You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.


Does Race Affect Care in Pediatric Emergency Department Visits?

  • Authors: News Author: Marcia Frellick; CME Author: Charles P. Vega, MD
  • CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 7/8/2022
  • Valid for credit through: 7/8/2023
Start Activity

  • Credits Available

    Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

    ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points

    Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)

    Physician Assistant - 0.25 AAPA hour(s) of Category I credit

    IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit

    You Are Eligible For

    • Letter of Completion
    • ABIM MOC points

Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for primary care physicians, emergency medicine physicians, pediatricians, nurses, physician assistants, and other members of the health care team who treat and manage children during emergency department visits.

The goal of this activity is for learners be better able to evaluate whether bias exists in orders for diagnostic imaging in pediatric emergency departments.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  • Assess potential bias in emergency medical services transfer to emergency departments
  • Evaluate whether bias exists in orders for diagnostic imaging in pediatric emergency departments
  • Outline implications for the healthcare team


Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated according to Medscape policies. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.

News Author

  • Marcia Frellick

    Freelance writer, Medscape


    Marcia Frellick has no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Charles P. Vega, MD

    Health Sciences Clinical Professor of Family Medicine
    University of California, Irvine School of Medicine


    Charles P. Vega, MD, has the following relevant financial relationships:
    Consultant or advisor for: GlaxoSmithKline; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

Editor/Compliance Reviewer

  • Yaisanet Oyola, MD

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC


    Yaisanet Oyola, MD, has no relevant financial relationships.

Nurse Planner

  • Leigh Schmidt, MSN, RN, CMSRN, CNE, CHCP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC


    Leigh Schmidt, MSN, RN, CMSRN, CNE, CHCP, has no relevant financial relationships.

Accreditation Statements

In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of continuing nursing education for RNs and APNs; none of these credits is in the area of pharmacology.

    Contact This Provider

  • For Physician Assistants

    Medscape, LLC has been authorized by the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for 0.25 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until 7/8/2023. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]

Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 75% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.


Does Race Affect Care in Pediatric Emergency Department Visits?

Authors: News Author: Marcia Frellick; CME Author: Charles P. Vega, MDFaculty and Disclosures

CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 7/8/2022

Valid for credit through: 7/8/2023


Clinical Context

There is evidence of racial and ethnic bias across the US healthcare system, including the emergency department (ED). But does the emergency medical services transport system contribute to health disparities based on race? A previous study by Hanchate and colleagues, which appeared in the September 4, 2019, issue of JAMA Network Open, explored this issue.[1]

The study cohort comprised more than 860,000 Medicare enrollees, all older than 66 years, and there were 4,175 ZIP codes represented. The ED most frequently used by White patients in a particular ZIP code was used as the reference ED. White patients were transferred via emergency medical services to the reference ED 61.3% of the time. However, the respective rates of 56.0% and 58.8% among Black and Hispanic patients were significantly lower for transfer to the reference ED. The difference in transfer rates was similar regardless of the acuity of patients' conditions, and Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to be transferred to safety-net hospitals.

On arrival to the ED, people of color still can face differences in care. The current study builds on previous limited evidence that children from racial and ethnic minorities are less likely to receive diagnostic imaging in the ED.

Study Synopsis and Perspective

Non-Hispanic White children were more likely to receive diagnostic imaging at children's hospitals' EDs across the United States than were Hispanic children and non-Hispanic Black children, according to a large study published in JAMA Network Open.[2]

Researchers found that the more the percentage of children from minority groups cared for by a hospital increased, the wider the imaging gap between those children and non-Hispanic White children.

In the cross-sectional study, led by Margaret E. Samuels-Kalow, MD, MPhil, MSHP, from the Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston, included 38 children's hospitals and more than 12 million ED visits.

"These findings emphasize the urgent need for interventions at the hospital level to improve equity in imaging in pediatric emergency medicine," the authors write.

Patients included in the study were younger than 18 years and visited an ED from January 2016 through December 2019. Data were pulled from the Pediatric Health Information System.

Of the more than 12 million visits in this study, 3.5 million (28.7%) involved at least 1 diagnostic imaging test.

Diagnostic imaging was performed in 1.5 million visits (34.2%) for non-Hispanic White children, 790,961 (24.6%) for non-Hispanic Black children, and 907,222 (26.1%) for Hispanic children (P<.001).

Non-Hispanic Black children were consistently less likely to get diagnostic imaging than their non-Hispanic White counterparts at every hospital in the study, no matter the imaging modality: radiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Hispanic patients were generally less likely to receive imaging than non-Hispanic White patients, although results were less consistent for ultrasound and MRI.

In a sensitivity analysis, when looking at imaging from patients' first visit across the study cohort, non-Hispanic Black children were significantly less likely to get imaging than non-Hispanic White children (adjusted odds ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.79).

"This remained significant even after adjustment for a priori specified confounders including hospital propensity to image," the authors write.

The authors acknowledge that it is possible that some of the differences may be attributable to the patient mix regarding severity of cases or indications for imaging by hospital, but they note that all models were adjusted for diagnosis-related group and other potential confounders.

This study did not assess whether 1 group is being overtested. Researchers also note that higher rates of imaging do not necessarily indicate higher quality of care.

However, the authors note, previous research has suggested overtesting of non-Hispanic White patients for head computed tomography and chest pain, as well as patterns of overtreatment of non-Hispanic White patients who have bronchiolitis or viral upper respiratory tract infections.

Medell Briggs-Malonson, MD, MPH, chief of health equity, diversity and inclusion for the University of California, Los Angeles, Hospital and Clinic System, who was not part of the study, said in an interview, "this all rings true."

"This is not the first study we have had in either the pediatric or adult populations that shows disparate levels of care, as well as health outcomes. Now we are starting to be able to measure it," she said.

This study is further evidence of medical racism, she says, and highlights that it's not the hospital choice or the insurance type affecting the numbers, she said.

"When you control for those factors, it looks to be it's only due to race, and that's because of the very deep levels of implicit bias as well as explicit bias that we still have in our health systems, and even in our providers," said Dr Briggs-Malonson, who is also an associate professor of emergency medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles. "It's incredibly important to identify and immediately address."

Study Highlights

  • Study data were drawn from the Pediatric Health Information System, which contains data on children receiving care in 49 children's hospitals in the US. Data from 38 pediatric EDs from 2016 to 2019 were included in the current study.
  • The primary study outcome was the completion of any diagnostic imaging in the ED, as determined by billing data. The primary study variable was race/ethnicity. The patient cohort was large enough to divide the group into White, Black, Hispanic, and other races.
  • The main study outcome was adjusted to account for the percentage of White patients seen in the ED, annual ED volume, percentage of population receiving Medicaid, access to MRI, and total number of imaging studies ordered annually.
  • There were 12,310,344 ED visits by 5,883,664 patients during the study period: 35.9% were by non-Hispanic White patients, 26.1% were by Black patients, and 28.3% of visits were by Hispanic patients.
  • The mean age of patients was 5.84 years and 52.7% were male. A total of 65.1% of patients had public insurance.
  • 28.7% of visits involved at least 1 diagnostic imaging test, with plain radiographs being by far the most common imaging performed (22.9% of all patients).
  • Rates of diagnostic imaging were 34.2% for White children, 24.6% for Black children, and 26.1% for Hispanic children. The adjusted analysis demonstrated a significantly lower rate of diagnostic imaging among Black and Hispanic children compared with White children.
  • Hospitals with a higher percentage of non-White patients had larger disparities in diagnostic imaging among White vs Black patients. The same was not true for comparisons between White and Hispanic patients.
  • The disparity for MRI studies was particularly more severe among Black and Hispanic patients at hospitals which served larger minority populations.
  • Other variables associated with a higher rate of imaging disparity between White and Black patients were a higher overall volume of imaging studies ordered and a higher percentage of Medicaid patients served.

Clinical Implications

  • A previous study found that EMS was less likely to transfer Medicare patients who were Black or Hispanic to a hospital where the highest number of White patients were seen. Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to be transferred to safety-net hospitals. These differences persisted regardless of acuity of illness.
  • The current study demonstrates a lower rate of diagnostic imaging applied to Black and Hispanic patients vs White patients in pediatric EDs. Hospital variables associated with a higher rate of this disparity included a higher proportion of patients from minority backgrounds, a higher proportion of patients with Medicaid, and a higher volume of radiographic studies overall.
  • Implications for the healthcare team: The healthcare team should understand its biases in caring for patients. Adherence to evidence-based guidelines for the application of diagnostic imaging can reduce the effect of bias. Healthcare team members must be aware of the urgent need for interventions at the hospital level to improve equity in imaging in pediatric emergency medicine.


Earn Credit

  • Print