You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

CME / CE

Low GI Diets Better for Weight Loss, Lipid Profiles, Finds Cochrane Review

  • Authors: News Author: Lisa Nainggolan
    CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MD
  • CME / CE Released: 7/24/2007; Reviewed and Renewed: 7/22/2008
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT
  • Valid for credit through: 7/22/2009, 11:59 PM EST
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This article is intended for primary care clinicians, cardiologists, nutritionists, and other specialists who care for overweight and obese patients and patients at risk for cardiovascular disease.

The goal of this activity is to provide medical news to primary care clinicians and other healthcare professionals in order to enhance patient care.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  1. Compare the effects of a diet with low glycemic index or load vs those of other diets on weight loss in overweight and obese subjects.
  2. Compare the effects of a diet with low glycemic index or load vs those of other diets on lipid profiles in overweight and obese subjects.


Disclosures

As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.

Medscape, LLC encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.


Author(s)

  • Lisa Nainggolan

    Lisa Nainggolan is a journalist for theheart.org, part of the WebMD Professional Network. She has been with theheart.org since 2000. Previously, she was science editor of Scrip World Pharmaceutical News, covering news about research and development in the pharmaceutical industry, and a consultant editor of Scrip Magazine. Graduating in physiology from Sheffield University, UK, she began her career as a poisons information specialist at Guy's Hospital before becoming a medical journalist in 1995. She can be reached at [email protected].

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Lisa Nainggolan has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author(s)

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Laurie Barclay is a freelance reviewer and writer for Medscape.

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

    Medscape, LLC designates this educational activity for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) . Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Medscape Medical News has been reviewed and is acceptable for up to 200 Prescribed credits by the American Academy of Family Physicians. AAFP accreditation begins 09/01/06. Term of approval is for 1 year from this date. This activity is approved for 0.25 Prescribed credits. Credit may be claimed for 1 year from the date of this activity. AAFP credit is subject to change based on topic selection throughout the accreditation year.


    AAFP Accreditation Questions

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • This Activity is sponsored by Medscape Continuing Education Provider Unit.

    Medscape is an approved provider of continuing nursing education by the New York State Nurses Association, an accredited approver by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation.

    Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of continuing nursing education for RNs and APNs; None of these credits is in the area of pharmacology.

    Provider Number: 6FDKKC-PRV-05

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. Medscape encourages you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 5 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates by accessing "Edit Your Profile" at the top of your Medscape homepage.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / CE

Low GI Diets Better for Weight Loss, Lipid Profiles, Finds Cochrane Review

Authors: News Author: Lisa Nainggolan CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MDFaculty and Disclosures
THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT

CME / CE Released: 7/24/2007; Reviewed and Renewed: 7/22/2008

Valid for credit through: 7/22/2009, 11:59 PM EST

processing....

from Heartwire — a professional news service of WebMD

July 24, 2007 — A new Cochrane review of six randomized controlled trials comparing low glycemic index (GI) or glycemic load (GL) diets with other diets has found that overweight or obese people lost more weight and had more improvement in lipid profiles with the low GI eating plans. Dr Diana E Thomas (Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia) and colleagues publish their findings in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Those on the low GI diets lost an average of 2.2 pounds (1 kg) more than those given comparison diets, which included higher GI or GL diets and conventional weight loss diets. They also had significantly better decreases in total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, the researchers note. And in the two trials that evaluated only obese participants, weight loss was even more apparent — the low GI dieters lost about 9.2 pounds, compared with about 2.2 pounds shed by those on the other diets.

However, the scientists caution that enduring data are still needed. "Longer trials with increased length of follow-up will determine whether the improvements reported can be maintained and incorporated into lifestyle long-term," they say.

Two experts not connected with the review expressed mixed opinions. One said this was a great review, while the other pointed out that the difference in weight loss between the low and high GI diets was rather small.

Results Applicable in Other Developed Communities

Thomas and colleagues included six trials in their review, including a total of 202 adults from Australia, France, South Africa, Denmark and the United States. The diets lasted from five weeks to six months, and none of the studies reported any adverse effects associated with consuming a low GI diet.

As well as losing more weight, those on the low GI diets also had significantly greater loss of total fat mass and decrease in body mass index (BMI) than those on the comparison diets. "The loss of 1-2 BMI units is clinically significant as is the weight loss observed with low GI diets," Thomas et al note. "Considering the brevity of the interventions, the results are notable," they add.

Improvements in blood lipids were also significant — those on the low GI diets saw a mean drop of -0.22 mmol/L in total cholesterol and -0.24 mmol/L in LDL cholesterol (both p < 0.05).

"Our systematic review may clarify issues surrounding the role of low GI or GL diets in the management of obesity and overweight," the researchers note.

They add that the degree of overweight and obesity in the populations included in these studies "was wide, suggesting that the results would be applicable in other developed communities." However, they caution that only one trial included children (n = 16), "so care would need to be taken in generalizing results in the pediatric population."

"Excellent and Fairly Comprehensive Work"

Dr Simin Liu (director of the program on genomics and nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA) told heartwire : "This looks like an excellent and fairly comprehensive work, which essentially confirms what we have seen in our epidemiologic work."

But another expert is not that impressed by the findings. Dr Lawrence Cheskin (Director, Johns Hopkins Weight Management Center, Baltimore, Maryland) commented to heartwire : "It strikes me that the difference in weight loss between low and high GI diets is, while statistically significant, of a rather tiny magnitude."

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Published online July 18, 2007.

The complete contents of Heartwire , a professional news service of WebMD, can be found at www.theheart.org, a Web site for cardiovascular healthcare professionals.

Clinical Context

The global prevalence of overweight and obesity is rising dramatically, with associated complications of higher rates of abnormal glucose tolerance, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. To decrease the complications of disease, to improve quality of life, to increase lifespan, and to lower healthcare costs, good glycemic control is essential.

Some studies have suggested that low GI or GL diets may lead to greater weight loss than do higher GI or GL diets or other weight reduction diets. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of low GI or GL diets for weight loss in overweight or obese people.

Study Highlights

  • The authors identified appropriate studies for review by searching The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and relevant bibliographies.
  • Selection criteria were randomized controlled trials in overweight or obese people that compared a low GI or LG diet with a higher GI or GL diet or other diet.
  • 2 authors independently identified studies, graded them for quality, and extracted data for analysis, including efficacy data and any findings regarding adverse events.
  • 6 randomized controlled trials enrolling a total of 202 participants met inclusion criteria. Weight loss interventions lasted from 5 weeks to 6 months. Follow-up continued for up to 6 months after the diet was stopped.
  • Compared with patients assigned to other diets, those assigned to low GI or GL diets had a greater reduction in body mass (weighted mean difference [WMD], -1.1 kg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.0 to -0.2; P < .05; n = 163), total fat mass (WMD, -1.1 kg; 95% CI, -1.9
    to -0.4; P < .05; n = 147), and BMI (WMD, -1.3; 95% CI, -2.0 to -0.5; P < .05; n = 48).
  • While on low GI or GL diets, patients had a clinically significant loss of 1 to 2 BMI units and of up to 7 kg.
  • Improvements in lipid profile with low GI or GL diets vs other diets were greater reduction in total cholesterol (WMD, -0.22 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.43 to -0.02; P < .05) and LDL cholesterol levels (WMD, -0.24 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.05; P < .05).
  • Studies that compared ad libitum low GI or GL diets with standard low-fat, restricted-energy diets showed equal or better outcomes with the low GI or GL diet, even though participants could eat as much as they wished, which would theoretically improve adherence.
  • Adverse events, deaths, and quality-of-life data were not reported in any of the reviewed studies.
  • The authors concluded that overweight or obese people on low GI or GL diets lost more weight and had more improvement in lipid profiles than did those receiving other diets. Body mass, total fat mass, BMI, and total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels all decreased significantly more in the group on low GI or GL diets vs the group on other diets.
  • The authors also concluded that decreasing dietary GL was a simple lifestyle measure that could encourage weight loss and improve lipid profiles, but they recommended additional studies with longer follow-up to evaluate long-term benefits.

Pearls for Practice

  • Overweight or obese people on low GI or GL diets lost more weight and had more improvement in body mass, total fat mass, and BMI than did those on other diets.
  • Overweight or obese people on low GI or GL diets had more improvement in lipid profiles than did those on other diets, with significantly greater decrease in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels.

CME/CE Test

  • Print