You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

CME/CE

FDA Approvals: Three New Type 2 Diabetes Formulations of Alogliptin

  • Authors: News Author: Miriam E. Tucker
    CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MD
  • CME/CE Released: 2/28/2013
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT
  • Valid for credit through: 2/28/2014, 11:59 PM EST
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This article is intended for primary care clinicians, pharmacists, endocrinologists, diabetologists, and other specialists who care for adults with type 2 diabetes.

The goal of this activity is to provide medical news to primary care clinicians and other healthcare professionals in order to enhance patient care.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  1. Describe FDA approval of alogliptin tablets.
  2. Describe FDA approval of fixed-dose combination alogliptin and metformin hydrochloride tablets.
  3. Describe FDA approval of fixed-dose combination alogliptin and pioglitazone tablets.


Disclosures

As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.

Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.


Author(s)

  • Miriam E. Tucker

    Miriam E. Tucker is a freelance writer for Medscape.

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Miriam E. Tucker has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Editor(s)

  • Brande Nicole Martin, MA

    CME Clinical Editor, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Brande Nicole Martin, MA, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author(s)

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Freelance writer and reviewer, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Reviewer(s)

  • Joi Tisdale

    CME Program Manager, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Joi Tisdale, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

    Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    This enduring material activity, Medscape Education Clinical Briefs has been reviewed and is acceptable for up to 260 Prescribed credits by the American Academy of Family Physicians. AAFP accreditation begins September 1, 2012. Term of approval is for 1 year from this date. Each Clinical Brief is approved for .25 Prescribed credits. Credit may be claimed for 1 year from the date of each Clinical Brief. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Note: Total credit is subject to change based on topic selection and article length.

    Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.

    AAFP Accreditation Questions

    Contact This Provider

    For Pharmacists

  • Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education.

    Medscape designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number 0461-0000-13-003-H04-P).

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME/CE

FDA Approvals: Three New Type 2 Diabetes Formulations of Alogliptin

Authors: News Author: Miriam E. Tucker CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MDFaculty and Disclosures
THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT

CME/CE Released: 2/28/2013

Valid for credit through: 2/28/2014, 11:59 PM EST

processing....

Clinical Context

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes in the United States is approximately 24 million, accounting for more than 90% of diabetes cases diagnosed. Alogliptin is a selective dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor. The mechanism of action is to inhibit the inactivation of incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, which are involved in blood glucose regulation. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had previously approved metformin hydrochloride and pioglitazone to manage type 2 diabetes.

The drug maker previously applied for FDA approval of alogliptin in July 2009, but this application was rejected because of insufficient cardiovascular data. In April 2012, the FDA requested further data regarding applications for alogliptin and the alogliptin/pioglitazone combination that was resubmitted in July 2011.

Study Synopsis and Perspective

The FDA has approved 3 different formulations of the selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

On January 25, the FDA announced approval of 3 drugs — Nesina (alogliptin) tablets, the fixed-dose combinations Kazano (alogliptin and metformin hydrochloride) tablets, and Oseni (alogliptin and pioglitazone) tablets for use with diet and exercise to improve blood glucose control in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Alogliptin is a selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor that works by slowing the inactivation of incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide involved in regulating blood glucose levels.

The FDA had rejected the drug maker's previous application for alogliptin in July 2009, citing insufficient cardiovascular data. The company resubmitted applications for both alogliptin and the alogliptin/pioglitazone combination in July 2011, but in April 2012, the FDA requested further data.

The current approval is based on data from separate studies for all 3 formulations. Alogliptin monotherapy was studied in 14 clinical trials involving 8500 patients with type 2 diabetes, in whom it produced reductions in hemoglobin A1c (A1c) levels of 0.4 to 0.6 percentage points at 26 weeks compared with placebo.

The FDA is requiring 5 postmarketing studies for alogliptin, including 3 pediatric studies; a cardiovascular outcomes trial; and an enhanced pharmacovigilance program to monitor for liver abnormalities, serious cases of pancreatitis, and severe hypersensitivity reactions.

The alogliptin/metformin combination was studied in 4 clinical trials involving over 2500 patients. It produced A1c reductions of 1.1 percentage points over alogliptin alone, and 0.5 percentage points over metformin at 26 weeks. As with metformin monotherapy, it will carry a black-box warning about the risk for lactic acidosis. Two postmarketing studies will be required for this formulation.

For alogliptin/pioglitazone, 4 clinical trials involving more than 1500 patients produced additional A1c reductions of 0.4 to 0.6 percentage points over pioglitazone monotherapy, and 0.4 to 0.9 percentage points over alogliptin alone. As with the other 2, the FDA is requiring enhanced pharmacovigilance for severe adverse events. And, as with pioglitazone, it will carry a black-box warning for heart failure.

Alogliptin will now be the fourth dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor licensed in the United States, but it was supposed to be the first. It was already far along in development in 2008 when the FDA issued new cardiovascular safety requirements for all new diabetes medications. This meant that the drug maker had to start fresh with new trials, while 3 competitors that were further back in development — sitagliptin, saxagliptin, and linagliptin — were able to beat alogliptin to market.

More information on these 3 new drug treatments for type 2 diabetes is available on the FDA Web site.

Clinical Implications

  • The FDA has approved alogliptin tablets for use with diet and exercise to improve blood glucose control in adults with type 2 diabetes. Approval was based on 14 clinical trials, in which alogliptin therapy was associated with reductions in A1c levels at 26 weeks of 0.4 to 0.6 percentage points vs placebo. However, the FDA is requiring 5 postmarketing studies including 3 pediatric studies, a cardiovascular outcomes trial, and an enhanced pharmacovigilance program.
  • The FDA has also approved fixed-dose combination alogliptin and metformin hydrochloride tablets, based on findings from 4 clinical trials. Reductions in A1c levels at 26 weeks were greater with this combination vs alogliptin alone or with metformin alone. The label for this combination will carry a black-box warning noting the risk for lactic acidosis, as does the metformin label. For this formulation, the FDA is requiring 2 postmarketing studies.
  • The third alogliptin formulation approved by the FDA is a fixed-dose combination with pioglitazone. Clinical trials showed additional reductions in A1c levels with this combination vs reductions seen with pioglitazone monotherapy and alogliptin monotherapy. Enhanced pharmacovigilance for severe adverse events is required. Like pioglitazone, the combination label will include a black-box warning for heart failure.

CME Test

  • Print