You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

Table. Parameters used in relative risk calculations for ehrlichiosis and Lyme disease, by vector, Monmouth County, New Jersey, USA*  

Parameter Ixodes scapularis Amblyomma americanum
Relative abundance of each species CIS  = 38.32 CAA  = 61.68
Adults Nymphs Adults Nymphs
Relative abundance of each life stage CIS. D = 19.96 CIS. N = 80.04 CAA. D = 35.34 CAA. N  = 64.66
Infection rates per life stage IIS. D = 39.87 IIS. N = 23.3 IAA. D = 11.7 IAA. N = 9.04
Infection rates, weighted IIS = 26.60 IAA = 9.98

Table. Parameters used in relative risk calculations for ehrlichiosis and Lyme disease, by vector, Monmouth County, New Jersey, USA*

*Values are in percentages. Relative abundances (denoted by CX ) are derived from specimens submitted to the Monmouth County Mosquito Control Division’s tick identification and testing service during peak Lyme disease transmission season (May–August) and during a 10-year period (2006–2015). Infection rates of I. scapularis ticks with Borrelia burgdorferi (IIS ) also from passive surveillance program. Infection rates of A. americanum ticks (IAA ) encompass both Ehrlichia chaffeensis and E. ewingii (accounting for co-infection).

CME

Relative Risk for Ehrlichiosis and Lyme Disease in an Area Where Vectors for Both Are Sympatric, New Jersey, USA

  • Authors: Andrea Egizi, PhD, Nina H. Fefferman, PhD, Robert A. Jordan, PhD
  • CME Released: 5/11/2017
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT
  • Valid for credit through: 5/11/2018, 11:59 PM EST
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for primary care physicians, infectious disease specialists, and other physicians who care for patients at risk for tick-borne illnesses.

The goal of this activity is to compare the prevalence of ehrlichiosis vs Lyme disease based on analytical models and case reports to public health agencies.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  1. Analyze the clinical presentation of ehrlichiosis
  2. Compare the vectors of ehrlichiosis vs Lyme disease
  3. Distinguish the ratio of ehrlichiosis to Lyme disease using a mathematical model
  4. Compare predicted rates of ehrlichiosis with actual reported rates of illness


Disclosures

As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.

Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.


Authors

  • Andrea Egizi, PhD

    Monmouth County Mosquito Control Division, Tinton Falls, New Jersey, USA; Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Andrea Egizi, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Nina H. Fefferman, PhD

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA; Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Nina H. Fefferman, PhD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
    Owns stock, stock options, or bonds from: VIVUS, Inc.

  • Robert A. Jordan, PhD

    Monmouth County Mosquito Control Division, Tinton Falls, New Jersey, USA; Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Robert A. Jordan, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Editor

  • Jude Rutledge, BA

    Copyeditor, Emerging Infectious Diseases

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Jude Rutledge, BA, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Charles P. Vega, MD

    Health Sciences Clinical Professor, UC Irvine Department of Family Medicine; Associate Dean for Diversity and Inclusion, UC Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Charles P. Vega, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
    Served as an advisor or consultant for: McNeil Consumer Healthcare
    Served as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: Shire Pharmaceuticals

CME Reviewer

  • Robert Morris, PharmD

    Associate CME Clinical Director, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Robert Morris, PharmD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements


Interprofessional Continuing Education


In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by Medscape, LLC and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME

Relative Risk for Ehrlichiosis and Lyme Disease in an Area Where Vectors for Both Are Sympatric, New Jersey, USA

Authors: Andrea Egizi, PhD, Nina H. Fefferman, PhD, Robert A. Jordan, PhDFaculty and Disclosures
THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT

CME Released: 5/11/2017

Valid for credit through: 5/11/2018, 11:59 PM EST

processing....

Abstract and Introduction

Abstract

The lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum, is a vector of Ehrlichia chaffeensis and E. ewingii, causal agents of human ehrlichiosis, and has demonstrated marked geographic expansion in recent years. A. americanum ticks often outnumber the vector of Lyme disease, Ixodes scapularis, where both ticks are sympatric, yet cases of Lyme disease far exceed ehrlichiosis cases. We quantified the risk for ehrlichiosis relative to Lyme disease by using relative tick encounter frequencies and infection rates for these 2 species in Monmouth County, New Jersey, USA. Our calculations predict ≥1 ehrlichiosis case for every 2 Lyme disease cases, >2 orders of magnitude higher than current case rates (e.g., 2 ehrlichiosis versus 439 Lyme disease cases in 2014). This result implies ehrlichiosis is grossly underreported (or misreported) or that many infections are asymptomatic. We recommend expansion of tickborne disease education in the Northeast United States to include human health risks posed by A. americanum ticks.

Introduction

Tickborne diseases are a growing public health concern in the United States.[1] Lyme disease, caused by the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi, is the most frequently reported vectorborne illness in the Northeast[2] and has been the subject of widespread education campaigns aimed at preventing human encounters with its vector, Ixodes scapularis (the black-legged tick). Unfortunately, such campaigns focus comparatively less attention on other medically important ticks in Lyme disease–endemic areas;[3] therefore, persons living in these areas may not fully recognize the threat posed by these species. Specifically, the much more aggressive lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum, transmits the agent of human monocytic ehrlichiosis and may serve as the vector for several other emerging tickborne pathogens.[3–5] Historically found primarily in the Southeast United States but with established distributions along the Atlantic Coast and into the Midwest,[6]A. americanum ticks are active concurrently with I. scapularis ticks; aggressively attack humans in all tick life stages (adult, nymph, and larvae); and are typically by far the more numerous of the 2 ticks where they are sympatric.[7,8]

Given the abundance and aggressive host-seeking behavior of A. americanum ticks, it is reasonable to expect high rates of human encounters with them.[8–10] In recent years, submissions of A. americanum ticks to the Monmouth County Mosquito Control Division’s passive tick surveillance program (Tinton Falls, New Jersey, USA; offering free tick identification to residents since 2006) have been increasing steadily while submissions of I. scapularis ticks remain nearly level (Figure 1), suggesting increased human exposure to A. americanum ticks relative to I. scapularis ticks.

Enlarge

Figure 1. Number of ticks submitted each year to Monmouth County Mosquito Control Division’s passive surveillance program during May–August, by year, Monmouth County, New Jersey, USA, 2006–2015.

A. americanum ticks are known vectors of ≥2 human pathogens, Ehrlichia chaffeensis and E. ewingii,[10,11] which cause human ehrlichiosis, an illness often marked by an initial prodrome of undifferentiated fever, headache, myalgia, nausea, malaise, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and hepatic injury (elevated serum transaminase levels).[12] More severe complications (including toxic shock–like symptoms and meningitis or meningoencephalitis) may occur in some untreated persons (including immunocompromised patients), and death rates as high as ≈3% have been reported.[12,13]

The number of ehrlichiosis cases attributable to E. chaffeensis that have been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA, USA) has increased steadily since the disease became reportable, from 0.8 cases/million persons/year in 2000 to 3.0 cases/million persons/year in 2007.[13,14] However, some evidence suggests that ehrlichiosis may be substantially underreported[12] and even reported cases may be misclassified because of cross-reactivity between E. chaffeensis, E. ewingii, and other Ehrlichia and Anaplasma agents in widely used serologic tests.[15–17] Health risks may be compounded if physicians are less familiar with ehrlichiosis than Lyme disease, particularly because initial symptoms may be relatively vague, resembling a viral syndrome typical of an array of tickborne diseases,[14] which creates the potential for diagnostic confusion where I. scapularis and A. americanum ticks are sympatric.[10] Ehrlichiosis could also be misdiagnosed as Rocky Mountain spotted fever if a patient is co-infected with Ehrlichia sp. and Rickettsia amblyommatis, (formerly Candidatus Rickettsia amblyommii [18]), a species cross-reactive in tests for rickettsial pathogens[19] and commonly present in ≥40% of field-collected A. americanum ticks.[4]

This study quantified the risk to humans of ehrlichial infections, relative to Lyme disease risk. We used data obtained from tick surveillance programs in Monmouth County, New Jersey, an area with a high reported incidence of Lyme disease and increasing A. americanum tick encounter rates.

Table of Contents

  1. Abstract and Introduction
  2. Methods
  3. Results
  4. Discussion