Characteristics at baseline | |
---|---|
Patients, N | 124 |
Gender, N (%) | |
Female | 67/124 (54%) |
Median age in years (IQR) | 9.5 (4) |
Ethnicitya | |
European | 83/124 (66.9%) |
East Asian | 13/124 (10.5%) |
Otherb | 29/124 (22.6%) |
Parental presence of myopia, N (%) | |
No myopia | 12/124 (9.7%) |
One parent | 51/124 (41.1%) |
Both parents | 49/124 (39.5%) |
Missingc | 12/124 (9.7%) |
Parental presence of high myopiad (≤−6D), N (%) | 47/124 (37.9%) |
Median onset of myopia in yearse (IQR) | 6 (3) |
Median SE in D (IQR) | −5.03 (IQR: 3.08) |
Median AL in mm (IQR) | 25.14 (IQR: 1.30) |
Table 1. Distribution of demographics and clinical measures of children eligible for the study.
aObtained by medical record.
bOther ethnicities included children with a background form Surinam, Venezuela, the Dutch Antilles, Indonesia, and Pakistan.
cComplete data could not be obtained due to adoption or one parent
situation.
dIn either parent or both parents obtained by questionnaire.
eObtained by questionnaire.
Continued therapy N = 89 (71.8%) | Ceased therapy N = 35 (28.2%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Increased dose N = 32 | Decreased dose N = 26 | Same dose N = 31 | Allergy stopb N = 9 | Adverse eventsc N = 17 | Lost to follow-up N = 9 | |
Median age (year) myopia onset (IQR) | 6.0 (3) | 7.0 (4) | 6.0 (4) | 6.0 (5) | 6.0 (5) | 7.0 (6) |
Median age (year) at baseline (IQR) | 8.5 (3) | 11.0 (4) | 9.0 (3) | 9.0 (4) | 11.0 (5) | 12.0 (6) |
Median spherical equivalent (SE) in D | ||||||
1 year prior to treatment | −4.5 (4.9) | −2.9 (3.9) | −3.8 (3.1) | −3.6 (6.4) | −4.3 (4.5) | −4.8 (4.1) |
Baseline | −5.8 (3.5) | −4.4 (2.8) | −4.9 (2.8) | −5.4 (4.9) | −5.3 (4.0) | −5.4 (3.0) |
1st year | −6.0 (3.6) | −4.2 (3.5) | −4.8 (2.5) | −7.5 (6.7) | −5.6 (3.7) | – |
2nd year | −6.9 (4.7) | −4.6 (2.8) | −5.2 (2.6) | −8.0 (5.5) | −6.8 (3.3) | – |
3rd year | −7.5 (5.2) | −4.8 (2.6) | −5.6 (2.6) | −8.1 (6.0) | −7.8 (3.7) | – |
Median progression rate of SE in D/year | ||||||
1 year before treatment | −1.0 (1.3) | −1.3 (1.0) | −1.0 (1.2) | −1.1 (2.1) | −0.8 (1.1) | −0.4 (1.0) |
1st year | −0.4 (0.6) | +0.2 (0.7) | +0.1 (0.5) | −0.4 (0.7) | −0.7 (1.1) | – |
2nd year | −0.6 (0.7) | −0.3 (0.4) | −0.3 (0.6) | −0.9 (1.3) | −0.8 (0.9) | – |
3rd year | −0.5 (0.8) | −0.3 (0.3) | −0.3 (0.5) | −0.4 (1.4) | −0.9 (1.1) | – |
Median axial length (AL) in mma | ||||||
Baseline | 25.2 (1.3) | 24.7 (1.3) | 25.4 (1.6) | 25.2 (2.8) | 24.8 (1.2) | 25.9 (2.5) |
1st year | 25.5 (1.7) | 24.5 (1.5) | 25.3 (1.6) | 25.4 (1.5) | 25.1 (1.3) | – |
2nd year | 25.8 (1.4) | 24.7 (1.3) | 25.3 (1.6) | – | – | – |
3rd year | 25.9 (2.3) | 24.8 (1.5) | 25.4 (1.5) | – | – | – |
Median progression rate AL in mm/yeara | ||||||
1st year | 0.3 (0.2) | 0.0 (0.2) | 0.0 (0.1) | 0.2 (0.3) | 0.3 (1.0) | – |
2nd year | 0.3 (0.3) | 0.1 (0.1) | 0.1 (0.2) | – | – | – |
3rd year | 0.2 (0.3) | 0.1 (0.1) | 0.1 (0.1) | – | – | – |
Table 2. Progression of spherical equivalent and axial length for children receiving atropine 0.5% as a starting dose.
aAL was not included in the standard ophthalmological examination 1 year prior to start of therapy and was not included in the children who stopped atropine treatment.
bAllergies developed after 1 year. First-year data are on treatment, 2nd and 3rd year were without treatment.
cAdverse events included photophobia, reading difficulties, nightmares, and deterioration of behavioral problems in a child with diagnosis of ADHD.
This activity is intended for ophthalmologists and other physicians who care for children at risk for high myopia.
The goal of this activity is to evaluate the long-term effects of atropine eye drops on myopia among children.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:
As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.
Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.
Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME Released: 9/21/2020
Valid for credit through: 9/21/2021, 11:59 PM EST
processing....
Background: Atropine is the most powerful treatment for progressive myopia in childhood. This study explores the 3-year effectiveness of atropine in a clinical setting.
Methods: In this prospective clinical effectiveness study, children with progressive myopia ≥ 1D/year or myopia ≤ −2.5D were prescribed atropine 0.5%. Examination, including cycloplegic refraction and axial length (AL), was performed at baseline, and follow-up. Outcome measures were spherical equivalent (SER) and AL; annual progression of SER on treatment was compared with that prior to treatment. Adjustments to the dose were made after 1 year in case of low (AL ≥ 0.3 mm/year) or high response (AL < 0.1 mm/year) of AL.
Results: A total of 124 patients were enrolled in the study (median age: 9.5, range: 5–16 years). At baseline, median SER was −5.03D (interquartile range (IQR): 3.08); median AL was 25.14 mm (IQR: 1.30). N = 89 (71.8%) children were persistent to therapy throughout the 3-year follow-up. Median annual progression of SER for these children was −0.25D (IQR: 0.44); of AL 0.11 mm (IQR: 0.18). Of these, N = 32 (36.0%) had insufficient response and were assigned to atropine 1%; N = 26 (29.2%) showed good response and underwent tapering in dose. Rebound of AL progression was not observed. Of the children who ceased therapy, N = 9 were lost to follow-up; N = 9 developed an allergic reaction; and N = 17 (19.1%) stopped due to adverse events.
Conclusion: In children with or at risk of developing high myopia, a starting dose of atropine 0.5% was associated with decreased progression in European children during a 3-year treatment regimen. Our study supports high-dose atropine as a treatment option for children at risk of developing high myopia in adulthood.
The prevalence of myopia is increasing all over the world, and has reached the highest frequencies in young adults in South Korea (96.5%), but has also increased significantly in Europe (49.2%).[1,2] The trait is determined by several optical components, of which increased axial length (AL) is the most important.[3] High myopia, i.e. refractive errors −6D or more, has increased from 4.2 to 21.6% in East-Asians and from 1.4 to 5.3% in Europeans.[2,4] Countries which presently have a low prevalence will follow these trends, as myopia prevalence is driven by lifestyle changes such as less time outdoors and increased near work activities.[5] Myopia carries a significant risk of retinal detachment, glaucoma, and myopic macular degeneration, which is most prominent for severe refractive errors.[6] Of those with high myopia, one in three develops bilateral severe visual impairment or blindness with age.[7] This highlights the need for myopia control strategies in children with progressive myopia, in particular progression to high myopia.[5,8,9]
During the last 10 years, many intervention studies for myopia progression have emerged.[10–12] Although lifestyle adjustments and optical solutions can be effective, pharmacological interventions targeting muscarinic receptors have shown the highest efficacy on reduction of eye growth.[13,14] Atropine is a nonselective muscarinic receptor antagonist which has been tested for progressive myopia in several dosages.[10] High dosages, 0.5 and 1%, are the most effective in reducing eye growth, but have drawbacks as pupil dilatation, loss of accommodation, and potential rebound of spherical equivalent of refraction (SER) after stopping.[15] The lowest dose of atropine, 0.01%, has become popular because it has minimal side effects and virtually no rebound after stopping, but reduction on AL progression is also minimal.[16–18]
In an earlier study, we reported 1 year results of intervention with atropine 0.5% for progressive myopia in a clinical setting in Europe. In children with already severe myopic refractive errors (mean SER, −6.6D) and progression of myopia 1D/year or more, we showed that atropine 0.5% reduced myopia progression to 0.1D/year. Despite the side effects, persistence to therapy was 78%.[19] We extended this study, and now report 3-year follow-up after the starting dose of atropine 0.5%. We addressed the photophobia and accommodation problems by prescribing photochromic multifocal spectacles.