This activity is intended for psychiatrists, primary care physicians, neurologists and other mental health professions.
The goal of this activity is to provide clinicians and researchers of many disciplines the latest research and clinical information on the neuroscience and treatment of psychiatric disorders.
On completion of this continuing medical education offering, participants will be able to:
Medical Education Collaborative, a nonprofit education organization, is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
Medical Education Collaborative designates this educational activity for a maximum of 1.5 hours in Category 1 credit towards the AMA Physician's Recognition Award. Each physician should claim only those hours of credit that he/she actually spent in the educational activity.
Medical Education Collaborative, Inc. has assigned 1.5 contact hours (0.15 CEUs) of continuing pharmaceutical education credit. ACPE provider number: 815-999-00-066-H01. Certificate is defined as a record of participation.
For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]
There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability
and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.
This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those
credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the
activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page.
Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit:
You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it.
Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 5 years; at any point within this time period you can print
out the tally as well as the certificates by accessing "Edit Your Profile" at the top of your Medscape homepage.
The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.
processing....
Substance P is 1 of a group of neuropeptides called tachykinins. There are 3 known members of this group: substance P, neurokinin (NK) A, and NK B. The receptors for these 3 neuropeptides are called NK1, NK2, and NK3, respectively. Thus, when the substance P receptor is discussed, it refers to the NK1 receptor. The NK2 receptor has yet to be found in brain tissue, and the NK3 receptor has some affinity for substance P, but approximately 30 orders of magnitude less.
Because the substance P receptor is a prototypical G protein-coupled receptor, it has many similarities to other receptors in terms of its protein sequence. It was only when antibodies were developed to a unique area in its structure that we were able to learn a great deal about its location (eg, finding it all over neuron bodies). It has also been discovered through the use of labeled antibodies that the substance P receptor (and other similar kinds of receptors, such as those from monoamines) is often internalized into the cell via a budding process in which a lysosome is formed, the neurotransmitter is degraded, and the membrane fragment is recycled back into the cell membrane.
Substance P is not only present in brain, it is also present in spinal cord tissue. It was in this area that the issue of how far substance P can diffuse to different layers of neurons was examined. It has been recently discovered that neurotransmitters not only affect those cells across the synapse into which they are released, but can diffuse to surrounding neurons and bind to receptors on those cells. Brown and colleagues[1] looked at how far substance P diffuses through rat spinal tissue, and found that in a normal resting state the neurotransmitter only diffuses through 2 or 3 levels of cells. They then created an inflamed condition upstream from the area of the spine that they examined and discovered that an inflammatory state increases both the amount of substance P and the number of substance P receptors. They also found that in this condition, substance P is able diffuse a full 5 layers.
These authors were also interested in the effects of substance P in the amygdala. Approximately 10% of all the neurons in the amygdala are substance P neurons. The authors created rats with no functional substance P receptors in their amygdala by binding substance P with a compound known to be toxic to these neurons and injecting it directly into the rats' amygdala. This technique allows researchers to dissect out specific neurons in animal models and literally change the animals' phenotype. When the rats had their substance P neurons chemically removed from their amygdala, it had very little effect on their locomotion, but they behaved significantly less anxiously in controlled laboratory tests.
The original application of nonpeptide antagonist substance P compounds was pain and analgesia. It was felt that substance P antagonists held great promise as pain medications because it was well documented that substance P was released in pain states and inflammation, and its neurons seem to follow pain tracts in afferent fibers. Although many preclinical studies were positive and encouraging, clinical trials of substance P antagonists to treat pain have been very disappointing.
The best-studied substance P antagonist is called MK 869. This medication has proven to be very effective in the treatment of emesis, particularly when it results from cancer treatment. This was studied because substance P has been found in emetic centers in the brain stem, and intravenous infusions of substance P often cause vomiting. Studies have shown that substance P antagonists are effective in the treatment of emesis from acute and delayed side effects of cancer treatments.
Substance P causes a "fight or flight" response, and there is evidence of substance P antagonists blocking this stress response via blockade of substance P receptors in the amygdala. There are multiple animal models providing evidence for this. Guinea pig pups that are separated from their mothers make vocalizations that seem to result from increased substance P released in their internal amygdala. Substance P antagonists inhibit these vocalizations. More direct evidence has come from cats who manifest rage behavior when their medial hypothalamus is stimulated. The medial hypothalamus has direct projections to the medial amygdala. Substance P antagonists as well as antidepressants block this behavior. Similar effects have been noted in hamsters with forced intruders in their cages and in mice forced to swim. There appears to be no direct interaction between substance P antagonists and antidepressants; substance P antagonists seem to work at sites unrelated to monoamines.
Other areas of the brain that have been implicated in substance P activity are the dorsal raphe nucleus and an area of the thalamus called the habenula, which has the highest density of substance P receptors. The habenula inhibits firing of the dorsal raphe nucleus. The dorsal raphe consists of approximately 50% serotonin neurons and 50% substance P neurons. Rats dosed with fluoxetine increase firing of both kinds of neurons, but substance P antagonists only increase substance P activity. When both drugs are given together, the substance P antagonist modulates the effects of the fluoxetine, increasing the response in both kinds of neurons.
Tyrosine hydroxylase, the rate-limiting step in the synthesis of norepinephrine, has been looked at in postmortem brains and was found to be increased in chronic stressful situations and decreased with the chronic administration of antidepressant medication. Substance P antagonists are known to reduce the stress response, and in those knockout mice bred without a NK1 receptor, there is considerably less tyrosine hydroxylase found by immunoreactivity.
Cutler and colleagues[5] studied MK 869 for depression and anxiety in a 6-week, randomized, double-blind trial with 3 arms, each with 70 patients. Patients in the first arm were given placebo, the second MK 869 300 mg/day , and the third used paroxetine 20 mg. Patients needed to have a Hamilton Depression Scale rating above 22 and Hamilton Anxiety Scale rating of above 15. The study showed that MK 869 was equal in efficacy to paroxetine and superior to placebo on both scales. The time course for recovery was similar with both active drugs. There was only a 9% rate of adverse events with MK 869, compared with a 19% rate with paroxetine. Of particular note was the rate of sexual dysfunction: only 3% of patients reported sexual dysfunction with MK 869, compared with 26% with paroxetine. Since MK 869 seemed to be effective and had a better side-effect profile than established antidepressants, there were possibilities not only for monotherapy but for combination therapy with other antidepressants. He also commented that the drug may possibly be effective in the treatment of other psychiatric illnesses, such as panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder. He noted that the phase 2 dosing study that was done subsequent to this study was a failure due to a very high placebo effect, but his group remains optimistic about the future of this and similar compounds.