National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Breast cancer risk reduction (Version 1.2020). Published May 29, 2020. Accessed March 23, 2021. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast_risk.pdf
Siu AL; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164:279-296.
Oeffinger KC, Fontham ET, Etzioni R, et al. Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. JAMA. 2015;314:1599-1614.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN ). Breast cancer screening and diagnosis (Version 1.2020). Published September 17, 2020. Accessed March 23, 2021. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast-screening.pdf
Practice Bulletin Number 179: Breast cancer risk assessment and screening in average-risk women. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:e1-e16.
Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Hendrick RE, et al. Breast cancer screening for average-risk women: recommendations from the ACR Commission on Breast Imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14:1137-1143.
Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, et al. Breast cancer screening in women at higher-than-average risk: recommendations from the ACR. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:408-414.
Sickles EA, D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, et al. ACR BI-RADS^® Mammography. In: ACR BI-RADS^® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology; 2013.
Sprague BL, Kerlikowske K, Bowles EJA, et al. Trends in clinical breast density assessment from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111:629-632. 
Conant EF, Sprague BL, Kontos D. Beyond BI-RADS density: a call for quantification in the breast imaging clinic. Radiology. 2018;286:401-404.
Kim WH, Moon WK, Kim SM, et al. Variability of breast density assessment in short-term reimaging with digital mammography. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:1724-1730.
Nazari SS, Mukherjee P. An overview of mammographic density and its association with breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2018;25:259-267. 
Huo CW, Chew GL, Britt KL, et al. Mammographic density-a review on the current understanding of its association with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;144:479-502.
Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:227-236.
McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1159-1169.
Gierach GL, Ichikawa L, Kerlikowske K, et al. Relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer death in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1218-1227.
The American Society of Breast Surgeons Foundation website-Breast360.org. Breast density legislation. Updated 2021. Accessed March 24, 2021. https://breast360.org/topics/2017/01/01/breast-density-legislation/
Kyanko KA, Hoag J, Busch SH, et al. Dense breast notification laws, education, and women's awareness and knowledge of breast density: a nationally representative survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35:1940-1945.
Miles RC, Lehman C, Warner E, et al. Patient-reported breast density awareness and knowledge after breast density legislation passage. Acad Radiol. 2019;26:726-731.
Haas JS, Giess CS, Harris KA, et al. Randomized trial of personalized breast density and breast cancer risk notification. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34:591-597.
Boyd NF, Dite GS, Stone J, et al. Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:886-894.
Stone J, Dite GS, Gunasekara A, et al. The heritability of mammographically dense and nondense breast tissue. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:612-617.
del Carmen MG, Halpern EF, Kopans DB, et al. Mammographic breast density and race. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1147-1150.
Moore JX, Han Y, Appleton C, et al. Determinants of mammographic breast density by race among a large screening population. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020;4:pkaa010. 
Sprague BL, Gangnon RE, Burt V, et al. Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:dju255.
Azam S, Jacobsen KK, Aro AR, et al. Hormone replacement therapy and mammographic density: a systematic literature review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;182:555-579.
Nakajima E, Iwase T, Miyagi Y, et al. Association of parity and infant feeding method with breast density on mammography. Acad Radiol. 2020;27:e24-e26.
Woolcott CG, Koga K, Conroy SM, et al. Mammographic density, parity and age at first birth, and risk of breast cancer: an analysis of four case-control studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132:1163-1171.
Ekpo EU, Brennan PC, Mello-Thoms C, et al. Relationship between breast density and selective estrogen-receptor modulators, aromatase inhibitors, physical activity, and diet: a systematic review. Integr Cancer Ther. 2016;15:127-144.
Masala G, Assedi M, Sera F, et al. Can dietary and physical activity modifications reduce breast density in postmenopausal women? The DAMA study, a randomized intervention trial in Italy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019;28:41-50.
Masala G, Ambrogetti D, Assedi M, et al. Dietary and lifestyle determinants of mammographic breast density. A longitudinal study in a Mediterranean population. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:1782-1789. 
Masala G, Assedi M, Ambrogetti D, et al. Physical activity and mammographic breast density in a Mediterranean population: the EPIC Florence longitudinal study. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:1654-1661.
Ziembicki S, Zhu J, Tse E, et al. The association between alcohol consumption and breast density: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26:170-178.
Melnikow J, Fenton JJ, Whitlock EP, et al. Supplemental screening for breast cancer in women with dense breasts: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164:268-278.
Bakker MF, de Lange SV, Pijnappel RM, et al. Supplemental MRI screening for women with extremely dense breast tissue. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2091-2102.
Smetana GW, Elmore JG, Lee CI, et al. Should this woman with dense breasts receive supplemental breast cancer screening?: Grand rounds discussion from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:474-484.
Conant EF, Barlow WE, Herschorn SD, et al. Association of digital breast tomosynthesis vs digital mammography with cancer detection and recall rates by age and breast density. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:635-642.
Tagliafico AS, Mariscotti G, Valdora F, et al. A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2). Eur J Cancer. 2018;104:39-46.
Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008;299:2151-2163.
Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA. 2012;307:1394-1404.
Comstock CE, Gatsonis C, Newstead GM, et al. Comparison of abbreviated breast MRI vs digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection among women with dense breasts undergoing screening. JAMA. 2020;323:746-756.
Weinstein SP, Korhonen K, Cirelli C, et al. Abbreviated Breast magnetic resonance imaging for supplemental screening of women with dense breasts and average risk. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:3874-3882.
Verburg E, van Gils CH, Bakker MF, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging screening of women with extremely dense breasts to reduce false-positive diagnoses. Invest Radiol. 2020;55:438-444.

As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.

Medscape, LLC encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.

Faculty

Emily F. Conant, MD

Division Chief, Breast Imaging
Vice Chair Faculty Development Radiology
Professor of Radiology, Department of Radiology
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Disclosures

Disclosure: Emily F. Conant, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Served as an advisor or consultant for: Hologic; iCAD
Served as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: Aunt Minnie; Hologic; iCAD
Received grants for clinical research from: Hologic; iCAD

Editors

Victoria Phoenix, BS

Medical Education Director, Medscape, LLC

Disclosures

Disclosure: Vickie Phoenix, BS, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Tristin Abair, PhD

Senior Medical Writer, Medscape, LLC

Disclosures

Disclosure: Tristin Abair, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships

CME Reviewer

Esther Nyarko, PharmD

Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

Disclosures

Disclosure: Esther Nyarko, PharmD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.

Peer Reviewer

This activity has been peer reviewed and the reviewer has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME / ABIM MOC

Breast MRI: Cancer Screening for Women With Increased Breast Density

Authors: Emily F. Conant, MD
CME / ABIM MOC Released: 5/21/2021
THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED
Valid for credit through: 5/21/2022

Start Activity

Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for obstetrician gynecologists (Ob/Gyns), women's health specialists, primary care physicians (PCPs), and radiologists.

The goal of this activity is to educate healthcare providers on the current guidelines for screening patients at high risk for breast cancer and how to counsel high-risk patients about the pros and cons of breast cancer screening options.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

Have increased knowledge regarding the
- Screening guidelines for patients with dense breasts and average risk
- Benefits of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer screening

Disclosures

Faculty

Emily F. Conant, MD

Division Chief, Breast Imaging
Vice Chair Faculty Development Radiology
Professor of Radiology, Department of Radiology
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Disclosures

Disclosure: Emily F. Conant, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Served as an advisor or consultant for: Hologic; iCAD
Served as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: Aunt Minnie; Hologic; iCAD
Received grants for clinical research from: Hologic; iCAD

Editors

Victoria Phoenix, BS

Medical Education Director, Medscape, LLC

Disclosures

Disclosure: Vickie Phoenix, BS, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Tristin Abair, PhD

Senior Medical Writer, Medscape, LLC

Disclosures

Disclosure: Tristin Abair, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships

CME Reviewer

Esther Nyarko, PharmD

Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

Disclosures

Disclosure: Esther Nyarko, PharmD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.

Peer Reviewer

This activity has been peer reviewed and the reviewer has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Accreditation Statements

In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

For Physicians

Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]

Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

Read about the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
Study the educational content online or print it out.
Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate, but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period, you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

From Medscape Education Radiology

CME / ABIM MOC

Breast MRI: Cancer Screening for Women With Increased Breast Density

Authors: Emily F. Conant, MDFaculty and Disclosures

THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED

CME / ABIM MOC Released: 5/21/2021

Valid for credit through: 5/21/2022

processing....

Carrie is a 46-year-old middle school teacher who recently had her first baseline breast cancer screening with digital mammography based on recommendations from her primary care physician. She subsequently received a letter indicating that no abnormalities were found by mammography and informing her that she had heterogeneously dense breast tissue, BI-RADS® density category C. The letter indicated that she should speak with her doctor regarding the effect of her breast density on breast cancer risk and optimal screening. She called her Ob/Gyn with several questions and a telemedicine visit was scheduled to address her questions and determine the appropriate next steps.

CME / ABIM MOC Information Download Slides

Print
Like Tweet

Disclaimer

The educational activity presented above may involve simulated, case-based scenarios. The patients depicted in these scenarios are fictitious and no association with any actual patient, whether living or deceased, is intended or should be inferred. The material presented here does not necessarily reflect the views of Medscape, LLC, or any individuals or commercial entities that support companies that support educational programming on medscape.org. These materials may include discussion of therapeutic products that have not been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, off-label uses of approved products, or data that were presented in abstract form. These data should be considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal. Readers should verify all information and data before treating patients or employing any therapies described in this or any educational activity. A qualified healthcare professional should be consulted before using any therapeutic product discussed herein.

References

Faculty and Disclosures

Faculty

Emily F. Conant, MD

Editors

Victoria Phoenix, BS

Tristin Abair, PhD

CME Reviewer

Esther Nyarko, PharmD

Peer Reviewer

CME / ABIM MOC

Breast MRI: Cancer Screening for Women With Increased Breast Density

Target Audience and Goal Statement

Disclosures

Faculty

Emily F. Conant, MD

Editors

Victoria Phoenix, BS

Tristin Abair, PhD

CME Reviewer

Esther Nyarko, PharmD

Peer Reviewer

Accreditation Statements

For Physicians

Instructions for Participation and Credit

Breast MRI: Cancer Screening for Women With Increased Breast Density