You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

CME

Unrelated Cord Blood Helpful in Hurler's Syndrome

  • Authors:
  • CME Released: 5/5/2004
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT
  • Valid for credit through: 5/5/2005, 11:59 PM EST
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This article is intended for primary care physicians and pediatric specialists who care for patients with mucopolysaccharidoses.

The goal of this activity is to provide the latest medical news to physicians and other healthcare professionals in order to enhance patient care.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  • Review the etiology and clinical manifestations of Hurler's syndrome.
  • Describe the efficacy of cord-blood transplantation in the treatment of Hurler's syndrome.


Disclosures

As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape requires authors and editors to disclose any significant financial relationship during the past 12 months with the manufacturer of any product that may relate to the subject matter of the educational activity, whether or not the activity is commercially supported. Authors are also asked to disclose any mention of investigational products or unapproved uses of products regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.


Author(s)

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Laurie Barclay is a freelance reviewer and writer for Medscape.

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Dr. Barclay has reported no significant financial interests.

CME Author(s)

  • Charles P Vega, MD

    Associate Professor, Residency Director, Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Irvine

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Dr. Vega has disclosed that he has received grants for educational activities from Pfizer.


Accreditation Statements

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

    Medscape designates this educational activity for 0.25 category 1 credit(s) toward the AMA Physician's Recognition Award. Each physician should claim only those credits that reflect the time he/she actually spent in the activity.

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. Medscape encourages you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 5 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates by accessing "Edit Your Profile" at the top of your Medscape homepage.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME

Unrelated Cord Blood Helpful in Hurler's Syndrome

THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT

CME Released: 5/5/2004

Valid for credit through: 5/5/2005, 11:59 PM EST

processing....

May 5, 2004 -- Cord blood from unrelated donors is an excellent source for stem cell transplant to treat children with Hurler's syndrome, according to the results of a study published in the May 6 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

"Hurler's syndrome (the most severe form of mucopolysaccharidosis type I) causes progressive deterioration of the central nervous system and death in childhood," write Susan L. Staba, MD, from Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina, and colleagues. "Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation before the age of two years halts disease progression and prolongs life, but many children lack a bone marrow donor. We investigated the feasibility of using cord-blood transplants from unrelated donors and a myeloablative preparative regimen that did not involve total-body irradiation in young children with Hurler's syndrome."

Between December 1995 and October 2002, 20 consecutive children with Hurler's syndrome were treated with busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and antithymocyte globulin, but they did not undergo total-body irradiation. They then received cord-blood transplantation from unrelated donors with normal α-L-iduronidase activity (mean number of cells, 10.53 × 10 7 per kilogram of body weight) and discordance for up to three of six HLA markers. Median age at cord-blood transplantation was 16 months.

Neutrophil engraftment occurred a median of 24 days after transplantation. Although five children had grade II or grade III acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), none had extensive chronic GVHD.

At a median of 905 days after transplantation, 17 of the 20 children were alive and had complete donor chimerism and normal peripheral-blood α-L-iduronidase activity. Event-free survival rate was 85%. These children also had improved neurocognitive performance and decreased somatic features of Hurler's syndrome.

"Although long-term follow-up is needed to determine the full effect of cord-blood transplantation on the natural history of Hurler's syndrome, patients appear to derive important benefits from this therapy," the authors write. "It may prove to be a therapeutic option for young patients with Hurler's syndrome who lack an HLA-matched, related bone marrow donor who is not a carrier of the disease."

The authors recommend additional studies to determine whether the positive outcomes in this study were related to the stem-cell source, the age at transplantation, or both.

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health helped support this study.

In an accompanying perspective, Joseph Muenzer, MD, PhD, and Amy Fisher, MS, from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, summarize the evolving history of management in Hurler's disease. Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is now the treatment of choice for a child younger than two years of age with minimal or no central nervous system disease, while enzyme-replacement therapy with recombinant α-L-iduronidase (laronidase) is recommended for children with the milder or attenuated forms of mucopolysaccharidosis type I and for patients with neurologic impairment.

"When mucopolysaccharidosis is diagnosed in a patient, the family and primary care providers will immediately encounter an unfamiliar realm of medical knowledge regarding the implications of the diagnosis, as well as the treatment options of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and enzyme-replacement therapy," the editorialists write. "Adequate counseling on these options, including the risks and benefits associated with each, is crucial for those embarking on this difficult, possibly time-sensitive decision-making process, which is made more challenging by the emotionally charged experience of receiving the diagnosis."

Dr. Muenzer reports having received consulting fees and research support from Transkaryotic Therapies, lecture fees from Genzyme, and consulting fees from Biomarin Pharmaceuticals.

N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1932-1934, 1960-1969