Monday, May 29, 2023
This article is intended for all physicians, particularly house staff, academic physicians, and other clinicians supervising students and physicians-in-training.
Describe potential harms of and corrective measures for inappropriate social media postings by medical staff, based on an American College of Physicians Ethics Case Study and commentary.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:
As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.
Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.
Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The cases and commentary were developed by the American College of Physicians.
Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.50
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME Released: 6/9/2015; Reviewed and Renewed: 7/12/2017
Valid for credit through: 7/12/2018
processing....
This case study is one in a series of case histories with commentaries by the American College of Physicians (ACP) Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee and the Center for Ethics and Professionalism. The series uses hypothetical examples to elaborate on controversial or subtle aspects of issues not addressed in detail in the ACP Ethics Manual, the Physician Charter on Professionalism, or other College position statements. The sixth edition of the ACP Ethics Manual, the Physician Charter, and additional College policies on ethics, professionalism, and human rights issues are available at http://www.acponline.org/running_practice/ethics/ or by contacting the Center for Ethics and Professionalism at 215/351-2839.
This case has been adapted from materials developed by ACP and SUNY Upstate as part of a collaborative project. We would like to thank the Institute on Medicine as a Profession/Macy Foundation Education and Training to Professionalism Grant for supporting this project.
;)
