This article is intended for primary care clinicians, infectious disease specialists, and other specialists who provide care to infants requiring immunizations.
The goal of this activity is to provide medical news to primary care clinicians and other healthcare professionals in order to enhance patient care.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:
As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.
Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.
Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
This enduring material activity, Medscape Education Clinical Briefs, has been reviewed and is acceptable for up to 300 Prescribed credits by the American Academy of Family Physicians. AAFP accreditation begins September 1, 2011. Term of approval is for 1 year from this date. Each Clinical Brief is approved for .25 Prescribed credits. Credit may be claimed for 1 year from the date of each Clinical Brief. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Note: Total credit is subject to change based on topic selection and article length.
Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.
AAFP Accreditation Questions
Medscape, LLC is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation.
Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of continuing nursing education for RNs and APNs; none of these credits is in the area of pharmacology.
Accreditation of this program does not imply endorsement by either Medscape, LLC or ANCC.
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME/CE Released: 5/1/2012
Valid for credit through: 5/1/2013
processing....
One of the main barriers to timely immunizations in children is the parents' concern about the associated pain and discomfort, as reported by Jacobson and colleagues in the March 21, 2001, issue of Vaccine. In the December 14, 2010, issue of the Canadian Medical Association Journal, Taddio and colleagues noted that concentrated sucrose alone is effective for pain control in infants receiving immunizations. Breast-feeding, which combines comforting, skin-to-skin contact, distraction, and the sweetness of lactose, is another effective method of analgesia, as reported by Shah and colleagues in the June 2007 issue of Breastfeeding Medicine. In The Happiest Baby on the Block, published in 2003, Karp described a calming intervention called the 5 S's: swaddling, side or stomach position, shushing, swinging, and sucking.
This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial by Harrington and colleagues assesses whether sucrose water alone, physical intervention with the 5 S's alone, or sucrose water plus physical intervention are effective forms of analgesia for infants receiving immunizations.
Infant immunizations are stressful for parents and painful for recipients. A study published in the May issue of Pediatrics found that the pain-reducing effect of a physical intervention with or without sucrose water was superior to sucrose water alone.
Evidence is scant that a pain reliever such as acetaminophen is effective postvaccination, and this drug may dampen the antibody response to certain vaccine antigens. To investigate a nonpharmacological intervention to alleviate injection pain, John W. Harrington, MD, from the Department of Pediatrics, Eastern Virginia Medical School, and Department of Pediatrics, Section of General Academic Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of The King's Daughters, Norfolk, Virginia, and colleagues conducted a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to test an intervention termed the "5 S's," for swaddling, side/stomach position, shushing, swinging, and sucking.
The researchers divided 230 infants being immunized at 2- or 4-month well-baby check-ups into 4 groups that received either 2 mL of water or 2 mL of a 24% sucrose solution 2 minutes before vaccination, and either standard comfort care from the parent or guardian or a 5 S's intervention from a researcher. Sucrose is added to acetaminophen products to improve palatability, and in some studies appeared to relieve pain.
The investigators used the Modified Riley Pain Score (cry quality, grimace, movement) to assess pain every 15 seconds for 2 minutes, and subsequently every 30 seconds for up to 5 minutes after vaccination. A 1-way analysis of variance evaluated mean pain across groups over time, and repeated-measure general linear modeling evaluated pain scores at each interval across the groups. The vaccines were for rotavirus and hepatitis B, injected intramuscularly into the thigh.
Pain scores ranged from 0 to 9. Mean pain scores were 4.46 for the control group (water, parental comfort), 3.95 for the sucrose group (sucrose, parental comfort), 3.24 for the physical group (water, 5 S's), and 3.61 for the physical with sucrose group (sucrose, 5 S's). The difference in mean pain scores was significantly lower in all treatment groups compared with the control group, and the mean pain score for the 5 S's–only group was significantly less than the sucrose group. However, the difference between the two 5 S's groups was not statistically significant.
The 2 groups implementing the 5 S strategy had less pain and shorter duration of crying than the 2 groups without the strategy, and the 5 S intervention was about equally effective with or without sucrose. The researchers conclude, "The 5 S's appear to be a viable nonpharmacologic option for clinics to implement when providing analgesia during vaccinations." In addition to minimizing suffering, pain control during immunizations may calm parents who are hesitant to have their children vaccinated, the researchers point out.
Limitations of the study include that the 3 researchers who provided the 5 S's might have differed slightly in their technique, the disproportionate number of 2-month-olds, and the difficulty of assessing movements to evaluate pain in a swaddled baby. Finally, the parents may have been providing the 5 S's as well.
The authors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
Pediatrics. 2012;129:815-822.