You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

Table 1. Transarterial Embolization Versus Chemoembolization for Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver  Metastases  

Table 2. Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization  

Table 3. Radioembolization  

CME

Liver-Directed Therapies in Patients With Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors

  • Authors: Natalie B. Jones, MD; Manisha H. Shah, MD; Mark Bloomston, MD
  • CME Released: 6/4/2012
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT
  • Valid for credit through: 6/4/2013, 11:59 PM EST
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for primary care physicians, oncologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, and other physicians who care for patients with NETs.

The goal of this activity is to evaluate treatment strategies for liver metastases of NETs.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  1. Distinguish the most important prognostic factor for survival in cases of NETs
  2. Analyze surgical options for the treatment of liver metastases associated with NETs
  3. Assess the use of embolization of liver metastases associated with NETs
  4. Evaluate other treatment modalities of liver metastases associated with NETs


Disclosures

As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.

Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.


Author(s)

  • Natalie B. Jones, MD

    Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Natalie B. Jones, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Manisha H. Shah, MD

    Department of Hematology/Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Manisha H. Shah, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Mark Bloomston, MD

    Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Mark Bloomston, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Editor

  • Kerrin M. Green, MA

    Assistant Managing Editor, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Kerrin M. Green, MA, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Charles P. Vega, MD, FAAFP

    Health Sciences Clinical Professor; Residency Director, Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Irvine

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Charles P. Vega, MD, FAAFP, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Reviewer

  • Nafeez Zawahir, MD

    CME Clinical Director, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Nafeez Zawahir, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

    For Physicians

  • This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education through the joint sponsorship of Medscape, LLC and JNCCN - The Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Medscape, LLC is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

    Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. Medscape Education encourages you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates by accessing "Edit Your Profile" at the top of your Medscape homepage.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME

Liver-Directed Therapies in Patients With Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors

Authors: Natalie B. Jones, MD; Manisha H. Shah, MD; Mark Bloomston, MDFaculty and Disclosures
THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT

CME Released: 6/4/2012

Valid for credit through: 6/4/2013, 11:59 PM EST

processing....

Abstract and Introduction

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are increasing in incidence. Incidental NETs that may have little clinical significance, such as gastric and rectal primaries, are often identified because of increased screening efforts and advanced imaging modalities. Although NETs are biologically indolent cancers, many patients present with incurable metastatic disease to the liver at initial diagnosis. Some literature suggests a delay averaging almost 5 years in making the correct diagnosis based on clinical symptoms. Although surgical resection offers the only potentially curative therapy, liver-directed therapies, such as embolization and ablation, offer effective alternatives to control symptoms and potentially impact overall survival. This article reviews the latest liver-directed approaches to the management of advanced NETs. (JNCCN 2012;10:765–774)

Introduction

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare, with a rising incidence over the past few decades of 5 to 7 cases per 100,000.[1,2] Gastroenteropancreatic NETs have the second highest prevalence of all gastrointestinal cancers. Not surprisingly, the liver is the most common site of metastases, in addition to regional lymph nodes. As many as 75% of small bowel NETs and 30% to 85% of pancreatic NETs present either synchronous or metachronous with liver metastases.[1,3] In addition, 5% to 10% of patients with NETs present with liver metastases as their initial presentation, with primaries of unknown origin. It has been shown that hepatic metastases are the most important prognostic indicator of survival in patients with NETs regardless of the primary site.[4] Historically, 5-year survival rates for untreated neuroendocrine liver metastases range from 13% to 54% compared with 75% to 99% in patients without liver metastases.[5,6] Progression of liver metastases associated with bony metastases can often be seen in NETs and is an indicator of aggressive disease. Therefore, distinction is often made between treatment modalities based on aggressiveness of tumor and extent of extrahepatic metastasis. The presence of liver metastases and their patterns of distribution are prognostic indicators.[7,8]

Currently, consensus is lacking regarding how NET liver metastases should be managed, specifically regarding the goals of therapy (curative vs. palliative), indication for initiation of treatment (tumor burden, symptoms), and optimal means to achieve these objectives (systemic therapy, surgery, percutaneous interventions).[9] This article focuses on liver-directed therapies for metastatic NETs, specifically the role of cytoreductive hepatectomy, liver transplantation, and percutaneous interventions (e.g., ablation, chemoembolization, radioembolization). Given the propensity for poorly differentiated tumors to be treated with systemic therapy, this discussion is limited to the management of low-grade (i.e., well-differentiated and moderately differentiated) tumors.