You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

CME/CE

The Global GERD Epidemic: Definitions, Demographics, and the Clinical Implications of Changing Population Trends (Slides with Transcript)

  • Authors: William D. Chey, MD, AGAF, FACG, FACP
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity has been designed to meet the educational needs of gastroenterologists, nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare providers involved in the care of patients with GI disorders.

Upon completion of this activity, participants should be able to:

  1. Identify the demographic drivers accounting for the current global GERD epidemic, including the influence of age and obesity in the population.
  2. Determine the respective roles of genetic predisposition, acid suppression, and endoscopic ablation in the etiology and management of Barrett's esophagus.
  3. Describe the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis.
  4. Establish the risk:benefit ratio in managing common GI disorders, including the role of eradication of H. pylori infection in the prevention of gastric cancer and the evaluation of GI and cardiovascular risks in optimizing clinical outcomes with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories.
  5. Determine the pros and cons of the latest endoscopic procedures including the endoluminal treatment of GERD and the evolving role of advanced GI imaging techniques.


Disclosures

Syllabus disclosure statement

In direct response to the September 2004 Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) Standards for Commercial Support, CME Consultants issued a conflict of interest policy dated January 2, 2005. The policy states that the disclosure of potential financial conflicts of interest within the last 12 months must be made and resolved prior to the date of the CME/CE/CEU activity where commercial support grants are to be used to fund the activity. The following conflicts have been managed and resolved through CME Consultants' Independent Review Committee. Our intent is to assist learners in assessing the potential for bias in information that is presented during this CME/CE/CEU activity.

The Faculty is also aware it is their responsibility to inform the audience if discussion of any non-FDA-approved uses of pharmaceuticals, medical equipment, prostheses, etc, will be included in their presentation.


Author(s)

  • William D. Chey, MD, AGAF, FACG, FACP

    Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Consultant: AGI, Auersan, and Esai; Speakers' Bureau: Axcan, Novartis,
    P & G, Salix, Santarus, Smart Pill, Takeda, and TAP


Accreditation Statements

    For Physicians

  • This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and Policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of CME Consultants and Educational Awareness Solutions (EAS). CME Consultants is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

    CME Consultants designates this educational activity for a maximum of 2.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • CME Consultants is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation.

    CME Consultants designates this program for 2.0. Participants should claim only those contact hours actually spent in the educational activity.

    In order to receive credit for this program, each participant must complete the evaluation form and certificate request form.

    Contact This Provider

    For Pharmacists

  • CME Consultants is accredited by the Accreditation Council on Pharmacy Education (ACPE) as a provider of continuing pharmacy education. This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the ACPE strategic goals objectives through CME Consultants.

    This activity has been accredited for 2.0 contact hours (0.200 CEUs). There will be no fee for this activity. In order to receive credit for this activity, all participants must complete a signature sheet and evaluation form. ACPE #309-000-07-012-H04. Initial Release Date: 08/10/2007; Planned Expiration Date: 08/10/2008

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. In addition, you must complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates by accessing "Edit Your Profile" at the top of your Medscape homepage.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME/CE

The Global GERD Epidemic: Definitions, Demographics, and the Clinical Implications of Changing Population Trends (Slides with Transcript)

Authors: William D. Chey, MD, AGAF, FACG, FACPFaculty and Disclosures
THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT

processing....

Trends in GERD

  •  
  • Slide 1. The global GERD epidemic: Definitions, demographics, and the clinical implications of

    Slide 1.

    The global GERD epidemic: Definitions, demographics, and the clinical implications of changing population trends

    (Enlarge Slide)
  • This first slide is a compilation of data from a systematic review that clearly illustrates the point that the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux-related symptomatology is rising worldwide. Certainly there can be no argument that within the United States, there is growing evidence to suggest an increasing prevalence of GERD-related symptoms. Similarly, the same argument can be made for data coming from Europe. Emerging data from South America as well as Asia show similar trends — maybe to lesser degrees, but still very similar trends.

  • Slide 2. Time trends of GERD symptoms: Review of cross-sectional, population-based studies

    Slide 2.

    Time trends of GERD symptoms: Review of cross-sectional, population-based studies

    (Enlarge Slide)
  • Now this rising prevalence of GERD-related symptoms has very tangible consequences with regard to health resource utilization. These are data from the US National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey that very clearly show an increasing proportion of primary care physician visits attributable to GERD. Actually, according to this data set, 22% of primary care visits were related in some way to GERD in data collected from 2000 to 2001.

    In addition, there's been a 46% increase in the number of GERD-related visits to primary care physicians; by comparison, the rise in visits for other, non-GERD-related indications was around 5% to 6%. So there seems to be a growing increase in patient complaints related to GERD.

  • Slide 3. Time trends of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Longitudinal US studies

    Slide 3.

    Time trends of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Longitudinal US studies

    (Enlarge Slide)
  • In addition, another important observation that's been made over the past few years is that not only symptoms, but also the downstream consequences of GERD appear to be rising. So whether you look at curves relating to Barrett's esophagus or, in this particular case, esophageal adenocarcinoma, the incidence of these problems appears to be increasing over time.

  • Slide 4. US cancer incidence rates

    Slide 4.

    US cancer incidence rates

    (Enlarge Slide)

Why Is the Prevalence of GERD Increasing?

  • Now, of course, the question is, what are the potential explanations for the increasing prevalence of GERD and the incidence of esophageal carcinoma? There are a number of potential explanations. First, the effect of advancing age on symptoms, and also the growing problem with obesity. If you're going to talk about an epidemic, certainly in the Western world, I think you'd have to focus a lot of attention on obesity-related complications — not only gastroesophageal disease, but things like non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

    We'll also briefly discuss data on dietary and lifestyle issues. We won't talk here about the decreasing prevalence of H. pylori, but that will be discussed later.

  • Slide 5. Why is the prevalence of GERD increasing?

    Slide 5.

    Why is the prevalence of GERD increasing?

    (Enlarge Slide)
  • First, with regard to the data we have on the potential relationship between advancing age and reflux-related symptomatology, we really don't have very much data on this particular issue. And the data that we do have are somewhat conflicting.

    But data from a study conducted at the Houston VA Hospital suggest a trend toward increasing prevalence of GERD-related symptoms with advancing age. They also found that the likelihood of GERD-related symptoms was not influenced by ethnicity. However, there are some data suggesting that a lot of the increased visits we're seeing for GERD-related symptoms are attributable to females as opposed to males.

  • Slide 6. Age and GERD symptoms: A cross-sectional survey from Houston

    Slide 6.

    Age and GERD symptoms: A cross-sectional survey from Houston

    (Enlarge Slide)
  • Now let's turn our attention to obesity, because here the data appear to be fairly clear. This is a compilation of data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), basically a series of maps illustrating the prevalence of obesity — in other words, the percentage of patients defined as obese — in the United States over the past 15 years.

    What you can see is that in 1990, there were no states reporting more than 20% prevalence of obesity in the United States. Now compare that to 1995, where there's an increasing prevalence, and certainly in 2005, where 16 states reported a prevalence of obesity of greater than 20% and 2 states reported a prevalence of greater than 30% — so truly there has been a remarkable explosion of obesity within the United States.

  • Slide 7. Obesity trends in US adults

    Slide 7.

    Obesity trends in US adults

    (Enlarge Slide)
  • This isn't only a United States phenomenon. We certainly talk about it a lot in the United States, but similar trends have been observed in Europe — and I'm using this McDonald's paradigm to emphasize the point. In addition, in South America, the same trends are being observed.

    Finally, the only country in the world that has the Mega Mac — an ingenious invention by some employee of McDonald's — is Japan. This thing is 4 all-beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, and onions on a sesame seed bun. When they released this thing, they sold 3.2 million Mega Macs in 4 months in Japan. So it's been a big hit.

  • Slide 8. Obesity: Not just a US problem

    Slide 8.

    Obesity: Not just a US problem

    (Enlarge Slide)
  • What are the data on the relationship between obesity and reflux-related symptomatology? Well, this slide shows data from a meta-analysis performed recently and published by Doug Corley's group, data that very nicely illustrate the fact that obesity is associated with an increased risk of GERD-related symptomatology.

    In fact, there may be a stepwise increase in the likelihood of GERD-related symptomatology based on how overweight you are, at least in terms of your body mass index (BMI). These investigators also broke the data down by US vs European studies and made the exact same observation in terms of the association between obesity, or BMI, and GERD-related symptoms.

  • Slide 9. Body mass index and GERD: A meta-analysis

    Slide 9.

    Body mass index and GERD: A meta-analysis

    (Enlarge Slide)
  • A very nice study, and a very important study, published by Jacobson and colleagues in The New England Journal of Medicine showed a nearly linear relationship between body mass index and the likelihood of experiencing GERD-related symptoms. I think this is a truly remarkable observation.

  • Slide 10. BMI and the risk of frequent GERD symptoms

    Slide 10.

    BMI and the risk of frequent GERD symptoms

    (Enlarge Slide)
  • The next question that you might ask is, why is obesity associated with an increased likelihood of reflux-related symptoms? We're starting to accrue a body of literature on this particular topic. This slide shows data from a couple of recently published studies that addresses this issue.

    One study found that the mean number of reflux episodes, as well as the total number of acid reflux episodes, were increased in obese patients who experienced GERD-related symptoms. In addition, the total percentage of time with pH <4 was also dramatically increased in obese patients experiencing reflux-related symptoms, compared with nonobese controls.

    A second study was published earlier this year in Gastroenterology and drew some very nice associations between waist circumference and the frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. So this is another potential etiology for why this association exists.

  • Slide 11. Obesity associated with increased esophageal acid exposure

    Slide 11.

    Obesity associated with increased esophageal acid exposure

    (Enlarge Slide)
  • The association with obesity is not only about reflux-related symptoms. Data from a meta-analysis by Kubo and colleagues show a significant association between obesity or BMI and esophageal adenocarcinoma. So again, there is an association not only between obesity and GERD-related symptoms, but also between obesity and the downstream effects of GERD, or esophageal adenocarcinoma.

  • Slide 12. Body mass index and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: A meta-analysis

    Slide 12.

    Body mass index and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: A meta-analysis

    (Enlarge Slide)
  • What about other potential risk factors for GERD-related symptoms? We've recognized for a long time that high-fat meals can be associated with a greater likelihood of experiencing GERD-related symptoms. In addition, in a couple of recent analyses, smoking has been associated with a greater likelihood of experiencing reflux-related symptomatology.

    Although we talk about alcohol and caffeine quite a bit, specifically coffee, it turns out that when you critically analyze the data, the literature is quite mixed on both of these particular topics with data for and data against an association between alcohol and coffee consumption and reflux-related symptomatology.

  • Slide 13. Other risk factors for GERD

    Slide 13.

    Other risk factors for GERD

    (Enlarge Slide)

Management of GERD

  • Now with this clear increase in the prevalence of GERD-related symptoms, we've seen, not surprisingly, a clear increase in the use of antisecretory therapies to address these symptoms. This is related to a variety of different issues, including the increased level of comfort with the use of acid-suppressive therapies, specifically proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) — particularly among primary care physicians — and now the availability of acid-suppressive medications over the counter.

    When you look at the available data addressing symptom response with the use of potent antisecretories like PPIs, it's important to remember that these drugs are clearly more effective than H2 receptor antagonists or placebo.

  • Slide 14. Implications for management of GERD: Increased consumption of antisecretories

    Slide 14.

    Implications for management of GERD: Increased consumption of antisecretories

    (Enlarge Slide)
  • This recent systematic review stratified data on the basis of erosive esophagitis (EE) versus endoscopy-negative reflux disease (ENRD), and you can see that these numbers are clearly better than H2 blockers or placebo.

  • Slide 15. Systematic review of symptom response with PPI therapy in EE and ENRD

    Slide 15.

    Systematic review of symptom response with PPI therapy in EE and ENRD

    (Enlarge Slide)
  • What strategies can we think about to address patients with persistent reflux symptomatology? Well, for nocturnal heartburn, you can certainly think about giving the PPI before the evening meal instead of in the morning. You can also consider the addition of an H2 receptor antagonist, particularly if the evening symptoms are intermittent and not all the time. You can consider increasing PPI dosing to twice-daily therapy, an issue that becomes particularly relevant when you're using over-the-counter omeprazole.

    What is the potential role for new antisecretory therapies? There are a number in development at the current time. There are isomers of existing proton pump inhibitors. One example would be dexlansoprazole. There are long plasma half-life PPIs, like ilaprazole. There are also P-CABs as listed here, as well as other agents that don't necessarily target acid secretion, but instead address other potential etiologic, pathophysiologic targets for GERD.

  • Slide 16. Strategies for improved acid control in GERD

    Slide 16.

    Strategies for improved acid control in GERD

    (Enlarge Slide)
  • So the conclusions and take-home messages are: The prevalence of GERD has increased globally and continues to increase. Age may be a risk factor for reflux-related symptomatology, but at this point it's difficult to conclude that that's a clear association. We need more data on that particular issue, and we need to control the data for potential confounders like, for example, medications or obesity.

    I think that there is very good evidence now to clearly draw an association between reflux symptoms and esophageal adenocarcinoma and body mass index. Diet and tobacco appear to play a role in reflux-related symptomatology, while other things like alcohol and coffee are more controversial.

    There appears to be an inverse relationship between H. pylori and gastroesophageal reflux disease, and we'll touch on that in a just a few moments.

    And PPI consumption is increasing in westernized countries. And it's important to remember that, while these agents are very good, they're not perfect. There certainly are other agents in development that will hopefully create opportunities for patients who don't respond to traditional PPI therapy.

    DR. LAINE: I don't know about you, but I never get tired of hearing about Barrett's esophagus — and I know our next speaker never gets tired of talking about it. Stuart Spechler has tremendous expertise in this area and certainly is one of the world's experts.

  • Slide 17. Conclusions and take-home messages ...

    Slide 17.

    Conclusions and take-home messages ...

    (Enlarge Slide)