Wednesday, October 4, 2023
This article is intended for primary care clinicians, hospitalists, nurses, public health officials, and other members of the healthcare team caring for patients needing hospitalization.
The goal of this activity is to provide medical news to primary care clinicians and other healthcare professionals in order to enhance patient care.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:
As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.
Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.
Medscape, LLC is accredited by the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.
Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.
This Enduring Material activity, Medscape Education Clinical Briefs, has been reviewed and is acceptable for credit by the American Academy of Family Physicians. Term of approval begins 9/1/2016. Term of approval is for one year from this date. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Approved for 0.25 AAFP Prescribed credits.
Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.
AAFP Accreditation Questions
Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of continuing nursing education for RNs and APNs; none of these credits is in the area of pharmacology.
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 2/10/2017
Valid for credit through: 2/10/2018, 11:59 PM EST
processing....
The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) penalizes hospitals for excess readmissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, and pneumonia. After announcement of HRRP, readmission rates decreased, and thousands of hospitals paid penalties now totaling nearly $1 billion.
However, it was previously unknown whether overall trends in readmission rates, and trends for target and nontarget conditions, differed based on whether a hospital was subject to penalties imposed by HRRP. The goal of this retrospective cohort study by Desai and colleagues was to compare trends in readmission rates for target vs nontarget conditions, stratified by hospital penalty status.
Penalties imposed under the Affordable Care Act's HRRP are associated with lower readmission rates at penalized hospitals vs nonpenalized hospitals, according to a study of hospitalizations among Medicare beneficiaries published in the December 27, 2016, issue of JAMA.[1]
In addition, the researchers found that reductions in readmissions were greater at penalized institutions for 3 targeted conditions than for nontargeted conditions.
Announced in March 2010, the HRRP mandated reduced reimbursement as of October 2012 for hospitals with high readmission rates for AMI, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia in fee-for-service Medicare recipients. So far, almost $1 billion in penalties have been imposed on thousands of US hospitals, according to an analysis by the Kaiser Family Foundation.[2]
In the current study, Nihar R. Desai, MD, MPH, assistant professor of medicine in the cardiovascular medicine section at Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut, and colleagues looked at beneficiaries older than 64 years who had been discharged between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2015, from 2214 HRRP-penalized hospitals and 1238 nonpenalized hospitals. Penalized institutions tended to be larger and to be teaching hospitals with more Medicaid patients.
The study included 48,137,102 hospitalizations of 20,351,161 Medicare recipients. Between January 2008 and March 2010, when HRRP was announced, readmission rates tended to be stable across US hospitals, but afterward, they differed notably by penalty status.
In January 2008, for example, the mean readmission rates at penalized institutions were 21.9% for AMI, 27.5% for heart failure, 20.1% for pneumonia, and 18.4% for nontarget conditions. At their nonpenalized counterparts, the corresponding rates were 18.7%, 24.2%, 17.4%, and 15.7%, respectively.
After the program's announcement in March 2010, however, rehospitalization rates for target and nontarget conditions declined significantly faster at hospitals later subject to financial penalties vs those at nonpenalized hospitals.
For AMI discharges at penalty institutions, the authors found an additional decrease of -1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.84 to -0.65) percentage points per year vs nonpenalty discharges. For heart failure, the decrease was -1.25 (95% CI, -1.64 to -0.86), and for pneumonia, the decline was -1.37 (95% CI, -1.80 to -0.95).
For nontarget conditions, there was an additional decrease of -0.27 (95% CI, -0.38 to -0.17; P <.001 for all).
Moreover, at penalized hospitals, annual readmission rates for target conditions declined significantly faster compared with the decline in readmissions for nontarget conditions. In AMI, for example, there was an additional decline of -0.49 (95% CI, -0.81 to -0.16) percentage points per year vs nontarget conditions (P =.004). The additional decline for heart failure was -0.90 (95% CI, -1.18 to -0.62; P <.001), and for pneumonia, it was -0.57 (95% CI, -0.92 to -0.23; P <.001).
This finding "suggests that these hospitals specifically focused efforts to improve readmission outcomes for patients admitted for these target conditions," the authors write.
Among nonpenalized hospitals, readmissions for target conditions declined comparably or even more slowly vs nontarget conditions, with AMI rehospitalizations actually showing an additional increase of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.01 - 0.95) percentage points per year (P =.05).
Changes in rehospitalization rates for heart failure and pneumonia were 0.08 (95% CI, -0.30 to 0.46; P =.67) and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.13-0.93; P =.01) compared with nontarget conditions.
Dr Desai and coauthors state that in hospitals not subject to reduced reimbursement, "broader, system-wide readmission reduction strategies were more likely to have been used as opposed to strategies focusing solely on the target conditions."
After initial announcement of the program, readmission rates for nontarget conditions showed a modest but statistically significant decline at hospitals of either status: for penalty hospitals, the decrease was -0.81 percentage points per year (95% CI, -1.23 to -0.39); for nonpenalty hospitals, it was -0.54 (95% CI, -0.85 to -0.23; P <.001).
After implementation in October 2012, the rate of change flattened, with the greatest change seen in penalty hospitals.
"These findings may have implications for future policy programs aimed at reducing readmissions and may provide insight into the effect of external incentives," the authors write.
"This analysis may help elucidate the mechanism by which financial penalties in the HRRP were effective," they continue.
Further, they note their results are in line with a study published earlier this year in which 66% of hospital leaders surveyed thought the HRRP had a "major impact" on system efforts to reduce readmission rates.[3]
"As additional longitudinal data become available, analyses of the effects of changing financial penalties over time to further define the association of the HRRP on readmission rates should be undertaken," Dr Desai and colleagues write.
The authors received funding from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the National Institute on Aging, the American Federation for Aging Research, and the Yale Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center. Three coauthors have disclosed relevant financial relationships with the private sector.
JAMA. 2016;316:2647-2656.
