fillit added. Although the technology is not currently available in mainstream clinical practice, when it is, it will be "relatively inexpensive and noninvasive," he added.

In an accompanying editorial, Rajendra Apte, MD, PhD, professor of ophthalmology and visual sciences and vice chair for innovation and translation, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, writes that the study "contributes to our evolving knowledge of the ability of retinal imaging to identify biomarkers that predict development of cognitive impairment and dementia."[3]

This research was supported by a research grant from Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, a National Research Foundation grant funded by the Korean government, and a grant from the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea. The investigators and Dr Fillit have reported no relevant financial relationships. The Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation is invested in retinal programs but was not involved with this study. Dr Apte reported having received research funding and Department of Ophthalmology funding from the Jeffrey Fort Innovation Fund, the Starr Foundation, and an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness.

Study Highlights

  • Participants were enrolled in 1 of 2 longitudinal studies in South Korea. All participants were at least 60 years of age and were free of high myopia, glaucoma, or other ocular pathologies that might affect retinal thickness.
  • Baseline retinal measurements and cognitive studies were conducted in 2010 to 2011 and repeated in 2015 to 2016. Spectral domain OCT was completed to measure 6 retinal layers. Neuropsychological assessments were conducted using the Korean version of the CERAD-K and the MMSE.
  • Cognitive impairment was defined by a result worse than −1.5 standard deviation on the cognitive tests above.
  • 430 participants entered the study. The mean age of participants was 76.3 years, and 51.4% of participants were men. The prevalence of the APOE ɛ4 allele was 16.2%, 20% of the cohort had diabetes, and nearly 30% had hypertension.
  • 215 adults completed a follow-up assessment at a mean of 5.4 years.
  • Baseline outer layer, inner layer, and total RNFL scores at baseline were significantly associated with changes in cognitive scores. The lowest quartile of baseline RNFL had a baseline prevalence of MCI of 27.2%, which increased to 41.8% at follow-up. The respective rates of AD in this quartile were 7.2% and 10.9%.
  • In comparison, the second-lowest quartile of baseline RNFL had a baseline prevalence of MCI of 6.3%, which increased to 9.4% at follow up. The respective rates of AD in this quartile were 1.3% and 1.9%.

Clinical Implications

  • In this study, macular RNFL thickness could be used as a prognostic biomarker of long-term cognitive decline in adults 60 years or older.
  • In the current study, lower RNFL thickness, regardless of outer layer, inner layer, or total thickness, was associated with lower cognitive test scores at baseline. Lower RNFL thickness also predicted higher rates of MCI or AD over the course of 5 years of follow-up.
  • Implications for the healthcare team: RNFL may emerge as a means to predict patients' risk for cognitive dysfunction. Health care team members are now aware of how retinal imaging contributes to our evolving knowledge of the ability to identify biomarkers that predict development of cognitive impairment and dementia.

 

Earn Credit

  • Print