This article is intended for primary care physicians, obstetricians/gynecologists, geriatricians, nurses, pharmacists, and other clinicians on the healthcare team who care for women with urinary incontinence (UI).
The goal of this activity is to provide medical news to primary care clinicians and other healthcare professionals in order to enhance patient care.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:
As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.
Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.
Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.
Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.
Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of continuing nursing education for RNs and APNs; none of these credits is in the area of pharmacology.
Medscape, LLC designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number JA0007105-0000-19-115-H01-P).
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 5/3/2019
Valid for credit through: 5/3/2020, 11:59 PM EST
processing....
Urinary incontinence affects approximately 17% of nonpregnant women, and it can have severe effects on women’s quality of life and function. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is frequently recommended for women with mild to moderate UI, but is it effective? Dumoulin and colleagues performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, which was published in the October 4, 2018 issue of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,[1] to answer this question.
The review included 31 studies, which enrolled a total of 1817 women. Rates of cure in the PFMT and control groups at the end of treatment among women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were 56% and 6% [risk ratio (RR) 8.38; 95% CI, 3.68-19.07]. The respective RR among women with any UI was 5.34 (95% CI, 2.78-10.26). Pelvic floor muscle training was associated with approximately one less urinary leakage episode per day compared with control therapy, and PFMT was associated with a significant reduction the volume of urine leaked. Women were more satisfied with PFMT vs control therapy.
The current study by Balk and colleagues compared behavioral therapy with pharmacotherapy and more invasive treatment for UI among women.
Behavioral therapy is as good as, and in some cases may be better than, medication alone for treating UI in women, according to a network meta-analysis.
The study also found that hormones and periurethral bulking agents may not be much better than no treatment at all.
The results, published online on March 19 in the Annals of Internal Medicine,[2] confirm past systematic reviews and are consistent with international guidelines.
"[B]ehavioral therapy, alone or combined with other interventions, is generally more effective than other first- and second-line monotherapies for both [SUI] and [UUI]," wrote Ethan Balk, MD, MPH, of Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, and colleagues.
Medications have the disadvantage of bothersome adverse effects, such as dry mouth, nausea, and fatigue.
Many women experience UI, especially if they are older or have had children. The condition can have wide-ranging effects on physical, psychological, and social well-being. Restrictions in lifestyle are not uncommon.
To compare the effectiveness of treatments for UI, researchers searched 6 databases, without language restriction, from inception to August 2018. Ultimately, their meta-analysis included 84 randomized controlled trials of nonsurgical therapies for UI in nonpregnant women. All trials had a minimum follow-up of 4 weeks. Urinary incontinence was classified as SUI (involuntary loss of urine with physical exertion, sneezing, or coughing) or urge (UUI) (compulsion to urinate that cannot be delayed). Cure was defined as resolution of incontinence, not necessarily a permanent cure of the underlying problem.
Among first- and second-line interventions for SUI, α agonists alone and hormones alone were no different from no treatment for achieving cure (odds ratio [OR]=1.22 [95% CI: 0.61, 2.45], moderate strength of evidence [SOE]; OR=2.89 [95% CI: 0.76, 11.0], low SOE, respectively).
Behavioral therapy was more effective than α agonists alone for achieving cure (OR=2.50 [95% CI: 1.19, 5.28], moderate SOE).
Indirect evidence suggested that adding behavioral therapy to hormone therapy was also more effective than α agonists alone for achieving cure (OR=3.62 [95% CI : 0.98, 13.4], moderate SOE).
For improving SUI, behavioral therapy was more effective than either hormones alone (OR=10.2 [95% CI: 3.61, 28.9], moderate SOE) or α agonists alone (OR=2.5 [95% CI: 1.39, 4.5], moderate SOE).
Among third-line interventions for SUI, neuromodulation was more effective than no treatment for achieving cure (OR=3.34 [95% CI: 2.12, 5.26], high SOE). In contrast, intravesical pressure release and periurethral bulking were generally not effective for achieving cure or improvement.
Among first- and second-line interventions for UUI, behavioral therapy was significantly more effective than anticholinergics alone for achieving cure (OR=1.57 [95% CI: 1.02, 2.43], high SOE).
Among third-line interventions for UUI, Botox and neuromodulation were more effective than no treatment for achieving cure (OR=5.66 [95% CI: 2.8, 11.4], high SOE; OR=3.34 [95% CI: 2.12, 5.26], high SOE, respectively).
The authors noted that most studies showed low or moderate risk for bias. The analyses were limited by few head-to-head comparisons and by differences across studies with respect to severity of UI and past treatment.
The study was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the US Department of Health and Human Services. The authors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.