You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

Table 1.  

Rank 1983 (Coates et al.2) 1996 (Griffin et al.3) 1997 (de Boer-Dennert et al.1) 1999 (Lindley et al.4) 2004 (Hofman et al.5)
1 Vomiting Nausea Nausea Nausea Fatigue
2 Nausea Constantly tired Hair loss Hair loss Nausea
3 Hair loss Hair loss Vomiting Constantly tired Sleep disturbances
4 Thought of treatment Effect of family Constantly tired Vomiting Weight loss
5 Length of treatment Vomiting Injections Taste changes Hair loss

Patient Perceptions of the Most Severe Side Effects of Cancer Chemotherapy

Table 2.  

High (> 90% Chance of CINV Without Prophylaxis)
AC combination (doxorubicin or epirubicin with cyclophosphamide)
Carmustine (> 250 mg/m2)
Cisplatin (≥ 50 mg/m2)
Cyclophosphamide (> 1500 mg/m2)
Dacarbazine
Doxorubicin (> 60 mg/m2)
Epirubicin (> 90 mg/m2)
Ifosfamide (≥ 10 g/m2)
Mechlorethamine
Streptozocin
Moderate (30%–90% Chance of CINV Without Prophylaxis)
Amifostine (> 300 mg/m2)
Arsenic trioxide
Azacitidine
Bendamustine
Busulfan
Carboplatin
Carmustine (≤ 250 mg/m2)
Cisplatin (< 50 mg/m2)
Clofarabine
Cyclophosphamide (≤ 1500 mg/m2)
Cytarabine (> 200 mg/m2)
Dactinomycin
Daunorubicin
Doxorubicin (≤ 60 mg/m2)
Epirubicin (≤ 90 mg/m2)
Idarubicin
Ifosfamide (< 10 g/m2)
Interferon (≥ 10 million IU/m2)
Interleukin-2 (> 12–15 million IU/m2)
Irinotecan
Melphalan
Methotrexate (250 to > 1000 mg/m2)
Oxaliplatin
Temozolomide
Low (10%–30% Chance of CINV Without Prophylaxis)
Amifostine (≤ 300 mg/m2)
Cabazitaxel
Cytarabine (100–200 mg/m2)
Docetaxel
Eribulin
Etoposide
5-Fluorouracil
Floxuridine
Gemcitabine
Interferon (> 5 to < 10 million IU/m2)
Interleukin-2 (≤ 12 million IU/m2)
Ixabepilone
Liposomal doxorubicin
Methotrexate (> 50 to < 250 mg/m2)
Mitomycin
Mitoxantrone
Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel-albumin
Pemetrexed
Pralatrexate
Pentostatin
Romidepsin
Thiotepa
Topotecan
Minimal (< 10% Chance of CINV Without Prophylaxis)
Alemtuzumab
Asparaginase
Bevacizumab
Bleomycin
Bortezomib
Cetuximab
Cladribine
Cytarabine (< 100 mg/m2)
Decitabine
Denileukin diftitox
Dexrazoxane
Fludarabine
Interferon (≤ 5 million/units/m2)
Ipilimumab
Methotrexate (≤ 50 mg/m2)
Nelarabine
Ofatumumab
Panitumumab
Pegaspargase
Peginterferon
Rituximab
Temsirolimus
Trastuzumab
Valrubicin
Vinblastine
Vincristine
Vinorelbine

Emetogenicity of Intravenous Chemotherapeutic Agents

Abbreviation: CINV, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
Data from Refs.[8–10]

Table 3.  

  NCCN ASCO MASCC
High
  • Acute
  • Delayed
12 mg po or IV
8 mg po days 2–4
or
8mg po day 2, 8 mg twice daily days 3 and 4a
12 mg po or IV
8 mg po or IV; days 2–3 or days 2–4
20 mg (12 mg if used with an NK1 antagonist)
8 mg bid for 3-4 d (qd with NK1 antagonist)
Moderate
  • Acute
  • Delayed
12 mg po or IV
8 mg po or IV days 2 and 3
8 mg po or IV
8 mg po or IV days 2 and 3
8 mg
8 mg for 2–3 d
Low 12 mg po or IV 8 mg po or IV 4-8 mg

Corticosteroid Dosing Recommendations

All corticosteroid doses for moderate and high regimens are in combination with a 5HT3 antagonist +/- a neurokinin-1 antagonist.
Abbreviations: IV, intravenous; MASCC, Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer; NK1, neurokinin-1.
aWhen given with fosaprepitant, 150 mg IV.

CME

Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting

  • Authors: Sally Yowell Barbour, PharmD, BCOP, CPP
  • CME Released: 4/9/2012
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT
  • Valid for credit through: 4/9/2013, 11:59 PM EST
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for primary care physicians, oncologists, and other physicians who care for patients with cancer.

The goal of this activity is to evaluate the role of corticosteroids in the treatment of CINV.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  1. Assess the classification of CINV
  2. Distinguish chemotherapy agents associated with high rates of CINV
  3. Analyze the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of acute CINV
  4. Analyze the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of delayed CINV


Disclosures

As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.

Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.


Author

  • Sally Yowell Barbour, PharmD, BCOP, CPP

    Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Sally Yowell Barbour, PharmD, BCOP, CPP, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Editor

  • Kerrin M. Green, MA

    Assistant Managing Editor, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Kerrin M. Green, MA, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Charles P. Vega, MD

    Health Sciences Clinical Professor; Residency Director, Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Irvine

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Charles P. Vega, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Reviewer(s)

  • Nafeez Zawahir, MD

    CME Clinical Director, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Nafeez Zawahir, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Sarah Fleischman

    CME Program Manager, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Sarah Fleischman has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

    For Physicians

  • This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education through the joint sponsorship of Medscape, LLC and JNCCN - The Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Medscape, LLC is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

    Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 70% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. Medscape Education encourages you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates by accessing "Edit Your Profile" at the top of your Medscape homepage.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME

Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CINV Prophylaxis: Mechanism and Role of Corticosteroids

processing....

CINV Prophylaxis: Mechanism and Role of Corticosteroids

Serotonin receptor antagonists (5HT3-RA), neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonists, and corticosteroids are the main agents used in the prevention and treatment of CINV. Additional agents available in the clinicians’ armamentarium are dopamine antagonists, cannabinoids, benzodiazepines, and miscellaneous agents, such as olanzapine. Dexamethasone is the most widely used corticosteroid in the treatment of CINV, and methylprednisolone has also been studied and used. Both corticosteroids are effective as monotherapy and in combination with other agents, either with a serotonin antagonist alone or as part of a triple-drug regimen with an NK1 antagonist. They are recommended agents in both the acute and delayed settings.[8–10]

Mechanism of Action

The mechanism of action of corticosteroids in CINV remains relatively unknown. Studies in pigeons suggest that the antiemetic effect of steroids may be partially from their activity in the central nervous system.[13] Evidence also suggests that the effect may be from activation of glucocorticoid receptors in the nucleus of the solitary tract in the medulla.[14] Lastly, dexamethasone and methylprednisolone have also been shown to antagonize 5HT3A receptors in Xenopus oocytes; this antagonism may also explain the beneficial effects of corticosteroids in CINV prophylaxis and treatment.[15]

Role in Management

Acute CINV. The role of corticosteroids in acute CINV management is largely in combination with either a 5HT3 antagonist alone or as part of triple-drug therapy with an NK1 antagonist. In the moderately emetogenic setting, when used in combination with a 5HT3 antagonist, the optimal dexamethasone dose is 8 mg ( Table 3 ). This dose was established by the Italian Group for Antiemetic Research in a study of 587 patients receiving carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, or anthracyclines. Patients were randomized to receive 1 of 3 dexamethasone treatments in combination with ondansetron, 8 mg intravenously: 8 mg intravenously before chemotherapy plus 4 mg orally every 6 hours for 4 doses, starting at the same time of the chemotherapy; 24 mg intravenously as a single dose before chemotherapy; or 8 mg intravenously as a single dose before chemotherapy. All patients received oral dexamethasone, 4 mg twice daily from days 2 to 5. The rates of complete protection against vomiting/nausea were not significantly different among the 3 dosing arms (84.6%/66.7%; 83.6%/56.9%; 89.2%/61.0%), nor was a significant difference seen in delayed control (81.0%/46.7%; 81.3%/45.1%; 79.8%/46.1%).[16]

In the highly emetogenic chemotherapy setting, before the introduction of routine combination with NK1 antagonists, when used in combination with a 5HT3 alone, the recommended dose of dexamethasone was 20 mg. A study by the Italian Group for Antiemetic Research evaluated various single intravenous doses of dexamethasone (4, 8, 12, or 20 mg) in combination with ondansetron, 8 mg intravenously in patients receiving cisplatin. Complete protection from acute vomiting and nausea was significantly superior with the 20-mg dose compared with the 4- and 8-mg doses (83.2%/71% vs. 69.2%/60.9% and 69.1%/61%), and superior, but not significantly, to the 12-mg dose (78.5%/66.9%).[17] With the introduction of the NK1 antagonists, the triple-drug combination has become the standard of care for highly emetogenic regimens. When this combination is used, the dose of the steroid is reduced to account for the interaction with CYP3A4, which increases the area under the curve of the corticosteroid by approximately 50%. The dose of dexamethasone in this triple-drug regimen is reduced to 12 mg for acute management of CINV. Corticosteroids are also an option for monotherapy in low emetogenic regimens, especially in patients who would be receiving it for hypersensitivity prophylaxis (e.g., paclitaxel; Table 3 ).

Delayed CINV. Dexamethasone is also recommended for the management of delayed CINV in both high and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. Doses are generally 8 mg once or twice daily in the delayed setting, depending on emetogenicity and concurrent antiemetics ( Table 3 ). More recent data have suggested that corticosteroids could be eliminated from the delayed setting without decreased efficacy in CINV control in some settings. Aapro et al.[18] evaluated 300 chemotherapy-naïve female patients receiving AC/EC (anthracycline and cyclophosphamide/epirubicin and cyclophosphamide)-based chemotherapy. All patients received a single injection of palonosetron, 0.25 mg intravenously in combination with dexamethasone, 8 mg intravenously on day 1 and were then randomized to either dexamethasone, 4 mg orally twice daily or placebo for days 2 and 3. The primary end point was complete response (no emesis and no rescue medication) in the overall (days 1–5) period. Overall complete response was achieved in 53.7% of the group receiving palonosetron plus dexamethasone days 1 through 3 and in 53.6% of the group receiving palonosetron plus dexamethasone on day 1. The authors concluded that a single injection of palonosetron and dexamethasone on day 1 might be a sufficient treatment option, and that reducing dexamethasone was not associated with significant reduction in antiemetic control during the 5-day period, or with an impact on patient functioning.

A similar study conducted by Celio et al.[19] evaluated 332 chemotherapy-naïve patients receiving a variety of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens, with oxaliplatin-based or anthracycline-containing regimens the most common. Patients received a single 0.25-mg injection of palonosetron in combination with dexamethasone, 8 mg intravenously on day 1 and were then randomized to either 8 mg of oral dexamethasone daily or placebo for days 2 and 3. Noninferiority was shown, with overall complete response rates of 67.5% for those administered dexamethasone only on day 1, and 71.1% for those also administered dexamethasone on days 2 and 3. The authors concluded that palonosetron plus single-dose dexamethasone administered before common moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens protects against acute and delayed CINV, which is noninferior to that of palonosetron plus dexamethasone for 3 days, and that the major benefit of the single-day regimen occurred in patients receiving non-AC moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens.[19] A single-day administration of triple-drug therapy (dexamethasone, fosaprepitant, and palonosetron) was also investigated in a small single-arm study,[20] which, if proven to be similar in efficacy in randomized trials, would provide a more convenient and perhaps safe option for patients undergoing emetogenic chemotherapy.

Safety of Corticosteroids in CINV

Corticosteroids used in CINV as either monotherapy or in combination with other agents are generally very well tolerated. The most common side effects are transient elevations in glucose, insomnia, anxiety, and gastric upset. However, in most settings the duration of therapy with a corticosteroid is short and side effects can be managed, and the benefits are thought to outweigh any adverse effects. They are not completely benign, however, and, although uncommon, can decompensate diabetes, cause psychosis, or reactivate an ulcer.[21] In a survey of 60 patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy with dexamethasone for acute and delayed CINV prophylaxis, patients reported moderate to severe problems with insomnia (45%), indigestion/epigastric discomfort (27%), agitation (27%), increased appetite (19%), weight gain (16%), and acne (15%) the week after chemotherapy.[22] A theoretical concern has also been expressed about their use in patients undergoing immunosuppressive chemotherapy because of a potential increased risk for infection and interference with the antitumor effects of chemotherapy.[21,23] Their use in the bone marrow transplant setting and in some hematologic malignancies remains provider- and institution-specific.