You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

 

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Is Rapid Rise in CVT Concerning?

  • Authors: MDEdge News Author: Erik Greb; CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MD
  • CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 11/9/2020
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED
  • Valid for credit through: 11/9/2021
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This article is intended for primary care clinicians, emergency medicine clinicians, family medicine/primary care practitioners, internists, neurologists, nurses, and other members of the healthcare team who care for patients with cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT).

The goal of this activity is to provide medical news to primary care clinicians and other healthcare professionals in order to enhance patient care.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  • Describe trends in age-, sex- and race-specific incidences of CVT in the United States over the last decade, according to a retrospective cohort study
  • Determine clinical implications of trends in age-, sex- and race-specific incidences of CVT in the United States over the last decade, according to a retrospective cohort study
  • Outline implications for the healthcare team


Disclosures

As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.

Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.


MDEdge News Author

  • Erik Greb

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Erik Greb has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

     

CME Author

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Freelance writer and reviewer, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Reviewer

  • Esther Nyarko, PharmD

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Esther Nyarko, PharmD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Editor/Nurse Planner

  • Stephanie Corder, ND, RN, CHCP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Stephanie Corder, ND, RN, CHCP, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.  

Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements



In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of continuing nursing education for RNs and APNs; none of these credits is in the area of pharmacology.

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 75% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Is Rapid Rise in CVT Concerning?

Authors: MDEdge News Author: Erik Greb; CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MDFaculty and Disclosures
THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED

CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 11/9/2020

Valid for credit through: 11/9/2021

processing....

Clinical Context

Cerebral venous thrombosis is a relatively uncommon but important etiology of stroke that may confer significant morbidity and mortality. Older studies of the annual incidence of CVT likely failed to detect many cases, as they predated the widespread use of modern noninvasive imaging techniques. More recent studies suggest that incidence may be higher than previously estimated, but population-based data are still limited regarding trends in CVT incidence and hospitalizations, particularly in multi-ethnic populations.

 The goal of this retrospective cohort study by Otite and colleagues was to test the hypothesis that race-, age- and sex-specific incidences of CVT have increased in the United States over the last decade.

Study Synopsis and Perspective

The US incidence of CVT, an uncommon but important cause of stroke, is more than 3 times greater than previously reported, new research suggests; however, whether this is a real increase or simply an artifact of better detection is unclear.

Results of a large population-based study that included data for inpatient hospital stays throughout New York and Florida showed the incidence of CVT, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, increased from 13.9 cases/million in 2006 to 20.2 cases/million in 2014. Most of the increased CVT incidence over time resulted from increases among men of all ages and women age 45 years and older.

"CVT is considered to be a disease that predominantly affects young women. Part of the message to neurologists is that the demographic characteristics of CVT may be changing. More men and older women are now developing CVT, and in the appropriate clinical scenario, [neurologists] should have a high index of suspicion for CVT," study investigator Fadar Oliver Otite, MD, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, New York, told Medscape Medical News.

The findings were published online August 26 in Neurology.

Unique Study

Previous research examining the incidence of CVT relied on data that predated the widespread use of modern noninvasive diagnostic technologies, introducing the possibility that the condition has been underdetected in the past.

More recent research from other countries suggested CVT incidence may be higher than previously thought, but there is still a lack of population-based data examining incidence trends and hospitalizations, particularly in ethnic populations, the investigators noted.

"Population-based studies are very rare. This is one of a few studies to evaluate CVT incidence using the entire population of multiple states in the US," said Otite. He also noted this is the first study to evaluate CVT incidence by race. 

The study had 3 primary aims: quantify current racial, age, and sex-specific CVT incidence in the United States; investigate trends in the incidence and the overall burden of CVT hospitalizations; and describe trends in the prevalence of CVT over the past decade.

To identify all new cases of CVT between 2006 and 2016, the researchers used nationally representative retrospective administrative claims data from the acute care hospitals participating in the State Inpatients Databases (SIDs) of New York and Florida.

The investigators chose these 2 states because they are large, demographically diverse, and together represent > 10% of the US population, so are likely nationally representative.

A Doubling in the Elderly

Researchers identified all hospitalizations of patients age 18 years or older with a first diagnosis of CVT using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes.

To determine national generalizability, they used ICD codes to identify all adult stroke hospitalizations in the National Inpatient Sample, which is a database of a 20% stratified sample of all hospital discharges in the United States during the study period.

Finally, the researchers used ICD codes to identify established risk factors for CVT such as pregnancy/puerperium, prothrombotic conditions, inflammatory diseases, and contraceptive use.

They identified a total of 57,315 weighted CVT admissions from 2005 through 2016. These admissions accounted for 0.66% of all adult hospitalizations for any cerebrovascular disease during that period. The proportion of CVT stroke admissions increased from 0.47% in 2005 to 0.8% in 2016.

Two-thirds (66.7%) of CVT hospitalizations in the United States were in women, but this decreased during the period. Hospitalizations in men increased from 22.9% in 2005 to 43.1% in 2016: an increase of 88.6%. The mean age was 49.6 years among men and 42.1 years among women; the mean age increased steadily among women during the entire study period.

Women ages 18 to 44 years accounted for 56.5% of all CVT hospitalizations in the United States in 2005 and 27.6% of all CVT hospitalizations in 2016. In contrast, CVT incidence in elderly adults more than doubled from 11.2% in 2005 to 24.7% in 2016.

Racial Differences

CVT incidence also differed by race. Results showed the incidence was disproportionately higher in Black individuals in New York and Florida, where it jumped from 18.6 cases/million population in 2010 to 21.2 cases/million in 2016. In contrast, CVT incidence in Asian people increased from 5.1 cases/million in 2010 to 13.8 cases/million in 2016; and for White persons, the incidence rose from 14.3 cases/million to 18.4 cases/million.

The exact reasons for the racial disparity in CVT incidence is unknown, the investigators noted; however, they added, it is possible that Black people may have an underlying predisposition to thrombosis.

They pointed out that fibrinogen levels, an essential component of blood clots and an "established marker" of coronary artery disease and stroke, are known to be higher in people of African descent vs European Americans.

Furthermore, they pointed out that systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), sarcoidosis, and other inflammatory conditions associated with CVT incidence are more prevalent and more severe in Black individuals vs White individuals.

Finally, they noted, race may be a proxy for socioeconomic and lifestyle risk factors that increase CVT risk.

"Studies evaluating the role of access to healthcare, neighborhood factors and other social determinants of health that separate across racial lines and may possibly influence CVT risk are lacking. Further studies are needed to address these and other potential explanatory factors," the investigators wrote. 

In the United States, most hospitalized patients (57.4% of men and 63.6% of women) had at least 1 CVT risk factor. The most common associated conditions in women were pregnancy and puerperium (21.7%), cancer (11.8%), and inflammatory conditions (11.4%). In men, the most common conditions were cancer (19.5%), central nervous system (CNS) trauma (11.3%), and CNS infection (11.2%).

The proportion of women hospitalized with comorbid codes for pregnancy and puerperium decreased by more than 50% during the study period; however, the proportion of hospitalizations with comorbid cancer and comorbid CNS trauma increased significantly in both sexes.

The exact reasons for these changes in CVT risk factors are unclear and require further research, said Otite.

A Much-Needed Update

Commenting on the findings for Medscape Medical News, Shashank Shekhar, MD, assistant professor of vascular neurology at the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson, Mississippi, said the study provides much needed up-to-date information on the incidence and prevalence of CVT.

"Representative and up-to-date information on the incidence and prevalence of CVT has been lacking in the US population," Shekhar told Medscape Medical News. "This study gives us the latest trends from a representative sample from the US and sheds light on the evolving racial and sex disparity of the disease."

The results will improve neurologists' understanding of CVT and ultimately improve patient care, Shekhar added.

Nevertheless, he added, the study has limitations. The community-level incidence of CVT may be underreported because of missing data for asymptomatic or mild cases, said Shekhar. On initial presentation, some patients may have received a misdiagnosis.

"In addition, CVT risk factor prevalence should be interpreted with caution, as improved patient care risk category may have modified the temporal association between risk factors and CVT."

The database that the investigators used also did not include information about all CVT risk factors.

Increased prevalence of known CVT risk factors, and the emergence of unknown CVT risk factors, could explain the increasing incidence of CVT, said Shekhar.

Like the investigators, Shekhar pointed out the potential genetic, socioeconomic, and lifestyle risk factors that may make Black individuals more vulnerable to CVT and called for more research into prevention and treatment.

"Future research should focus on replicating similar multiethnic studies in different parts of the country to better understand the etiological reasons for the trend," he said. "Future studies should also focus on an individualized and optimal treatment regimen for CVT patients and develop new risk modification and preventive therapies."

The study had no specific funding. Otite and Shekhar have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

 Neurology. Published online August 26, 2020.[1]

Study Highlights

  • This retrospective cohort study by Otite and colleagues used validated ICD codes to identify all new cases of CVT from administrative claims data in the SIDs of New York and Florida, which are thought to be nationally representative, from 2006 to 2016.
  • The definition of a new CVT case was the first hospitalization for CVT entered in the SID without previous CVT hospitalization, in persons age ≥ 18 years.
  • Investigators calculated CVT incidence from CVT counts combined with annual US Census data and assessed trends in incidence over time using joinpoint regression.
  • From 2006 to 2016, annual overall age and sex-standardized incidence of CVT increased from 13.9 cases/million to 20.2 cases/million population.
  • CVTs accounted for 0.66% of all stroke admissions during the period 2005-2016, and this proportion increased by 70% over time.
  • CVT incidence varied significantly by sex (female: 20.3-26.9 cases/million population [66.7% of total CVT hospitalizations]; male: 6.8-16.8 cases/million population) and by age/sex (men age 18-44 years [5.3-12.8 cases/million population]).
  • CVT incidence also varied by race (Blacks: 18.6-27.2; Whites: 14.3-18.5; Asians: 5.1-13.8).
  • Mean age at hospitalization for CVT was 49.6 years in men and 42.1 years in women, increasing steadily in women across the study period.
  • Joinpoint regression showed that incidence increased over the period from 2006 to 2016, driven mostly by increases in all age groups of male individuals (combined annualized percentage change [APC] = 9.2%; P < .001), women ages 45 to 64 years (7.8%, P < .001) and women age ≥ 65 years (APC = 7.4%; P < .001).
  • Hospitalizations in men increased by 88.6%, from 22.9% in 2005 to 43.1% in 2016, whereas hospitalizations in women decreased.
  • In 2005, women ages 18 to 44 years accounted for 56.5% of all CVT hospitalizations, which decreased to 27.6% in 2016.
  • Meanwhile, CVT incidence in elderly adults more than doubled, from 11.2% in 2005 to 24.7% in 2016.
  • Among women ages 18 to 44 years, incidence remained stable over time.
  • CVT incidence increased from 18.6 cases/million population in 2010 to 21.2 cases/million population in 2016 in Blacks; from 5.1 cases/million to 13.8 cases/million in Asians; and from 14.3 cases/million to 18.4 cases/million in Whites.
  • A sensitivity analysis showed that the trend in CVT incidence remained significantly high when limited to the period before ICD, 10th revision introduction.
  • There was a marked increase over time in the proportion of CVT hospitalizations with comorbid codes for brain tumor, cancer, and inflammatory diseases.
  • Prevalence of obesity, which may also be an emerging risk factor for CVT when combined with oral contraceptive usage, more than doubled in CVT hospitalizations over time.
  • More than half (57.4% of men and 63.6% of women) had ≥ 1 CVT risk factor, particularly pregnancy and puerperium (21.7%), cancer (11.8%), and inflammatory conditions (11.4%) in women and cancer (19.5%), central nervous system (CNS) trauma (11.3%), and CNS infection (11.2%) in men.
  • Although the proportion of women with comorbid codes for pregnancy and puerperium fell by > 50% during the study, the proportion of both sexes with comorbid cancer and comorbid CNS trauma increased significantly.
  • According to their findings, the investigators concluded that CVT incidence is disproportionately higher in Blacks than in other races and that new CVT hospitalizations increased significantly over the last decade mostly in men and older women.
  • The investigators called for further research to determine whether this apparent increase reflects an actual increase from changing risk factors, such as increased survival after a cancer diagnosis or greater prevalence of brain tumor, obesity, and inflammatory diseases.
  • Alternatively, the apparent rise in CVT prevalence may be an artifactual increase from better detection by improved imaging tests and increased clinician awareness of CVT.
  • Whether actual or artifactual, rising CVT incidence suggests that it is either a growing or previously unrecognized problem in men and older women and is no longer limited to only young women.
  • US incidence of CVT has more than tripled since previous reports, as seen in recent studies from other countries, but the demographics of detected cases in the United States has changed.
  • Although incidence of CVT was disproportionately higher in Blacks than in other races, the findings need to be confirmed in other multi-ethnic studies to clarify the causes underlying the changing trends in CVT incidence.
  • Blacks may be at increased risk for thrombosis, as they have higher levels of fibrinogen, which is required for thrombus formation and which is a known marker of coronary artery disease and stroke, than do European Americans.
  • Compared with Whites, Blacks also have greater prevalence and severity of SLE, sarcoidosis, and other inflammatory conditions linked to CVT incidence.
  • Race may also be a proxy marker for socioeconomic and lifestyle risk factors associated with increased CVT risk.
  • Study limitations include potential underestimation or overestimation of true incidence depending on the baseline risk of dying or migrating patients; possible effects of changing ICD codes over time; and inability to determine the impact on the findings of increased CVT ascertainment over time.
  • In addition, caution is warranted regarding the demonstrated trends in CVT risk factor prevalence, as the study only showed a cross-sectional association between these factors and CVT, precluding causal or temporal inferences.
  • The databases also lacked information on individual prothrombotic conditions such as Factor V Leiden or prothrombin gene mutation.
  • An expert consulted by Medscape noted that future research should also help to determine optimal patient-specific treatment regimens for CVT, new risk modification interventions, and preventive therapies.

Clinical Implications

  • US incidence of CVT appears to have risen in the past decade, more so in Black and male individuals, according to a retrospective cohort study by Otite and colleagues.
  • The findings may reflect an actual increase caused by changing risk factors, or an artifactual increase from better detection by improved imaging tests and increased clinician awareness of CVT.
  • Implications for the Healthcare Team: Whether actual or artifactual, rising CVT incidence suggests that it is either a growing or previously unrecognized problem in men and older women and no longer limited to only young women.

 

Earn Credit

  • Print