This article is intended for primary care clinicians, obstetricians, and other specialists who care for pregnant women.
The goal of this activity is to provide medical news to primary care clinicians and other healthcare professionals in order to enhance patient care.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:
As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.
Medscape, LLC encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.
Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
Medscape, LLC designates this educational activity for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
This activity, MedscapeCME Clinical Briefs has been reviewed and is acceptable for up to 300 Prescribed credits by the American Academy of Family Physicians. AAFP accreditation begins September 1, 2010. Term of approval is for 1 year from this date. Each issue is approved for .25 Prescribed credits. Credit may be claimed for 1 year from the date of this issue.
Note: Total credit is subject to change based on topic selection and article length.
Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.
AAFP Accreditation Questions
Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education.
Medscape designates this continuing education activity for 0.25 contact hour(s) (0.025 CEUs) (Universal Activity Number 0461-0000-10-282-H04-P).
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates by accessing "Edit Your Profile" at the top of your Medscape homepage.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME/CE Released: 11/30/2010
Valid for credit through: 11/30/2011
processing....
November 30, 2010 — Exposure to proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) during the month before conception, but not during the first trimester, is associated with a significantly increased risk for major birth defects, according to the results of a large cohort study reported in the November 25 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.
"Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux are common in pregnancy, but there are limited data on the risk of birth defects associated with exposure to ...PPIs in early pregnancy," write Björn Pasternak, MD, PhD, and Anders Hviid, DrMedSci, from Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen, Denmark. "We conducted a cohort study to assess the association between exposure to PPIs during pregnancy and the risk of major birth defects among all infants born alive in Denmark between January 1996 and September 2008."
Using nationwide registries, the investigators linked individual-level data on exposure to PPIs on the basis of prescriptions, birth defects, and potential confounders. The standardized classification scheme of the European surveillance of congenital anomalies (EUROCAT) was used to categorize major birth defects diagnosed within the first year of life. Primary analyses determined PPI use from 4 weeks before conception through 12 weeks of gestation and in the first trimester (from 0 through 12 gestational weeks).
PPI exposure between 4 weeks before conception and the end of the first trimester occurred in 5082 of 840,968 live births, including 174 (3.4%) with major birth defects. In the group whose mothers had not been exposed to PPIs during this period, there were 21,811 major birth defects (2.6%; adjusted prevalence odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05 - 1.44).
In analyses of PPI exposure only during the first trimester, 118 (3.2%) of 3651 exposed infants had major birth defects (adjusted prevalence OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.91 - 1.34), which was not a significant association. However, women who were exposed to PPIs within 4 weeks before conception were at significantly increased risk of having offspring with major birth defects (adjusted prevalence OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.10 - 1.76).
"The risk of birth defects was not significantly increased in secondary analyses of exposure to individual PPIs during the first trimester or in analyses limited to the offspring of women who had filled PPI prescriptions and received enough doses to have a theoretical chance of first-trimester exposure," the study authors write. "In this large cohort, exposure to PPIs during the first trimester of pregnancy was not associated with a significantly increased risk of major birth defects."
Limitations of this study include possible misclassification of the timing of exposure or of identification of birth defects, possible unmeasured confounding or chance findings of the observed association between exposure to PPIs within the month before conception and major birth defects, and limited power to detect associations with individual defects.
In an accompanying editorial, Allen A. Mitchell, MD, from the Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University in Boston, Massachusetts, cautions that although this study provides some reassurance regarding the safety of PPIs in pregnancy, more data are needed.
"First, the PPIs most commonly represented in the study do not appear to carry major teratogenic risks when they are taken during the first trimester or later in pregnancy," Dr. Mitchell writes. "Second, the modestly increased risk during the period before conception that was observed with PPIs as a group was not seen with omeprazole. Until we have a better understanding of what might explain this latter finding, it may be prudent to consider omeprazole to be the PPI of choice when PPI treatment is clearly needed for women of childbearing potential and particularly for those who are planning to become pregnant."
The Danish Medical Research Council and the Lundbeck Foundation supported this study. Disclosure forms provided by the authors and editorialist are available with the full text of this article at the NEJM Web site .
N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:2114-2123, 2161-2163.
Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux are common among pregnant women in the first trimester. PPIs are the most efficacious treatment, but omeprazole is classified as a class C drug in pregnancy, and the other PPIs are classified as class B drugs.
This is a nationwide, registry-based cohort study to assess the association between PPI use in the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk for major birth defects.