Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points
Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0.25 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)
Pharmacists - 0.25 Knowledge-based ACPE (0.025 CEUs)
Physician Assistant - 0.25 AAPA hour(s) of Category I credit
IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit
This activity is intended for hematologists/oncologists, pediatricians, family medicine and primary care practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, internists, physician assistants, and other members of the healthcare team for adolescents and young adults treated for sarcoma.
The goal of this activity is for learners to be better able to describe patterns of new persistent opioid use among adolescents and young adults in the year after treatment for sarcoma.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will:
Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.
All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated according to Medscape policies. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.
This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.
Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.
Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of nursing continuing professional development for RNs and APNs; 0.25 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.
Medscape designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number: JA0007105-0000-22-225-H01-P).
Medscape, LLC has been authorized by the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for 0.25 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until 7/15/2023. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of
continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the
time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the
valid credit period that
is noted on the title page. To receive
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 75% on the post-test.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in
your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as
the certificates from the
CME/CE Tracker.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 7/15/2022
Valid for credit through: 7/15/2023
processing....
Nearly 80% of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are expected to become long-term survivors. Minimizing their long-term treatment-related sequelae is essential to lower morbidity, optimize health-related quality of life (QoL), and improve long-term survival.
Potential for long-term opioid use among previously opioid-naive AYAs is of increasing concern. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states that AYAs are more likely than other age groups to misuse and overdose on opioids. Acute or chronic pain is an identified risk factor for opioid misuse in the general AYA population.
Young people with sarcoma may be at heightened risk for long-term opioid use after their cancer treatment.
In a nationally representative cohort of adolescents and young adults with sarcoma, nearly two-thirds took opioids during treatment, and almost one-quarter of those patients continued to use opioids after treatment ended.
"As a healthcare member, the finding that most adolescents and young adults treated for sarcoma receive opioid prescriptions is not surprising," lead author Melissa Beauchemin, PhD, RN, with Columbia University School of Nursing in New York, New York. "We use intense treatments to achieve the highest chance of a cure, and these treatments come with side effects. Opioids are very effective at preventing and treating pain, and they are often a key component of high-quality cancer care."
Still, "we were surprised" that nearly a quarter of patients who were prescribed opioids during treatment continued to use the painkillers after treatment, she said. "That to me is the important finding of this study."
Intense Treatment, Lingering Pain?
Adolescents and young adults with sarcoma experience disease- and treatment-related pain. Research shows that older patients are at high risk for persistent opioid use after therapy, but few studies have examined opioid use among younger patients.
Using the IBM MarketScan Research Database, Beauchemin and colleagues identified 938 patients with opioid-naive sarcoma aged 10 to 26 years. More than half (56%) were male, and 62% were aged younger than 18 years.
A total of 599 patients (64%) filled an opioid prescription during their cancer treatment. Of these patients, the number of opioid prescriptions ranged from 1 to 97; 44% received 1 prescription, 31% received 2 to 4 prescriptions, and 24% received 5 or more.
Overall, 77% (n = 464) of these patients discontinued opioid use after completing treatment. The other 23%, however, met criteria for new persistent opioid use: defined as filling at least 2 opioid prescriptions in the 12 months after the end of treatment.
In multivariable analysis that adjusted for age, pretreatment mental health (MH), and substance use (SU) disorders, having Medicaid insurance was associated with higher likelihood of new persistent opioid use compared with having commercial insurance (odds ratio [OR] 1.74).
Compared with patients with soft tissue sarcoma, patients with bone tumors -- specifically, Ewing sarcoma (OR 3.23) and osteosarcoma (OR 2.05) -- had significantly higher odds for new persistent opioid use after completing treatment.
"Our study provides new knowledge about the prevalence of opioid prescriptions and clinical factors, and future research should focus on optimizing pain management through safe and sustainable interventions and developing guidelines for safe opioid prescribing and monitoring," the authors wrote.
And, Beauchemin noted, "new persistent use may signal an inflection point at which clinicians can intervene, discuss with patients what the source of the pain might be, strategize how to reduce opioid exposure, and utilize other strategies to improve quality of life."
William Dahut, MD, chief scientific officer for the American Cancer Society, saidthat the study involved patients who would experience "significant pain" during their cancer treatment, particularly those who had bone sarcomas.
"It's a dilemma," said Dahut, who was not involved in the study, "because there's definitely a significant risk for opioid addiction. I think it just shows that we need to find newer and better ways to treat pain beyond opioids."
The study was partially funded by the National Cancer Institute, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, the American Cancer Society, and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center. Beauchemin and Dahut have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.