You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

 

CME / CE

Will Newborn Hearing Screening Detect Autism?

  • Authors: News Author: Pauline Anderson; CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MD
  • CME / CE Released: 2/22/2021
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT
  • Valid for credit through: 2/22/2022, 11:59 PM EST
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for pediatricians, family medicine practitioners, neurologists, nurses, psychiatrists, and other members of the health care team involved in newborn hearing screening or in early detection of autism spectrum disorder.

Describe abnormalities in auditory brainstem response testing among healthy newborns who later develop autism spectrum disorder, based on a study using data from Universal Newborn Hearing Screening.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  • Assess auditory brainstem response abnormalities in healthy newborns who later develop autism spectrum disorder, based on a study using Universal Newborn Hearing Screening data
  • Evaluate the clinical implications of auditory brainstem response abnormalities in healthy newborns who later develop autism spectrum disorder, based on a study using Universal Newborn Hearing Screening data
  • Outline implications for the healthcare team


Disclosures

As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.

Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.


News Author

  • Pauline Anderson

    Freelance writer, Medscape

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Pauline Anderson has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Freelance writer and reviewer
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Editor/CME Reviewer

  • Hazel Dennison, DNP, RN, FNP-BC, CHCP, CPHQ, CNE

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Hazel Dennison, DNP, RN, FNP-BC, CHCP, CPHQ, CNE, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Nurse Planner

  • Stephanie Corder, ND, RN, CHCP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Stephanie Corder, ND, RN, CHCP, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.  

Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

Medscape

Interprofessional Continuing Education

In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

IPCE

This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
     

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of nursing continuing professional development for RNs and APNs; 0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read about the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or print it out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate, but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period, you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / CE

Will Newborn Hearing Screening Detect Autism?

Authors: News Author: Pauline Anderson; CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MDFaculty and Disclosures
THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT

CME / CE Released: 2/22/2021

Valid for credit through: 2/22/2022, 11:59 PM EST

processing....

Clinical Context

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by restricted behavior and deficits in social communication and interaction. Previous research showed prolonged auditory brainstem response (ABR) in children and adults with ASD.

Although ABR is a promising biomarker, it is unclear whether healthy newborns who later develop ASD also have ABR abnormalities. The current study addressed this question using ABR data from Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS).

Study Synopsis and Perspective

A commonly used newborn hearing test shows promise for early detection of ASD, according to one of the largest studies of its kind, published online October 31 in Autism Research.

The ABR test, performed on most newborns, represents "a huge untapped potential" to detect autism, lead author Oren Miron, research associate, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, and a PhD candidate at Ben Gurion University in Israel, told Medscape Medical News.

"The findings further reinforce our understanding that autism, in many cases, has a sensorial and auditory aspect," said Miron, adding that an adverse response to sound is one of the earliest behavioral signs of autism.

Early Intervention Critical

ASD affects an estimated 1 in 59 children. Early identification and intervention are critical for improving outcomes and decreasing the associated economic burden.

ABR, used for UNHS, uses surface electrodes to measure auditory nerve and brainstem responses to sound delivered through an earpiece at 35 decibels (dB) above normal hearing level (nHL) at 77 clicks/second in the right ear and 79 clicks/second in the left ear.

Previous studies identified abnormal ABR amplitude in children with ASD. However, it is unclear whether healthy newborns who later develop autism also show ABR differences vs those who do not.

UNHS data provided a larger, younger, healthier sample compared with previous studies (321 newborns later diagnosed with ASD; 138,844 controls). Mean ABR testing age was 1.76 vs 1.86 days; 76.95% vs 51.11% were male; neonatal intensive care unit admission rate was 7.79% vs 9.72%.

Brainstem Abnormalities?

When sound reaches the brain stem, it creates 5 consecutive waveforms: I, II, III, IV, and V.

Previous studies focused on wave V, which is easiest to detect. The current study used low-intensity sound, causing a weaker signal. To overcome this, the researchers focused on the negative drop (latency) after wave V (Vn), which is easier to detect, and on ABR phase, or the entire waveform.

ABR phase was prolonged in the ASD vs non-ASD group in the right (P<.001) and left (P=.021) ear. In the right but not left ear, Vn latency was significantly prolonged (P=.048) such that Vn might appear after 8 msec in normally developing children vs 8.5 to 9 msec in those with autism.

This is the first study to show Vn and phase abnormalities associated with ASD, suggesting anatomical abnormalities in the brainstem.

Present Before Birth?

The presence of ABR biomarkers of ASD in the first weeks after birth suggests it is likely present before birth in many of these children.

It is possible the ABR test could be modified to use lower intensities to detect not only hearing impairment but also autism risk, said Miron. "The test has been optimized to detect hearing impairment, and it does so brilliantly and it helps thousands of children. We want to do the same kind of optimization for autism."

The level of prolongation to detect ASD is still unclear. "I would think a lot of people would want to make it 1 standard deviation [SD], but it depends on a lot of factors, including, for example, whether a baby is preterm," he said.

More research and better accuracy and specificity are needed before the newborn hearing test is clinically useful. Miron noted that it is only one marker of autism, which could potentially be combined with other behavioral signs and genetic markers to facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment and improve outcomes for patients with ASD.

Future research by his group will investigate whether the degree of auditory prolongation relates to autism severity and ASD subgroups including children with comorbid epilepsy.

Terrific, Clever Research

Commenting for Medscape Medical News, Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeele, MD, professor, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Columbia University, called the study "terrific" and a "clever use" of an existing data set, showing "a difference between a large group of kids with autism and a large group of kids without," but more research is needed.

"[F]or this to be a screening test that could be broadly applied you would need to identify a cutoff where you'd think a child was at risk for autism, [but] there are no clear cutoffs," he said. "[Y]ou would have to establish sensitivity and specificity [and] look not just at the comparison of kids with autism and kids without but apply it in a predictive way in a second population."

The study authors and Dr Veenstra-VanderWeele have no relevant conflicts of interest.

Study Highlights

  • ABR data from 139,154 newborns who had UNHS included 321 later diagnosed with ASD.
  • UNHS data included tests using 35 dB nHL, which is a lower sound intensity than that used in most ASD studies (85 dB nHL), resulting in weaker signal and lower signal-to-noise ratio, preventing precise labeling of wave V-positive.
  • The analysis focused on wave Vn, which is easier to detect, and ABR phase, which is more robust in noisy conditions.
  • ASD vs non-ASD newborns had significantly prolonged ABR phase in the right (P<.001) and left (P=.021) ear and Vn latency in the right but not left ear (P=.048).
  • ASD newborns also had greater variance in latencies compared with previous studies in older ASD samples, likely caused partly by low ABR stimulus intensity.
  • The findings suggest that at birth, newborns have neurophysiological variation associated with ASD, namely, ABR phase increases and latency prolongation, especially in the right ear.
  • These findings are similar to prolonged ABR latencies reported in older infants and children with ASD.
  • ABR prolongation could reflect anatomical abnormalities in the brainstem of persons with ASD, such as those previously reported in the olivary complex at age 2 to 36 years.
  • Early detection of ASD risk could result in earlier diagnosis, allowing earlier treatments and better outcomes.
  • ABR biomarkers of ASD in the first weeks after birth suggests that for many, ASD is likely present before birth.
  • Study limitations include those inherent in UNHS data, including tests using 35 dB nHL.
  • As Vn and phase have not been studied as widely as wave-V, the findings should be replicated to determine whether they are clinically useful.
  • The smaller signal-to-noise ratio likely resulted in a larger SD in latencies compared with previous ASD studies, with no clear cutoffs, preventing robust, clinically useful classification model.
  • Future studies using higher-intensity stimulus ABRs may improve accuracy of ASD risk predictions, which could augment the universal ABR test currently used to screen millions of newborns worldwide.
  • Even if future studies achieve sufficient accuracy for detecting ASD risk, clinicians should rule out hearing impairment and other diagnoses affecting ABR and should refer infants for behavioral ASD diagnosis.
  • To determine ABR settings that can best identify children who later develop ASD, future studies should also test newborns at increased genetic risk for ASD because of family history, and children already diagnosed with ASD, using higher stimulus intensities.
  • Combining ABR and genetic biomarkers could improve classification of ASD and clarify its early development.

Clinical Implications

  • ASD vs non-ASD newborns had significantly prolonged ABR phase in both ears and Vn latency in the right but not left ear.
  • Early detection of ASD risk could result in earlier diagnosis, allowing earlier treatments and better outcomes.
  • Implications for the Health Care Team: Even if future studies are sufficiently accurate to detect ASD risk, clinicians should rule out hearing impairment and other diagnoses affecting ABR and should refer infants for a behavioral ASD diagnosis.

 

Earn Credit

  • Print