You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

Table 1.  

  Patients
Characteristic n %
Full cohort, n 295 100
Recipient age, median (range) 66 (6-76)
Recipient sex    
 Female 117 40
 Male 178 60
HCT-CI score    
 0 83 28
 1-2 81 27
 3+ 120 40
 Missing 11 4
Type of AML (clinically defined)    
De novo 173 59
 Secondary 91 31
 Therapy-related 31 11
Cytogenetics*    
 Normal 136 46
 Core binding factor 6 2
 Complex karyotype 41 14
 Other 112 38
2017 ELN risk group    
 Favorable 53 18
 Intermediate 85 29
 Adverse 152 52
 Missing 5 2
Initial therapy    
 Intensive induction 249 84
 Non-intensive induction 46 16
Reinduction    
 Yes 90 31
 No 204 69
 Missing 1 0.3
Remission quality    
 CR with hematologic recovery 225 75
 CRi 67 23
 Missing 1 0.3
Donor type    
 Matched related 54 18
 Matched unrelated 154 52
 Mismatch related 7 2
 Mismatch unrelated 29 10
 Haploidentical 51 17
Conditioning regimen    
 Myeloablative 28 9
 Reduced intensity 267 91
  T-cell depletion 25 9
Stem cell source    
 Peripheral blood 216 73
 Bone marrow 71 24
 Umbilical cord blood 8 3

Table 1. Cohort characteristics

Shown are the pretransplant characteristics of the 295 patients included in the cohort. HCT-CI: hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index score. CRi denotes complete remission with incomplete recovery of at least 1 hematopoietic cell lineage.

ELN, European Leukemia Network.

* Core binding factor: inv(16) or t(8;21); complex karyotype: 3 or more chromosomal abnormalities within a single clone.

CME / ABIM MOC

Impact of Diagnostic Genetics on Remission MRD and Transplantation Outcomes in Older Patients With AML

  • Authors: H. Moses Murdock, MD; Haesook T. Kim, PhD; Nathan Denlinger, DO; Pankit Vachhani, MD; Bryan C. Hambley, MD, MPH; Bryan S. Manning; Shannon Gier; Christina Cho, MD; Harrison K. Tsai, MD, PhD; Shannon R. McCurdy, MD; Vincent T. Ho, MD; John Koreth, MBBS, DPhil; Robert J. Soiffer, MD; Jerome Ritz, MD; Martin P. Carroll, MD; Sumithira Vasu, MBBS; Miguel-Angel Perales, MD; Eunice S. Wang, MD; Lukasz P. Gondek, MD, PhD; Steven M. Devine, MD; Edwin P. Alyea III, MD; R. Coleman Lindsley, MD, PhD; Christopher J. Gibson, MD
  • CME / ABIM MOC Released: 6/16/2022
  • Valid for credit through: 6/16/2023
Start Activity

  • Credits Available

    Physicians - maximum of 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

    ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 1.00 ABIM MOC points

    You Are Eligible For

    • Letter of Completion
    • ABIM MOC points

Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for hematologists, oncologists, internists, geriatricians, and other clinicians caring for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The goal of this activity is that the learner will be better able to describe factors that drive outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for AML in older patients, according to a targeted mutational genomic analysis of paired diagnostic and available remission specimens in a multi-institutional cohort of 295 patients with AML aged ≥ 60 years who underwent HCT in first complete morphologic remission (CR1).

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  1. Describe clinical and genetic determinants of posttransplant leukemia-free survival in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to a targeted mutational genomic analysis
  2. Determine molecular genetics of complete remission and minimal residual disease associations with baseline characteristics and posttransplant outcomes in older patients with AML, according to a targeted mutational genomic analysis of paired diagnostic and available remission specimens
  3. Identify clinical implications of factors that drive outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for AML in older patients, according to a targeted mutational genomic analysis of paired diagnostic and available remission specimens


Disclosures

Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated according to Medscape policies. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.


Faculty

  • H. Moses Murdock, MD

    Division of Hematologic Neoplasia
    Department of Medical Oncology
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts

  • Haesook T. Kim, PhD

    Department of Data Science
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts

  • Nathan Denlinger, DO

    Division of Hematology
    The Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital
    Columbus, Ohio

  • Pankit Vachhani, MD

    Division of Hematology and Oncology
    University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine

  • Bryan C. Hambley, MD, MPH

    Department of Internal Medicine
    Division of Hematology/Oncology
    University of Cincinnati
    Cincinnati, Ohio

  • Bryan S. Manning

    Department of Medicine
    Perelman Cancer Center
    University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Shannon Gier

    Department of Medicine
    Perelman Cancer Center
    University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Christina Cho, MD

    Department of Medicine
    Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    New York, New York

  • Harrison K. Tsai, MD, PhD

    Department of Pathology
    Boston Children’s Hospital
    Harvard Medical School
    Boston, Massachusetts

  • Shannon R. McCurdy, MD

    Department of Medicine
    Perelman Cancer Center
    University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Vincent T. Ho, MD

    Division of Hematologic Malignancies
    Department of Medical Oncology
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts

  • John Koreth, MBBS, DPhil

    Division of Hematologic Malignancies
    Department of Medical Oncology
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts

  • Robert J. Soiffer, MD

    Division of Hematologic Malignancies
    Department of Medical Oncology
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts

  • Jerome Ritz, MD

    Division of Hematologic Neoplasia
    Department of Medical Oncology
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts

  • Martin P. Carroll, MD

    Department of Medicine
    Perelman Cancer Center
    University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Sumithira Vasu, MBBS

    Division of Hematology
    The Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital
    Columbus, Ohio

  • Miguel-Angel Perales, MD

    Department of Medicine
    Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    New York, New York

  • Eunice S. Wang, MD

    Department of Medicine
    Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Buffalo, New York

  • Lukasz P. Gondek, MD, PhD

    Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Johns Hopkins University
    Baltimore, Maryland

  • Steven M. Devine, MD

    National Marrow Donor Program
    Minneapolis, Minnesota

  • Edwin P. Alyea III, MD

    Duke Cancer Institute
    Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina

  • R. Coleman Lindsley, MD, PhD

    Division of Hematologic Neoplasia
    Department of Medical Oncology
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts

  • Christopher J. Gibson, MD

    Division of Hematologic Malignancies
    Department of Medical Oncology
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts

CME Author

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Freelance writer and reviewer
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Laurie Barclay, MD, has the following relevant financial relationships:
    Formerly owned stocks in: AbbVie

Editor

  • Hervé Dombret, MD

    Associate Editor, Blood

Compliance Reviewer

  • Amanda Jett, PharmD, BCACP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Amanda Jett, PharmD, BCACP, has no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements



In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by Medscape, LLC and the American Society of Hematology. Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 1.0 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read about the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or print it out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate, but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period, you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

From Blood
CME / ABIM MOC

Impact of Diagnostic Genetics on Remission MRD and Transplantation Outcomes in Older Patients With AML

Authors: H. Moses Murdock, MD; Haesook T. Kim, PhD; Nathan Denlinger, DO; Pankit Vachhani, MD; Bryan C. Hambley, MD, MPH; Bryan S. Manning; Shannon Gier; Christina Cho, MD; Harrison K. Tsai, MD, PhD; Shannon R. McCurdy, MD; Vincent T. Ho, MD; John Koreth, MBBS, DPhil; Robert J. Soiffer, MD; Jerome Ritz, MD; Martin P. Carroll, MD; Sumithira Vasu, MBBS; Miguel-Angel Perales, MD; Eunice S. Wang, MD; Lukasz P. Gondek, MD, PhD; Steven M. Devine, MD; Edwin P. Alyea III, MD; R. Coleman Lindsley, MD, PhD; Christopher J. Gibson, MDFaculty and Disclosures

CME / ABIM MOC Released: 6/16/2022

Valid for credit through: 6/16/2023

processing....

References

  1. Mrózek K, Marcucci G, Nicolet D, et al. Prognostic significance of the European LeukemiaNet standardized system for reporting cytogenetic and molecular alterations in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(36):4515-4523.
  2. Goldstone AH, Burnett AK, Wheatley K, Smith AG, Hutchinson RM, Clark RE; Medical Research Council Adult Leukemia Working Party. Attempts to improve treatment outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older patients: the results of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial. Blood. 2001;98(5):1302-1311.
  3. Oran B, Weisdorf DJ. Survival for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a population-based study. Haematologica. 2012;97(12):1916-1924.
  4. Lindsley RC, Mar BG, Mazzola E, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia ontogeny is defined by distinct somatic mutations. Blood. 2015; 125(9):1367-1376.
  5. Gardin C, Pautas C, Fournier E, et al. Added prognostic value of secondary AML-like gene mutations in ELN intermediate-risk older AML: ALFA-1200 study results. Blood Adv. 2020;4(9):1942-1949.
  6. Leith CP, Kopecky KJ, Godwin J, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: assessment of multidrug resistance (MDR1) and cytogenetics distinguishes biologic subgroups with remarkably distinct responses to standard chemotherapy. A Southwest Oncology Group study. Blood. 1997;89(9):3323-3329.
  7. Itzykson R, Fournier E, Berthon C, et al. Genetic identification of patients with AML older than 60 years achieving long-term survival with intensive chemotherapy. Blood. 2021;138(7):507-519.
  8. Devine SM, Owzar K, Blum W, et al. Phase II study of allogeneic transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission using a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 100103 (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology)/Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trial Network 0502. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(35): 4167-4175.
  9. Ustun C, Le-Rademacher J, Wang H-L, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation compared to chemotherapy consolidation in older acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients 60-75 years in first complete remission (CR1): an alliance (A151509), SWOG, ECOG-ACRIN, and CIBMTR study. Leukemia. 2019;33(11):2599-2609.
  10. Diaconescu R, Flowers CR, Storer B, et al. Morbidity and mortality with nonmyeloablative compared with myeloablative conditioning before hematopoietic cell transplantation from HLA-matched related donors. Blood. 2004;104(5):1550-1558.
  11. Slavin S, Nagler A, Naparstek E, et al. Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation and cell therapy as an alternative to conventional bone marrow transplantation with lethal cytoreduction for the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases. Blood. 1998;91(3):756-763.
  12. Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Bullinger L, et al. Genomic classification and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(23):2209-2221.
  13. Hourigan CS, Dillon LW, Gui G, et al. Impact of conditioning intensity of allogeneic transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia with genomic evidence of residual disease. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(12):1273-1283.
  14. Muffly L, Pasquini MC, Martens M, et al. Increasing use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients aged 70 years and older in the United States. Blood. 2017;130(9):1156-1164.
  15. Lindsley RC, Saber W, Mar BG, et al. Prognostic mutations in myelodysplastic syndrome after stem-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(6):536–547.
  16. Tyner JW, Tognon CE, Bottomly D, et al. Functional genomic landscape of acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2018;562(7728):526-531.
  17. Polprasert C, Schulze I, Sekeres MA, et al. Inherited and somatic defects in DDX41 in myeloid neoplasms. Cancer Cell. 2015; 27(5):658-670.
  18. Sébert M, Passet M, Raimbault A, et al. Germline DDX41 mutations define a significant entity within adult MDS/AML patients. Blood. 2019;134(17):1441-1444.
  19. Kadono M, Kanai A, Nagamachi A, et al. Biological implications of somatic DDX41 p.R525H mutation in acute myeloid leukemia. Exp Hematol. 2016;44(8): 745-754.e4.
  20. Reilly CR, Myllymäki M, Redd R, et al. The clinical and functional effects of TERT variants in myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2021;138(10):898-911.
  21. Marsh JCW, Gutierrez-Rodrigues F, Cooper J, et al. Heterozygous RTEL1 variants in bone marrow failure and myeloid neoplasms. Blood Adv. 2018;2(1):36-48.
  22. Boocock GRB, Morrison JA, Popovic M, et al. Mutations in SBDS are associated with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. Nat Genet. 2003;33(1):97-101.
  23. Nagata Y, Narumi S, Guan Y, et al. Germline loss-of-function SAMD9 and SAMD9L alterations in adult myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2018;132(21):2309-2313.
  24. Hahn CN, Chong C-E, Carmichael CL, et al. Heritable GATA2 mutations associated with familial myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Genet. 2011;43(10):1012-1017.
  25. Pohlen M, Groth C, Sauer T, et al. Outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for AML and myelodysplastic syndrome in elderly patients (≥60 years). Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51(11):1441-1448.
  26. Yanada M, Fukuda T, Tanaka M, et al. Long-term results of reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective analysis of 10-year follow-up data. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020;55(10):2008-2016.
  27. Isobe M, Konuma T, Masuko M, et al.; Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Working Group of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Single cord blood transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia patients aged 60 years or older: a retrospective study in Japan. Ann Hematol. 2021;100(7):1849-1861.
  28. Armand P, Gibson CJ, Cutler C, et al. A disease risk index for patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2012;120(4):905-913.
  29. Sorror ML, Logan BR, Zhu X, et al. Prospective validation of the predictive power of the hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index: a center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(8):1479-1487.
  30. Heuser M, Freeman SD, Ossenkoppele GJ, et al. 2021 Update on MRD in acute myeloid leukemia: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. Blood. 2021;138(26):2753-2767.
  31. Morita K, Wang F, Jahn K, et al. Clonal evolution of acute myeloid leukemia revealed by high-throughput single-cell genomics [Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5996]. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5327.
  32. Miles LA, Bowman RL, Merlinsky TR, et al. Single-cell mutation analysis of clonal evolution in myeloid malignancies. Nature. 2020;587(7834):477-482.
  33. Gibson CJ, Lindsley RC, Tchekmedyian V, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes after autologous stem-cell transplantation for lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(14):1598-1605.
  34. Coombs CC, Zehir A, Devlin SM, et al. Therapy-related clonal hematopoiesis in patients with non-hematologic cancers is common and associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21(3): 374-382.e4.
  35. Bolton KL, Ptashkin RN, Gao T, et al. Cancer therapy shapes the fitness landscape of clonal hematopoiesis. Nat Genet. 2020; 52(11):1219-1226.
  36. Jongen-Lavrencic M, Grob T, Hanekamp D, et al. Molecular minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(13):1189-1199.
  37. Tanaka T, Morita K, Loghavi S, et al. Clonal dynamics and clinical implications of postremission clonal hematopoiesis in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2021;138(18):1733-1739.
  38. Craddock C, Jackson A, Loke J, et al. Augmented reduced-intensity regimen does not improve postallogeneic transplant outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(7):768-778.
  39. Sung A, Koll T, Gier SH, et al. Fried’s frailty phenotype predicts overall survival for older hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients [abstract]. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021;27(3):S53-S54. Abstract 56.
  40. Freeman S, Craddock C. Less is not necessarily more: toward a rational selection of the conditioning regimen in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(12):1249-1251.
  41. Burchert A, Bug G, Fritz LV, et al. Sorafenib maintenance after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3-internal tandem duplication mutation (SORMAIN). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(26):2993-3002.
  42. Schlenk RF, Weber D, Fiedler W, et al.; German-Austrian AML Study Group. Midostaurin added to chemotherapy and continued single-agent maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3-ITD. Blood. 2019;133(8):840-851.
  43. de Lima M, Oran B, Champlin RE, et al. CC-486 maintenance after stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018;24(10):2017-2024.
  44. Sandmaier BM, Khaled S, Oran B, Gammon G, Trone D, Frankfurt O. Results of a phase 1 study of quizartinib as maintenance therapy in subjects with acute myeloid leukemia in remission following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Am J Hematol. 2018;93(2):222-231.
  45. Bashey A, Medina B, Corringham S, et al. CTLA4 blockade with ipilimumab to treat relapse of malignancy after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2009;113(7):1581-1588.
  46. Davids MS, Kim HT, Bachireddy P, et al.; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Blood Cancer Research Partnership. Ipilimumab for patients with relapse after allogeneic transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(2):143-153.
  47. Platzbecker U, Middeke JM, Sockel K, et al. Measurable residual disease-guided treatment with azacitidine to prevent haematological relapse in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia (RELAZA2): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(12):1668-1679.
  48. Liu J, Wang L, Zhao F, et al. Pre-clinical development of a humanized anti-CD47 antibody with anti-cancer therapeutic potential. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0137345.
  49. Romee R, Rosario M, Berrien-Elliott MM, et al. Cytokine-induced memory-like natural killer cells exhibit enhanced responses against myeloid leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(357):357ra123.
  50. Zhou Z, Nath R, Cerny J, et al. Reduced intensity conditioning for acute myeloid leukemia using melphalan- vs busulfan-based regimens: a CIBMTR report [published correction appears in Blood Adv. 2021;5(13):2752]. Blood Adv. 2020;4(13):3180-3190.
  51. Ciurea SO, Kongtim P, Varma A, et al. Is there an optimal conditioning for older patients with AML receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation? Blood. 2020;135(6):449-452.
  52. Kanakry CG, O’Donnell PV, Furlong T, et al. Multi-institutional study of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as single-agent graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation using myeloablative busulfan and fludarabine conditioning. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(31):3497-3505.
  53. Kasamon YL, Bolaños-Meade J, Prince GT, et al. Outcomes of nonmyeloablative HLA-haploidentical blood or marrow transplantation with high-dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in older adults. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(28):3152-3161.
  54. Lancet JE, Uy GL, Cortes JE, et al. CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin) liposome for injection versus conventional cytarabine plus daunorubicin in older patients with newly diagnosed secondary acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(26): 2684-2692.
  55. Stone RM, Mandrekar SJ, Sanford BL, et al. Midostaurin plus chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia with a FLT3 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(5):454-464.
« Return to: Impact of Diagnostic Genetics on Remission MRD and Transplantation Outcomes in Older Patients With AML