Adverse Effects of Deferasirox in the EPIC Study*
Adverse Effects of Deferasirox in the US03 Trial*
Representative Clinical Guidelines Concerning Iron Chelation Therapy for Patients with MDS
This activity is intended for hematologists and other physicians who care for patients with MDS.
The goal of this activity is to evaluate the balance of benefits vs potential harms of iron chelation therapy among patients with MDS.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:
As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of
an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant
financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial
relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.
Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food
and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.
This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education through the joint sponsorship of Medscape, LLC and JNCCN - The Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Medscape, LLC is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME for a maximum of 1.00
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
. )™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates by accessing "Edit Your Profile" at the top of your Medscape homepage.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME Released: 1/14/2011
Valid for credit through: 1/14/2012, 11:59 PM EST
processing....
The appropriate role of iron chelation therapy in the management of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is currently controversial. Some investigators interpret data to indicate that careful attention to iron parameters, with early initiation of iron chelation in patients with evidence suggesting transfusion-associated iron overload, is an important component of high-quality MDS patient care. Other physicians are more skeptical, noting that chelation can be cumbersome or costly, has associated risks, and has not yet been shown to reduce morbidity or mortality in the MDS setting. This article reviews the extent to which iron chelation therapy might be either an important clinical intervention in MDS or a distraction from more pressing clinical concerns. (JNCCN 2011;9:65–75)
More than 90% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are anemic at the time of diagnosis,[1] and most patients will require red blood cell (RBC) transfusions at some point during the course of their illness. Patients with MDS who require RBC transfusions experience worse outcomes than transfusion-independent patients, even when the cohorts are matched for other known disease-associated prognostic markers.[2,3]
The specific reasons why patients with MDS requiring transfusions experience more rapid disease progression and shorter overall survival are currently unclear. RBC transfusion dependence might mark patients who have intrinsically more severe marrow failure and more dangerous disease, but the RBC transfusions themselves also likely confer risks. Several recent investigations have focused on the specific risk of transfusion-associated iron overload (hemosiderosis) in MDS, because each RBC unit contains approximately 200 to 250 mg of elemental iron, and humans lack a physiologic excretion mechanism for excess iron. Iron overload from increased gut iron absorption in the setting of ineffective erythropoiesis, exacerbated by RBC transfusions, has proven to be a leading cause of death in several congenital forms of anemia, such as severe β-thalassemia.[4]
The risk of iron overload in chronic acquired anemic states, such as MDS, could be clinically relevant, because this risk is potentially modifiable with iron chelation therapy (ICT). However, which patients with MDS should be offered ICT is currently an area of uncertainty in clinical practice.[5] Although the advent of an effective orally bioavailable iron chelator, deferasirox (Exjade, approved by the FDA in 2005; deferiprone [L1], another orally administered iron chelator, is available in many countries but not in the United States) promised increased convenience for patients compared with injectable deferoxamine (Desferal, FDA-approved in 1968), ICT is costly and confers risks, and thus far no completed randomized clinical trials have shown that patients with MDS benefit from ICT. This article discusses the evidence supporting the concept that iron overload is harmful to patients with MDS, benefits and risks of ICT, preliminary data from phase II deferasirox clinical trials, and the various consensus guidelines on management of excess iron in patients with MDS.