You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

Table 1.  

Characteristic No. (Weighted %)
Age, mean (SE), y 45.6 (15.9)
Female 10,911 (50.3)
Married 16,102 (76.9)
Social risk factors
Low household incomea 8,223 (38.6)
Low level of educationb 6,085 (24.0)
Single livingc 1,852 (8.0)
Framingham risk factors (except age and sex)
Total cholesterol, mean (SE), mg/dL 189.6 (35.7)
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, mean (SE), mg/dL 51.2 (12.4)
Has ever smoked 7,076 (40.3)
Has diabetes 2,240 (9.5)
Systolic blood pressure, mean (SE), mm Hg 116.7 (15.8)
Receives treatment for hypertension 3,945 (15.5)
Occurrence of a lifetime CVD eventd
Stroke 420 (1.6)
Myocardial infarction 172 (0.7)
Angina 364 (1.4)
Cumulative social risk scoree
0 8,671 (50.8)
1 5,790 (31.0)
2 3,688 (15.1)
3 998 (3.1)

Population-Weighted Characteristics of the Study Sample, Adults Aged ≥19 (n = 19,147) From the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), 2013–2016

Abbreviation: CVD, cardiovascular disease.

a Participants were categorized into 4 quartiles of household income (upper, moderate, moderate-low, and low). Household income lower than the 50th percentile (ie, moderate-low and low) was categorized as low household income.

b KNHANES asked, “What is the highest qualification you obtained from school?” Response categories were college graduate, high school graduate, middle school graduate, and elementary school graduate. Middle school graduate and elementary school graduate were classified as low level of education.

c KNHANES asked, “How many people are cohabiting with you?” Response categories ranged from 0 to 9 persons. Respondents who reported zero people were classified as single living.

d KNHANES asked, “Have you ever been diagnosed with [stroke, myocardial infarction, or angina] by a physician?” Respondents who answered yes were categorized as having a lifetime occurrence.

e Possible range, 0–3: 0, no social risk factors reported; 1, 1 social risk factor reported; 2, 2 social risk factors reported; 3, 3 social risk factors reported.

Table 2.  

Cardiovascular Disease Unadjusted Adjustedd
Stroke
Framingham risk score 1.81 (1.70–1.95) [<.001] 1.42 (1.31–1.53) [<.001]
Cumulative social risk score 2.53 (2.25–2.84) [<.001] 1.89 (1.64–2.17) [<.001]
Myocardial infarction
Framingham risk score 1.66 (1.51–1.83) [<.001] 1.37 (1.22–1.55) [<.001]
Cumulative social risk score 2.11 (1.79–2.49) [<.001] 1.63 (1.31–2.01) [.002]
Angina
Framingham risk score 1.88 (1.72–2.06) [<.001] 1.56 (1.41–1.73) [<.001]
Cumulative social risk score 2.35 (2.08–2.66) [<.001] 1.64 (1.42–1.89) [<.001]

Table 2. Weighted Logistic Regression of Cardiovascular Disease on Framingham Risk Scorea and Cumulative Social Riskb, Adults Aged ≥19 (n = 19,147) From the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013–2016c

a Computed by using the algorithm described by D’Agostino et al (6). Components of the risk score are age, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking status, diabetes status, systolic blood pressure, and whether or not the participant was treated for hypertension.

b Consistent with previous studies [14,15], we computed a cumulative social risk score (range, 0 to 3) by using 3 binary social risk factors: low household income (yes/no), low level of education (yes/no), and single-living status (yes/no).

c All values are relative risk (95% confidence interval) [P value].

d In the adjusted model, each cardiovascular disease was regressed on the Framingham risk score and cumulative social risk.

CME / ABIM MOC

Cumulative Social Risk and Cardiovascular Disease Among Adults in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Nationally Representative Sample

  • Authors: Harold H. Lee, PhD; Augustine W. Kang, PhD; Hyunjoon Lee, BS; Yoojin Cha, ScM; Don Operario, PhD
  • CME / ABIM MOC Released: 5/28/2020
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT
  • Valid for credit through: 5/28/2021, 11:59 PM EST
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for cardiologists, neurologists, internists, and other clinicians caring for patients with or at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD).

The goal of this activity is to describe the contribution of the cumulative social risk score (CSRS) (range 0-3; based on income, education, and single-living status) to CVD risk beyond the Framingham risk score (FRS) among South Korean adults using nationally representative data (Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [KNHANES]) from 19,147 adults age ≥ 19 years from 2013 to 2016.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  • Describe the contribution of CSRS to stroke risk beyond the FRS among South Korean adults, according to study results using nationally representative data from KNHANES from 2013 to 2016
  • Determine the contribution of CSRS to risk for myocardial infarction (MI) and angina beyond the FRS among South Korean adults, according to study results using nationally representative data from KNHANES from 2013 to 2016
  • Identify the clinical implications of contribution of CSRS to risk for CVD beyond the FRS among South Korean adults, according to study results using nationally representative data from KNHANES from 2013 to 2016


Disclosures

As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.

Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.


Faculty

  • Harold H. Lee, PhD

    Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences
    Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
    Boston, Massachusetts

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Harold H. Lee, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Augustine W. Kang, PhD

    Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences
    Brown University School of Public Health
    Providence, Rhode Island

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Augustine W. Kang, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Hyunjoon Lee, BS

    Data Science Initiative
    Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences
    Brown University School of Public Health
    Providence, Rhode Island

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Hyunjoon Lee, BS, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Yoojin Cha, ScM

    Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences
    Brown University School of Public Health
    Providence, Rhode Island

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Yoojin Cha, ScM, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Don Operario, PhD

    Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences
    Brown University School of Public Health
    Providence, Rhode Island

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Don Operario, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Freelance writer and reviewer
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Editor

  • Ellen Taratus

    Editor
    Preventing Chronic Disease

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Ellen Taratus has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Reviewer

  • Esther Nyarko, PharmD

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Esther Nyarko, PharmD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

Medscape

Interprofessional Continuing Education

In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by Medscape, LLC and Preventing Chronic Disease. Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.00  AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™  . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 1.0 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / ABIM MOC

Cumulative Social Risk and Cardiovascular Disease Among Adults in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Nationally Representative Sample

Authors: Harold H. Lee, PhD; Augustine W. Kang, PhD; Hyunjoon Lee, BS; Yoojin Cha, ScM; Don Operario, PhDFaculty and Disclosures
THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT

CME / ABIM MOC Released: 5/28/2020

Valid for credit through: 5/28/2021, 11:59 PM EST

processing....

Abstract & Introduction

Abstract

Introduction
The Framingham risk score (FRS) is widely used to predict cardiovascular disease (CVD), but it neglects to account for social risk factors. Our study examined whether use of a cumulative social risk score in addition to the FRS improves prediction of CVD among South Korean adults.

Methods
We used nationally representative data on 19,147 adults aged 19 or older from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013–2016. We computed a cumulative social risk score (range, 0–3) based on 3 social risk factors: low household income, low level of education, and single-living status. CVD outcomes were stroke, myocardial infarction, and angina. Weighted logistic regression examined the associations between cumulative social risk, FRS, and CVD. McFadden pseudo-R 2 and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) assessed model performance. We conducted mediation analyses to quantify the association between cumulative social risk score and CVD outcomes that is not mediated by the FRS.

Results
A unit increase in social risk was associated with 89.4% higher risk of stroke diagnosis, controlling for the FRS (P < .001). The FRS explained 8.0% of stroke diagnosis (R 2) with fair discrimination (AUC = 0.728), and adding the cumulative social risk score enhanced R 2 and AUC by 2.4% and 0.039. In the association between cumulative social risk and stroke, the proportion not mediated by the FRS was 65% (P < .001). We observed similar trends in myocardial infarction and angina, such that an increase in social risk was associated with increased relative risk of disease and improved disease diagnosis, and a large proportion of the association was not mediated by the FRS.

Conclusion
Controlling for the FRS, cumulative social risks predicted stroke, myocardial infarction, and angina among adults in South Korea. Future research is needed to examine non-FRS mediators between cumulative social risk and CVD.

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been the leading cause of death in the past 20 years [1]. In 2016, ischemic heart disease and stroke accounted for a combined 26% (15.2 million) of global deaths [2]. To curb the incidence of CVD, a comprehensive understanding of CVD etiology is needed.

Epidemiological and biomedical research has made progress in understanding CVD etiology and the mechanisms through which determinants manifest as CVD. Among the better-known studies is the Framingham Heart Study, an ongoing longitudinal cohort study. Many known determinants of CVD, such as smoking, cholesterol, blood pressure, and physical activity, were first reported by the Framingham Heart Study [3–5]. The Framingham risk score (FRS) was developed to predict a person’s 10-year risk for CVD on the basis of demographic information, such as age and sex, and biobehavioral markers, such as cholesterol levels, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, and diabetes [6].

A limitation of the FRS is that it is based solely on individual-level factors. Hence, it does not sufficiently account for the role of social factors in determining CVD risk. For example, empirical data suggest that the FRS underestimates CVD mortality and morbidity among adults with low socioeconomic status in the United States [7] and Scotland [8]. A wealth of evidence corroborates the relationship between socioeconomic factors (household income, education, occupation, marital status, social support) on health, with some research even suggesting a causal influence [9,10]. Evidence on the social determinants of CVD has accumulated such that current scientific literature recommends including socioeconomic factors such as income, education, and social isolation in the FRS to enhance prediction of CVD [11,12]. Associations between socioeconomic status and CVD risk persist even after controlling for age, sex, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, physical activity, diet, cholesterol, and body weight [13]. In 2 recent studies, CVD researchers examined composite measures of cumulative social risk [14,15] by identifying indicators of social disadvantage that were consistently related to health outcomes, including household income, education, solitude (ie, whether one lives alone), and ethnicity [14,16]. In a nationally representative sample of US adults, cumulative social risk factors were associated with increased CVD mortality [15]. An important gap in this research, however, is that we do not know whether cumulative social risk predicts CVD independently of the individual-level biobehavioral factors measured in the FRS.

Most evidence on CVD risk is based on participants sampled in the Western Hemisphere, despite studies indicating that the prevalence of chronic disease is increasing rapidly across the world, in nations such as South Korea [17]. The economic growth in South Korea since the 1960s [18] has been accompanied by increases in inequalities in income and education. Concerns are emerging about health disparities in overall mortality and the prevalence of noncommunicable diseases [19–21].

The objective of our study was to examine the effect of cumulative social risk and the FRS on CVD incidence among adults in South Korea, with the following 3 aims. First, we investigated the association between the FRS and CVD incidence to assess the utility of the FRS among adults in South Korea. Second, we assessed the association between a cumulative social risk score (based on low household income, low level of education, and single-living status) and CVD incidence. Finally, we examined the association between the cumulative social risk score and CVD incidence, controlling for the FRS.