You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

Table 1.  

Variable Healthy subjects Anemia of the elderly Cytopenia of undetermined significance Myeloid neoplasm with myelodysplasia
Patients, n 355 177 311 592
Sex, male/female 154/201 87/90 144/167 365/227
Age, y, median (range) 70 (60-94) 72 (60-102) 58 (19-89) 67 (18-93)
Hb, g/dL, median (range) 14.4 (12.1-18.4) 12.0 (6.8-17.6) 12.7 (5.9-16.4) 10.2 (3.33-17.4)
MCV, fL, median (range) 90.6 (74.0-99.6) 94.0 (60.3-114.3) 91.9 (61.7-121.0) 98.0 (56.1-134.6)
WBC, ×109/L, median (range) 5.94 (2.79-12.44) 6.07 (3.53-12.9) 3.48 (0.87-16.0) 4.66 (0.7-164.0)
ANC, ×109/L, median (range) 3.36 (1.42-7.88) 3.66 (1.54-6.3) 1.63 (0.05-10.9) 2.16 (0.04-109.62)
PLT, ×109/L, median (range) 224 (101-421) 230.5 (113-481) 152 (10-917) 148 (6-1383)
BM blasts, %, median (range) 2 (1-3) 2 (1-98)
WHO category        
 MDS 405
 MDS/MPN 152
 AML-MRC 35

Table 1. Clinical and hematological features of individuals included in the study

ANC, absolute neutrophil count; BM, bone marrow; Hb, hemoglobin; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; PLT, platelet; WBC, white blood cell; WHO, World Health Organization.

Table 2.  

Variable Total Unmutated (ICUS) Mutated (CCUS)
Patients, n 311 219 92
Sex. male/female 144/167 94/125 50/42
Age. y, median (range) 58 (19-89) 53 (19-89) 68 (32-87)
Hb, g/dL, median (range) 12.7 (5.9-16.4) 12.5 (5.9-16.4) 12.9 (8.9-16.1)
MCV, fL, median (range) 91.9 (61.7-121.0) 91.9 (61.7-121.0) 91.2 (76.9-113.0)
WBC, ×109/L, median (range) 3.48 (0.87-16.0) 3.5 (0.87-10.6) 3.4 (1.2-16.0)
ANC, ×109/L, median (range) 1.63 (0.05-10.9) 1.61 (0.05-7.42) 1.70 (0.36-10.9)
PLT, ×109/L, median (range) 152 (10-917) 152 (26-559) 150.5 (10-917)
Number of cytopenic lineages, 1/2/3 (%) 54/33/13 56/31/13 53/35/12
BM blasts (%), median (range) 2 (0-3) 2 (0-3) 2 (0-3)

Table 2. Clinical and hematological features of patients with cytopenia of undetermined significance according to mutation status

ANC, absolute neutrophil count; BM, bone marrow; Hb, hemoglobin; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; PLT, platelet; WBC, white blood cell.

CME / ABIM MOC

Relationship Between Clone Metrics and Clinical Outcome in Clonal Cytopenia

  • Authors: Anna Gallì, PhD; Gabriele Todisco, MD; Eulalia Catamo, BSc; Cinzia Sala, PhD; Chiara Elena, MD; Sara Pozzi, BSc; Elisa Bono, MD; Virginia V. Ferretti, PhD; Ettore Rizzo, PhD; Elisabetta Molteni, PhD; Silvia Zibellini, PhD; Martina Sarchi, MD; Emanuela Boveri, MD; Jacqueline Ferrari, MD; Nicolas Fiorelli, MD; Clara Camaschella, MD; Paolo Gasparini, MD; Daniela Toniolo, PhD; Mario Cazzola, MD; Luca Malcovati, MD
  • CME / ABIM MOC Released: 9/16/2021
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT
  • Valid for credit through: 9/16/2022
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for hematologists, oncologists, and other clinicians caring for patients with idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS) or clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS).

The goal of this activity is to describe associations among molecular profiles, hematologic phenotypes, and clinical outcomes in a prospective cohort of patients with CCUS who were sequentially investigated at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up, either in a phase of stable disease or at the time of progression to a myeloid neoplasm with myelodysplasia (MN), and in cohorts of community-dwelling individuals and of patients with MN.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  1. Describe features of the mutant clone(s) associated with clinical phenotype and progression in a prospective cohort of 311 patients with idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance who were sequentially investigated at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up, either in a phase of stable disease or at the time of progression to a myeloid neoplasm with myelodysplasia (MN), and in cohorts of 532 community-dwelling individuals (355 without hematologic conditions; 177 with unexplained anemia) and of 592 patients with overt MN
  2. Determine use of molecular profiling and clone metrics in patients with clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS), including mutation signatures causative of cytopenia and factors contributing to the clinical expressivity of clones
  3. Identify clinical implications of features of the mutant clone(s) associated with clinical phenotype and progression in patients with CCUS, community-dwelling individuals, and patients with MN


Disclosures

As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.

Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.


Faculty

  • Anna Gallì, PhD

    Department of Hematology Oncology
    IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo
    Pavia, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Anna Gallì, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Gabriele Todisco, MD

    Department of Molecular Medicine
    University of Pavia
    Pavia, Italy
    Department of Medicine,
    Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine,
    Karolinska Institutet,
    Stockholm, Sweden

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Gabriele Todisco, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Eulalia Catamo, BSc

    Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences
    University of Trieste
    Institute for Maternal and Child Health-IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
    Trieste, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Eulalia Catamo, BSc, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Cinzia Sala, PhD

    Division of Genetics and Cell Biology
    San Raffaele Scientific Institute
    Milano, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Cinzia Sala, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Chiara Elena, MD

    Department of Hematology Oncology
    IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo
    Pavia, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Chiara Elena, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Sara Pozzi, BSc

    Department of Molecular Medicine
    University of Pavia
    Pavia, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Sara Pozzi, BSc, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Elisa Bono, MD

    Department of Hematology Oncology
    IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo
    Department of Molecular Medicine
    University of Pavia
    Pavia, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Elisa Bono, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Virginia V. Ferretti, PhD

    Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometrics
    IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo
    Pavia, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Virginia V. Ferretti, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Ettore Rizzo, PhD

    enGenome s.r.l.
    Pavia, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Ettore Rizzo, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Elisabetta Molteni, PhD

    Department of Molecular Medicine
    University of Pavia
    Pavia, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Elisabetta Molteni, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Silvia Zibellini, PhD

    Department of Hematology Oncology
    IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo
    Pavia, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Silvia Zibellini, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Martina Sarchi, MD

    Department of Molecular Medicine
    University of Pavia
    Pavia, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Martina Sarchi, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Emanuela Boveri, MD

    Department of Pathology
    IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo
    Pavia, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Emanuela Boveri, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Jacqueline Ferrari, MD

    Department of Hematology Oncology
    IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo
    Department of Molecular Medicine
    University of Pavia
    Pavia, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Jacqueline Ferrari, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Nicolas Fiorelli, MD

    Department of Hematology Oncology
    IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo
    Department of Molecular Medicine
    University of Pavia
    Pavia, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Nicolas Fiorelli, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Clara Camaschella, MD

    Division of Genetics and Cell Biology
    San Raffaele Scientific Institute
    Milano, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Clara Camaschella, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Paolo Gasparini, MD

    Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences
    University of Trieste
    Institute for Maternal and Child Health-IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
    Trieste, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Paolo Gasparini, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Daniela Toniolo, PhD

    Division of Genetics and Cell Biology
    San Raffaele Scientific Institute
    Milano, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Daniela Toniolo, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Mario Cazzola, MD

    Department of Hematology Oncology
    IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo
    Department of Molecular Medicine
    University of Pavia
    Pavia, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Mario Cazzola, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Luca Malcovati, MD

    Department of Hematology Oncology
    IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo
    Department of Molecular Medicine
    University of Pavia
    Pavia, Italy

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Luca Malcovati, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Freelance writer and reviewer
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Editor

  • Andrew Roberts, MBBS, PhD

    Deputy Editor, Blood

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Andrew Roberts, MBBS, PhD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
    Received grants for clinical research from: His organization, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute received grants for clinical research from AbbVie Inc.; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    Other: His organization, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, received royalties related to venetoclax and will control any distribution based on their institutional policies about scientific contribution to commercial income.

CME Reviewer

  • Esther Nyarko, PharmD

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Esther Nyarko, PharmD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

None of the nonfaculty planners for this educational activity have relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose with ineligible companies whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, reselling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.


Accreditation Statements



In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by Medscape, LLC and the American Society of Hematology. Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 1.0 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read about the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or print it out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate, but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period, you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

From Blood
CME / ABIM MOC

Relationship Between Clone Metrics and Clinical Outcome in Clonal Cytopenia

Authors: Anna Gallì, PhD; Gabriele Todisco, MD; Eulalia Catamo, BSc; Cinzia Sala, PhD; Chiara Elena, MD; Sara Pozzi, BSc; Elisa Bono, MD; Virginia V. Ferretti, PhD; Ettore Rizzo, PhD; Elisabetta Molteni, PhD; Silvia Zibellini, PhD; Martina Sarchi, MD; Emanuela Boveri, MD; Jacqueline Ferrari, MD; Nicolas Fiorelli, MD; Clara Camaschella, MD; Paolo Gasparini, MD; Daniela Toniolo, PhD; Mario Cazzola, MD; Luca Malcovati, MDFaculty and Disclosures
THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT

CME / ABIM MOC Released: 9/16/2021

Valid for credit through: 9/16/2022

processing....

Abstract and Introduction

Abstract

Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) is associated with an increased risk of developing a myeloid neoplasm with myelodysplasia (MN). To identify the features of the mutant clone(s) that is associated with clinical phenotype and progression, we studied the following cohorts of individuals: 311 patients with idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS), 532 community-dwelling individuals without hematologic phenotype (n = 355) or with unexplained anemia (n = 177), and 592 patients with overt MN. Ninety-two of 311 (30%) patients with ICUS carried a somatic genetic lesion that signaled CCUS. Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) was detected in 19.7% and 27.7% of nonanemic and anemic community-dwelling individuals, respectively. Different mutation patterns and variant allele frequencies (VAFs) (clone metrics parameters) were observed in the conditions studied. Recurrent mutation patterns exhibited different VAFs associated with marrow dysplasia (0.17-0.48), indicating variable clinical expressivity of mutant clones. Unsupervised clustering analysis based on mutation profiles identified 2 major clusters, characterized by isolated DNMT3A mutations (CH-like cluster) or combinatorial mutation patterns (MN-like cluster), and showing different overall survival (HR, 1.8). In patients with CCUS, the 2 clusters had different risk of progression to MN (HR, 2.7). Within the MN-like cluster, distinct subsets with different risk of progression to MN were identified based on clone metrics. These findings unveil marked variability in the clinical expressivity of myeloid driver genes and underline the limitations of morphologic dysplasia for clinical staging of mutant hematopoietic clones. Clone metrics appears to be critical for informing clinical decision-making in patients with clonal cytopenia.

Introduction

In the past decade, massive parallel DNA sequencing studies have unveiled the genomic landscape of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) and related myeloid neoplasms with myelodysplasia (MNs). By using targeted gene sequencing in large patient cohorts, independent studies detected somatic mutations in several genes belonging to different biological pathways, and showed that most patients have combinatorial mutation patterns.[1-3] At the same time, population-based studies searched for somatic mutations of these genes in individuals not known to have any hematologic abnormalities.[4,5] These investigations have shown that selected somatic mutations, mainly those in genes of DNA methylation and histone modification, are commonly acquired during aging, resulting in clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), a condition with normal peripheral blood cell counts but increased risk of developing hematologic malignancies.[4-6] Somatic mutations in myeloid malignancy–related genes have also been detected in patients with aplastic anemia and have been found to be associated with worse outcomes, including progression to MDS.[7,8] Moreover, a recent population-based study showed higher prevalence of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in elderly individuals with unexplained anemia.[9]

From a clinical standpoint, demonstrating the clonal nature of hematopoiesis is particularly important in those disorders that do not fulfill the current diagnostic criteria for myeloid malignancy,[1,10] such as clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) or clonal monocytosis.[10-14] However, how to use molecular profiling in these patients is still unclear.[15-17] In particular, several issues related to CCUS remain to be clarified, including mutation signatures truly causative of cytopenia and factors contributing to the clinical expressivity of clones, as well as mechanisms of progression to overt malignancy.

In this study, we examined a prospective cohort of patients with CCUS who were sequentially investigated at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up, either in a phase of stable disease or at the time of progression to an MN. In addition, we studied cohorts of community-dwelling individuals and of patients with MN, to better define the associations between molecular profiles and hematologic phenotypes with clinical outcomes.