Molecular Genetic Profile of our DOA Cohort
Distribution of RNFL Indices for Our OPA1 Cohort
RNFL Thickness Data for OPA1 Patients and Normal Controls
Comparison of RNFL Thickness Between Pure DOA and DOA + Subgroups
This activity is intended for primary care clinicians, ophthalmologists, and other specialists who care for patients with DOA.
The goal of this activity is to review features of DOA and RGC loss in patients with the pure and syndromal forms of DOA.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:
As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of
an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant
financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial
relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.
Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food
and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.
This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education through the joint sponsorship of Medscape, LLC and Nature Publishing Group. Medscape, LLC is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.00
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates by accessing "Edit Your Profile" at the top of your Medscape homepage.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
processing....
The majority of eyes from patients with OPA1 mutations had an average RNFL thickness < 1% of the normal range (73/80, 91.3%), and this was also observed independently for the temporal (70/80, 87.5%), inferior (69/80, 86.3%), and superior (53/80, 66.3%) quadrants.
For the nasal quadrant, only 13/80 (16.2%) eyes had an RNFL thickness < 1%, compared with 44/80 (55.0%) eyes in the 5-95% range ( Table 2 ). There was a significant difference in the distribution of RNFL thickness between quadrants (Supplementary Table 1), except for the comparison between the temporal and inferior quadrants (P = 0.5868). To confirm these findings, peripapillary RNFL thickness in the OPA1 group (mean age = 42.7 years, standard deviation (SD) = 14.9 years, range = 7.0-69.0 years) was compared with the measurements obtained from an independent cohort of 15 age-matched normal controls (mean age = 40.3 years, SD = 12.3 years, range = 22.0-66.0 years, P = 0.5745). OPA1 patients had a statistically significant reduction in mean RNFL thickness for all measurement parameters (Supplementary Figure 2, Table 3 ), and the percentage decrease was greater in the temporal quadrant (59.0%), followed by the inferior (49.6%), superior (41.8%), and nasal (25.9%) quadrants.
There was no statistically significant difference in age between the pure DOA (mean = 40.1 years, SD = 15.7 years, range = 7.0-69.0 years, N= 26) and DOA + subgroups (mean = 47.6 years, SD =12.1 years, range = 21.0 = 64.0 years, N = 14, P = 0.1295) (Supplementary Figure 3A). Patients with DOA + features had significantly worse LogMAR visual acuities (mean = 1.26, SD = 0.85) compared with patients with pure DOA (mean = 0.76, SD = 0.54, P = 0.0018) (Supplementary Figure 3B). Except for the temporal quadrant, RNFL measurements were significantly thinner in the DOA + group (Figure 1, Table 4 ). There was a statistically significant inverse correlation between average RNFL thickness and LogMAR visual acuity (Figure 2), and this relationship was also significant for the inferior, superior, and nasal quadrants on subgroup analysis (Supplementary Table 2).
Comparison of Average RNFL Thickness Between Patients with Pure DOA and DOA + Phenotypes.
***P-value = 0.0006.
Correlation of Average RNFL Thickness with LogMAR Visual Acuity. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = -0.6355, P< 0.0001.