This article is intended for primary care clinicians, cardiologists, nutritionists, and other specialists who care for overweight and obese patients and patients at risk for cardiovascular disease.
The goal of this activity is to provide medical news to primary care clinicians and other healthcare professionals in order to enhance patient care.
Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:
As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.
Medscape, LLC encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.
Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
Medscape, LLC designates this educational activity for a maximum of 0.25
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)
™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Medscape Medical News has been reviewed and is acceptable for up to 200 Prescribed credits by the American Academy of Family Physicians. AAFP accreditation begins 09/01/06. Term of approval is for 1 year from this date. This activity is approved for 0.25 Prescribed credits. Credit may be claimed for 1 year from the date of this activity. AAFP credit is subject to change based on topic selection throughout the accreditation year.
This Activity is sponsored by Medscape Continuing Education Provider Unit.
Medscape is an approved provider of continuing nursing education by the New York State Nurses Association, an accredited approver by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation.
Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of continuing nursing education for RNs
and APNs; None of these credits is in the area of pharmacology.
Provider Number: 6FDKKC-PRV-05
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 5 years; at any point within this time period you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates by accessing "Edit Your Profile" at the top of your Medscape homepage.
*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
CME / CE Released: 7/24/2007; Reviewed and Renewed: 7/22/2008
Valid for credit through: 7/22/2009, 11:59 PM EST
processing....
from Heartwire — a professional news service of WebMD
July 24, 2007 — A new Cochrane review of six randomized controlled trials comparing low glycemic index (GI) or glycemic load (GL) diets with other diets has found that overweight or obese people lost more weight and had more improvement in lipid profiles with the low GI eating plans. Dr Diana E Thomas (Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia) and colleagues publish their findings in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Those on the low GI diets lost an average of 2.2 pounds (1 kg) more than those given comparison diets, which included higher GI or GL diets and conventional weight loss diets. They also had significantly better decreases in total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, the researchers note. And in the two trials that evaluated only obese participants, weight loss was even more apparent — the low GI dieters lost about 9.2 pounds, compared with about 2.2 pounds shed by those on the other diets.
However, the scientists caution that enduring data are still needed. "Longer trials with increased length of follow-up will determine whether the improvements reported can be maintained and incorporated into lifestyle long-term," they say.
Two experts not connected with the review expressed mixed opinions. One said this was a great review, while the other pointed out that the difference in weight loss between the low and high GI diets was rather small.
Results Applicable in Other Developed Communities
Thomas and colleagues included six trials in their review, including a total of 202 adults from Australia, France, South Africa, Denmark and the United States. The diets lasted from five weeks to six months, and none of the studies reported any adverse effects associated with consuming a low GI diet.
As well as losing more weight, those on the low GI diets also had significantly greater loss of total fat mass and decrease in body mass index (BMI) than those on the comparison diets. "The loss of 1-2 BMI units is clinically significant as is the weight loss observed with low GI diets," Thomas et al note. "Considering the brevity of the interventions, the results are notable," they add.
Improvements in blood lipids were also significant — those on the low GI diets saw a mean drop of -0.22 mmol/L in total cholesterol and -0.24 mmol/L in LDL cholesterol (both p < 0.05).
"Our systematic review may clarify issues surrounding the role of low GI or GL diets in the management of obesity and overweight," the researchers note.
They add that the degree of overweight and obesity in the populations included in these studies "was wide, suggesting that the results would be applicable in other developed communities." However, they caution that only one trial included children (n = 16), "so care would need to be taken in generalizing results in the pediatric population."
"Excellent and Fairly Comprehensive Work"
Dr Simin Liu (director of the program on genomics and nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA) told heartwire : "This looks like an excellent and fairly comprehensive work, which essentially confirms what we have seen in our epidemiologic work."
But another expert is not that impressed by the findings. Dr Lawrence Cheskin (Director, Johns Hopkins Weight Management Center, Baltimore, Maryland) commented to heartwire : "It strikes me that the difference in weight loss between low and high GI diets is, while statistically significant, of a rather tiny magnitude."
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Published online July 18, 2007.
The complete contents of Heartwire , a professional news service of WebMD, can be found at www.theheart.org, a Web site for cardiovascular healthcare professionals.
The global prevalence of overweight and obesity is rising dramatically, with associated complications of higher rates of abnormal glucose tolerance, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. To decrease the complications of disease, to improve quality of life, to increase lifespan, and to lower healthcare costs, good glycemic control is essential.
Some studies have suggested that low GI or GL diets may lead to greater weight loss than do higher GI or GL diets or other weight reduction diets. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of low GI or GL diets for weight loss in overweight or obese people.