Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points
Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)
Pharmacists - 0.25 Knowledge-based ACPE (0.025 CEUs)
Physician Assistant - 0.25 AAPA hour(s) of Category I credit
IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit
This activity is intended for primary care physicians, infectious disease specialists, endocrinologists, nurses, pharmacists, physician assistants, and other members of the healthcare team who care for patients with diabetes.
The goal of this activity is that learners will be able to assess the risks for severe illness and mortality associated with COVID-19 in patients with diabetes.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will:
Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.
All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated according to Medscape policies. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.
This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.
Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.
Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of nursing continuing professional development for RNs and APNs; 0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.
Medscape designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number: JA0007105-0000-22-183-H01-P).
Medscape, LLC has been authorized by the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for 0.25 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until 7/1/2023. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of
continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the
time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the
valid credit period that
is noted on the title page. To receive
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 75% on the post-test.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in
your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as
the certificates from the
CME/CE Tracker.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 7/1/2022
Valid for credit through: 7/1/2023
processing....
Note: The information on the coronavirus outbreak is continually evolving. The content within this activity serves as a historical reference to the information that was available at the time of this publication. We continue to add to the collection of activities on this subject as new information becomes available. It is the policy of Medscape Education to avoid the mention of brand names or specific manufacturers in accredited educational activities. However, manufacturer names related to COVID-19 vaccines may be provided in this activity to promote clarity. The use of manufacturer names should not be viewed as an endorsement by Medscape of any specific product or manufacturer.
Major clinical decisions regarding preventive strategies, including vaccination, and treatment for COVID-19 hinge on the patient’s baseline risk for severe illness. Multiple comorbid health conditions have been cited as major risk factors for complicated COVID-19, and this list has changed frequently, as data has emerged during the pandemic. Interesting highlights from the current list of conditions considered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to be most likely to promote a higher risk for COVID-19 include, but are not limited to, chronic kidney disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and physical inactivity.[1]
There is only mixed evidence that asthma, hypertension, and chronic hepatitis infection increase the risk for severe COVID-19. Diabetes, both type 1 and 2, is entrenched on the list of high-risk conditions for severe COVID-19, but there might be geographic differences in this global disease. Moreover, there is controversy as to how much risk patients with diabetes have during infection with SARS-CoV-2. The current study by Kastora and colleagues explores these issues.
An umbrella review of meta-analyses/systematic reviews of COVID-19 outcomes in patients with and without diabetes from around the world found overall worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 who had diabetes -- with geographic differences.
Diabetes has been known to be a risk factor for poorer prognosis in COVID-19, but this is the first time a study has looked at the risks while factoring in the patients' location. In the study, diabetes almost doubled the rate of death from COVID-19, but good glucose control was a protective factor, and this seems to have differed across many of the countries studied, as well as within countries.
The review included 270,000 participants, with studies from North America, Europe, the Middle East, and the Far East. It was recently published in Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism[2]by Stavroula Kastora, MD, PhD, of the University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom, and colleagues.
In the pooled results, "people with diabetes were 1.87 times more likely to die with COVID, 1.59 times more likely to be admitted to [intensive care unit (ICU)], 1.44 times more likely to require ventilation, and 2.88 times more likely to be classed as severe or critical, when compared to patients without diabetes," Anne L. Peters, MD, who was not involved in this research, summarized in an email to Medscape Medical News.
Patients treated in the United States or Europe fared best, and patients in other areas, particularly China, Korea, and the Middle East, did the worst, said Peters, a professor of medicine at the University of Southern California (USC) Keck School of Medicine in Los Angeles. Older patients and patients treated with insulin also had worse outcomes, and people with better glycemic control did better, she noted.
"These findings are interesting because they reveal that worse outcomes due to COVID-19 in people with diabetes can be reduced in the right setting," Peters said.
She noted, however, that although the findings revealed differences in outcomes between countries, "within a country there is variation in outcomes."
For instance, within the United States and the United Kingdom, outcomes in the review differed according to whether people live in an area with higher or lower healthcare resources.
"In light of the ongoing pandemic, strengthening outpatient diabetes clinics, ensuring consistent follow-up of patients with diabetes, and optimizing their glycemic control could significantly increase the chances of survival following a COVID-19 infection," she noted.
Francisco J. Pasquel, MD, MPH, who was not involved in the research, agreed.
"This is an alert to the global community about the importance of prioritizing care and research resources focused on people with diabetes and COVID-19 to reduce the gaps in outcomes compared to those without diabetes," he said in an email to Medscape Medical News.
Pasquel is associate professor, endocrinology, at Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
ICU Admission, Ventilator Need, and MortalityThe researchers performed an umbrella review of other reviews -- according to 158 original articles (148 retrospective studies and 10 prospective studies, including 15 preprints) -- that were published up to August 30, 2021.
Twenty-two studies were conducted in the European Union (Denmark, France, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom), 90 were from the Far East (China and Korea), 16 were from the Middle East (Iran, Iraq, Israel, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and Turkey), and 30 were from North America (29 from the United States and 1 from Mexico).
The total sample consisted of 270,212 patients, including 57,801 patients who were diagnosed with diabetes (488 with type 1 diabetes and 57,313 with type 2 diabetes).
Overall, 19% of the patients were admitted to an ICU, 12% were placed on a ventilator, and 13.5% died during follow-up.
In the 59 studies that looked at ICU admission, this outcome was more likely among patients with vs without diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 1.59; P = .005), driven primarily by the increased risk for ICU admission in patients with diabetes in the 29 studies from the Far East (OR 1.94; P < .0001).
There was no overall increased risk for ICU admission in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes (vs no diabetes) in the 8 studies from the Middle East (OR 1.32; P = .26), the 9 studies from the European Union (OR 1.2; P = .16), or the 13 studies from North America (OR 1.57; P = .36).
In the 83 studies that looked at need for a ventilator, overall, there was a greater need in patients with vs without diabetes (OR 1.44; P < .0001).
Among patients with COVID-19, patients with diabetes had an overall increased need for a ventilator in the 10 studies from the Middle East (OR 2.02; P = .01), the 51 studies from the Far East (OR 1.61; P = .0001), and the 8 studies from Europe (OR 1.26; P < .0001), but not in the 14 studies from North America (OR 0.71; P = .19).
Overall, in the 136 studies that looked at mortality, patients with diabetes and COVID-19 had an increased risk of dying during follow-up (OR 1.75; P < .0001). This was also true overall for patients with diabetes in the 77 studies from the Far East (OR 2.4), the 15 studies from the Middle East (OR 1.71; P < .0001), the 18 studies from Europe (OR 1.47; P = .04), and the 14 studies from North America (OR 1.42; P = .04) that looked at this outcome.
The authors have reported no relevant financial relationships. Peters has reported receiving consulting fees from Abbott Laboratories; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; Medscape; Novo Nordisk; Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated; and Zealand Pharma and research funding from Abbott Laboratories; Dexcom, Inc.; and Insulet Corporation and having stock options with Omaha Health and Teladoc.