You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

CME / CE

Herbal Medicine May Be Effective for Low Back Pain

  • Authors: News Author: Laurie Barclay, MD
    CME Author:
    Désirée Lie, MD, MSEd
  • CME / CE Released: 1/16/2007; Reviewed and Renewed: 1/15/2008
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED
  • Valid for credit through: 1/15/2009
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This article is intended for primary care clinicians, rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, and other specialists who care for patients with nonspecific low back pain.

The goal of this activity is to provide medical news to primary care clinicians and other healthcare professionals in order to enhance patient care.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  • List herbal medicines shown to have some efficacy in nonspecific low back pain.
  • Describe the strength of evidence supporting the use of herbal medicines in the treatment of nonspecific low back pain.


Disclosures

As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.

Medscape, LLC encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.


Author(s)

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Laurie Barclay, MD, is a freelance reviewer and writer for Medscape.

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author(s)

  • Désirée Lie, MD, MSEd

    Clinical Professor, Family Medicine, University of California, Orange; Director, Division of Faculty Development, UCI Medical Center, Orange, California

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Désirée Lie, MD, MSEd, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

    Medscape, LLC designates this educational activity for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) . Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • This Activity is sponsored by Medscape Continuing Education Provider Unit.

    Medscape is an approved provider of continuing nursing education by the New York State Nurses Association, an accredited approver by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation.

    Approved for 0.25 contact hour(s) of continuing education for RNs and NPs; 0.25 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.

    Provider Number: 6FDKKC-PRV-05

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. Medscape encourages you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 5 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates by accessing "Edit Your Profile" at the top of your Medscape homepage.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / CE

Herbal Medicine May Be Effective for Low Back Pain

Authors: News Author: Laurie Barclay, MD CME Author: Désirée Lie, MD, MSEdFaculty and Disclosures
THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED

CME / CE Released: 1/16/2007; Reviewed and Renewed: 1/15/2008

Valid for credit through: 1/15/2009

processing....

January 16, 2006 -- Short-term treatments with certain herbal medicines (including Devil's claw and willow bark) are effective for relief of acute low back pain, according to the results of a Cochrane review reported in the January issue of Spine.

"Low back pain is a common condition and a substantial economic burden in industrialized societies," write Joel J. Gagnier, ND, MSc, PhD(cand.), from the University of Toronto in Ontario, Canada, and colleagues. "A large proportion of patients with chronic low back pain use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and/or visit CAM practitioners. Several herbal medicines have been purported for use in low back pain."

The authors searched Medline (1966 to April 2003), EMBASE (1980 to April 2003), Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 1, 2003), and Cochrane Complementary Medicine field Trials Register for appropriate trials, as well as reference lists in review articles, guidelines, an in the retrieved trials. Criteria for review were randomized controlled trials of herbal medicines, enrolling adults (> 18 years of age) with acute, subacute, or chronic nonspecific low back pain. Herbal medicines were defined as plants used for medicinal purposes in any form. The main endpoints were pain and function.

Two reviewers conducted electronic searches in all databases; 1 reviewer contacted content experts and obtained relevant citations; and 2 individuals evaluated methodologic quality and clinical relevance.

Ten trials meeting criteria were identified and reviewed. Two high-quality trials of Harpagophytum procumbens (Devil's claw) showed strong evidence for short-term improvements in pain and rescue medication for daily doses standardized to 50 or 100 mg harpagoside, and another high-quality trial showed relative equivalence to 12.5 mg per day of rofecoxib.

Two moderate-quality trials of Salix alba (white willow bark) showed moderate evidence for short-term improvements in pain and rescue medication for daily doses standardized to 120 or 240 mg salicin, and an additional trial showed relative equivalence to 12.5 mg per day of rofecoxib. Three low-quality trials of Capsicum frutescens (cayenne) used topically showed moderate evidence for favorable results compared with placebo, and 1 trial showed equivalence to a homeopathic ointment.

" Harpagophytum procumbens, Salix alba, and Capsicum frutescens seem to reduce pain more than placebo," the authors write. "Additional trials testing these herbal medicines against standard treatments will clarify their equivalence in terms of efficacy. The quality of reporting in these trials was generally poor; thus, trialists should refer to the CONSORT statement in reporting clinical trials of herbal medicines."

Study limitations include poor methodologic and reporting quality in some trials reviewed; insufficient evidence to make definitive conclusions about trials comparing herbal-medicine interventions with standard treatments; lack of reporting of sufficient raw data; lack of information on the size of the treatment effect; and heterogeneity of herbal-medicine products.

"The following herbal medicines have strong evidence for the short-term treatment of acute episodes of chronic NSLBP [nonspecific low back pain]: an aqueous extract of H. procumbens at a standardized daily dosage of 50 mg harpagoside, an extract of S. alba at a standardized dosage of 240 mg salicin per day," the authors conclude. "The following herbal medicines have moderate evidence for the short-term treatment of acute episodes of chronic NSLBP: an aqueous extract of H. procumbens at a standardized daily dosage of 100 mg harpagoside, an extract of S. alba at a standardized dosage of 120 mg salicin per day, and a plaster of C. frutescens. Additional high-quality trials must be done to determine if H. procumbens standardized to 100 mg harpagoside and S. alba standardized to 120 mg salicin are effective in the treatment of LBP [low back pain]."

The Cochrane Collaborative Back Review Group, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Natural Health Products Directorate supported this study. Federal funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. One of the authors is coordinating editor of the Cochrane Back Review Group.

Spine. 2007;32:82-92.

Clinical Context

Low back pain and related disability is a major cause of disability in industrialized nations, and the second-leading cause of work absenteeism, with a 1-month prevalence of 35% to 37% and a lifetime prevalence of 70% to 85%. Traditional treatment of low back pain consists of pain medication, tissue stimulation, rest, and orthotics, whereas acute exacerbations of low back pain can be managed by activity, reassurance, and short-term pain control. Many patients with low back pain visit alternative practitioners (37% vs 17% of the general population), and a variety of modalities of treatment have been reported as useful in low back pain in additional to traditional approaches. Several herbal medicines have been reported to be useful for treating varying levels of back pain, including Camphora molmol, C frutescens, S alba, Maleluca alternifolia, Angelica sinensis, Aloe vera, Thymus officinalis, Menthe peperita, Arnica montana, Curcuma longa, Tancaetum parthenium, H procumbens, and Zingiber officinicalis.

This is a systematic review of evidence supporting or refuting the efficacy of herbal medicines in overall pain, improvement, and function, including return to work, based on comprehensive searching of the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Clinical Evidence databases to 2005.

Study Highlights

  • Participants included in the review were adults older than 18 years with acute (< 6 weeks), subacute (6 - 12 weeks), and chronic (> 12 weeks) nonspecific low back pain, defined as pain between the costal margin and inferior gluteal fold with no specific cause.
  • Herbal medicine was defined as the whole or part of a plant used for medicinal purposes administered orally or topically.
  • Excluded were medicinals administered by inhalation (Cannabis sativa), chemicals derived from plants, and synthetics.
  • Outcome measures were pain intensity assessed on a visual analog scale, back pain assessed by validated instruments, overall improvement assessed by subjective measures, and return to work.
  • Only randomized controlled trials were included.
  • Evidence for each herbal medicine was rated as strong (consistent findings among high-quality randomized controlled trials), moderate (consistent findings among multiple low-quality randomized controlled trials or 1 high-quality randomized clinical trial), limited (1 low-quality randomized clinical trial), conflicting (inconsistent findings among multiple randomized controlled trials), or no evidence (no randomized controlled trials).
  • 2 independent assessors rated the quality of studies for validity and clinical relevance using standardized criteria.
  • Of 295 studies identified, 10 met prespecified criteria.
  • 3 studies used oral H procumbens (Devil's claw) for patients with acute exacerbations of nonspecific low back pain, 3 used oral S alba (White willow bark) for patients with exacerbations of chronic nonspecific low back pain, and 4 used topical C frutescens (Cayenne) ointment in patients with acute mechanical nonspecific low back pain.
  • Dosages used were 50- to 100-mg per-day equivalent of harpagoside for H procumbens, 120- to 240-mg equivalent of salicin for S alba, and 11-mg equivalent of capsasinoids per plaster for topical C frutescens with compound preparations, such as Rado-Salil® (Will-Pharma; The Netherlands) and Cremor Capsici Compositus FNA® (Ratiopharm; The Netherlands).
  • Mean score for methodologic quality was 6.6 (range, 5 - 9) using a cutoff of 6 of 11 criteria, and 8 of 10 trials were of high quality.
  • There was strong evidence that 50 mg of harpagoside per dose of an aqueous extract of H procumbens per day reduced pain more than placebo in the short term in patients with acute episodes of chronic nonspecific low back pain.
  • There was moderate evidence that 100 mg of harpagoside per dose of an aqueous extract of H procumbens led to more pain-free patients for at least 5 days in the fourth week of treatment of acute episodes of chronic nonspecific low back pain.
  • There was moderate evidence that 60 mg of harpagoside was equivalent to 12.5 mg rofecoxib daily for acute episodes of chronic nonspecific low back pain.
  • Long-term treatment data are not available for H procumbens.
  • There was moderate evidence that a 120-mg salicin dose of an extract of S alba led to more pain-free patients for the acute treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain.
  • There was moderate evidence that a 240-mg salicin dose of an extract of S alba was associated with less pain than placebo.
  • There was moderate evidence of equivalence between 240 mg of salicin and 12.5 mg of rofecoxib in acute episodes of nonspecific low back pain in the short term.
  • There was limited evidence that Rado-Salil cream reduced pain more than placebo (2-cm reduction on a visual analog scale) for newly occurring episodes of nonspecific low back pain in the short term (14 days).
  • There was moderate evidence that a plaster of C frutescens reduced pain and improved function more than placebo for acute episodes of chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Pearls for Practice

  • A variety of herbal medicines have been used for nonspecific low back pain, but quality evidence is available for only 3 categories: oral H procumbens, oral S alba, and topical C frutescens.
  • There is moderate evidence that 50 to 100 mg of harpagoside (H procumbens) and 120 to 240 mg of salicin (S alba) are useful in the treatment of acute nonspecific low back pain in the short term and limited evidence for efficacy of topical C frutescens.

CME/CE Test

  • Print