You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

 

Management of Thrombocytopenia in Patients With Leukemia

Authors: Arafat Tfayli, MD   James N. George, MD  Faculty and Disclosures

processing....

Introduction

The incidence and severity of thrombocytopenia in patients with leukemia vary according to the type and stage of the disease. Patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) tend to have an elevated platelet count during the chronic phase of the disease. Thrombocytopenia can develop as a result of cytotoxic therapy or when the disease progresses to the accelerated and blastic phases. Similarly, patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) tend to develop thrombocytopenia only in the advanced stages of the disease.

On the other hand, thrombocytopenia is very common at presentation in patients with acute leukemia (myelogenous and lymphocytic). Easy bruisability and other bleeding symptoms are very typical presentations in these patients and could be the first symptoms that lead to the diagnosis of acute leukemia. In addition, patients with acute leukemia are usually treated with combination chemotherapy to induce remission. As a result, thrombocytopenia is essentially universal in these patients and can persist for several weeks until the healthy bone marrow recovers.

In addition to bone marrow infiltration by leukemia cells leading to decreased production of platelets, other factors might contribute to thrombocytopenia in these patients (Table). Such factors are increased platelet destruction from hypersplenism, sepsis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Also, cytotoxic drugs are common contributors to thrombocytopenia in patients with leukemia. Immune destruction of platelets may occur in some patients with CLL.

Table. Factors That Contribute to Thrombocytopenia in Leukemia

• Increased platelet destruction from hypersplenism

• Sepsis

• Disseminated intravascular coagulation

• Chemotherapy and radiotherapy

• Immune destruction of platelets

• Immune response to medications (heparin is most common)

Clinical Presentation

Bleeding complications occur more frequently as the severity of thrombocytopenia increases, but only after the platelet count crosses a threshold of about 10 to 30 x 103. A normal platelet count is not required to support normal hemostasis. Traditionally, although supported by few data, a platelet count of 50 x 103 is often considered sufficient to provide hemostasis for invasive procedures. Clinically important spontaneous bleeding does not occur until the platelet count is very low or unless other disorders are present. Of course, other disorders, such as infections, are common in patients with leukemia. When bleeding occurs, it could be minor, such as skin and gingival bleeding, or more serious, such as gastrointestinal, intracranial, retinal, or pulmonary bleeding.

Two studies have attempted to better determine the platelet count below which the bleeding complications increase. The first study involved 92 patients treated for acute leukemia at the National Cancer Institute between 1956 and 1959.[1] These patients were observed for bleeding complications without any platelet transfusion support, in the era before current methods of platelet collection and storage were developed and before platelet transfusions were routinely available. In patients with a platelet count <1 x 103/mcL, gross bleeding occurred on 33% of the study days. At platelet counts between 5 x 103/mcL and 20 x 103/mcL, gross bleeding occurred only on 3% of the study days. When this study was conducted, the antiplatelet properties of aspirin were not known, and it is possible that many of these patients received aspirin when they developed fever.

The second study was conducted in a group of 20 patients with aplastic anemia who received no platelet transfusions and no medications.[2] Patients were injected with radiolabeled chromium, and stool samples were collected to estimate the amount of blood loss in the gastrointestinal tract. When platelet counts exceeded 10 x 103/mcL, the amount of blood loss in the stools was similar to that of healthy persons: It was slightly higher at levels between 5 and 10 x 103/mcL and markedly elevated in patients with platelet counts < 5 x 103/mcL. This study remains the best evidence that only very few platelets are required to support normal hemostasis in patients without other overt illness and who are not taking medications. This observation is consistent with what is seen in patients with other bleeding disorders, such as congenital hemophilia: Patients with absent factor VIII have a severe bleeding disorder, but bleeding in patients with only 1% to 2% of normal factor levels is substantially less.

The leukemic process itself could also contribute to platelet function abnormalities. In a study of 14 patients with active acute leukemia,[3] all patients had platelet function abnormalities. In 2 patients whose leukemia went into complete remission, the platelets regained normal function.

Management

Platelet Transfusion

Platelet transfusion remains the most common intervention in the management of thrombocytopenia in patients with leukemia. Autopsy studies have shown that bleeding complications leading to death became much less frequent with the introduction of platelet transfusion.[4-7] In a study conducted at the National Cancer Institute to assess the risk for bleeding with thrombocytopenia, the investigators were not able to determine a threshold below which platelets needed to be transfused prophylactically.[1] However, following this study, it became common practice to transfuse platelets prophylactically when the count falls below 20x103/mcL. Several subsequent randomized studies showed that using a platelet
count< 10x103/mcL as the trigger for prophylactic platelet transfusion did not increase the risk for bleeding.[8-11] The optimal dose of platelets to be transfused remains highly controversial.[12] A current National Institutes of Health-sponsored randomized clinical trial carried out by the Transfusion Medicine/Hemostasis Clinical Trials Network has just completed enrollment of 1350 patients in a platelet dose study to better define the optimal dose of platelets to be administered with each transfusion.

Platelet transfusion has its limitations, including the risk for alloimmunization[13] and transmission of viral and bacterial infections.[14,15] Alloimmunization is particularly common in patients with leukemia because they tend to receive multiple platelet transfusions.[16] In addition, platelets have a short shelf-life and are commonly in short supply. Several pharmacologic agents have been introduced to help maintain a patient's platelet count without transfusion.

Pharmacologic Therapies

Oprelvekin (recombinant human interleukin [IL]-11) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of severe thrombocytopenia from chemotherapy in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies.[17] Clinical studies on the effectiveness of this agent in patients with acute leukemia are lacking. Cell line studies have suggested that IL-11 may have a stimulatory effect on IL-3-dependent growth of leukemia cells.[18] IL-11 has also been proposed to have an autocrine effect in acute megakaryoblastic leukemia.[19] It is unlikely that oprelvekin will have any significant clinical usefulness in the management of thrombocytopenia in patients with acute leukemia.

IL-3 acts on early progenitor cells and therefore promotes the differentiation of all myeloid cells.[20] Administration of recombinant IL-3 to patients with AML has not been shown to shorten the duration of neutropenia or thrombocytopenia.[21] At the same time, IL-3 administration has been associated with significant toxicity, including fluid retention, rash, bone pain, and headache.

IL-6 is a multifunctional cytokine that exerts various effects in the body. The physiologic effects of IL-6 include the induction of immunoglobulin synthesis, activation of T lymphocytes and natural killer cells, induction of fever, stimulation of megakaryopoiesis, induction of acute-phase protein synthesis by the liver, and corticotropin release by the pituitary gland.[22] In human bone marrow cultures, IL-6 has been shown to induce granulocytic and monocytic differentiation in the presence of additional colony- stimulating factors.[23] Thrombopoiesis is by far the most pronounced hematopoietic function of IL-6, as shown in studies in mice.[24,25] Administration of human recombinant IL-6 to monkeys resulted in megakaryocyte maturation and increased the platelet count consistent with a thrombopoietic effect.[26] On the other hand, several studies have raised concern about the safety of IL-6 administration in patients with leukemia. It has been suggested that IL-6 co-stimulates proliferation of clonogenic leukemia cells together with various colony-stimulating factors and IL-1.[27,28]

Thrombopoietin (Mpl ligand) is a hematopoietic growth factor that stimulates megakaryocyte and platelet proliferation and differentiation.[29,30] Two recombinant forms of Mpl ligand, pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF) and recombinant human thrombopoietin (rHuTPO), have been tested in clinical trials. Initial phase 1 studies of PEG-rHuMGDF were promising.[31-33] Randomized, double-blind, phase 3 studies on PEG-rHuMGDF in patients with acute leukemia failed to show an improvement in the severity or duration of thrombocytopenia following induction chemotherapy.[34,35] In addition, PEG-rHuMGDF administration to healthy volunteers and patients receiving chemotherapy was associated with episodes of prolonged thrombocytopenia related to the development of antibodies to PEG-rHuMGDF that cross-reacted with the endogenous thrombopoietin.[36,37] Both PEG-rHuMGDF and rHuTPO are no longer in clinical development.

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) was originally developed for the management of bleeding in patients with hemophilia A or B with factor VIII or IX inhibitors, respectively. This agent has been used in various other bleeding settings, including trauma, obstetric complications, and platelet disorders.[38-41] A recent audit of its use to control bleeding in patients with thrombocytopenia associated with hematologic malignancies has shown promising activity.[42] Among 24 patients, rFVIIa was reported to stop bleeding in 11 (46%) and markedly decrease it in 8 (33%). Hemostasis was achieved within 2.5 hours of administration in most patients. rFVIIa is a therapeutic option in patients with thrombocytopenia and bleeding that is not responding to platelet transfusions.

Investigational Agents

Multiple new agents are in development for management of thrombocytopenia that may have important benefits for patients with leukemia. The first 2 agents to enter clinical trials, romiplostim (formerly known as AMG 531) and eltrombopag, will likely be approved for use in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) in 2008. Romiplostim is described as a "peptibody"; the molecule is composed of 4 peptides with no sequence homology to endogenous thrombopoietin joined to IgG1 Fc components. The peptides bind to the thrombopoietin receptor and the Fc fragments provide stability for prolonged circulation so that romiplostim can be administered subcutaneously once weekly. In a phase 1 study in 48 healthy volunteers, romiplostim caused a consistent increase in the platelet count without inducing any neutralizing or cross-reacting antibodies against thrombopoietin.[43] This agent has been tested in patients with chronic ITP and has shown very effective activity.[44,45] It is well tolerated with no significant side effects. Eltrombopag is a small, nonpeptide molecule that also binds to the thrombopoietin receptor and stimulates intracellular signaling pathways identical to endogenous thrombopoietin. It is administered orally once daily and has demonstrated effectiveness in patients with ITP[46] and thrombocytopenia associated with hepatitis C.[47] These agents, and others in preliminary stages of development, hold promise for the management of thrombocytopenia in patients with acute leukemia. No clinical trials have reported on their activity in this patient population.

Conclusion

Thrombocytopenia in patients with leukemia is a significant and common problem. Mortality and morbidity from bleeding complications in these patients remain frequent. Currently, platelet transfusions remain the mainstay of therapy for these patients. To date, no single pharmacologic agent has shown consistent improvement in the platelet count in patients with leukemia without causing significant side effects. rFVIIa has promising activity in controlling bleeding in patients not responding to platelet transfusions. Romiplostim, eltrombopag, and other thrombopoietin mimetic molecules have yet to be tested in this patient population.

This activity is supported by an educational donation provided by Amgen.


References

References

  1. Geidos LA, Freirich EJ, Mantel N. The quantitative relation between platelet count and hemorrhage in patients with acute leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1962;266:905-909. Abstract
  2. Slighter SJ, Harker LA. Thrombocytopenia: mechanisms and management of defects in platelets production. Clin Haematol. 1978;7:523-539. Abstract
  3. Ramos OF, Moron EC, De Castro Arenas R. Platelet function abnormalities in acute leukaemia. Haematologia. 1981;14:383-391. Abstract
  4. Han T, Stutzman L, Cohen E. Effect of platelet transfusion on hemorrhage in patients with acute leukemia. An Autopsy Study. Cancer. 1966;19:1937-1942. Abstract
  5. Roy AJ, Jaffe N, Djerassi I. Prophylactic platelet transfusions in children with acute leukemia: a dose response study. Transfusion. 1973;13:283-290. Abstract
  6. Hamajima N, Sasaki R, Aoki K. A notable change in mortality of aplastic anemia observed during the 1970s in Japan. Blood. 1988;72:995-999. Abstract
  7. Higby DJ, Cohen E, Holland JF. The prophylactic treatment of thrombocytopenic leukemia patients with platelets: a double blind study. Transfusion. 1974;14:440-446. Abstract
  8. Zumberg MS, del Rosario ML, Nejame CF. A prospective randomized trial of prophylactic platelet transfusion and bleeding incidence in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: 10,000/mcl versus20,000/mcl trigger. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2002;8:569-576. Abstract
  9. Rubella P, Finazzi G, Marangoni F. The threshold for prophylactic platelet transfusions in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:2870-2875.
  10. Wandt H, Frank M, Ehninger G. Safety and cost effectiveness of a 10 x 109/l trigger for prophylactic platelet transfusions compared to the traditional 20 x 109/l: A prospective comparative trial in 105 patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 1998;91:3601-3606. Abstract
  11. Heckman KD, Weiner GJ, Davis CS. Randomized study of prophylactic platelet transfusion threshold during induction therapy for adult acute leukemia: 10,000/mcl versus 20,000/mcl. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:1143-1149. Abstract
  12. Tinmouth AT, Freedman J. Prophylactic platelet transfusion: which dose is the best dose? A review of the literature. Transfusion Med Rev. 2003;17:181-193.
  13. Sepulveda JL. Alloimmunization from transfusions. eMedicine. 2005. Available at: http://www.emedicine.com/med/TOPIC107.HTM. Accessed on January 2, 2008.
  14. McCullough J. Current issues with platelet transfusion in patients with cancer. Semin Hematol. 2000;37:3-10.
  15. Consensus Conference. Platelet transfusion therapy. JAMA. 1987;257:1777-1780. Abstract
  16. Meehan KR, Matias CO, Rathore SS. Platelet transfusions: utilization and associated costs in a tertiary care hospital. Am J Hematol. 2000;64:251-256. Abstract
  17. Tsimberidou AM, Giles FJ, Khouri I. Low-dose interleukin-11 in patients with bone marrow failure: update of the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:139-145. Abstract
  18. Hu JP, Cesano A,Santoli D, Clark SC, Hoang T. Effects of interleukin-11 on the proliferation and cell cycle status of myeloid leukemic cells. Blood. 1993;81:1586-1592. Abstract
  19. Kobayashi S, Teramura M, Sugawara I, Oshimi K, Mizogushi H. Interleukin-11 acts as an autocrine growth factor for human megakaryoblastic cell lines. Blood. 1993;81:889-893. Abstract
  20. Spivak JL, Smith RR, Ihle JN. Interleukin 3 promotes the in vitro proliferation of murine pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells. J Clin Invest. 1985;76:1613-1621. Abstract
  21. Wielenga JJ, Vellenga E, Groenewegen A, Sonneveld P, Lowenberg B. Recombinant human interleukin-3 (rH IL-3) in combination with remission induction chemotherapy in patients with relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML): a phase I/II study. Leukemia. 1996;10:43-47. Abstract
  22. Akira S, Hirano T, Taga T, Kishimoto T. Biology of multifunctional cytokines: IL-6 and related molecules. FASEP J. 1990;4:2860-2867.
  23. Bot FJ, van Eijk L, Broeders L, Aarden LA, Lowenberg B. Interleukin-6 synergizes with M-CSF in the formation of macrophage colonies from purified human marrow progenitor cells. Blood. 1989;73:135-137.
  24. Hill RJ, Warren MK, Levin J. Stimulation of thrombopoiesis in mice by human recombinant interleukin-6. J Clin Invest. 1990;85:1242-1247. Abstract
  25. Ishibashi T, Kimura H, Shikama Y, Uchida T, et al. Interleukin-6 is a potent thrombopoietic factor in vivo in mice. Blood. 1989;74:1241-1244. Abstract
  26. Asano S, Okano A, Ozaka K, et al. In vivo effects of recombinant human interleukin-6 in primates: stimulated production of platelets. Blood. 1990;75:1602-1605. Abstract
  27. Brach MA, Lowenberg B, Mantovani L, et al. Interleukin-6 is an intermediate in IL-1-induced proliferation of leukemic human megakaryoblasts. Blood. 1990;76:1972-1979. Abstract
  28. Hoang T, Haman A, Goncalves O, Wong GG, Clark SC. Interleukin-6 enhances growth factor-dependent proliferation of the blast cells of acute myeloblastic leukemia. Blood. 1988;72:823-826. Abstract
  29. Bartley TD, Bogenberger J, Hunt P, et al. Identification and cloning of a megakaryocyte growth and development factor that is a ligand for the cytokine receptor mpl. Cell. 1994;77:1117–1124.
  30. de Sauvage FJ, Hass PE, Spencer SD, et al. Stimulation of megakaryocytopoiesis and thrombopoiesis by the c-Mpl ligand. Nature. 1994;369:533–538.
  31. Basser RL, Rasko JE, Clarke K, et al. Thrombopoietic effects of pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF) in patients with advanced cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1279-1281. Abstract
  32. Basser RL, Rasko JE, Clarke K, et al. Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled phase I trial of pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor with filgrastim after dose-intensive chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer. Blood. 1997;89:3118-3128. Abstract
  33. Fanucchi M, Glaspy J, Crawford J, et al. Effects of polyethylene glycol-conjugated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor on platelet counts after chemotherapy for lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:404-409. Abstract
  34. Archimbaud E, Ottmann OG, Yin JA, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF) as an adjunct to chemotherapy for adults with de novo acute myeloid leukaemia. Blood. 1999;94:3694–3701.
  35. Geissler K, Yin JA, Ganser A, et al. Prior and concurrent administration of recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor in patients receiving consolidation chemotherapy for de novo acute myeloid leukemia--a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind safety and efficacy study. Ann Hematol. 2003;82:677-683. Abstract
  36. Li J, Yang C, Xia Y, et al. Thrombocytopenia caused by the development of antibodies to thrombopoietin. Blood. 2001;98:3241-3248. Abstract
  37. Basser RL, O'Flaherty E, Green M, et al. Development of pancytopenia with neutralizing antibodies to thrombopoietin after multicycle chemotherapy supported by megakaryocyte growth and development factor. Blood. 2002;99:2599-2602. Abstract
  38. Hedner U. Recombinant factor VIIa (NovoSeven) as a hemostatic agent. Disease-A-Month. 2003;49:39-48.
  39. van Buuren HR, Wielenga JJ. Successful surgery using recombinant factor VIIa for recurrent, idiopathic nonulcer duodenal bleeding in a patient with Glanzmann's thrombasthenia. Dig Dis Sci. 2002;47:2134-2136. Abstract
  40. Kaleelrahman M, Minford A, Parapia LA. Use of recombinant factor VIIa in inherited platelet disorders. Br J Haematol. 2004;125:95-96. Abstract
  41. Eskandari N, Feldman N, Greenspoon JS. Factor VII deficiency in pregnancy treated with recombinant factor VIIa. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(5 Pt 2):935-937.
  42. Brenner B, Hoffman R, Balashov D, Shutluko E, Culi SD, Nizamoutdinova E. Control of bleeding caused by thrombocytopenia associated with hematologic malignancy: an audit of the clinical use of recombinant activated factor VII. Clin Appl Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2005;11:401-410.
  43. Wang B, Nichol JL, Sullivan JT. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of AMG 531, a novel thrombopoietin receptor ligand. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;76:628-638. Abstract
  44. Newland A, Caulier MT, Kappers-Klunne M, et al. An open-label, unit dose-finding study of AMG 531, a novel thrombopoiesis-stimulating peptibody, in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Br J Haematol. 2006;135:547-553. Abstract
  45. Bussel JB, Kuter DJ, George JN, et al. AMG 531, a thrombopoiesis-stimulating protein, for chronic ITP. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1672-1681. Abstract
  46. Bussel JB, Cheng G, Saleh MN, et al. Eltrombopag for the treatment of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2237-2247. Abstract
  47. McHutchison JG, Dusheiko G, Shiffman ML, et al. Eltrombopag for thrombocytopenia in patients with cirrhosis associated with hepatitis C. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2227-2236. Abstract
  • Print