This article is intended for primary care clinicians, rheumatologists, orthopaedists, and other specialists who care for patients with osteoarthritis.
The goal of this activity is to provide medical news to primary care clinicians and other healthcare professionals in order to enhance patient care.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:
As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.
Medscape, LLC encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.
Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
Medscape, LLC designates this educational activity for a maximum of 0.25
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™
. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Medscape Medical News has been reviewed and is acceptable for up to 300 Prescribed credits by the American Academy of Family Physicians. AAFP accreditation begins 09/01/07. Term of approval is for 1 year from this date. This activity is approved for 0.25 Prescribed credits. Credit may be claimed for 1 year from the date of this activity. AAFP credit is subject to change based on topic selection throughout the accreditation year.
This Activity is sponsored by Medscape Continuing Education Provider Unit.
Medscape is an approved provider of continuing nursing education by the New York State Nurses Association, an accredited approver by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation.
Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of continuing nursing education for RNs and APNs; None of these credits is in the area of pharmacology.
Provider Number: 6FDKKC-PRV-05
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
CME/CE Released: 2/28/2008
Valid for credit through: 2/28/2009, 11:59 PM EST
processing....
February 27, 2008 — The Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) has issued 25 evidence-based, expert consensus recommendations for the management of osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and knee. These guidelines, which are published in the February issue of Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, were intended to be adapted for use in different countries or regions according to the availability of treatment modalities and strength of recommendation (SOR) for each modality of therapy.
"Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common type of arthritis and the major cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain and mobility disability in elderly populations worldwide," write W. Zhang, PhD, from the University of Edinburgh, Osteoarticular Research Group, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. "Knee and hip pain are the major causes of difficulty in walking and climbing stairs in the elderly in Europe and the USA and as many as 40% of people over the age of 65 in the community in the United Kingdom suffer symptoms associated with knee or hip OA."
The objective of these guidelines was to develop concise, current, patient-centered, evidence-based, expert consensus recommendations for the management of hip and knee OA. The panel intended these guidelines to be adaptable and designed them as an aid to clinicians and allied healthcare professionals in general and specialist practice throughout the world.
Goals of treatment of knee and hip OA include decreasing joint pain and stiffness, stabilizing and increasing joint mobility, reducing physical limitations and disability, improving health-related quality of life, limiting the progression of joint damage, and providing patient education regarding the nature and management of OA.
The medical literature has described more than 50 modalities of nonpharmacologic, pharmacologic, and surgical therapy for knee and hip OA. Despite the development of several National and Regional Guidelines to guide clinicians, allied healthcare professionals, and patients in their choice of treatment to manage knee and hip OA, there have been no internationally agreed-on and universally applicable guidelines for management.
In September 2005, OARSI convened a meeting of an international, multidisciplinary committee of experts to critically review all existing evidence-based and consensus guidelines as well as the recent research evidence and to develop up-to-date, evidence-based, globally relevant consensus recommendations for management of knee and hip OA in 2007.
The guidelines development team consisted of 16 experts in primary care, rheumatology, orthopaedics, and evidence-based medicine from the United States, the United Kingdom, France, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Canada. Using the validated appraisal of guidelines research and evaluation instrument, the team reviewed 23 existing guidelines published between 1945 and January 2006 and generated a core set of management modalities based on the agreement between guidelines.
Evidence before 2002 was based on a systematic review by the European League Against Rheumatism, and subsequent evidence was updated with use of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, the Cochrane Library, and health technology assessment reports. Whenever feasible, effect size (ES), number needed to treat, relative risk or odds ratio, and cost per quality-adjusted life years gained were estimated. A Delphi exercise was used to produce consensus recommendations, and a visual analog scale was used to determine the SOR for propositions relating to each modality.
Of 51 treatment modalities addressed by the identified guidelines, 20 were universally recommended. Although ES for pain relief varied among treatments, overall there was no statistically significant difference between nonpharmacologic (0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 - 0.34) and pharmacologic (ES, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31 - 0.47) modalities.
The team reached a consensus on 25 carefully worded recommendations and provided SORs and 95% CIs for each. Their overall conclusion was that optimal management of patients with hip or knee OA requires a combination of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment modalities.
Twelve recommendations describe the use of nonpharmacologic treatment modalities: education and self-management; regular telephone contact with healthcare providers; physical therapy referral with provision of canes or walkers when appropriate; aerobic, muscle-strengthening, and water-based exercises; weight loss in overweight patients; assistive devices including walking aids, knee braces, footwear, and insoles; thermal modalities; transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for short-term pain control; and acupuncture, which may help relieve symptoms in some patients.
Eight of the recommendations discuss pharmacotherapeutic agents including acetaminophen (up to 4 g/day); cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) nonselective and selective oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) used at the lowest effective dose, with avoidance of long-term use; topical preparations of NSAIDs and capsaicin; intra-articular injections of corticosteroids and hyaluronates; symptomatic relief with glucosamine and chondroitin sulphate supplementation; possible structure-modifying effects associated with glucosamine sulphate, chondroitin sulphate, and diacerein; and indications for use of weak opioids and narcotic analgesics to treat refractory pain.
Five recommendations focus on surgical modalities, including total joint replacements, unicompartmental knee replacement, osteotomy and joint-preserving surgical procedures, joint lavage and arthroscopic debridement for knee OA, and joint fusion used as a salvage procedure when joint replacement has failed.
"Patients with hip or knee OA who are not obtaining adequate pain relief and functional improvement from a combination of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment should be considered for joint replacement surgery," the authors of the guidelines write. "Replacement arthroplasties are effective, and cost-effective interventions for patients with significant symptoms, and/or functional limitations associated with a reduced health-related quality of life, despite conservative therapy."
OARSI provided financial support for development of these guidelines. The authors of the guidelines have disclosed various financial relationships with such industrial entities as Abbott, AstraZeneca, Merck, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis. The complete list of disclosures is available in the original article.
Osteoarthr Cartil. 2008;16:137-162.
OA is the most common form of arthritis, and as many as 40% of community-dwelling adults older than 65 years in the United Kingdom have symptoms associated with OA of the hip or knee. Despite the widespread prevalence of OA, there remains controversy regarding the best management of this condition. To address this issue, the OARSI convened 16 experts in 4 medical disciplines to review current guidelines for the management of OA of the hip and knee. Researchers focused on guidelines published between 1945 and January 2006, and they emphasized the quality of evidence in the guidelines as well as ES, number need to treat, and cost per quality-adjusted life years. Consensus among the expert panel was achieved following a specific algorithm, and all current recommendations were assigned an SOR based on a scale of 0 to 100, with a higher assigned value indicating a stronger recommendation.
The individual recommendations with their SOR values are summarized in the Study Highlights.