You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

Table 1.  

Characteristics at baseline
Patients, N 124
Gender, N (%)
   Female 67/124 (54%)
Median age in years (IQR) 9.5 (4)
Ethnicitya
   European 83/124 (66.9%)
   East Asian 13/124 (10.5%)
   Otherb 29/124 (22.6%)
Parental presence of myopia, N (%)
   No myopia 12/124 (9.7%)
   One parent 51/124 (41.1%)
   Both parents 49/124 (39.5%)
   Missingc 12/124 (9.7%)
Parental presence of high myopiad (≤−6D), N (%) 47/124 (37.9%)
Median onset of myopia in yearse (IQR) 6 (3)
Median SE in D (IQR) −5.03 (IQR: 3.08)
Median AL in mm (IQR) 25.14 (IQR: 1.30)

Table 1. Distribution of demographics and clinical measures of children eligible for the study.

aObtained by medical record.
bOther ethnicities included children with a background form Surinam, Venezuela, the Dutch Antilles, Indonesia, and Pakistan.
cComplete data could not be obtained due to adoption or one parent
situation.
dIn either parent or both parents obtained by questionnaire.
eObtained by questionnaire.

Table 2.  

Continued therapy N = 89 (71.8%) Ceased therapy N = 35 (28.2%)
Increased dose N = 32 Decreased dose N = 26 Same dose N = 31 Allergy stopb N = 9 Adverse eventsc N = 17 Lost to follow-up N = 9
Median age (year) myopia onset (IQR) 6.0 (3) 7.0 (4) 6.0 (4) 6.0 (5) 6.0 (5) 7.0 (6)
Median age (year) at baseline (IQR) 8.5 (3) 11.0 (4) 9.0 (3) 9.0 (4) 11.0 (5) 12.0 (6)
Median spherical equivalent (SE) in D
   1 year prior to treatment −4.5 (4.9) −2.9 (3.9) −3.8 (3.1) −3.6 (6.4) −4.3 (4.5) −4.8 (4.1)
   Baseline −5.8 (3.5) −4.4 (2.8) −4.9 (2.8) −5.4 (4.9) −5.3 (4.0) −5.4 (3.0)
   1st year −6.0 (3.6) −4.2 (3.5) −4.8 (2.5) −7.5 (6.7) −5.6 (3.7)
   2nd year −6.9 (4.7) −4.6 (2.8) −5.2 (2.6) −8.0 (5.5) −6.8 (3.3)
   3rd year −7.5 (5.2) −4.8 (2.6) −5.6 (2.6) −8.1 (6.0) −7.8 (3.7)
Median progression rate of SE in D/year
   1 year before treatment −1.0 (1.3) −1.3 (1.0) −1.0 (1.2) −1.1 (2.1) −0.8 (1.1) −0.4 (1.0)
   1st year −0.4 (0.6) +0.2 (0.7) +0.1 (0.5) −0.4 (0.7) −0.7 (1.1)
   2nd year −0.6 (0.7) −0.3 (0.4) −0.3 (0.6) −0.9 (1.3) −0.8 (0.9)
   3rd year −0.5 (0.8) −0.3 (0.3) −0.3 (0.5) −0.4 (1.4) −0.9 (1.1)
Median axial length (AL) in mma
   Baseline 25.2 (1.3) 24.7 (1.3) 25.4 (1.6) 25.2 (2.8) 24.8 (1.2) 25.9 (2.5)
   1st year 25.5 (1.7) 24.5 (1.5) 25.3 (1.6) 25.4 (1.5) 25.1 (1.3)
   2nd year 25.8 (1.4) 24.7 (1.3) 25.3 (1.6)
   3rd year 25.9 (2.3) 24.8 (1.5) 25.4 (1.5)
Median progression rate AL in mm/yeara
   1st year 0.3 (0.2) 0.0 (0.2) 0.0 (0.1) 0.2 (0.3) 0.3 (1.0)
   2nd year 0.3 (0.3) 0.1 (0.1) 0.1 (0.2)
   3rd year 0.2 (0.3) 0.1 (0.1) 0.1 (0.1)

Table 2. Progression of spherical equivalent and axial length for children receiving atropine 0.5% as a starting dose.

aAL was not included in the standard ophthalmological examination 1 year prior to start of therapy and was not included in the children who stopped atropine treatment.
bAllergies developed after 1 year. First-year data are on treatment, 2nd and 3rd year were without treatment.
cAdverse events included photophobia, reading difficulties, nightmares, and deterioration of behavioral problems in a child with diagnosis of ADHD.

CME

A Three-Year Follow-Up Study of Atropine Treatment for Progressive Myopia in Europeans

  • Authors: Jan Roelof Polling, MD; Emily Tan, MD; Sjoerd Driessen, MD; Sjoukje E. Loudon, MD; Hoi-Lam Wong, MD; Astrid van der Schans, MD, PhD; J. Willem L. Tideman, MD; Caroline C.W. Klaver, MD, PhD
  • CME Released: 9/21/2020
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT
  • Valid for credit through: 9/21/2021, 11:59 PM EST
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for ophthalmologists and other physicians who care for children at risk for high myopia.

The goal of this activity is to evaluate the long-term effects of atropine eye drops on myopia among children.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  1. Distinguish the most salient pathological feature of high myopia
  2. Evaluate the long-term tolerability of atropine eye drops for myopia
  3. Analyze the long-term efficacy of atropine eye drops for myopia
  4. Assess variables which might alter the efficacy of atropine eye drops for myopia


Disclosures

As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.

Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.


Faculty

  • Jan Roelof Polling, MD

    Department of Ophthalmology
    Erasmus Medical Center
    Rotterdam, the Netherlands
    Department of Optometry & Orthoptics
    Faculty of Health
    University of Applied Sciences
    Utrecht, the Netherlands
    Department of Epidemiology
    Erasmus Medical Center
    Rotterdam, the Netherlands

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Jan Roelof Polling, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
    Served as an advisor or consultant for: Théa Laboratories; Nevakar, Inc.

  • Emily Tan, MD

    Department of Ophthalmology
    Erasmus Medical Center
    Rotterdam, the Netherlands

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Emily Tan, MD, disclosed has no relevant financial relationships.

  • Sjoerd Driessen, MD

    Department of Epidemiology
    Erasmus Medical Center
    Rotterdam, the Netherlands

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Sjoerd Driessen, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Sjoukje E. Loudon, MD

    Department of Ophthalmology
    Erasmus Medical Center
    Rotterdam, the Netherlands

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Sjoukje E. Loudon, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Hoi-Lam Wong, MD

    Department of Ophthalmology
    Erasmus Medical Center
    Rotterdam, the Netherlands

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Hoi-Lam Wong, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Astrid van der Schans, MD, PhD

    Department of Ophthalmology
    Erasmus Medical Center
    Rotterdam, the Netherlands

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Astrid van der Schans, MD, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • J. Willem L. Tideman, MD

    Department of Ophthalmology
    Department of Epidemiology
    Erasmus Medical Center
    Rotterdam, the Netherlands

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: J. Willem L. Tideman, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Caroline C.W. Klaver, MD, PhD

    Department of Ophthalmology
    Department of Epidemiology
    Erasmus Medical Center
    Rotterdam, the Netherlands

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Caroline C.W. Klaver, MD, PhD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
    Served as an advisor or consultant for: Bayer AG; Nevakar, Inc.; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Théa Laboratories

Editor

  • Sobha Sivaprasad, MD

    Editor
    Eye

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Sobha Sivaprasad, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
    Served as an advisor or consultant for: Allergan, Inc.; Apellis; Bayer AG; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Heidelberg Pharma GmbH; Novartis; Oculis; Optos; Oxurion; Roche
    Served as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: Allergan, Inc.; Bayer AG; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Optos
    Received grants for clinical research from: Allergan, Inc.; Bayer AG; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Optos

CME Author

  • Charles P. Vega, MD

    Health Sciences Clinical Professor of Family Medicine
    University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
    Irvine, California, United States

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Charles P. Vega, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
    Served as an advisor or consultant for: GlaxoSmithKline; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
    Served as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: Genentech, Inc.; GlaxoSmithKline

CME Reviewer

  • Hazel Dennison, DNP, RN, FNP, CHCP, CPHQ, CNE

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Hazel Dennison, DNP, RN, FNP, CHCP, CPHQ, CNE, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

Medscape

Interprofessional Continuing Education

In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by Medscape, LLC and Springer Nature. Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

From Eye
CME

A Three-Year Follow-Up Study of Atropine Treatment for Progressive Myopia in Europeans

Authors: Jan Roelof Polling, MD; Emily Tan, MD; Sjoerd Driessen, MD; Sjoukje E. Loudon, MD; Hoi-Lam Wong, MD; Astrid van der Schans, MD, PhD; J. Willem L. Tideman, MD; Caroline C.W. Klaver, MD, PhDFaculty and Disclosures
THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT

CME Released: 9/21/2020

Valid for credit through: 9/21/2021, 11:59 PM EST

processing....

Abstract and Introduction

Abstract

Background: Atropine is the most powerful treatment for progressive myopia in childhood. This study explores the 3-year effectiveness of atropine in a clinical setting.

Methods: In this prospective clinical effectiveness study, children with progressive myopia ≥ 1D/year or myopia ≤ −2.5D were prescribed atropine 0.5%. Examination, including cycloplegic refraction and axial length (AL), was performed at baseline, and follow-up. Outcome measures were spherical equivalent (SER) and AL; annual progression of SER on treatment was compared with that prior to treatment. Adjustments to the dose were made after 1 year in case of low (AL ≥ 0.3 mm/year) or high response (AL < 0.1 mm/year) of AL.

Results: A total of 124 patients were enrolled in the study (median age: 9.5, range: 5–16 years). At baseline, median SER was −5.03D (interquartile range (IQR): 3.08); median AL was 25.14 mm (IQR: 1.30). N = 89 (71.8%) children were persistent to therapy throughout the 3-year follow-up. Median annual progression of SER for these children was −0.25D (IQR: 0.44); of AL 0.11 mm (IQR: 0.18). Of these, N = 32 (36.0%) had insufficient response and were assigned to atropine 1%; N = 26 (29.2%) showed good response and underwent tapering in dose. Rebound of AL progression was not observed. Of the children who ceased therapy, N = 9 were lost to follow-up; N = 9 developed an allergic reaction; and N = 17 (19.1%) stopped due to adverse events.

Conclusion: In children with or at risk of developing high myopia, a starting dose of atropine 0.5% was associated with decreased progression in European children during a 3-year treatment regimen. Our study supports high-dose atropine as a treatment option for children at risk of developing high myopia in adulthood.

Introduction

The prevalence of myopia is increasing all over the world, and has reached the highest frequencies in young adults in South Korea (96.5%), but has also increased significantly in Europe (49.2%).[1,2] The trait is determined by several optical components, of which increased axial length (AL) is the most important.[3] High myopia, i.e. refractive errors −6D or more, has increased from 4.2 to 21.6% in East-Asians and from 1.4 to 5.3% in Europeans.[2,4] Countries which presently have a low prevalence will follow these trends, as myopia prevalence is driven by lifestyle changes such as less time outdoors and increased near work activities.[5] Myopia carries a significant risk of retinal detachment, glaucoma, and myopic macular degeneration, which is most prominent for severe refractive errors.[6] Of those with high myopia, one in three develops bilateral severe visual impairment or blindness with age.[7] This highlights the need for myopia control strategies in children with progressive myopia, in particular progression to high myopia.[5,8,9]

During the last 10 years, many intervention studies for myopia progression have emerged.[10–12] Although lifestyle adjustments and optical solutions can be effective, pharmacological interventions targeting muscarinic receptors have shown the highest efficacy on reduction of eye growth.[13,14] Atropine is a nonselective muscarinic receptor antagonist which has been tested for progressive myopia in several dosages.[10] High dosages, 0.5 and 1%, are the most effective in reducing eye growth, but have drawbacks as pupil dilatation, loss of accommodation, and potential rebound of spherical equivalent of refraction (SER) after stopping.[15] The lowest dose of atropine, 0.01%, has become popular because it has minimal side effects and virtually no rebound after stopping, but reduction on AL progression is also minimal.[16–18]

In an earlier study, we reported 1 year results of intervention with atropine 0.5% for progressive myopia in a clinical setting in Europe. In children with already severe myopic refractive errors (mean SER, −6.6D) and progression of myopia 1D/year or more, we showed that atropine 0.5% reduced myopia progression to 0.1D/year. Despite the side effects, persistence to therapy was 78%.[19] We extended this study, and now report 3-year follow-up after the starting dose of atropine 0.5%. We addressed the photophobia and accommodation problems by prescribing photochromic multifocal spectacles.