You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Have UK Cervical Cancer Mortality Rates Changed in Younger Women?

  • Authors: News Author: Pam Harrison; CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MD
  • CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 1/14/2022
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT
  • Valid for credit through: 1/14/2023, 11:59 PM EST
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for hematologists/oncologists, obstetricians/gynecologists/women's health clinicians, infectious disease clinicians, internists, family medicine/primary care clinicians, public health and prevention officials, nurses, pharmacists, and other members of the health care team who treat and manage patients with or at risk for cervical cancer.

The goal of this activity is to describe the early effect of the UK immunization program against human papillomavirus on rates of cervical cancer and noninvasive cervical carcinoma in situ (grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; CIN3), based on findings of a register-based observational study.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  • Assess the early effect of the UK immunization program against human papillomavirus on rates of cervical cancer and grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, based on findings of a register-based observational study
  • Evaluate the clinical and public health implications of the early effect of the UK immunization program against human papillomavirus on rates of cervical cancer and grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, based on findings of a register-based observational study
  • Outline implications for the healthcare team


Disclosures

Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated according to Medscape policies. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.


News Author

  • Pam Harrison

    Freelance writer, Medscape

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Pam Harrison has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Freelance writer and reviewer
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Editor/CME Reviewer/Nurse Planner

  • Leigh A. Schmidt, MSN, RN, CMSRN, CNE, CHCP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Leigh A. Schmidt, MSN, RN, CMSRN, CNE, CHCP, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CE Reviewer

  • Amanda Jett, PharmD, BCACP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Amanda Jett, PharmD, BCACP, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

Medscape

Interprofessional Continuing Education

In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

IPCE

This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of nursing continuing professional development for RNs and APNs; 0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.

    Contact This Provider

    For Pharmacists

  • Medscape designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number: JA0007105-0000-22-009-H01-P).

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 75% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Have UK Cervical Cancer Mortality Rates Changed in Younger Women?

Authors: News Author: Pam Harrison; CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MDFaculty and Disclosures
THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT

CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 1/14/2022

Valid for credit through: 1/14/2023, 11:59 PM EST

processing....

Clinical Context

Reflecting the World Health Organization (WHO)'s global strategy to eliminate cervical cancer, more than 100 countries have implemented human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. England introduced HPV immunization with a bivalent vaccine September 1, 2008 and offered routine vaccination to girls aged 12 to 13 years with a catch-up program at ages 14 to 18 years in 2008 to 2010.

Study Synopsis and Perspective

New data from England show the success of the national program for vaccinating girls against HPV to prevent cervical cancer.

Among young women who received the HPV vaccine when they were 12 or 13 years old (before their sexual debut), cervical cancer rates are 87% lower than among previous nonvaccinated generations.

"It's been incredible to see the impact of HPV vaccination, and now we can prove it prevented hundreds of women from developing cancer in England," senior author Peter Sasieni, MD, from King's College London, United Kingdom, said in a statement. "To see the real-life impact of the vaccine has been truly rewarding," he added

"This study provides the first direct evidence of the impact of the UK HPV vaccination campaign on cervical cancer incidence, showing a large reduction in cervical cancer rates in vaccinated cohorts," commented Kate Soldan, MD, UK Health Security Agency, London, in a statement.

Vanessa Saliba, MD, a consultant epidemiologist for the UK Health Security Agency, agreed, saying that "these remarkable findings confirm that the HPV vaccine saves lives by dramatically reducing cervical cancer rates among women.

"This reminds us that vaccines are one of the most important tools we have to help us live longer, healthier lives," she added.

The study was published online November 3 in the Lancet.[1]

Approached for comment on the new study, Maurice Markman, MD, president, Medicine and Science Cancer Treatment Centers of America, noted that the results of the English study are very similar to those of a Swedish study of the quadrivalent vaccine alone.[2]

"You can put any superlatives you want in here, but these are stunningly positive results," Dr Markman told Medscape Medical News. He said that as an oncologist who has been treating cervical cancer for 40 years, particularly patients with advanced cervical cancer, "I can tell you this is one of the most devastating diseases to women, and the ability to eliminate this cancer with something as simple as a vaccine is the goal of cancer therapy, and it's been remarkably successful," Dr Markman said.

"I can only emphasize the critical importance of all parents to see that their children who are eligible for the vaccine receive it. This is a cancer prevention strategy that is unbelievably, remarkably effective and safe," Dr Markman added.

National Vaccination Program

The national HPV vaccination program in England began in 2008. Initially, a bivalent vaccine against HPV 16 and 18 was used. HPV 16 and 18 are responsible for approximately 80% of all cervical cancers in England, the researchers note in their article.

In 2012 the program switched to a quadrivalent HPV vaccine, which is effective against 2 additional HPV types, HPV 6 and 11. Those strains cause genital warts.

The prevention program originally recommended a 3-dose regimen in which both HPV vaccines were used. At this time, 2 doses are given to girls younger than 15 years. In addition, a single dose of the HPV vaccine provides good protection against persistent infection. The efficacy rate of a single dose is similar to that of 3 doses, the authors comment.

Population-Based Registry

The new data come from a population-based cancer registry that shows the incidence of cervical cancer and noninvasive cervical carcinoma (CIN3) in England between January 2006 and June 2019.

The study included 7 cohorts of women who were 20 to 64 years of age at the end of 2019. Three of these cohorts made up the vaccinated population.

The team reports that overall, from January 2006 through June 2019, there were 27,946 cases of cervical cancer and 318,058 cases of CIN3.

In the 3 vaccinated cohorts, there were around 450 fewer cases of cervical cancer and 17,200 fewer cases of CIN3 than would be expected in a nonvaccinated population.

The 3 vaccinated cohorts had been eligible to receive the bivalent vaccine when they were aged 12 to 13 years. A catch-up scheme was aimed at 14- to 16-year-olds and 16- to 18-year-olds. Most of these persons were vaccinated through a school vaccination program.

The team analyzed the data for each of these cohorts.

Among the cohort eligible for vaccination at 12 to 13 years of age, 89% received at least 1 dose of the HPV vaccine and 85% received 3 shots and were fully vaccinated. Among these persons, the rate of cervical cancer was 87% lower than expected in a nonvaccinated population and the rate of CIN3 was 97% lower than expected.

For the cohort that was eligible to be vaccinated between the ages of 14 and 16 years, the corresponding reductions were 62% for cervical cancer and 75% for CIN3.

For the cohort eligible for vaccination between the ages of 16 and 18 years (of whom 60% had received at least 1 dose and 45% were fully vaccinated), the corresponding reduction were 34% for cervical cancer and 39% for CIN3.

The authors acknowledge some limitations with the study--principally that cervical cancer is rare in young women and that these vaccinated populations are still young. The youngest would have been vaccinated at age 12 years in 2008 and so would be only 23 years old in 2019, when the follow-up in this current study ended. The authors emphasize that because the vaccinated populations are still young, it is too early to assess the full effect of HPV vaccination on cervical cancer rates.

Editorial Commentary

"The relative reductions in cervical cancer, expected as a result of the HPV vaccination programme, support the anticipated vaccine effectiveness," comment 2 authors of an accompanying editorial, Maggie Cruickshank, MD, from the University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom, and Mihaela Grigore, MD, from the University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Lasi, Romania.[3]

"The scale of the HPV vaccination effect reported by this study should also stimulate vaccination programmes in low-income and middle-income countries where the problem of cervical cancer is a far greater public health issue than in those with well established systems of vaccination and screening," they note.

"The most important issue, besides the availability of the vaccine...is the education of the population to accept the vaccination because a high rate of immunisation is a key element of success," they emphasize. "Even in a wealthy country, such as England with free access to HPV immunisation, uptake has not reached the 90% vaccination target of girls aged 15 years set by WHO."

The authors and editorialists have disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Dr Markman is a regular contributor to Medscape Oncology. He has received income of $250 or more from Genentech, Inc; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; Celgene; Clovis; and Amgen.

Lancet. Published online November 3, 2021. 

Study Highlights

  • This observational study estimated relative risk for cervical cancer in 3 vaccinated cohorts (to account for differences in school year in which vaccine was offered and its national coverage) compared with earlier cohorts ineligible for HPV vaccination.
  • Use of a population-based cancer registry identified cervical cancer and CIN3 diagnoses from January 1, 2006, to June 30, 2019, in women aged 20 to 64 years in England.
  • The researchers adjusted for confounding by changes in cervical screening policy and historical events affecting cervical cancer incidence, compared findings across models with different adjustments for confounders, and used data from 13.7 million years of follow-up of women aged 20 to younger than 30 years.
  • Compared with the reference unvaccinated cohort, the estimated relative reductions in cervical cancer rates were 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25%-41%) for ages 16 to 18 years at vaccine offer (school year 12-13), 62% (95% CI, 52%-71%) for ages 14 to 16 years (school year 10-11), and 87% (95% CI, 72%-94%) for ages 12 to 13 years (school year 8).
  • Corresponding risk reductions for CIN3 were 39% (95% CI, 36%-41%) for those offered at ages 16 to 18 years, 75% (95% CI, 72%-77%) for ages 14 to 16 years, and 97% (95% CI, 96%-98%) for ages 12 to 13 years.
  • Models differing in adjustment for confounding yielded similar findings.
  • By June 30, 2019, there were an estimated 448 (95% CI, 339-556) fewer than expected cervical cancers and 17,235 (95% CI, 15,919-18,552) fewer than expected cases of CIN3 in vaccinated cohorts in England.
  • The investigators concluded that cervical cancer and CIN3 incidence in young women decreased substantially after HPV immunization program introduction in England, especially in those offered vaccination at age 12 to 13 years.
  • This program had successfully nearly eliminated cervical cancer in women born after September 1, 1995.
  • Their study offers the first direct evidence of cervical cancer prevention using a bivalent HPV vaccine, especially if vaccination coverage is high and women are offered the vaccine at a younger age.
  • The findings help clarify the benefits of HPV immunization, although it is still too early to assess the full effect of the English HPV vaccination program.
  • The success of vaccination programs depends on vaccine efficacy and on the proportion of the population vaccinated.
  • Growing evidence suggests that a single dose of HPV vaccine provides good protection against persistent infection, with efficacy similar to that of 3 doses.
  • Even unvaccinated women in vaccine-eligible cohorts are likely to benefit from indirect protection of the vaccination program through herd immunity.
  • Study limitations include lack of individual-level data for vaccination status and of HPV type in each of the cancers, possible unknown confounding, and relatively few cancers expected (without vaccination) in the vaccinated cohorts, especially for those aged 12 to 13 years.
  • Clinicians should encourage girls and women eligible for HPV vaccination to receive it at any age, but ideally when first offered it, to ensure continued benefit in younger generations.
  • An accompanying editorial notes that even in a wealthy country such as England with free access to HPV immunization, uptake has not reached the 90% vaccination target of girls aged 15 years set by WHO.

Clinical Implications

  • Cervical cancer and CIN3 incidence in young women decreased substantially after introduction of the HPV immunization program in England, especially in those offered vaccination at ages 12 to 13 years.
  • This program had successfully nearly eliminated cervical cancer in women born after September 1, 1995.
  • Implications for the Health Care Team: Clinicians should encourage girls and women eligible for HPV vaccination to receive it at any age, but ideally when first offered it.

 

Earn Credit

  • Print