This activity is intended for nurses and nurse practitioners.
The goal of this activity is to educate nursing professionals about current and emerging approaches with oral antiandrogen therapies in the management of locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer to better recognize and differentiate adverse events (AEs) of therapies that target the androgen axis pathway.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will:
The Annenberg Center for Health Sciences at Eisenhower requires instructors, planners, managers and other individuals who are in a position to control the content of this activity to disclose any real or apparent conflict of interest (COI) they may have as related to the content of this activity. All identified COI are thoroughly vetted and resolved according to the Annenberg Center for Health Sciences at Eisenhower policy. The Annenberg Center for Health Sciences at Eisenhower is committed to providing its learners with high quality CME activities and related materials that promote improvements or quality in healthcare and not a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest
Jointly provided by the Annenberg Center for Health Sciences at Eisenhower and Medscape LLC in collaboration with Postgraduate Institute for Medicine
The Annenberg Center for Health Sciences at Eisenhower is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Commission on Accreditation.
1.0 contact hours may be earned for successful completion of this activity. Designated for 0.9 contact hours of pharmacotherapy credit for Advance Practice Registered Nurses.
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; registered nurses should claim only
those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete
the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive ANCC contact hours, you must
receive a minimum score of 66% on the post-test.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CE Released: 6/24/2020
Valid for credit through: 6/24/2021
processing....
Question 1: What are the best treatments for hot flashes?
Answer: Venlafaxine works well. If patients have issues dealing with side effects from that, or if it doesn't work, that's usually when they can switch to gabapentin, and maybe a low dose to start. The old adage of "start low and go slow" really applies to those medications for the hot flashes.[1]
Question 2: Do hormonal changes have a psychological effect on men?
Answer: Yes, testosterone is synonymous with some aspects of male identity, and when that is taken away it can be really distressing for some men. That is why it is important to set expectations at the onset of treatment, so that the patient is not surprised by these adverse effects from medications. Being referred to therapists or psychiatrists that have a specialization in oncology can be very helpful.[2]
Question 3: Darolutamide requires fewer pills to achieve the desired dose vs apalutamide. Since they're both approved around the same time, why not use darolutamide since the number of pills daily would be less, hopefully increasing patient compliance?
Answer: It is reasonable to give the patient darolutamide to get better compliance with the patient as you have less pills to take. But the other thing you have to remember is that there are no studies that say that darolutamide is better than apalutamide; both studies show efficacy. What clinicians do is look at the side effect profiles to determine the better drug for the patient. Darolutamide does not cross the BBB and has less fatigue or could have less fatigue, less cognitive dysfunction. So again, not only by taking 2 tablets vs 4 tablets, the toxicity may be better for the patient. When looking at the side effect profiles, darolutamide has generally lower toxicities overall compared to apalutamide and enzalutamide, and patients tend to tolerate darolutamide very well.[3-5]
References:
« Return to: The Nursing Intersection: Upregulating Quality of Life During Downregulation of the Androgen Axis |