You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

 

CME

Copied and Pasted and Misdiagnosed (or Cloned Notes and Blind Alleys)

  • Authors: Susan Rattner, MD; Michele Mathes, JD; Eugenia Siegler, MD
  • CME Released: 5/16/2012; Reviewed and Renewed: 6/5/2015
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT
  • Valid for credit through: 6/5/2017
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for internists, intensivists, hospital practitioners, and other clinicians caring for patients in whom EHRs are used.

The goal of this activity is to describe potential problems associated with use of EHRs and strategies to overcome these problems.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  1. Describe potential EHR problems associated with note copying
  2. Describe other potential problems associated with medical record documentation
  3. Describe possible strategies to overcome potential problems associated with use of EHRs


Disclosures

As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.

Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.


Authors

  • Susan Rattner, MD

    Associate Dean for Undergraduate Medical Education, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Susan Rattner, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Michele Mathes, JD

    Senior Associate, Center for Ethics and Professionalism, American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Michele Mathes, JD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Eugenia Siegler, MD

    Weill Medical College of Cornell University; New York Presbyterian Hospital, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, New York, New York

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Eugenia Siegler, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Editor

  • Lois Snyder, JD

    Director, Center for Ethics and Professionalism, American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Lois Snyder, JD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Freelance writer and reviewer, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Reviewer(s)

  • Nafeez Zawahir, MD

    CME Clinical Director, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Nafeez Zawahir, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Sarah Fleischman

    CME Program Manager, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Sarah Fleischman has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

    The cases and commentary were developed by the American College of Physicians.

    Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME

Copied and Pasted and Misdiagnosed (or Cloned Notes and Blind Alleys)

Authors: Susan Rattner, MD; Michele Mathes, JD; Eugenia Siegler, MDFaculty and Disclosures
THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT

CME Released: 5/16/2012; Reviewed and Renewed: 6/5/2015

Valid for credit through: 6/5/2017

processing....

Introduction

This case study is one in a series with commentaries by the American College of Physicians’ (ACP) Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee and the Center for Ethics and Professionalism. The series uses hypothetical examples to elaborate on controversial or subtle aspects of issues not addressed in detail in the College's Ethics Manual, the Physician's Charter on professionalism, or other College position statements. The sixth edition of the ACP's Ethics Manual, the Physician's Charter, and additional College policies on ethics, professionalism, and human rights issues are available at http://www.acponline.org/ethics/ethics_man.htm or by contacting the Center for Ethics and Professionalism at
215/351-2839.

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Case
  3. Commentary
  4. Conclusion
  • Print