Friday, March 31, 2023
As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.
Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.
Nurse Planner, Continuing Professional Education Department, Medscape, LLC; Clinical Assistant Professor, School of Nursing and Allied Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC
Associate Professor and Residency Director, Department of Family Medicine, University of California-Irvine, Irvine
This article is intended for primary care clinicians, endocrinologists, and other specialists who care for adults who might use calcium and vitamin D supplements.
The goal of this activity is to provide medical news to primary care clinicians and other healthcare professionals in order to enhance patient care.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:
As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.
Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.
Nurse Planner, Continuing Professional Education Department, Medscape, LLC; Clinical Assistant Professor, School of Nursing and Allied Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC
Associate Professor and Residency Director, Department of Family Medicine, University of California-Irvine, Irvine
Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
This enduring material activity, Medscape Education Clinical Briefs has been reviewed and is acceptable for up to 260 Prescribed credits by the American Academy of Family Physicians. AAFP accreditation begins September 1, 2012. Term of approval is for 1 year from this date. Each Clinical Brief is approved for .25 Prescribed credits. Credit may be claimed for 1 year from the date of each Clinical Brief. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Note: Total credit is subject to change based on topic selection and article length.
Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.
AAFP Accreditation Questions
Medscape, LLC is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation.
Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of continuing nursing education for RNs and APNs; none of these credits is in the area of pharmacology.
Accreditation of this program does not imply endorsement by either Medscape, LLC or ANCC.
Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education.
Medscape designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number 0461-0000-13-016-H05-P).
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME/CE Released: 5/14/2013
Valid for credit through: 5/14/2014
processing....
Many adults take supplements featuring vitamin D and calcium, but the recommendations for this practice are widely disparate. An editorial by Nestle and Nesheim, which accompanies the new recommendations from the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) in the Annals of Internal Medicine, reviews these recommendations. In 2011, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) found that calcium and vitamin D overall are important for bone health, and it recommends calcium intake of 800 to 1000 mg/day for low-risk adults. The Institute also recommends vitamin D intake of 400 IU/day for most adults.
The Endocrine Society was more aggressive in its approach to calcium and vitamin D supplements. Its recommendations, also published in 2011, would define vitamin D deficiency more broadly and recommend vitamin D supplements of 1500 to 2000 IU/day for many adults.
The USPSTF weighs into this controversy but focuses its current recommendations on the prevention of fracture risk in adults. The USPSTF also provides separate guidelines to address vitamin D supplementation for fall prevention.
The USPSTF recommends against daily supplementation with 400 IU or less of vitamin D3 and 1000 mg or less of calcium for primary fracture prevention in noninstitutionalized postmenopausal women, according to its final recommendation statement with updated guidelines reported in the May 7 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine.
"In review of the scientific evidence, the question of whether one should supplement in order to prevent fractures is that [the USPSTF doesn't] have enough evidence to make a recommendation about this for anything, except for postmenopausal women, where we have a study that demonstrates that vitamin D supplementation of modest doses potentially does you some harm," USPSTF chair Virginia A. Moyer, MD, MPH, vice president for Maintenance of Certification and Quality for The American Board of Pediatrics, told Medscape Education. "We do not know about higher doses of supplementation. We don't know about men and premenopausal women."
To determine the effects of supplementation on bone health outcomes in community-dwelling adults, the association of vitamin D and calcium levels with bone health outcomes, and the harms of supplementation, the USPSTF commissioned 2 systematic evidence reviews and a meta-analysis on vitamin D supplementation with or without calcium.
The new recommendations are intended only for noninstitutionalized, asymptomatic adults without a history of fractures, and not for persons with osteoporosis or vitamin D deficiency.
"The USPSTF recommends taking vitamin D if you are frail and elderly and at risk for fractures," Robert P. Heaney, MD, professor of medicine, Division of Endocrinology at Creighton University in Omaha, Nebraska, told Medscape Education when asked for an independent comment.
"We [The Endocrine Society] recommend it [vitamin D] for fall prevention," Dr. Heaney said. "It is clearly not a recommendation against vitamin D for frail, elderly individuals. The media headlines interpreted it as a recommendation against vitamin D instead of stating that [the USPSTF] did not find the evidence they wanted to support a recommendation for vitamin D supplementation for fracture risk...and they [USPSTF] are against the use of too little vitamin D to prevent fracture risk."
Updated USPSTF Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of its review, the USPSTF determined that current evidence is insufficient to evaluate the balance of the benefits and harms of combined vitamin D and calcium supplementation for the primary prevention of fractures in premenopausal women or in men.
The USPSTF also found that current evidence is insufficient to evaluate the balance of the benefits and harms of daily supplementation with more than 400 IU of vitamin D3 and more than 1000 mg of calcium for the primary prevention of fractures in noninstitutionalized postmenopausal women. Both of these are I level statements, meaning that the evidence is insufficient to make a recommendation for or against the provision of a preventive service.
"[I]n terms of postmenopausal women, recommending high doses [of vitamin D] is not good practice," Dr. Moyer said. "There is no evidence of benefit but evidence of a slight risk of harm [such as renal stones]. On the other hand, if someone recommends higher doses, the task force would say that there is no evidence to support this."
For the primary prevention of fractures in noninstitutionalized postmenopausal women, the USPSTF recommends against daily supplementation with 400 IU or less of vitamin D3 and 1000 mg or less of calcium. This recommendation is a D level statement, meaning that moderate or high certainty exists that the service has no net benefit or that the harms outweigh the benefits, and that the USPTSF therefore discourages use of the practice.
Women taking supplemental vitamin D and calcium have a statistically increased incidence of renal stones, according to evidence from the Women's Health Initiative. For every 273 women who received supplementation during a 7-year follow-up period, 1 woman was diagnosed with a urinary tract stone.
Specialty Views on Evidence Base for Updated Recommendations
"The task force does not make a recommendation in the absence of at least moderate certainty about a medicine, meaning the evidence has to be at least of a certain quality," Dr. Moyer said. "Specialty societies, in response to request of its members, make recommendations based on less solid evidence."
She explained that The Endocrine Society focuses on the population from the perspective that most of the population is vitamin D deficient, whereas the IOM takes the view that most people receive the proper amount of vitamin D.
"[The IOM] used a broader group of people to assess this and take a scientific look at the issue," Dr. Moyer said. "The starting point is not focusing on thinking that the entire population is deficient. Specialty societies see things through the lenses of their specialty, and [the USPSTF wants] to take a broader view."
However, Dr. Heaney points out that the issue of fracture prevention with vitamin D and calcium is linked to baseline levels, as he explained last year in an editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine (July 5, 2012; 367:77-78). Unlike drugs, nutrients do not result in a linear response, and if the patient has adequate vitamin D, giving more will have no effect.
"All depends on whether you are starting from a point of deficiency or adequacy in the vitamin D status," Dr. Heaney said. "There is solid evidence that vitamin D and calcium in adequate doses will prevent fractures. The USPSTF may have come to a different conclusion because they used 2 large systematic reviews on which the [IOM] also based their recommendations, and both of those systematic reviews are seriously flawed."
He notes that the criteria for including studies in the review were all methodological and technical and not biological, and that the review therefore cannot answer the question of whether vitamin D can prevent fracture.
Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:691-696, 701-702.
