You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Does Bariatric Surgery Affect Fatty Liver Disease?

  • Authors: News Author: Pam Harrison; CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MD
  • CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 1/14/2022
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT
  • Valid for credit through: 1/14/2023, 11:59 PM EST
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for diabetologists/endocrinologists, family medicine/primary care clinicians, cardiologists, gastroenterologists, general surgeons, internists, nephrologists, nurses, and other members of the health care team who treat and manage patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis who may benefit from bariatric surgery.

The goal of this activity is to describe the association between bariatric surgery and major adverse liver outcomes or major adverse cardiovascular events in obese patients with biopsy-proven fibrotic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis without cirrhosis, based on long-term follow-up in the Surgical Procedures and Long-Term Effectiveness in NASH Disease and Obesity Risk (SPLENDOR) study.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  • Assess the association between bariatric surgery and major adverse liver outcomes or major adverse cardiovascular events in obese patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), based on long-term follow-up in the Surgical Procedures and Long-Term Effectiveness in NASH Disease and Obesity Risk study
  • Evaluate the clinical implications of the association between bariatric surgery and major adverse liver outcomes or major adverse cardiovascular events in obese patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), based on long-term follow-up in the Surgical Procedures and Long-Term Effectiveness in NASH Disease and Obesity Risk study
  • Outline implications for the healthcare team


Disclosures

Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated according to Medscape policies. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.


News Author

  • Pam Harrison

    Freelance writer, Medscape

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Pam Harrison has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Freelance writer and reviewer
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Editor/Nurse Planner

  • Leigh A. Schmidt, MSN, RN, CMSRN, CNE, CHCP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Leigh A. Schmidt, MSN, RN, CMSRN, CNE, CHCP, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Reviewer

  • Amanda Jett, PharmD, BCACP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Amanda Jett, PharmD, BCACP, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

Medscape

Interprofessional Continuing Education

In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

IPCE

This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of continuing nursing education for RNs and APNs; none of these credits is in the area of pharmacology.

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 75% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Does Bariatric Surgery Affect Fatty Liver Disease?

Authors: News Author: Pam Harrison; CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MDFaculty and Disclosures
THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT

CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 1/14/2022

Valid for credit through: 1/14/2023, 11:59 PM EST

processing....

Clinical Context

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome, is a leading cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and is significantly associated with cardiovascular disease. Diagnosis and management of NASH are challenging.

Study Synopsis and Perspective

Weight loss surgery significantly lowers the risk for major adverse liver outcomes as well as major acute cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with biopsy-proven NASH compared with similar patients who did not have surgery, new research shows.

"This is the first study in the medical field reporting a treatment modality that is associated with decreased risk of major adverse events in patients with biopsy-proven NASH," senior author Steven Nissen, MD, from the Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, said in a statement from the hospital.

"The [Surgical Procedures and Long-Term Effectiveness in NASH Disease and Obesity Risk (SPLENDOR)] study shows that in patients with obesity and NASH, substantial and sustained weight loss achieved with bariatric surgery can simultaneously protect the heart and decrease the risk of progression to end-stage liver disease," he emphasized.

The study was published online November 11 in JAMA.

SPLENDOR Study

The SPLENDOR study included 1158 adult patients with biopsy-proven NASH without cirrhosis; 650 patients underwent bariatric surgery and the remaining 508 served as controls. Participants were a median age of 49.8 years and had a median body mass index of 44.1 kg/m2; almost 64% were women.

Bariatric procedures included Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, performed in 83% of patients, and sleeve gastrectomy, performed in the other 17%.

"The prespecified primary endpoints were the incidence of major adverse liver outcomes and MACE," lead author Ali Aminian, MD, director, Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, notes. Major adverse liver events included progression to clinical or histological cirrhosis, development of liver cancer, need for liver transplantation, or liver-related death.

MACE was a composite of coronary artery events, cerebrovascular events, heart failure, or cardiovascular death.

At a median follow-up of 7 years, 5 patients in the bariatric surgery group versus 40 patients among the nonsurgical controls had experienced a major adverse liver event.

At 10 years, the cumulative incidence of major adverse liver outcomes was 88% lower in the bariatric surgery group, occurring in 2.3% of that group compared with 9.6% in the nonsurgical group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.12; P=.01), the investigators report.

By study end, 39 patients in the surgical group had experienced MACE compared with 60 patients in the control group. After 10 years, the cumulative incidence of MACE was 70% lower in the bariatric surgery group, at 8.5%, versus 15.7% in the control group (HR, 0.30; P=.007). 

Again at 10 years, bariatric surgery also reduced mean body weight by 22.4% among those who had undergone an operation compared with weight loss, on average, of 4.6% among nonsurgical controls (P<.001), whereas among patients with diabetes, bariatric surgery also led to a significant reduction in A1c.

However, the risk for major adverse events within 30 days of bariatric surgery was relatively high, at 9.5%, the authors note.

But within the first year after undergoing the procedure, only 4 patients (0.6%) had died from surgical complications, including 2 patients from a gastrointestinal leak.

Primary Treatment for NASH Is Weight Loss

As the authors point out, obesity is the main pathophysiologic driver of NASH and weight loss, however it is achieved, is currently the primary treatment for NASH.

"[B]ariatric surgery is the most effective available therapy for obesity," they stress.

Shanu Kothari, MD, president of the American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, agrees, saying in a statement: "No treatment other than bariatric surgery has been shown to have such a significant effect in reducing the risk of severe outcomes or death in patients with NASH."

He added, "Bariatric surgery should be considered as first-line treatment for these patients."

As pointed out by Dr Aminian, there is currently no medication approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of fatty liver.

"The striking findings of this study provide strong evidence that bariatric surgery should be considered as an effective therapeutic option for patients with advanced fatty liver and obesity," he added in the statement.

Dr Aminian has reported receiving research support and speaking honoraria from Medtronic. Dr Nissen has reported receiving research support from Medtronic and Ethicon.

JAMA. Published online November 11, 2021.[1]

Study Highlights

  • Among 25,828 liver biopsies performed at a US health system from 2004 to 2016, 1158 obese adults fulfilled enrollment criteria for SPLENDOR, including confirmed histological diagnosis of NASH and presence of liver fibrosis (histological stages 1-3).
  • Median age was 49.8 years (interquartile range, 40.9-57.9 years), median body mass index was 44.1 kg/m2 (interquartile range, 39.4-51.4 kg/m2), 63.9% were women.
  • Using overlap weighting methods, baseline clinical characteristics, histological disease activity, and fibrosis stage of patients (n=650) who underwent simultaneous liver biopsy at the time of bariatric surgery were balanced with a nonsurgical control group (n=508).
  • Follow-up ended in March 2021 (median, 7 years; interquartile range, 4-10 years).
  • Primary outcomes were incidence of major adverse liver outcomes (progression to clinical or histological cirrhosis; development of hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, or liver-related mortality) and MACE (a composite of coronary artery events, cerebrovascular events, heart failure, or cardiovascular death), estimated using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression.
  • At study end, 5 patients in the surgery group and 40 in the control group had major adverse liver outcomes; MACE occurred in 39 patients vs 60 patients, respectively.
  • Overlap weighting methods showed cumulative incidence of major adverse liver outcomes at 10 years of 2.3% (95% CI, 0%-4.6%) in the surgery group and 9.6% (95% CI, 6.1%-12.9%) in the nonsurgical group (adjusted absolute risk difference, 12.4% [95% CI, 5.7%-19.7%]; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.12 [95% CI, 0.02-0.63]; P=.01).
  • Cumulative incidence of MACE at 10 years was 8.5% (95% CI, 5.5%-11.4%) vs 15.7% (95% CI, 11.3%-19.8%), respectively (adjusted absolute risk difference, 13.9% [95% CI, 5.9%-21.9%]; aHR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.12-0.72]; P=.007).
  • Within 1 year after bariatric surgery, 4 patients (0.6%) died from surgical complications including gastrointestinal leak (n=2) and respiratory failure (n=2).
  • The investigators concluded that among obese patients with NASH, bariatric surgery vs nonsurgical management was associated with significantly lower risk for incident major adverse liver outcomes (adjusted absolute 10-year risk difference, 12.4%) and MACE (13.9%).
  • Ideal management of NASH requires a comprehensive approach to reverse liver injury and minimize risk for both major adverse liver outcomes and MACE.
  • To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study reporting a treatment modality linked to reduced risk for major clinical end points in patients with biopsy-proven NASH.
  • The findings suggest that bariatric surgery can be considered as a therapeutic option for patients with NASH and obesity.
  • Study limitations include a retrospective, observational design, but sufficiently powered randomized clinical trials using liver biopsy and adequate follow-up duration to assess rare clinical end points in this slowly progressive disease are unlikely to be performed in the near future.
  • Carefully designed observational studies such as this one, with adjustment for patient characteristics across treatment groups, can be useful to inform treatment decisions.
  • Several drugs, such as vitamin E, pioglitazone, obeticholic acid, liraglutide, and semaglutide, targeting improvement in histological features of NASH are in the pipeline, but there is currently no approved pharmacotherapy for NASH.
  • Obesity is the main pathophysiologic driver of NASH, and losing weight by any means is the current primary treatment of NASH, but bariatric surgery is the most effective available therapy for obesity.
  • Key initial steps triggering development of NASH in obese patients are ectopic fat accumulation, immune system activation, and insulin resistance.
  • Substantial, sustained weight loss after bariatric surgery and subsequently improved metabolic dysfunction and inflammatory state may potentially reverse histopathological changes and prevent progressive liver damage.
  • Weight loss after bariatric surgery also effectively improves cardiometabolic risk factors and quality of life.

Clinical Implications

  • Among obese patients with NASH, bariatric surgery vs nonsurgical management was associated with significantly lower risk for incident major adverse liver outcomes and MACE.
  • The findings suggest that bariatric surgery can be considered as a therapeutic option for patients with NASH and obesity.
  • Implications for the Health Care Team: Obesity is the main pathophysiologic driver of NASH, and losing weight by any means is the current primary treatment of NASH, but bariatric surgery is the most effective available therapy for obesity.

 

Earn Credit

  • Print