Regimen | Drug 1, dose | Drug 2, dose |
---|---|---|
Levofloxacin/ethambutol | Levofloxacin, ≤5 y: 15–20 mg/kg, >5 y: 7.5–10 mg/kg; max. dose 1,000 mg/d | Ethambutol, 15–25 mg/kg; max. dose 2,000 mg/kg |
Levofloxacin/ethionamide | Levofloxacin, ≤5 y: 15–20 mg/kg, >5 y: 7.5–10 mg/kg; max. dose 1,000 mg/d | Ethionamide, 15–20 mg/kg; max. dose 750 mg/kg |
Moxifloxacin/ethambutol | Moxifloxacin, 7.5–10 mg/kg; max. dose 400 mg/d | Ethambutol, 15–25 mg/kg; max. dose 2,000 mg/kg |
Moxifloxacin/ethionamide | Moxifloxacin, 7.5–10 mg/kg; max. dose 400 mg/d | Ethionamide, 15–20 mg/kg; max. dose 750 mg/kg |
*Max., maximum. |
Table 1. Preventive therapy regimens in study of persons exposed at home to drug-resistant tuberculosis, Karachi, Pakistan, February 2016–March 2017*
Characteristic | Becerra et al.[25] | Fox et al.[22] | Reichler et al.[26] | Martin-Sanchez et al.[27] | Sloot et al.[28] | Saunders et al.[29] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Setting | Peru | Global | US and Canada | Spain | Netherlands | Peru |
Year | 2013 | 2013 | 2019 | 2019 | 2014 | 2017 |
HHC age group, y | ||||||
<15 | 1,299 | N/A | 879 | 77 | 1,489 | NA |
≥15 | 3,411 | N/A | 3,611 | 876 | 7,757 | 1,910 |
IR or risk | IR and risk | IR and risk | IR and risk | IR and risk | Risk | Risk |
IR or risk by PT status | No PT for DR TB exposure | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
IR or risk by age and year of follow-up | Yes | Not by age but by year of follow-up | No | No cases in children | No | No |
IR or risk by risk group | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
IR or risk reported | <15 y, Y 1: 2,079/100,000 p-y; <15 y, Y 2: 315/100,000 p-y; ≥15 y, Y 1: 2,610/100,000 p-y; ≥15 y, Y 2: 1,309/100,000 p-y; risk: 163/4,515 (3.6%) | Y 1: 1,478/100,000 p-y; Y 2: 831/100,000 p-y; risk: 898/65,935 (1.4%) | Rate: 951/100,000 p-y; 5 y risk for TST-positive contacts without PT: 49/446 (11.0%) | Rate: 1970/100,000 p-y; 5 y risk for TST-positive contacts not completing PT: 6/72 (8.3%) | 2 y risk in TST-positive contacts without PT: 9/372 (2.4%) | 2.5 y risk for medium- to high-risk contacts in validation cohort: 57/1,335 (4.3%) |
Other limitations | Some children received isoniazid-based PT | NA | P-y accumulated over 5 y | No cases in children less than 15 y; p-y accumulated over 5.3 y | Definition of incidence >6 mo | HHCs >15 y |
Table 2. Details of studies from which data were extracted for analysis in study of persons exposed at home to drug-resistant tuberculosis, Karachi, Pakistan, February 2016–March 2017*
*DR TB, drug-resistant tuberculosis; HHC, household contacts; IR, incidence rate; PT, preventive therapy; p-y, person-years; TST, tuberculin skin test; Y, year of follow-up; NA, data not available.
Characteristic | No. (%) or median [IQR] | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Total, n = 789† | On PT, n = 172 | Did not start PT, n = 43 | Not eligible for PT, n = 574 | |
Age group, y | 19 [10–32] | 7 [3–15] | 16 [3–22] | 24 [15–36] |
<15 | 283 (36) | 128 (74) | 21 (49) | 134 (23) |
≥15 | 506 (64) | 44 (26) | 22 (51) | 440 (77) |
Sex | ||||
M | 423 (54) | 91 (53) | 20 (47) | 312 (54) |
F | 366 (46) | 81 (47) | 23 (53) | 262 (46) |
BMI, kg/m2 | 18.1 [14.8–24.0], n = 616 | 14.8 [13.4–16.9], n = 171 | 15.2 [13.4–16.9], n = 42 | 21.6 [17.1–26.0], n = 403 |
Presence of symptoms | n = 737 | n = 172 | n = 43 | n = 522 |
Cough, duration | 10 (1) | 3 (2) | 2 (5) | 5 (1) |
Fever | 7 (1) | 1 (1) | 3 (7) | 3 (1) |
Weight loss | 12 (2) | 1 (1) | 2 (5) | 9 (2) |
Additional TB risk factors | n = 737 | n = 172 | n = 43 | n = 522 |
History of TB | 9 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 9 (2) |
TST >5 mm | 6/136 (4) | 6/64 (9) | 0/11 (0) | 0/61 (0) |
Index patient resistant to FQ | 138 (19) | 16 (9) | 11 (26) | 111 (21) |
Regimen given | ||||
Levofloxacin/ethambutol | NA | 102 (59) | NA | NA |
Levofloxacin/ethionamide | NA | 54 (31) | NA | NA |
Moxifloxacin/ethambutol | NA | 11 (6) | NA | NA |
Moxifloxacin/ethionamide | NA | 5 (3) | NA | NA |
TB disease occurred during follow-up | 2 (0.3) | 2 (1) | 0 | 0 |
Table 3. Demographics and clinical characteristics of household contacts exposed to drug-resistant tuberculosis free of disease at baseline in study of preventive therapy in Karachi, Pakistan, February 2016–March 2017*
*FQ, fluoroquinolone; NA, not applicable; PT, preventive therapy; TB, tuberculosis; TST, tuberculin skin test.
†Excluding 3 contacts found to have TB and 8 already on treatment for TB at time of screening.
Characteristic | Becerra et al.[25] | Fox et al.[22] | Reichler et al.[26] | Martin-Sanchez et al.[27] |
---|---|---|---|---|
No. expected cases | 4.7 | 3.9 | 6.6 | 6.6 |
Expected IR per 1,000 p-y | 15 | 12 | 20 | 20 |
IRR (95% CI) | 0.40 (0.05–2.0) | 0.50 (0.06–2.8) | 0.29 (0.04–1.3) | 0.29 (0.04–1.3) |
IR difference per 1,000 p-y (95% CI) | −8.0 (–23.0 to 7.1) | −5.7 (–20.0 to 8.5) | −14 (–31.0 to 3.4) | −14 (–31.0 to 3.4) |
NNT | 64 | 91 | 37 | 37 |
Preventive fraction in exposed, % | 57.5 | 48.7 | 69.5 | 69.7 |
Table 4. Incidence rate comparison of effectiveness of preventive therapy for tuberculosis in published studies in study of persons exposed at home to drug-resistant tuberculosis, Karachi, Pakistan*
*IR, incidence rate; IRR, incidence rate ratio; NNT, number needed to treat; p-y, person-years.
This activity is intended for primary care physicians, infectious disease specialists, and other physicians who treat and manage patients at risk for tuberculosis.
The goal of this activity is to assess the efficacy of a prophylaxis regimen against multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will:
As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.
Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.
Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME for a maximum of 1.0
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 1.0 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate, but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period, you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME / ABIM MOC Released: 2/22/2021
Valid for credit through: 2/22/2022, 11:59 PM EST
processing....
In Karachi, Pakistan, a South Asian megacity with a high prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) and low HIV prevalence, we assessed the effectiveness of fluoroquinolone-based preventive therapy for drug-resistant (DR) TB exposure. During February 2016–March 2017, high-risk household contacts of DR TB patients began a 6-month course of preventive therapy with a fluoroquinolone-based, 2-drug regimen. We assessed effectiveness in this cohort by comparing the rate and risk for TB disease over 2 years to the rates and risks reported in the literature. Of 172 participants, TB occurred in 2 persons over 336 person-years of observation. TB disease incidence rate observed in the cohort was 6.0/1,000 person-years. The incidence rate ratio ranged from 0.29 (95% CI 0.04–1.3) to 0.50 (95% CI 0.06–2.8), with a pooled estimate of 0.35 (95% CI 0.14–0.87). Overall, fluoroquinolone-based preventive therapy for DR TB exposure reduced risk for TB disease by 65%.
Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading infectious cause of death globally and the 9th leading cause overall[1]. TB causes ≈10 million new cases and 1.7 million deaths annually[1]. Annually, ≈650,000 TB patients have multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB, defined as TB that is resistant to both isoniazid and rifampin[1]. Treatment for MDR TB is toxic, complex, and prolonged, and it has a success rate of only 55%[1–3]. Therefore, preventive interventions, including preventive therapy and future vaccines, are essential to reduce cases and deaths from MDR TB[4,5].
Delivering effective treatment for exposure to drug-resistant (DR) TB is central to the work of Zero TB Initiative coalitions, which aim to rapidly drive down TB rates worldwide[6]. Household contacts of persons with DR TB are at high risk for TB[7] and are prime candidates for preventive interventions[8]. Available standard preventive therapies are not expected to protect persons exposed to MDR TB because the infecting TB strain in the exposed person is highly likely to be resistant to isoniazid and rifampin. A meta-analysis of 33 studies found that >80% of household contacts of persons with DR TB in whom TB occurred also had isoniazid-resistant strains[9]. Thus, household contacts of persons with DR TB should receive treatment under the assumption that they, too, are infected with a DR Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain[9].
Evidence is limited regarding effective preventive regimens for MDR TB, in contrast to the abundant evidence available for preventive therapy in isoniazid-sensitive TB[10]. Although data from randomized controlled trials are not available to guide the approach to preventive therapy for MDR TB, observational studies from the Federated States of Micronesia, United States, United Kingdom, and South Africa have shown efficacy of fluoroquinolone-based preventive therapy in adults and children[11–17]. The largest observational study with a comparison arm, from the Federated States of Micronesia, described 104 household contacts of persons with MDR TB who received preventive therapy with a fluoroquinolone-based regimen for 12 months. During 3 years of follow-up, TB did not occur in any of the contacts who received preventive therapy; in 3 (20%) of the 15 contacts who refused treatment, MDR TB occurred. A meta-analysis of observational studies determined MDR TB preventive therapy to be 90% effective, and a wide range of 9%–99% effectiveness was reported[18].
Most studies of preventive therapy for MDR TB have been conducted in either high-resource settings or settings with a high prevalence of HIV. Hence, evaluations of the effectiveness of MDR TB preventive therapy in other settings are needed. In Karachi, Pakistan, which has a high TB burden and low HIV prevalence setting (annual TB incidence of 265/100,000 and HIV prevalence [among persons 15–49 years of age] of 0.1%)[1,19], we examined the effectiveness of fluoroquinolone-based 2-drug preventive therapy for high-risk household contacts of persons with DR TB.