Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points
Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)
Physician Assistant - 0.25 AAPA hour(s) of Category I credit
IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit
This activity is intended for primary care physicians, ophthalmologists, neurologists, nurses, physician assistants, and other members of the health care team who treat and manage older adults at risk for cognitive decline.
The goal of this activity is for learners to be better able to analyze how the retinal nerve fiber layer might predict cognitive outcomes among older adults.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will:
Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.
All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated according to Medscape policies. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.
This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.
Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.
Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of continuing nursing education for RNs and APNs; none of these credits is in the area of pharmacology.
Medscape, LLC has been authorized by the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for 0.25 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until 7/22/2023. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 75% on the post-test.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 7/22/2022
Valid for credit through: 7/22/2023
processing....
Findings in the eye may portend serious illness in other organs, and there has been interest in the relationship between retinal findings and cognitive decline. The authors of the current study provide a brief review of previous research in this topic area.
Thinning of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) has been widely reported among patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In addition, AD has been associated with reduced macular vessel and perfusion density in the superficial capillary plexus. Even persons with normal cognition but positive biomarkers for AD were found to have enlargement of the foveal avascular zone.
The current study uses a longitudinal design to evaluate which retinal layers might be most predictive of cognitive decline.
Thinning of the eye's macular RNFL is linked to cognitive decline in older adults, new research suggests.
Results from a study of more than 400 adults showed an association between baseline macular RNFL thickness and scores on 2 cognitive tests, with thinner baseline macular RNFL associated with greater cognitive decline.
A steeper decline in cognitive scores and a higher prevalence of cognitive impairment and AD were also shown in participants with baseline total macular RNFL thickness below the lowest quartile cutoff value vs participants with RNFL thickness above that threshold.
"In this study, macular RNFL thickness could be used as a prognostic biomarker of long-term cognitive decline in adults 60 years or older," the investigators, led by Hyeong Min Kim, MD, from Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea, write.
The findings were published online May 26 in JAMA Ophthalmology.[1]
Early Diagnosis
Subjective cognitive decline, or preclinical AD, precedes MCI and AD. Because of this, clinicians and researchers "have investigated several biomarkers of AD to diagnose the disease as early as possible," the investigators note.
These include the discovery of noninvasive ophthalmic biomarkers that might identify patients with cognitive impairment and AD. Since publication of a 2001 study[2] reporting peripapillary RNFL thinning in patients with AD, other studies have reported similar findings and advances in visualization.
In addition, segmentation of retinal layer structures by optical coherence tomography (OCT) has "provided better opportunities to analyze retinal layer morphology in vivo," the researchers write.
In the current study, they looked both cross-sectionally and longitudinally at retinal layer thickness parameters and their potential association with future cognitive decline and AD.
The investigators assessed 430 randomly selected community-dwelling adults (mean age, 76.3 years; 48.6% women) from 2 population-based longitudinal cohort studies: the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging and the Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging and Dementia. Of these participants, 215 completed a mean of 5.4 years of follow-up.
Spectral-domain OCT was used to assess the thickness of 6 retinal layers of the macular region, RNFLs, and subfoveal choroid. In addition, participants completed 2 neuropsychological assessments at baseline and at follow-up: the Korean version of the Consortium to establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-K) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).
Covariates included age, sex, level of education, presence of the APOE e4 allele, diabetes, and hypertension.
Ocular Biomarker
Baseline total macular RNFL thickness was associated with scores on both cognitive assessments at baseline.
Assessment Tool |
Coefficient [β] (95% CI) |
P Value |
---|---|---|
CERAD-K |
.077 (.054-.100) |
.04 |
MMSE |
.082 (.063-.101) |
.03 |
CI = confidence interval |
The same baseline associations between RNFL thickness and both assessment tools held true for outer as well as inner macular RNFL thickness.
However, in the longitudinal study, macular RNFL thickness was not associated with decreases in CERAD or MMSE scores during the follow-up period.
Nevertheless, when the researchers set the cutoff value as the lowest quartile (less than 231 mm total RNFL thickness), they found that participants with the thinnest baseline total macular RNFL thickness had the largest decline in CERAD and MMSE scores during the follow-up period (P=.003 and P=.01, respectively) compared with those above that threshold. The same finding held true with outer as well as inner macular RNFL thickness.
Changes in the prevalence of MCI and AD from baseline to follow-up in the below-lowest and above-lowest quartile groups (n=55 and n=160, respectively) are shown in the table below.
Quartile |
MCI Prevalence |
AD Prevalence |
---|---|---|
Below-lowest |
baseline: 27.2% follow-up: 41.8% |
baseline: 7.2% follow-up: 10.9% |
Above-lowest |
baseline: 6.3% follow-up: 9.4% |
baseline: 1.3% follow-up: 1.9% |
No differences were found in the association of cognitive score and RNFL thickness according to APOE e4 status.
The investigators note several study limitations. For example, only half of the baseline participants continued to the follow-up phase, which might have affected the findings of the longitudinal analysis. Also, the follow-up period lasted for only about 5 years, "which is a considerably small period of time in the development of neurodegenerative diseases," they write.
Nevertheless, the study did reveal that "OCT-measured baseline macular RNFL thickness was associated with future cognitive decline," they add.
The researchers propose that "a thinner macular RNFL may predict a decline in cognitive performance" and "macular RNFL thickness may be considered a noninvasive ocular biomarker for assessing changes in cognitive function in patients."
However, further population-based investigations with long-term follow-up are necessary, they write.
Inexpensive, Noninvasive
Howard Fillit, MD, cofounder and chief science officer at the Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation and clinical professor of geriatric medicine and palliative care, medicine, and neuroscience at The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City, said that there is "a lot of interest now in retinal imaging as a technology for detecting early-stage AD."
The current researchers assessed the retinal layer of the eye, which is particularly populated by neurons and by peripapillary nerve fibers, which come from the brain, he noted.
"So, it's logical, plausible, and reasonable that what's happening in the retinal layer of the eye is reflective of neurodegeneration in the brain," and this was demonstrated in the study, said Dr Fillit, who was not involved with the research.
OCT technology is commonly used in ophthalmological practice, but not for the purpose described in this study.
There are other, more advanced technologies under investigation that may be able to detect amyloid and be used as add-ons to OCT devices, such as hyperspectral camera imaging, that might "find its place in the algorithm" for AD diagnoses, Dr Fillit said.
"Imagine a world where older people going for their annual eye checkup could have a 5- to 10-minute examination to screen for AD. Or, if they already have memory problems, a diagnosis of AD could be confirmed based on the presence of amyloid plaques at the back of the eye," Dr Fillit added. Although the technology is not currently available in mainstream clinical practice, when it is, it will be "relatively inexpensive and noninvasive," he added.
In an accompanying editorial, Rajendra Apte, MD, PhD, professor of ophthalmology and visual sciences and vice chair for innovation and translation, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, writes that the study "contributes to our evolving knowledge of the ability of retinal imaging to identify biomarkers that predict development of cognitive impairment and dementia."[3]
This research was supported by a research grant from Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, a National Research Foundation grant funded by the Korean government, and a grant from the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea. The investigators and Dr Fillit have reported no relevant financial relationships. The Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation is invested in retinal programs but was not involved with this study. Dr Apte reported having received research funding and Department of Ophthalmology funding from the Jeffrey Fort Innovation Fund, the Starr Foundation, and an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness.